U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Cantrell A, Croot E, Johnson M, et al. Access to primary and community health-care services for people 16 years and over with intellectual disabilities: a mapping and targeted systematic review. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2020 Jan. (Health Services and Delivery Research, No. 8.5.)

Cover of Access to primary and community health-care services for people 16 years and over with intellectual disabilities: a mapping and targeted systematic review

Access to primary and community health-care services for people 16 years and over with intellectual disabilities: a mapping and targeted systematic review.

Show details

Appendix 11Quality appraisal of included studies

For the one randomised study the risk of bias was assessed using the checklist produced by the US National Heart Lung and Blood Institute for controlled intervention studies. The checklist can be accessed at URL: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools (Table 27).

TABLE 27

TABLE 27

Quality assessment of randomised intervention study

For the one non-randomised study the risk of bias was assessed using the checklist produced by the US National Heart Lung and Blood Institute for controlled intervention studies. The checklist can be accessed at URL: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools (Table 28).

TABLE 28

TABLE 28

Quality assessment of non-randomised intervention study

For the observational, cohort and cross-sectional studies, risk of bias was assessed using the checklist published by the US National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. The checklist can be accessed at URL: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools (Table 29).

TABLE 29

TABLE 29

Quality assessment of observational cohort and cross-sectional studies

For the case–control studies risk of bias was assessed using the checklist published by the US National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute for case–control studies. The checklist can be accessed at URL: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools (Table 30).

TABLE 30

TABLE 30

Quality assessment of case–control studies

For the before-and-after studies, risk of bias was assessed using the checklist published by the US National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute for before-and-after studies with no control group. The checklist can be accessed at URL: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools (Table 31).

TABLE 31

TABLE 31

Quality assessment of before-and-after studies with no control group

Qualitative studies were assessed with the CASP checklist for qualitative studies, which can be accessed at https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/ (Table 32).

TABLE 32

TABLE 32

Quality assessment of qualitative studies

Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2020. This work was produced by Cantrell et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.
Bookshelf ID: NBK553267
Contents

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (1.6M)

Other titles in this collection

Recent Activity

ClearTurn OffTurn On

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...