This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits others to distribute the work, provided that the article is not altered or used commercially. You are not required to obtain permission to distribute this article, provided that you credit the author and journal.
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-.
StatPearls [Internet].
Show detailsDefinition/Introduction
The prevalence of diabetes has increased fourfold in the last three to four decades. It currently affects more than 500 million people in the world. Of these, 90% of this is type 2 diabetes. Although oral medications can also manage type 2 diabetes, a significant percentage of these people require insulin for proper glycemic control. Type 1 diabetes is solely insulin-dependent and involves a substantial portion of young kids < 18 years of age, posing a considerable challenge to their management.[1][2]
Insulin delivery has evolved remarkably over the last century. In the early 20th century, the first type 1 diabetic was treated with insulin, which served as a lifesaving measure for this patient.[3] Later on, advancements in insulin production led to the development of human insulin by the end of the 20th century. Currently, we have many insulin preparations available, including short-acting, ultra short-acting, long-acting, ultra long-acting, intermediate-acting, and mixed preparations.[3] The insulin analogs have been prepared through genetic engineering and are very similar to human insulin. The development of insulin pens has tremendously improved insulin delivery in terms of ease and accuracy.
Late in the 20th century, a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) delivery system was developed, which is currently commonly known as an insulin pump. The first insulin pump was about the size of an Army backpack. The closed-loop pumps were designed to deliver insulin and dextrose as needed as a computerized algorithm calculated the dosing through the real-time measurement of blood glucose since the blood glucose analyzer was inside the insulin pump. But the size and the complexity of those devices limited their use, and they were solely used for research purposes. The next generation devices had an open-loop insulin delivery, which was delivered intravenously at a preset rate and boluses at 15 times the set rate. But recurrent infections and phlebitis also limited the use of these sets of insulin pumps. In 1976 the first commercial insulin pump was developed that was called blue brick and was later termed the Auto Syringe. It was designed by Kamen. Complications, including hyperglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, and infection at the injection site, were common with early pumps causing the limited acceptance of this technology until the 1990s.
Newer and more refined technology has now revolutionized insulin pumps in terms of their ease of use and the quality of care, resulting in improved glycemic control. There has been growing popularity of these devices, and insulin pumps are now becoming the mainstay of treatment for insulin-dependent diabetes. Recent studies report population disparity in the access to insulin pumps even when medical insurance plans cover the cost.[4]
Insulin pumps are devices that continuously deliver short-acting insulin at a predetermined or auto-adjusted rate per hour.
Insulin Pump Parts
- The pump itself
- Infusion set
- Sensor and transmitter in sensor-augmented insulin pumps
For most devices, the pump and infusion set are separate, connected by thin plastic tubing, but some devices combine both into one called the tubeless pump. The infusion set is attached to the patient with a cannula placed in the subcutaneous tissue and secured with adhesive. Infusion sets are typically placed into the upper arm, abdomen, lower back, or upper thigh. The pump contains the reservoir and the battery. The reservoir is changed every two to three days. The reservoir typically holds a two to three-day supply of rapid-acting insulin analog depending on the patient's total daily insulin needs. It requires replacement after all the insulin is used up in the reservoir. Battery requirements vary from device to device; some contain a rechargeable lithium battery that uses a cable, whereas others require a standard alkaline battery. Pumps should always be on if there is a functioning battery. Often the pump will be in standby mode to conserve battery. From the home screen of the insulin pump, there will be options to review basal insulin settings and the history of delivered insulin boluses. Additionally, there will be settings for priming the device for changing infusion sets and insulin reservoirs. Returning to an active home screen requires a specific series of button presses that vary depending on the device.
Insulin type used: This is usually rapid-acting insulin-like lispro, aspart, or glulisine, but also any kind of rapid-acting insulin can be used in an insulin pump.[5] In some cases with uncontrolled diabetes and a total daily dose (TDD) of over 100 Units of insulin, U-500 concentrated regular insulin can also be used in the insulin pump. This reduces the frequency at which the reservoir has to be changed. [6]
Insulin Delivery
Basal: Insulin is continuously delivered at a preset rate or an auto-adjusted rate for a basal supply lasting 24 hours.
Mealtime Bolus: Insulin is also delivered at the time of meals as a mealtime bolus. Bolus is calculated based on the number of carbs entered by the patient. The insulin to carb ratio (ICR) has to be entered into the pump beforehand by the patient or their clinician and is calculated by the formula: ICR: 450/TDD. ICR reflects the number of grams of carbs covered by one unit of insulin. With insulin pumps, there is the option for different bolus profiles, including dual wave, short extended, and long extended boluses, which will be discussed below.[7]
The patient also gets a correction bolus along with the mealtime bolus insulin, and the correction is calculated based on the insulin sensitivity factor (ISF). ISF shows how much the blood glucose is lowered by 1 unit of insulin. ISF is calculated by the formula: 1700/TDD.
There are currently two different modes in which the insulin pumps can be used:
- Auto mode: In this mode, the pump is usually connected to or communicates to a continuous glucose monitoring device (CGM). Preset algorithms will change the basal rate of insulin delivery and adjust it based on blood glucose. There is a basal IQ and also a control IQ as some examples of the auto mode. There are also temporary basal rates in situations with higher or lower insulin requirements. The rate is adjusted based on the ISF.
- Manual Mode: In this mode, the user, or the physician, can set a predetermined basal rate based on the total daily dose of insulin needed by that patient. The rates can be adjusted and have to be entered manually.
The hybrid closed-loop system is the first generation of automated insulin delivery, which dynamically modulates basal insulin delivery but still requires the users to administer boluses.
Some newer modalities will come to market, like fully automated multi-hormonal closed-loop systems.[8]
Automated adjustment of bolus calculators is available to improve glycemic control and postprandial spikes.[9]
Insulin pump treatment is associated with improved glycemic control and decreased number of daily injections. Although the data does not document a clear difference in glycemic control in young children, there is increased user satisfaction among the parents of the kids with the use of insulin pumps.[10]
There is also a feature that allows for a dual wave bolus, which involves a usual pre-meal insulin bolus followed by an extended bolus delivered evenly over many hours as programmed by the patient. The study comparing the normal bolus delivery with the dual wave bolus showed improved glycemic control in patients receiving the dual wave bolus, and it prevented prolonged postprandial hyperglycemic excursions.[11]
Duration of insulin action: This is the time rapid-acting insulin will take to control blood glucose. Duration of insulin action is a decline in bolus activity by 20 to 25% each hour. As a result, a certain percentage of insulin is still available at the end of 3 to 4 hours. In general, the greater the bolus amount of insulin is, the higher the amount of insulin is available at the end of that time.[12] Insulin on board is a term used to describe the amount of insulin available after a bolus is delivered for the next 3 to 5 hours as determined by the preset insulin action time in the insulin pump.
There are also features associated with hypoglycemia suspension of the pumps used in auto mode with the sensor-augmented version. This function is referred to as threshold suspend (TS), or low glucose suspends (LGS).[13] There is a 40 to 50% decrease in the rate of hypoglycemia without any significant increase in HbA1c. Another technology known as predictive low glucose suspend (PLGS) will suspend the insulin delivery almost 30 minutes before hypoglycemia is expected to occur.
Issues of Concern
Infusion site infection, erythema, induration, tenderness to palpation, or signs of fluid leakage from the infusion site are some of the commonest problems that can arise. They are all indications for removal and the need for a new site to be chosen at a different location.[14]
Hyperglycemia: Insulin analogs are rapid-acting, with the onset of action within 15 minutes, peaking in approximately 60 minutes, and lasting less than five hours after injection. In patients on a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, hyperglycemia secondary to disruption in insulin delivery must be on the differential.
The clinician should always check the infusion site during the physical exam. The easiest way to evaluate is to deliver an insulin bolus via the pump and recheck blood glucose. If blood glucose remains elevated despite insulin bolus, the tubing or infusion set is likely compromised and requires replacement.[15] If the patient is unable to replace the unit, then restarting multiple daily injections with long and short-acting insulins should be considered. The daily requirement of long-acting insulin can be calculated from the patient's total daily needs of their basal rate.
Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA): Since insulin analogs remain active for a relatively short duration, the risk for diabetic ketoacidosis is a concern as these patients do not have long-acting insulin in their system. Studies comparing the incidence of DKA in patients treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections have demonstrated lower rates of DKA in patients on a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.[16]
In rare case reports, the insulin pump site change has been associated with hypoglycemia after being injected with an unsolicited insulin bolus.[17] In those reported cases, the events were preceded by the pump site change, and an alarm followed, indicating that a high dose of insulin bolus was delivered without the user's appropriate bolus instructions, resulting in hypoglycemia. It is essential to be aware of this possible complication when using insulin pumps.
Clinical Significance
An initial randomized study by DeVries compared the efficacy of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion to multiple daily injections with NPH and regular insulin and demonstrated a reduction in the hemoglobin A1c of 0.84% at 16 weeks.[18]
A larger clinical trial called the 5-Nations trial performed in 11 European centers reported a hemoglobin A1c decrease of 0.22% with a lower incidence of hypoglycemic events and higher user perception of satisfaction when comparing continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion to multiple daily injections using NPH.[19][20]
Hypoglycemia: Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion is associated with lower hemoglobin A1c levels, so there are concerns for an increased risk of hypoglycemia. Studies have shown that event rates of severe hypoglycemia and hypoglycemic coma were significantly lower with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections.[16]
There has been a reported decrease in blood glucose variability in the users of insulin pumps, as described in various studies.[21] Preliminary studies have suggested that blood glucose variability is the underlying pathophysiologic mechanism leading to diabetic complications, including nephropathy, retinopathy, coronary artery disease, and cognitive decline, although more research is needed to establish causation.[22]
Clinical indications for insulin pump therapy:
- All patients with type 1 diabetes.[23]
- Patients with type 1 diabetes are difficult to manage due to frequent hypoglycemia.
- Patients with type 2 diabetes who do not meet glycemic targets despite multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) and extensive lifestyle changes.[24]
- Individuals suffering from gastroparesis will benefit from insulin pumps' extended bolus delivery feature.[25]
- Pregnancy[26]
- Variable schedule or shift workers.[25]
- Patients requiring small doses of insulin-like, for example, the pediatric diabetic population.[27]
Ideal candidates for insulin pump therapy:
- Willingness to wear the insulin pump and the sensor.
- Motivation and interest in pump education.
- Good vision and ability to operate the pump and make necessary adjustments.
- Knowledge of carb counting.
- Ability to calculate the insulin bolus from the device.
Insulin pump technology will continue to develop rapidly, improving the quality of life for patients with diabetes. It will be challenging for healthcare professionals to stay abreast of every advancement, but a basic understanding of insulin pump delivery can help avoid common complications and improve outcomes.
Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions
The interprofessional team must maintain strong communication during the transition of care so that all involved in managing the patient's health problems are aware that the patient is on insulin pump therapy. The patient or a certified pump specialist should make adjustments to the pump settings, including but not limited to insulin boluses, temporary basal settings, and other changes to basal rates. Persistent hyperglycemia, problems with infusion sites, or removal of the device should be rapidly communicated with the physician.
In most hospitals, there is a system where the patients can continue to use their insulin pumps as inpatients.[28] Still, the patients should be able to consent to and be willing and able to manage their insulin pump on their own as the hospital personnel is usually not trained in managing insulin pumps, so ultimately it would be the patient's responsibility to handle all pump's changes for optimal blood glucose control. In all settings, the healthcare staff has the right to suspend the pump and start the patient on a conventional regimen if they consider this to be in the best interest of the patient, such as in situations of anesthesia, any critical change in patient's mental and health status and when the patient is not fully awake to be able to manage the insulin pump independently.
Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Monitoring
The nursing staff must maintain a log of the blood glucose levels and basal rates on the insulin pump. That usually happens with the help of the patient reporting all glucose levels, especially if the patient is on CGM.[29] The individual requirements may vary from hospital to hospital. Still, most of the time, there is a need to maintain some paperwork showing that the patient consented and can manage the pump independently.[30]
References
- 1.
- Bratke H, Margeirsdottir HD, Assmus J, Njølstad PR, Skrivarhaug T. Does Current Diabetes Technology Improve Metabolic Control? A Cross-Sectional Study on the Use of Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices in a Nationwide Pediatric Population. Diabetes Ther. 2021 Sep;12(9):2571-2583. [PMC free article: PMC8385028] [PubMed: 34389930]
- 2.
- Marks BE, Wolfsdorf JI, Waldman G, Stafford DE, Garvey KC. Pediatric Endocrinology Trainees' Education and Knowledge About Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitors. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Mar;21(3):105-109. [PMC free article: PMC6434593] [PubMed: 30681363]
- 3.
- Sebastian SA, Co EL, Mehendale M, Hameed M. Insulin analogs in the treatment of type II diabetes and future perspectives. Dis Mon. 2023 Mar;69(3):101417. [PubMed: 35487767]
- 4.
- Tremblay ES. Persistent Socioeconomic Disparities in Insulin Pump Uptake Despite Universal Health Coverage-Nonmonetary Drivers in Insulin Pump Use. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 02;5(5):e2210471. [PubMed: 35507348]
- 5.
- Lane WS, Weinrib SL, Lawrence MJ, Lane BC, Jarrett RT. Basal Insulin Degludec and Glycemic Control Compared to Aspart Via Insulin Pump in Type 1 Diabetes (BIGLEAP): A Single-Center, Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Trial. Endocr Pract. 2022 Feb;28(2):165-172. [PubMed: 34763071]
- 6.
- Deberles E, Morello R, Hardouin J, Amadou C, Benhamou PY, Prévost G, Schaepelynck P, Chaillous L, Joubert M, Reznik Y. The switch from rapid-acting to concentrated regular insulin improves glucose control in type 2 diabetes patients on pump therapy: A cohort survey. Diabetes Metab. 2022 May;48(3):101300. [PubMed: 34728340]
- 7.
- Kamecke U, Waldenmaier D, Haug C, Ziegler R, Freckmann G. Establishing Methods to Determine Clinically Relevant Bolus and Basal Rate Delivery Accuracy of Insulin Pumps. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Jan;13(1):60-67. [PMC free article: PMC6313283] [PubMed: 30003823]
- 8.
- Weaver KW, Hirsch IB. The Hybrid Closed-Loop System: Evolution and Practical Applications. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Jun;20(S2):S216-S223. [PubMed: 29873517]
- 9.
- Herrero P, Pesl P, Bondia J, Reddy M, Oliver N, Georgiou P, Toumazou C. Method for automatic adjustment of an insulin bolus calculator: in silico robustness evaluation under intra-day variability. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2015 Apr;119(1):1-8. [PubMed: 25733405]
- 10.
- Cummins E, Royle P, Snaith A, Greene A, Robertson L, McIntyre L, Waugh N. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(11):iii-iv, xi-xvi, 1-181. [PubMed: 20223123]
- 11.
- Metwally M, Cheung TO, Smith R, Bell KJ. Insulin pump dosing strategies for meals varying in fat, protein or glycaemic index or grazing-style meals in type 1 diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;172:108516. [PubMed: 33096184]
- 12.
- Rosales N, De Battista H, Vehí J, Garelli F. Open-loop glucose control: Automatic IOB-based super-bolus feature for commercial insulin pumps. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Jun;159:145-158. [PubMed: 29650309]
- 13.
- Grassi B, Onetto MT, Zapata Y, Jofré P, Echeverría G. Lower versus standard sucrose dose for treating hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus in therapy with predictive low glucose suspend (PLGS) augmented insulin pumps: A randomized crossover trial in Santiago, Chile. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021 May-Jun;15(3):695-701. [PubMed: 33813244]
- 14.
- Berg AK, Nørgaard K, Thyssen JP, Zachariae C, Hommel E, Rytter K, Svensson J. Skin Problems Associated with Insulin Pumps and Sensors in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Jul;20(7):475-482. [PubMed: 29893593]
- 15.
- Dogan ADA, Jørgensen UL, Gjessing HJ. Diabetic Ketoacidosis Among Patients Treated With Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 May;11(3):631-632. [PMC free article: PMC5505411] [PubMed: 27595713]
- 16.
- Karges B, Schwandt A, Heidtmann B, Kordonouri O, Binder E, Schierloh U, Boettcher C, Kapellen T, Rosenbauer J, Holl RW. Association of Insulin Pump Therapy vs Insulin Injection Therapy With Severe Hypoglycemia, Ketoacidosis, and Glycemic Control Among Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes. JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1358-1366. [PMC free article: PMC5818842] [PubMed: 29049584]
- 17.
- Faulds ER, Wyne KL, Buschur EO, McDaniel J, Dungan K. Insulin Pump Malfunction During Hospitalization: Two Case Reports. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Jun;18(6):399-403. [PubMed: 27027151]
- 18.
- DeVries JH, Snoek FJ, Kostense PJ, Masurel N, Heine RJ., Dutch Insulin Pump Study Group. A randomized trial of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and intensive injection therapy in type 1 diabetes for patients with long-standing poor glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2002 Nov;25(11):2074-80. [PubMed: 12401759]
- 19.
- Hoogma RP, Hammond PJ, Gomis R, Kerr D, Bruttomesso D, Bouter KP, Wiefels KJ, de la Calle H, Schweitzer DH, Pfohl M, Torlone E, Krinelke LG, Bolli GB., 5-Nations Study Group. Comparison of the effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and NPH-based multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) on glycaemic control and quality of life: results of the 5-nations trial. Diabet Med. 2006 Feb;23(2):141-7. [PubMed: 16433711]
- 20.
- McAuley SA, Vogrin S, Lee MH, Paldus B, Trawley S, de Bock MI, Abraham MB, Bach LA, Burt MG, Cohen ND, Colman PG, Davis EA, Hendrieckx C, Holmes-Walker DJ, Jenkins AJ, Kaye J, Keech AC, Kumareswaran K, MacIsaac RJ, McCallum RW, Sims CM, Speight J, Stranks SN, Sundararajan V, Ward GM, Jones TW, O'Neal DN., Australian JDRF Closed-Loop Research Group. Less Nocturnal Hypoglycemia but Equivalent Time in Range Among Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Pumps Versus Multiple Daily Injections. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Jun;23(6):460-466. [PubMed: 33351699]
- 21.
- Petrelli F, Cangelosi G, Scuri S, Pantanetti P, Lavorgna F, Faldetta F, De Carolis C, Rocchi R, Debernardi G, Florescu A, Nittari G, Sagaro GG, Garda G, Nguyen CTT, Grappasonni I. Diabetes and technology: A pilot study on the management of patients with insulin pumps during the COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Nov;169:108481. [PMC free article: PMC8277429] [PubMed: 33002544]
- 22.
- Zhang ZY, Miao LF, Qian LL, Wang N, Qi MM, Zhang YM, Dang SP, Wu Y, Wang RX. Molecular Mechanisms of Glucose Fluctuations on Diabetic Complications. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:640. [PMC free article: PMC6759481] [PubMed: 31620092]
- 23.
- Zhang L, Leng X, Tian F, Xiao D, Xuan J, Yang H, Liu J, Chen Z. Cost-effectiveness analysis of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin for treatment of children with type 1 diabetes. Postgrad Med. 2022 Aug;134(6):627-634. [PubMed: 35695267]
- 24.
- Li Q, Wang L, Xiao L, Wang Z, Wang F, Yu X, Yan S, Wang Y. Effect of intensive insulin therapy on first-phase insulin secretion in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients with a family history of the disease. Exp Ther Med. 2015 Feb;9(2):612-618. [PMC free article: PMC4280938] [PubMed: 25574243]
- 25.
- Morros-González E, Gómez AM, Henao Carrillo DC, Ursida V, Serrano S, Rondón Sepúlveda MA, Muñoz Velandia OM. Efficacy and safety of sensor augmented insulin pump therapy with low-glucose suspend feature in older adults: A retrospective study in Bogota, Colombia. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021 May-Jun;15(3):649-653. [PubMed: 33813236]
- 26.
- O'Malley G, Ozaslan B, Levy CJ, Castorino K, Desjardins D, Levister C, McCrady-Spitzer S, Church MM, Kaur RJ, Reid C, Kremers WK, Doyle FJ, Trinidad MC, Rosenn B, Pinsker JE, Kudva YC, Dassau E. Longitudinal Observation of Insulin Use and Glucose Sensor Metrics in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitors and Insulin Pumps: The LOIS-P Study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Dec;23(12):807-817. [PMC free article: PMC9057877] [PubMed: 34270347]
- 27.
- Alemzadeh R, Palma-Sisto P, Holzum M, Parton E, Kicher J. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion attenuated glycemic instability in preschool children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007 Aug;9(4):339-47. [PubMed: 17705689]
- 28.
- Umpierrez GE, Klonoff DC. Diabetes Technology Update: Use of Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital. Diabetes Care. 2018 Aug;41(8):1579-1589. [PMC free article: PMC6054505] [PubMed: 29936424]
- 29.
- Vettoretti M, Facchinetti A. Combining continuous glucose monitoring and insulin pumps to automatically tune the basal insulin infusion in diabetes therapy: a review. Biomed Eng Online. 2019 Mar 29;18(1):37. [PMC free article: PMC6440103] [PubMed: 30922295]
- 30.
- Yeh T, Yeung M, Mendelsohn Curanaj FA. Managing Patients with Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitors in the Hospital: to Wear or Not to Wear. Curr Diab Rep. 2021 Jan 15;21(2):7. [PMC free article: PMC7810103] [PubMed: 33449214]
Disclosure: Phil Yao declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Disclosure: Sana Ahsun declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Disclosure: Catherine Anastasopoulou declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Disclosure: Prasanna Tadi declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
- The effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin pumps with continuous glucose monitoring in outpatient adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review.[JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012]The effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin pumps with continuous glucose monitoring in outpatient adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review.Matsuda E, Brennan P. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012; 10(42 Suppl):1-10.
- Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) Pumps for Type 1 and Type 2 Adult Diabetic Populations: An Evidence-Based Analysis.[Ont Health Technol Assess Ser....]Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) Pumps for Type 1 and Type 2 Adult Diabetic Populations: An Evidence-Based Analysis.Medical Advisory Secretariat. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009; 9(20):1-58. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
- Sex differences over time for glycemic control, pump use and insulin dose in patients aged 10-40 years with type 1 diabetes: a diabetes registry study.[BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021]Sex differences over time for glycemic control, pump use and insulin dose in patients aged 10-40 years with type 1 diabetes: a diabetes registry study.Boettcher C, Tittel SR, Meissner T, Gohlke B, Stachow R, Dost A, Wunderlich S, Lowak I, Lanzinger S. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Dec; 9(2).
- Review Emerging diabetes therapies and technologies.[Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012]Review Emerging diabetes therapies and technologies.Moser EG, Morris AA, Garg SK. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Jul; 97(1):16-26. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
- Review A Primer on Insulin Pump Therapy for Health Care Providers.[Nurs Clin North Am. 2017]Review A Primer on Insulin Pump Therapy for Health Care Providers.McCrea DL. Nurs Clin North Am. 2017 Dec; 52(4):553-564. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
- Insulin Pump - StatPearlsInsulin Pump - StatPearls
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...