U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.

Cover of StatPearls

StatPearls [Internet].

Show details

Ileus

; .

Author Information and Affiliations

Last Update: August 23, 2023.

Continuing Education Activity

Ileus refers to the intolerance of oral intake due to inhibition of the gastrointestinal propulsion without signs of mechanical obstruction. The diagnosis is often associated with surgery, medications, trauma, peritonitis, or severe illness. Mechanical obstruction has to be ruled out, and the diagnosis of ileus is dependent on radiographic evidence, usually on a CT scan or small bowel series. This activity reviews the evaluation and management of an Ileus and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in improving care for patients with this condition.

Objectives:

  • Identify the etiology of ileus.
  • Outline the typical presentation of a patient with ileus.
  • Review the management options available for ileus.
  • Identify interprofessional team strategies for improving care coordination and outcomes in patients with ileus.
Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.

Introduction

Ileus, also known as paralytic ileus or functional ileus, occurs when there is a non-mechanical decrease or stoppage of the flow of intestinal contents.[1][2] Bowel obstruction is a mechanical blockage of intestinal contents by a mass, adhesion, hernia, or some other physical blockage. These two diseases may present similarly, but treatment can be very different depending on the underlying pathology.

Ileus is an often unavoidable consequence of abdominal or retroperitoneal surgery, but can also be found in severely ill patients with septic shock or mechanical ventilation. Due to the delayed refeeding syndrome seen after an ileus, postoperative ileus has a large economic impact in the United States alone.[3] An ileus usually manifests itself from the third to the fifth day after surgery and usually lasts 2 to 3 days with the small bowel being the quickest to return to function (0 to 24 hours), followed by the stomach (24 to 48 hours), and lastly the colon (48 to 72 hours).[2][4][5] A prolonged ileus is diagnosed if the ileus exceeds 2 to 3 days with the continued absence of obstruction signs.[6]

Etiology

The cause of ileus has yet to be clearly defined. There are, however, several risk factors that have been shown to increase the likelihood and endurance of an ileus.[7]

  • Prolonged abdominal/pelvic surgery
  • Lower gastrointestinal (GI) surgery
  • Open surgery
  • Retroperitoneal spinal surgery
  • Opioid use
  • Intra-abdominal inflammation (sepsis/peritonitis)
  • Peritoneal carcinomatosis
  • Perioperative complications (pneumonia, abscess)
  • Bleeding (intraoperative or postoperative)
  • Hypokalemia
  • Delayed enteral nutrition or nasogastric (NG) tube placement

The risk for an ileus is influenced by a variety of factors, each affecting a small part of the complex neuroimmune system. These factors include pharmacological agents such as opioids, antihypertensives, and antiemetics, as well as medical conditions including pneumonia, stroke, and electrolyte abnormalities.[8][9][10]

Epidemiology

The incidence of ileus varies greatly, often dependent upon the type of surgery, the amount of bowel manipulation, and preoperative comorbidities. Lower abdominal surgery, especially with large open incisions and increased intestinal manipulation, is associated with a higher risk of ileus. On the contrary, laparoscopic surgery with minimal bowel manipulation, such as in a cholecystectomy, confers a lower risk. The literature shows about a 10-20% chance of ileus occurring depending on the procedure.[10][11][12]

Pathophysiology

The exact mechanism and cause of ileus are incompletely understood due to the complexity and numerous systems and factors involved. Ileus is a neuroimmune interaction that consists of two phases: the early neurogenic phase and the inflammatory phase.[13] This interaction is governed by the bidirectional communication between the autonomic nervous system (including afferents, efferents, and the enteric nervous system) and the immune system both outside and within the GI tract (mast cells, macrophages).

Macrophages residing in the tunica muscularis external of the bowel wall release cytokines that induce the activation of further pro-inflammatory cells, other antiperistaltic cytokines (including interleukin-6 and TNF-alpha), along with neuropeptides and nitric oxide.[14] Overall this interaction is initiated by manipulation of the bowel.[14][15] The stress of surgery and manipulation of the bowel leads to activation of a local molecular inflammatory response, the release of hormones, and neurotransmitters that result in a sustained inhibitory sympathetic activity and suppression of the neuromuscular apparatus.[15]

History and Physical

The patient will present with abdominal distension and bloating that is often a slow onset as opposed to the sudden onset usually seen with mechanical bowel obstruction. Pain is usually diffuse, persistent without peritoneal signs. Other common signs and symptoms include nausea and vomiting, as well as delayed or inability to pass flatus, and inability to tolerate oral diet. The patient is often distended and tympanic on physical exam with mild diffuse tenderness. Bowel sounds are usually sparse or absent as opposed to a mechanical obstruction where they are intensified in the early phase, although they may be absent in the late phase.

Evaluation

Plain abdominal films are usually the first diagnostic imaging obtained. Eliciting the difference between an ileus and a mechanical obstruction, especially if it is only a partial obstruction, can be difficult but is an important distinction to make. Supine and upright films may reveal dilated small bowel loops but should also show air in the colon and rectum without a transition point. If the plain film is vague, a computed tomography(CT) scan of the abdomen should be obtained. The abdominopelvic CT scan is most useful using oral and intravenous contrast not only to help delineate a potential transition point but also to rule out other intra-abdominal pathology, including a tumor or an abscess.[16][17][18]

Laboratory evaluation should be ordered to help identify any potentially reversible causes of an ileus, such as hypokalemia or signs of infection. A complete blood count should look for anemia to rule out bleeding or an elevated white count, as may be seen with an abscess, infection, or intestinal ischemia. The electrolyte panel should look for electrolyte abnormalities and replace them as needed.

Treatment / Management

Treatment of an ileus requires time and supportive management. Bowel rest, intravenous (IV) fluid therapy, and, if warranted, nasogastric (NG) decompression are important steps. Historically these treatments were thought to lower complications and improve outcomes, but a recent review of the evidence shows otherwise.[15] Chewing gum has been studied and seems to be a cheap, well-tolerated way to potentially help with ileus as it stimulates the cephalocaudal reflex, which promotes peristalsis and inhibits inflammation.[19][20] Unfortunately, these are the only options we currently have as pharmacologic agents have been ineffective. Many have been studied in the past with inconsistent outcomes, including erythromycin, sympathetic inhibitors (guanethidine), parasympathetic stimulators (neostigmine), hormonal agents (cholecystokinin, motilin).

Treatment of the underlying condition is paramount. Treating the infection, electrolyte abnormalities, decreasing opiate use, can all potentially decrease the durability of an ileus. These can be difficult to treat in the case of prolonged illness with mechanical ventilation, and septic shock that leads to lengthy bed-bound periods. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is recommended if the patient is unable to tolerate adequate oral intake after seven days. Decreasing opiate use and transitioning to a multimodal pain regimen has benefits, as does early ambulation. In the setting of postoperative ileus, the best treatment is prevention. Enhanced recovery protocols, regional anesthesia, opioid-sparing analgesics, and laparoscopy have all shown improvement in the number of postoperative ileus cases.[11][15]

Differential Diagnosis

The evaluation of an ileus needs to exclude other more concerning diagnoses such as small bowel obstruction, intra-abdominal abscess, or perforation. Some of these may require some type of intervention, and it is important to distinguish them. The most important diagnosis to distinguish from an ileus is an obstruction. Patients with a postoperative obstruction often have an initial return of bowel function and oral intake with subsequent nausea, vomiting, abdominal distention, and pain, whereas an ileus patient usually has no return of bowel function or oral intake. Intense pain, feculent emesis, or rapid onset/progression of pain/distension are usually a sign of obstruction and not of an ileus. The use of small bowel follow-through with gastrografin or water-soluble contrast is becoming increasingly useful for small bowel obstructions and can help to further distinguish obstruction from an ileus. Gastrografin has been noted to therapeutically treat adhesive small bowel obstructions.[21][22] Its use to treat a postoperative ileus has not been proven; it may improve some of the symptoms, but the duration of the ileus and the length of stay are not reduced.[22][23][24][25]

Prognosis

The overall prognosis from an ileus is good with patients eventually recovering, but the exact number of days until the return of bowel function is uncertain.[1][14] Having an ileus is only harmful in terms of the length of stay and decreased nutrition. Longer hospital stays increase the risk of nosocomial infections, and a prolonged ileus may lead to the need for TPN, which has its own risks and benefits.

Complications

Most of the complications come from the prolonged hospital stay and the possibility for subsequent procedures for a prolonged ileus (peripheral inserted central catheter line, TPN, NG tube placement).[1][3][15] There is the possibility of aspiration with increasing nausea and vomiting.

Deterrence and Patient Education

From a surgical perspective, it is paramount to encourage and educate patients on the benefits and risks of surgery, including the possibility of an ileus. Prevention of ileus is the responsibility of both the patient and healthcare providers, including, nurses, pharmacologists, and physical/occupational therapists. Encouraging ambulation, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, and educating the patient on their importance and benefits should improve patient understanding and compliance.

Pearls and Other Issues

Ileus needs to be distinguished from other causes of abdominal pain, distension, and nausea/vomiting. Once diagnosed, treatment is supportive (IV fluids, NG decompression) with the management of precipitating factors (opiates, sepsis). Postoperative ileus is common, but steps can be taken to help prevent it, especially in an outpatient/elective setting (ERAS protocols, ambulation, laparoscopy).

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

The mainstay management of ileus is prevention, followed by appropriate diagnosis, and conservative/expectant management. At times this can be difficult and often requires all aspects of the healthcare system to participate in its prevention. Encouraging ambulation, multimodal pain regimens, ERAS protocols, and monitoring oral intake all are difficult for any person/team to monitor.

  • Level 1- post-op analgesia with epidural catheter[2][20]
  • Level 1 - post-op gum-chewing is beneficial[2][20]
  • Level 1 - prokinetic drugs (neostigmine, metoclopramide, erythromycin) or laxatives are not effective once ileus is diagnosed[2][26]
  • Level 2 - adding peripheral opioid antagonist (naloxone)[27]
  • Level 5 - treatment consists of ambulation/mobilization, stopping opioids, TPN if oral intake is insufficient for seven days[15]

Review Questions

References

1.
Venara A, Neunlist M, Slim K, Barbieux J, Colas PA, Hamy A, Meurette G. Postoperative ileus: Pathophysiology, incidence, and prevention. J Visc Surg. 2016 Dec;153(6):439-446. [PubMed: 27666979]
2.
Vilz TO, Stoffels B, Strassburg C, Schild HH, Kalff JC. Ileus in Adults. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Jul 24;114(29-30):508-518. [PMC free article: PMC5569564] [PubMed: 28818187]
3.
Iyer S, Saunders WB, Stemkowski S. Economic burden of postoperative ileus associated with colectomy in the United States. J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Jul-Aug;15(6):485-94. [PMC free article: PMC10438346] [PubMed: 19610681]
4.
Livingston EH, Passaro EP. Postoperative ileus. Dig Dis Sci. 1990 Jan;35(1):121-32. [PubMed: 2403907]
5.
Holte K, Kehlet H. Postoperative ileus: a preventable event. Br J Surg. 2000 Nov;87(11):1480-93. [PubMed: 11091234]
6.
Artinyan A, Nunoo-Mensah JW, Balasubramaniam S, Gauderman J, Essani R, Gonzalez-Ruiz C, Kaiser AM, Beart RW. Prolonged postoperative ileus-definition, risk factors, and predictors after surgery. World J Surg. 2008 Jul;32(7):1495-500. [PubMed: 18305994]
7.
Huge A, Kreis ME, Jehle EC, Ehrlein HJ, Starlinger M, Becker HD, Zittel TT. A model to investigate postoperative ileus with strain gauge transducers in awake rats. J Surg Res. 1998 Feb 01;74(2):112-8. [PubMed: 9587348]
8.
Condon RE, Cowles V, Ekbom GA, Schulte WJ, Hess G. Effects of halothane, enflurane, and nitrous oxide on colon motility. Surgery. 1987 Jan;101(1):81-5. [PubMed: 3798331]
9.
Hollenbeck BK, Miller DC, Taub D, Dunn RL, Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Montie JE, Underwood W, Wei JT. Identifying risk factors for potentially avoidable complications following radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2005 Oct;174(4 Pt 1):1231-7; discussion 1237. [PubMed: 16145376]
10.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Hwang GS, Hanna MH, Phelan M, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Pigazzi A, Stamos MJ. Risk factors for prolonged ileus following colon surgery. Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):603-609. [PubMed: 26017914]
11.
Nazzani S, Bandini M, Preisser F, Mazzone E, Marchioni M, Tian Z, Stubinski R, Clementi MC, Saad F, Shariat SF, Montanari E, Briganti A, Carmignani L, Karakiewicz PI. Postoperative paralytic ileus after major oncological procedures in the enhanced recovery after surgery era: A population based analysis. Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar;28:201-207. [PubMed: 30851901]
12.
Wolff BG, Viscusi ER, Delaney CP, Du W, Techner L. Patterns of gastrointestinal recovery after bowel resection and total abdominal hysterectomy: pooled results from the placebo arms of alvimopan phase III North American clinical trials. J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):43-51. [PubMed: 17617331]
13.
Wehner S, Vilz TO, Stoffels B, Kalff JC. Immune mediators of postoperative ileus. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Apr;397(4):591-601. [PubMed: 22382699]
14.
Vilz TO, Wehner S, Pantelis D, Kalff JC. [Immunomodulatory aspects in the development, prophylaxis and therapy for postoperative ileus]. Zentralbl Chir. 2014 Aug;139(4):434-44. [PubMed: 24327489]
15.
Gero D, Gié O, Hübner M, Demartines N, Hahnloser D. Postoperative ileus: in search of an international consensus on definition, diagnosis, and treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Feb;402(1):149-158. [PubMed: 27488952]
16.
Frager D, Medwid SW, Baer JW, Mollinelli B, Friedman M. CT of small-bowel obstruction: value in establishing the diagnosis and determining the degree and cause. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Jan;162(1):37-41. [PubMed: 8273686]
17.
Frager DH, Baer JW, Rothpearl A, Bossart PA. Distinction between postoperative ileus and mechanical small-bowel obstruction: value of CT compared with clinical and other radiographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Apr;164(4):891-4. [PubMed: 7726042]
18.
Suri S, Gupta S, Sudhakar PJ, Venkataramu NK, Sood B, Wig JD. Comparative evaluation of plain films, ultrasound and CT in the diagnosis of intestinal obstruction. Acta Radiol. 1999 Jul;40(4):422-8. [PubMed: 10394872]
19.
Su'a BU, Pollock TT, Lemanu DP, MacCormick AD, Connolly AB, Hill AG. Chewing gum and postoperative ileus in adults: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2015 Feb;14:49-55. [PubMed: 25576763]
20.
Short V, Herbert G, Perry R, Atkinson C, Ness AR, Penfold C, Thomas S, Andersen HK, Lewis SJ. Chewing gum for postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 20;2015(2):CD006506. [PMC free article: PMC9913126] [PubMed: 25914904]
21.
Taourel PG, Fabre JM, Pradel JA, Seneterre EJ, Megibow AJ, Bruel JM. Value of CT in the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected acute small-bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Nov;165(5):1187-92. [PubMed: 7572500]
22.
D'Agostino R, Ali NS, Leshchinskiy S, Cherukuri AR, Tam JK. Small bowel obstruction and the gastrografin challenge. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Nov;43(11):2945-2954. [PubMed: 29632988]
23.
Vather R, Josephson R, Jaung R, Kahokehr A, Sammour T, Bissett I. Gastrografin in Prolonged Postoperative Ileus: A Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2015 Jul;262(1):23-30. [PubMed: 25575258]
24.
Biondo S, Miquel J, Espin-Basany E, Sanchez JL, Golda T, Ferrer-Artola AM, Codina-Cazador A, Frago R, Kreisler E. A Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Study on the Therapeutic Effect of Gastrografin in Prolonged Postoperative Ileus After Elective Colorectal Surgery. World J Surg. 2016 Jan;40(1):206-14. [PubMed: 26446450]
25.
Milne TGE, Vather R, O'Grady G, Miquel J, Biondo S, Bissett I. Gastrografin may reduce time to oral diet in prolonged post-operative ileus: a pooled analysis of two randomized trials. ANZ J Surg. 2018 Mar 06; [PubMed: 29510463]
26.
Traut U, Brügger L, Kunz R, Pauli-Magnus C, Haug K, Bucher HC, Koller MT. Systemic prokinetic pharmacologic treatment for postoperative adynamic ileus following abdominal surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD004930. [PubMed: 18254064]
27.
Smith K, Hopp M, Mundin G, Bond S, Bailey P, Woodward J, Palaniappan K, Church A, Limb M, Connor A. Naloxone as part of a prolonged release oxycodone/naloxone combination reduces oxycodone-induced slowing of gastrointestinal transit in healthy volunteers. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2011 Apr;20(4):427-39. [PubMed: 21395483]

Disclosure: Elsworth Beach declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Orlando De Jesus declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Copyright © 2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits others to distribute the work, provided that the article is not altered or used commercially. You are not required to obtain permission to distribute this article, provided that you credit the author and journal.

Bookshelf ID: NBK558937PMID: 32644363

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...