U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Cover of A brief behavioural intervention to promote regular self-weighing to prevent weight regain after weight loss: a RCT

A brief behavioural intervention to promote regular self-weighing to prevent weight regain after weight loss: a RCT

Public Health Research, No. 7.7

, , , , , , , and .

Author Information and Affiliations
Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; .

Headline

Brief behavioural telephone support delivered by non-specialist workers to promote target-setting and daily self-weighing and recording of weight did not prevent weight regain after intentional weight loss.

Abstract

Background:

Although behavioural weight loss treatments can be effective, long-term maintenance of this weight loss remains a critical challenge because the vast majority of people will regain their lost weight over time. The period after initial weight loss is the time when people are at the highest risk of weight regain.

Objective:

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a brief behavioural intervention delivered by non-specialist call centre staff to promote regular self-weighing to prevent weight regain after intentional weight loss.

Design:

Randomised controlled trial.

Setting:

West Midlands, UK.

Participants:

Adults were recruited if they had attended a local authority-funded weight management programme and had lost ≥ 5% of their starting weight by the end of their weight loss programme.

Interventions:

The intervention group received three brief support telephone calls, delivered by non-specialist call centre staff (from a third-sector community organisation), that encouraged setting a weight maintenance target of ≤ 1 kg of weight gain from current weight, which was to be assessed by daily self-weighing and recording weight on a record card, together with regular text messages. Participants were asked to return to their weight loss plan if they gained > 1 kg above their target weight. The usual-care group received a standard weight maintenance leaflet, the infographic EatWell Plate and a list of useful websites pertaining to weight management.

Main outcome measures:

The primary outcome was the difference between the groups in mean weight change (kg) from baseline to 12 months. The secondary outcomes included the proportion of participants in each group who had regained < 1 kg in weight at the 3- and 12-month follow-up points.

Results:

A total of 813 potential participants were screened, 583 of whom were eligible and randomised (usual care, n = 292; intervention, n = 291). A total of 94% and 89% of participants completed follow-up at 3 and 12 months, respectively. At 12 months, the mean unadjusted weight change was +0.39 kg for the intervention group and –0.17 kg for the usual-care group, an adjusted difference of 0.53 kg [95% confidence interval (CI) –0.64 to 1.71 kg]. At 12 months, 134 (45.9%) and 130 (44.7%) participants regained ≤ 1 kg of their baseline weight in the usual-care and intervention groups, respectively (odds ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.33). As the intervention was ineffective, we did not pursue a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Conclusions:

Brief behavioural telephone support delivered by non-specialist workers to promote target-setting and daily self-weighing and recording of weight does not prevent weight regain after intentional weight loss. Specifically, as target-setting and daily self-weighing did not increase conscious cognitive restraint, people may need more intensive interventions to promote the use of behavioural techniques that help people maintain lost weight.

Trial registration:

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN52341938.

Funding:

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 7, No. 7. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Contents

About the Series

Public Health Research
ISSN (Print): 2050-4381
ISSN (Electronic): 2050-439X

Article history

The research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the PHR programme as project number 12/179/09. The contractual start date was in June 2014. The final report began editorial review in June 2017 and was accepted for publication in October 2017. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The PHR editors and production house have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors’ report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the final report document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.

Declared competing interests of authors

Kate Jolly was an investigator on a trial in which the weight loss intervention was donated to the NHS by Slimming World® (Alfreton, UK; www.slimmingworld.co.uk) and Rosemary Conley Health and Fitness Clubs (Tharston, UK; www.rosemaryconley.com). Paul Aveyard reports grants from Weight Watchers® (Maidenhead, UK; www.weightwatchers.com/uk) and Cambridge Weight Plan® (Cambridge Weight Plan Ltd, Corby, UK) and non-financial support from Slimming World, Weight Watchers and Rosemary Conley Health and Fitness Clubs, outside the submitted work.

Last reviewed: June 2017; Accepted: October 2017.

Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2019. This work was produced by Daley et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.
Bookshelf ID: NBK540650PMID: 31042335DOI: 10.3310/phr07070

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (5.4M)

Other titles in this collection

Related information

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...