Structured Abstract

Contents

• Key Messages
• Preface
• Acknowledgments
• Peer Reviewers
• Introduction
  • Objectives
• Methods
  • Conduct
  • Machine Learning Tools
  • Performance Testing
  • User Experience Testing
  • Analysis
• Results
  • Performance
  • User Experiences
• Discussion, Limitations, and Conclusion
  • Strengths and Limitations
  • Conclusions
• References
• Abbreviations and Acronyms
• Appendixes
  • Appendix A. Screening Exercise for the User Experiences Testing
  • Appendix B. User Experiences Survey
  • Appendix C. 2×2 Tables and Calculations for the Performance Metrics (Example from the Antipsychotics Review in Abstrackr)
  • Appendix D. 2 × 2 Cross-tabulations for Each Review in Each Tool
  • Appendix E. Focused Codes and Supporting Quotes for the Properties of Each Tool

Suggested citation:

Gates A, Guitard S, Pillay J, Elliott SA, Dyson MP, Newton AS, Hartling L. Performance and Usability of Machine Learning for Screening in Systematic Reviews: A Comparative Evaluation of Three Tools. (Prepared by the University of Alberta Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2015-00001-I) AHRQ Publication No. 19(20)-EHC027-EF Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; November 2019. Posted final reports are located on the Effective Health Care Program search page. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23970/AHRQEPCMETHMACHINEPERFORMANCE

This report is based on research conducted by the University of Alberta Evidence-based Practice Center under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. 290-2015-00001-I). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its contents; the findings and conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. Therefore, no statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

None of the investigators have any affiliations or financial involvement that conflicts with the material presented in this report.

The information in this report is intended to help healthcare decision makers—patients and clinicians, health system leaders, and policymakers, among others—make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of healthcare services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for the application of clinical judgment. Anyone who makes decisions concerning the provision of clinical care should consider this report in the same way as any medical reference and in conjunction with all other pertinent information, i.e., in the context of available resources and circumstances presented by individual patients.

This report is made available to the public under the terms of a licensing agreement between the author and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. This report may be used and reprinted without permission except those copyrighted materials that are clearly noted in the report. Further reproduction of those copyrighted materials is prohibited without the express permission of copyright holders. AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of any derivative products that may be developed from this report, such as clinical practice guidelines, other quality enhancement tools, or reimbursement or coverage policies, may not be stated or implied.

Persons using assistive technology may not be able to fully access information in this report. For assistance contact vog.shh.qrha@CPE.