NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Feltner C, Wallace I, Berkman N, et al. Screening for Intimate Partner Violence, Elder Abuse, and Abuse of Vulnerable Adults: An Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 Oct. (Evidence Synthesis, No. 169.)
Screening for Intimate Partner Violence, Elder Abuse, and Abuse of Vulnerable Adults: An Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].
Show detailsAppendix F Table 1IPV Screening Instruments
Abbreviated Name | Complete Name | Description | Items | Scoring, Range, and Cutoff for Positive Screen |
---|---|---|---|---|
HITS66, 72, 160 | Hurt, Insulted, Threaten, Scream | 4 items assess the frequency of IPV |
| Each item is answered on a 5-point Likert scale:
Score range: 4–20 Cutoff for IPV:* ≥10 |
E-HITS72 | Extended–Hurt, Insulted, Threaten, Scream | 5 items (including all 4 HITS items and an additional sexual violence item) | Over the last 12 months, how often did your partner:
| Each item is answered on a 5-point Likert scale:
Score range: 5–25 Cutoff for IPV: ≥7 |
PSQ67 | Parent Screening Questionnaire | 3 items assess occurrence of physical IPV and fear in the past year |
| Each item is answered yes/no
Cutoff for IPV: Affirmative response to ≥1 items |
OVAT63, 160 | Ongoing Violence Assessment Tool | 4 items assess ongoing physical and emotional IPV |
| Items 1, 2, and 4 are answered true/false
Item 3 is answered on a 5-point Likert scale:
Cutoff for IPV: Affirmative response to items 1+H5, 2, or 4; Response of ≥3 for item 3 |
PVS64, 160 | Partner Violence Screen | 3 items that assess physical IPV in the last year and current safety |
| Each item is answered yes/no
Cutoff for IPV: Affirmative response to ≥1 items (assuming person harming or making the respondent feel unsafe is a current or past partner) |
HS-EAST98, 131 | Hwalek-Sengstock Elder Abuse Screening Test | 15 items that screen for elder abuse |
| All items (except item 4) are answered yes/no; item 4 answered by free response
Responses associated with abuse are: “No” to items 1, 6, 12, and 14; “Someone else” to item 4; “Yes” to all other items Unclear cutoff for positive test† |
BRFSS73 | Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (modified by authors) | 3 items from Colorado BRFFS |
| Each item is answered yes/no
Cutoff for IPV: Affirmative response to ≥1 item(s) |
WAST75, 160 | Woman Abuse Screening Tool | 8 items assess physical and emotional IPV |
| Item 1 is answered with: A lot of tension some tension, or no tension
Item 2 is answered with great difficulty, some difficulty, or no difficulty Items 4–8 are answered with often, sometimes, or never Responses recoded such that higher score indicates higher frequency of experiences; scores should be summed for individuals who answer all items Cutoff for IPV: None provided |
STaT65, 70 | Slapped, Things, Threatened | 3 items (2 assess physical IPV, 1 assesses threats) | Have you ever been in a relationship where:
| Each item is answered yes/no
Scoring: Each affirmative response is given a score of 1 Cutoff for IPV: Score of ≥1 |
HARK68 | Humiliation, Afraid, Rape, Kick | 4 items assess emotional and physical IPV in the past year |
| Each item is answered yes/no
Scoring: Each affirmative response is given a score of 1 Cutoff for IPV: Score of ≥1 |
OAS74, 160 | Ongoing Abuse Screen | 5 items adapted from the AAS that assess ongoing physical, sexual, emotional IPV, and fear |
| Each item is answered yes/no
Cutoff for IPV: Affirmative response to ≥1 item(s) |
AAS74, 160 | Abuse Assessment Screen | 5 items assess physical, emotional, and sexual violence |
| Items 1 and 5 are answered yes/no; if items 2, 3, or 4 are answered yes, participant is asked to indicate category of abuser (Circle all that apply: husband, ex-husband, boyfriend, stranger, other, multiple); for items 2 and 3, participants are asked to mark the area of injury on a body map.
For each violence incident, items are scored based on severity of (1–6)ǂ Cutoff for IPV: Affirmative response to ≥1 item(s) |
- *
Cutoff for positive score here reflects widely accepted value; one included IPV test accuracy study72 used a cutoff value of ≥6.
- †
We found no widely agreed upon standard for what constitutes a positive test. In general, higher scores indicate higher risk of being abused, neglected, or exploited. The one included study in this review considered positive responses to questions 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, and 15 to indicate high risk of elder mistreatment.98
- ǂ
Scores are based on the following: 1=Threats of abuse including use of weapon; 2=Slapping, pushing; no injuries and/or lasting pain; 3=Punching, kicking, bruises, cuts, and/or continuing pain; 4=Beating up, severe contusions, burns, broken bones; 5=Head injury, internal injury, permanent injury; 6=Use of weapon; wound from weapon.
Abbreviation: IPV=intimate partner violence.
- Appendix F Table 1, IPV Screening Instruments - Screening for Intimate Partner V...Appendix F Table 1, IPV Screening Instruments - Screening for Intimate Partner Violence, Elder Abuse, and Abuse of Vulnerable Adults: An Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
- uox*[Gene Symbol] AND xenopus laevis[Organism] (0)GEO Profiles
- JGI_CABH10171.rev NIH_XGC_tropSkeMus1 Xenopus tropicalis cDNA clone IMAGE:785320...JGI_CABH10171.rev NIH_XGC_tropSkeMus1 Xenopus tropicalis cDNA clone IMAGE:7853209 3', mRNA sequencegi|73780181|gnl|dbEST|31035396|gb|D 84.1|Nucleotide
- AL682819 XGC-gastrula Xenopus tropicalis cDNA clone TGas059f22 5', mRNA sequenceAL682819 XGC-gastrula Xenopus tropicalis cDNA clone TGas059f22 5', mRNA sequencegi|38254493|gnl|dbEST|20351946|emb| 819.2|Nucleotide
- AGENCOURT_10765257 Wellcome CRC pSK egg Xenopus laevis cDNA clone IMAGE:6324863 ...AGENCOURT_10765257 Wellcome CRC pSK egg Xenopus laevis cDNA clone IMAGE:6324863 5', mRNA sequencegi|27505552|gnl|dbEST|16558876|gb|C 98.1|Nucleotide
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...