NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
One of the pathways by which the scientific community confirms the validity of a new scientific discovery is by repeating the research that produced it. When a scientific effort fails to independently confirm the computations or results of a previous study, some fear that it may be a symptom of a lack of rigor in science, while others argue that such an observed inconsistency can be an important precursor to new discovery. Concerns about reproducibility and replicability have been expressed in both scientific and popular media. As these concerns came to light, Congress requested that the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine conduct a study to assess the extent of issues related to reproducibility and replicability and to offer recommendations for improving rigor and transparency in scientific research. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science defines reproducibility and replicability and examines the factors that may lead to non-reproducibility and non-replicability in research. Unlike the typical expectation of reproducibility between two computations, expectations about replicability are more nuanced, and in some cases a lack of replicability can aid the process of scientific discovery. This report provides recommendations to researchers, academic institutions, journals, and funders on steps they can take to improve reproducibility and replicability in science.
Contents
- The National Academies of SCIENCES • ENGINEERING • MEDICINE
- COMMITTEE ON REPRODUCIBILITY AND REPLICABILITY IN SCIENCE
- BOARD ON BEHAVIORAL, COGNITIVE, AND SENSORY SCIENCES
- COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL STATISTICS
- NUCLEAR AND RADIATION STUDIES BOARD
- BOARD ON MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES AND ANALYTICS
- COMMITTEE ON APPLIED AND THEORETICAL STATISTICS
- BOARD ON RESEARCH DATA AND INFORMATION
- COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, MEDICINE, AND PUBLIC POLICY
- Acknowledgments
- Preface
- Executive Summary
- Summary
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Scientific Methods and Knowledge
- 3. Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability
- 4. Reproducibility
- 5. Replicability
- 6. Improving Reproducibility and Replicability
- 7. Confidence in Science
- References
- Appendix A. Biographical Sketches of Committee Members and Staff
- Appendix B. Agendas of Open Committee Meetings
- Appendix C. Recommendations Grouped by Stakeholder
- Appendix D. Using Bayes Analysis for Hypothesis Testing
- Appendix E. Conducting Replicable Surveys of Scientific Communities
Suggested citation:
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303.
Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.17226/25303
Library of Congress Control Number: 2019946492
Additional copies of this publication are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.
Printed in the United States of America
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Establishing Institutional Scores With the Rigor and Transparency Index: Large-scale Analysis of Scientific Reporting Quality.[J Med Internet Res. 2022]Establishing Institutional Scores With the Rigor and Transparency Index: Large-scale Analysis of Scientific Reporting Quality.Menke J, Eckmann P, Ozyurt IB, Roelandse M, Anderson N, Grethe J, Gamst A, Bandrowski A. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 27; 24(6):e37324. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
- Review Reproducible Research: A Retrospective.[Annu Rev Public Health. 2021]Review Reproducible Research: A Retrospective.Peng RD, Hicks SC. Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1; 42:79-93. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
- Learning Lessons on Reproducibility and Replicability in Large Scale Genome-Wide Association Studies.[Harv Data Sci Rev. 2020]Learning Lessons on Reproducibility and Replicability in Large Scale Genome-Wide Association Studies.Lin X. Harv Data Sci Rev. 2020 Fall; 2(4). Epub 2020 Dec 16.
- Exploring Reproducibility in Visualization.[IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2020]Exploring Reproducibility in Visualization.Fekete JD, Freire J, Rhyne TM. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2020 Sep-Oct; 40(5):108-119.
- Review Replicability and other features of a high-quality science: Toward a balanced and empirical approach.[J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017]Review Replicability and other features of a high-quality science: Toward a balanced and empirical approach.Finkel EJ, Eastwick PW, Reis HT. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Aug; 113(2):244-253.
- Reproducibility and Replicability in ScienceReproducibility and Replicability in Science
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...