U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Addendum to Clinical Guideline 156, Fertility problems: assessment and treatment. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2016 Aug. (NICE Guideline Addendum, No. 156.1.)

Cover of Addendum to Clinical Guideline 156, Fertility problems: assessment and treatment

Addendum to Clinical Guideline 156, Fertility problems: assessment and treatment.

Show details

Appendix HGRADE profiles

Table 12Grade profile for IUI without ovarian stimulation versus expectant management

Quality assessmentNo of patientsEffectQuality
No of studiesDesignRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionOther considerationsIUIExpectant managementRelative (95% CI)Absolute
Live birth (all)
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2very serious3serious4none

43/191

(22.5%)

32/193

(16.6%)

RR 1.36 (0.9 to 2.05)60 more per 1000 (from 17 fewer to 174 more)VERY LOW
Live birth (unexplained infertility)
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2very serious3,5serious4none

38/165

(23%)

26/167

(15.6%)

RR 1.48 (0.94 to 2.32)75 more per 1000 (from 9 fewer to 206 more)VERY LOW
Live birth (mild male factor)
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2very serious3,5very serious6none

2/14

(14.3%)

2/9

(22.2%)

RR 0.64 (0.11 to 3.78)80 fewer per 1000 (from 198 fewer to 618 more)VERY LOW
Live birth (mild endometriosis)
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2very serious3,5very serious6none

3/13

(23.1%)

4/17

(23.5%)

RR 0.98 (0.26 to 3.64)5 fewer per 1000 (from 174 fewer to 621 more)VERY LOW
Live birth - Live birth (mild endometriosis and mild male factor)
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2very serious3,5no serious imprecision7none

0/1

(0%)

NCNCNCVERY LOW
Pregnancy rate - Pregnancy per woman (all)
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious5serious4none

43/191

(22.5%)

33/193

(17.1%)

RR 1.32 (0.88 to 1.98)55 more per 1000 (from 21 fewer to 168 more)VERY LOW
Pregnancy rate - multiple pregnancies per woman (all)
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious5very serious6none

1/191

(0.52%)

2/193

(1%)

RR 0.51 (0.05 to 5.53)5 fewer per 1000 (from 10 fewer to 47 more)VERY LOW
Pregnancy related adverse events - Miscarriage per pregnancy
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious5serious4none

9/55

(16.4%)

14/46

(30.4%)

RR 0.54 (0.26 to 1.13)140 fewer per 1000 (from 225 fewer to 40 more)VERY LOW
Pregnancy related adverse events - Ectopic pregnancy per pregnancy
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious5very serious6none

2/55

(3.6%)

1/46

(2.2%)

RR 1.67 (0.16 to 17.86)15 more per 1000 (from 18 fewer to 367 more)VERY LOW
Pregnancy related adverse events - Preterm birth
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious5very serious6none

6/43

(14%)

5/31

(16.1%)

RR 0.87 (0.29 to 2.58)21 fewer per 1000 (from 115 fewer to 255 more)VERY LOW
Patient related adverse events - Treatment related hospital admissions
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious5very serious6none

0/163

(0%)

2/160

(1.3%)

RR 0.2 (0.01 to 4.06)10 fewer per 1000 (from 12 fewer to 38 more)VERY LOW
Patient related adverse events - Abdominal pain
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious5serious4none

12/164

(7.3%)

5/159

(3.1%)

RR 2.33 (0.84 to 6.45)42 more per 1000 (from 5 fewer to 171 more)VERY LOW
Patient related adverse events - Vaginal bleeding
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious5serious4none

10/164

(6.1%)

4/159

(2.5%)

RR 2.42 (0.78 to 7.57)36 more per 1000 (from 6 fewer to 165 more)VERY LOW
Patient related adverse events - Nausea
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious5very serious6none

3/164

(1.8%)

0/158

(0%)

RR 0 (0.35 to 129.55)NCVERY LOW
Patient related adverse events - Hot flushes
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious5very serious6none

0/164

(0%)

4/159

(2.5%)

RR 0.11 (0.01 to 1.99)22 fewer per 1000 (from 25 fewer to 25 more)VERY LOW
Patient related adverse events - Bloating
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious5very serious6none

6/164

(3.7%)

0/158

(0%)

RR 12.53 (0.71 to 220.54)NCVERY LOW
Patient related adverse events - total
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious5serious4none

31/164

(18.9%)

15/159

(9.4%)

RR 2 (1.13 to 3.57)94 more per 1000 (from 12 more to 242 more)VERY LOW
Patient satisfaction - Process of treatment acceptable
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious5serious4none

155/162

(95.7%)

123/153

(80.4%)

RR 1.19 (1.09 to 1.3)153 more per 1000 (from 72 more to 241 more)VERY LOW
Patient satisfaction - Outcome of treatment acceptable
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious5serious4none

117/159

(73.6%)

82/148

(55.4%)

RR 1.33 (1.12 to 1.58)183 more per 1000 (from 66 more to 321 more)VERY LOW
Anxiety
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious5no serious imprecision8none

22/173

(12.7%)

3/171

(1.8%)

RR 7.25 (2.21 to 23.77)110 more per 1000 (from 21 more to 399 more)LOW
Depression
1(Bhattacharya 2008)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious5very serious6none

2/172

(1.2%)

4/170

(2.4%)

RR 0.49 (0.09 to 2.66)12 fewer per 1000 (from 21 fewer to 39 more)VERY LOW
1

Evidence was downgraded by 1 as blinding was not possible.

2

Inconsistency not applicable as no meta-analysis was conducted (outcome is from a single study).

3

Evidence was downgraded by 1 as the outcome ‘live birth’ is indirect for ‘live singleton birth’.

4

Evidence was downgraded by 1 due to 95% CI crossing one MID.

5

Evidence was downgraded by 1 due to indirectness of treatment as 17% of women allocated to IUI (n = 33) received expectant management and 3% of women in the EM group (n = 6) received IUI.

6

Evidence was downgraded by 2 as 95% CIs crossed two MIDs.

7

Effect estimate and 95% CIs not calculable.

8

No serious imprecision as 95% CIs do not cross MIDs.

Table 13GRADE table for IUI with ovarian stimulation versus expectant management

Quality assessmentNo of patientsEffectQuality Importance
No of studiesDesignRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionOther considerationsIUI with stimulationExpectant managementRelative (95% CI)Absolute
Live births (determined by interview, cumulative number after up to 4 cycles)
1(Tummon 1997)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious3serious4none

14/53

(26.4%)

4/50

(8%)

RR 3.3 (1.16 to 9.36)184 more per 1000 (from 13 more to 669 more)VERY LOW
Live singleton births (number of live births - multiple births)
1(Tummon 1997)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2no serious indirectness5serious4none

11/53

(20.8%)

4/50

(8%)

RR 2.59 (0.88 to 7.62)127 more per 1000 (from 10 fewer to 530 more)LOW
Live multiple births (determined by interview, cumulative number after up to 4 cycles)
1(Tummon 1997)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious3very seriousnone

3/53

(5.7%)

0/50

(0%)

RR 6.61 (0.35 to 124.85)NCVERY LOW
Live births
1(Steures 2006)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious3very serious6none

26/127

(20.5%)

30/126

(24.6%)

RR 0.86 (0.54 to 1.37)34 fewer per 1000 (from 113 fewer to 91 more)VERY LOW
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
1(Tummon 1997)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2no serious indirectness5no serious imprecision7none

0/53

(0%)

0/50

(0%)

NCNCMODERATE
Pregnancy rates - Pregnancy (ongoing), 6 months
1(Steures 2006)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2very serious8,9very serious6none

29/127

(22.8%)

34/126

(23.8%)

RR 00.85 (0.55 to 1.30)40 fewer per 1000 (from 121 fewer to 81 more)VERY LOW
Pregnancy rates - Multiple pregnancies, 6 months
1(Steures 2006)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious8very serious6none

2/127

(1.6%)

1/126

(0.79%)

RR 1.98 (0.18 to 21.61)8 fewer per 1000 (from 7 fewer to 164 more)VERY LOW
Pregnancy related adverse events - Miscarriage, 6 months
1(Steures 2006)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2serious8serious4none

13/42

(31%)

6/40

(15%)

RR 2.06 (0.87 to 4.9)159 more per 1000 (from 20 fewer to 585 more)VERY LOW
1

Evidence was downgraded by 1 as blinding was not reported.

2

Inconsistency not applicable as no meta-analysis was conducted (outcome is from a single study).

3

Evidence was downgraded by 1 as the outcome ‘live birth’ is indirect for ‘live singleton birth’.

4

Evidence was downgraded by 1 as 95% CIs crossed one MID.

5

No serious indirectness as population, intervention and outcome is in agreement with review protocol.

6

Evidence was downgraded by 2 as 95% CIs crossed two MIDs.

7

No serious imprecision as 95% CI do not cross MIDs.

8

Evidence was downgraded by 1 due to indirect assessment of infertility in 31 (24%) women assigned to the intervention group and in 32 (25%) assigned to expectant management group as tubal function had not been assessed by hysterosalpingography or laparoscopy before randomisation.

9

Evidence was downgraded by 1 due to indirect treatment: 25 couples in expectant management group started IUI during trial duration (6 months).

Table 14GRADE table for IUI with ovarian stimulation versus IUI without ovarian stimulation

Quality assessmentNo of patientsEffectQuality
No of studiesDesignRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionOther considerationsIUI with stimulationIUI without stimulationRelative (95% CI)Absolute
Live singleton birth
1(Goverde 2005)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2no serious indirectnessvery serious3none

22/85

(25.9%)

25/86

(29.1%)

RR 0.89 (0.55 to 1.45)32 fewer per 1000 (from 131 fewer to 131 more)VERY LOW
Live births
2(Goverde 2005, Guzick 1999)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency4serious5serious6none

72/316

(22.8%)

53/320

(16.6%)

RR 1.38 (1.01 to 1.88)63 more per 1000 (from 2 more to 146 more)VERY LOW
Pregnancy rate per IUI cycle
1(Cohlen 1998)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2no serious indirectness7very serious3none

3/36

(8.3%)

4/38

(10.5%)

RR 0.79 (0.19 to 3.29)22 fewer per 1000 (from 85 fewer to 241 more)VERY LOW
Pregnancy rate per couple
1(Guzick 1999)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2no serious indirectness7no serious imprecision8none

77/231

(33.3%)

42/234

(17.9%)

RR 1.86 (1.34 to 2.58)154 more per 1000 (from 61 more to 284 more)MODERATE
Pregnancy rates - Ongoing pregnancy
1(Goverde 2005)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2no serious indirectness7serious6none

33/85

(38.8%)

28/86

(32.6%)

RR 1.19 (0.8 to 1.79)62 more per 1000 (from 65 fewer to 257 more)LOW
Pregnancy rates - Singleton pregnancy
1(Goverde 2005)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2no serious indirectness7very serious3none

24/85

(28.2%)

27/86

(31.4%)

RR 0.9 (0.57 to 1.43)31 fewer per 1000 (from 135 fewer to 135 more)VERY LOW
Pregnancy rates - Multiple pregnancies
2(Goverde 2005, Guzick 1999)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency4no serious indirectness7no serious imprecision8none

14/316

(4.4%)

1/320

(0.31%)

RR 9.78 (1.84 to 51.91)27 more per 1000 (from 3 more to 159 more)MODERATE
Pregnancy related adverse events - Preterm birth
1(Guzick 1999)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2no serious indirectness7serious6none

9/231

(3.9%)

2/234

(0.85%)

RR 4.56 (1 to 20.87)30 more per 1000 (from 0 more to 170 more)LOW
Pregnancy related adverse events - Stillbirth
1(Guzick 1999)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2no serious indirectness7very serious3none

0/231

(0%)

1/234

(0.43%)

RR 0.34 (0.01 to 8.25)3 fewer per 1000 (from 4 fewer to 31 more)VERY LOW
Pregnancy related adverse events - Ectopic
1(Guzick 1999)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2no serious indirectness7very serious3none

4/231

(1.7%)

2/234

(0.85%)

RR 2.02 (0.37 to 10.95)9 more per 1000 (from 5 fewer to 85 more)VERY LOW
Pregnancy related adverse events - Miscarriage
1(Guzick 1999)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2no serious indirectness7no serious imprecision8none

22/231

(9.5%)

6/234

(2.6%)

RR 3.71 (1.57 to 8.99)69 more per 1000 (from 15 more to 205 more)MODERATE
Pregnancy related adverse events - Induced abortion
1(Guzick 1999)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2no serious indirectness7very serious3none

0/231

(0%)

1/234

(0.43%)

RR 0.34 (0.01 to 8.25)3 fewer per 1000 (from 4 fewer to 31 more)VERY LOW
Pregnancy related adverse events - Total
1(Guzick 1999)RCTserious1no serious inconsistency2no serious indirectness7no serious imprecisionnone

35/231

(15.2%)

12/234

(5.1%)

RR 2.95 (1.57 to 5.55)100 more per 1000 (from 29 more to 233 more)MODERATE
1

Evidence was downgraded by 1 as blinding was not reported.

2

Inconsistency not applicable as no meta-analysis was conducted (outcome is from a single study).

3

Evidence was downgraded by 2 as 95% CIs crossed two MIDs.

4

No serious inconsistency as heterogeneity measure (I squared) < 50%.

5

Evidence was downgraded by 1 as the outcome ‘live birth’ is indirect for ‘live singleton birth’.

6

Evidence was downgraded by 1 as 95% CIs crossed one MID.

7

No serious indirectness as population, intervention and outcome is in agreement with review protocol.

8

No serious imprecision as 95% CIs do not cross MIDs.

Copyright © National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2016.
Bookshelf ID: NBK550220

Views

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...