All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission from SAMHSA. Citation of the source is appreciated. However, this publication may not be reproduced or distributed for a fee without the specific, written authorization of the Office of Communications, SAMHSA, HHS.
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Structured Abstract
Background:
Multiple federally funded surveys collect data on tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drug use among adolescents. Seemingly similar measures in these surveys may yield different estimates of substance use among adolescents. This study can provide information on possible reasons for any differences in estimates among the surveys, how to interpret trends and patterns in substance use, and how to best analyze these data.
Methods:
This methodology report describes and compares adolescent substance use data from the 2002 to 2008 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), a U.S. household survey, and two school-based surveys: the 2002 to 2008 Monitoring the Future (MTF) survey, and the 2003, 2005, and 2007 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS). Where these surveys yield different estimates of substance use, this report examines possible reasons for these differences. The goals of this study are (1) to compare overall estimates, subgroup patterns, and trends over time among the different surveys; (2) to help users understand the reasons for differences in these estimates; (3) to facilitate accurate interpretation of results from these surveys; and (4) to improve the understanding of the true nature and extent of youth substance use in the United States.
Results:
In most instances, NSDUH estimates of substance use for adolescents enrolled in school were lower than corresponding estimates from MTF and YRBS. In addition, YRBS estimates for 10th and 12th graders tended to be higher than MTF estimates. However, the three surveys generally show similar findings in which subgroups of adolescents have relatively higher or lower substance use estimates. Also, NSDUH and MTF, which are conducted annually, generally provide similar findings about changes over time (i.e., trends) in the prevalence cigarette, alcohol, and marijuana use among 12th graders.
The methodological differences among the surveys include the setting (i.e., household vs. school) and the responding populations. NSDUH estimates generally were consistent with the hypothesis that youths who have used substances tend to underreport their use in household interview settings if their interviews are not private. Because YRBS and MTF estimate substance use for in-school youth they do not include dropouts. In general, YRBS and MTF estimates for youths in school align closely with overall youth estimates, except for those subpopulations and substances that have higher rates of absenteeism and dropouts and higher substance use.
Conclusions:
Because of the many methodological differences among NSDUH, MTF, and YRBS, this methodology report does not conclude that estimates of substance use among adolescents from any one of these surveys are more accurate than estimates from another. Each survey has definite strengths and limitations. The multiple methodological differences all can contribute to differences in estimates across these surveys.
Contents
- Executive Summary
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Adolescent Substance Use Estimates from NSDUH and Other Surveys
- 3. Effects of Dropouts, Absentees, and Seasonality on Adolescent Substance Use Estimates in NSDUH
- 4. Privacy of NSDUH Interviews for Adolescents
- 5. Discussion
- References
- Appendix A. Description of the Surveys
- Appendix B. Statistical Methods and Measurement
- Appendix C. Estimate and Standard Error Tables for Chapters 2, 3, and 4
- Appendix D. List of Contributors
Disclaimer
SAMHSA provides links to other Internet sites as a service to its users and is not responsible for the availability or content of these external sites. SAMHSA, its employees, and contractors do not endorse, warrant, or guarantee the products, services, or information described or offered at these other Internet sites. Any reference to a commercial product, process, or service is not an endorsement or recommendation by SAMHSA, its employees, or contractors. For documents available from this server, the U.S. Government does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed.
This publication may be downloaded from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/. Hard copies may be obtained from https://store.samhsa.gov. Or call SAMHSA at 1-877-SAMHSA-7 (1-877-726-4727) (English and Español).
Suggested Citation
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2012). Comparing and evaluating youth substance use estimates from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health and other surveys. HHS Publication No. SMA 12-4727, Methodology Series M-9. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD.
The CBHSQ Methodology Report is prepared by the Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (CBHSQ), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that leads public health efforts to advance the behavioral health of the nation. SAMHSA's mission is to reduce the impact of substance abuse and mental illness on America's communities.
Prepared by RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
RTI International is a registered trademark and a trade name of Research Triangle Institute.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Trends in initiation of alcohol use in the United States 1975 to 2003.[Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006]Trends in initiation of alcohol use in the United States 1975 to 2003.Faden VB. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006 Jun; 30(6):1011-22.
- Adolescent substance use: beware of international comparisons.[J Adolesc Health. 2003]Adolescent substance use: beware of international comparisons.Pirkis JE, Irwin CE Jr, Brindis C, Patton GC, Sawyer MG. J Adolesc Health. 2003 Oct; 33(4):279-86.
- Trends in anabolic-androgenic steroid use among adolescents.[Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997]Trends in anabolic-androgenic steroid use among adolescents.Yesalis CE, Barsukiewicz CK, Kopstein AN, Bahrke MS. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997 Dec; 151(12):1197-206.
- Review Risk and Protective Factors and Estimates of Substance Use Initiation: Results from the 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.[CBHSQ Data Review. 2012]Review Risk and Protective Factors and Estimates of Substance Use Initiation: Results from the 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.Lipari RN, Ahrnsbrak RD, Pemberton MR, Porter JD. CBHSQ Data Review. 2012
- Review Risk and Protective Factors and Estimates of Substance Use Initiation: Results from the 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.[CBHSQ Data Review. 2012]Review Risk and Protective Factors and Estimates of Substance Use Initiation: Results from the 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.Lipari RN, Williams MR, Copello EAP, Pemberton MR. CBHSQ Data Review. 2012
- Comparing and Evaluating Youth Substance Use Estimates from the National Survey ...Comparing and Evaluating Youth Substance Use Estimates from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health and Other Surveys
- Field Interviewer–Administered Dietary Recalls in Participants’ Homes: A Feasibi...Field Interviewer–Administered Dietary Recalls in Participants’ Homes: A Feasibility Study Using the US Department of Agriculture’s Automated Multiple-Pass Method
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...