Trends in reported diagnosis

The percentage of children ages 13-17 with a reported ADHD diagnosis was consistently just above 13 percent throughout the period from 2008-09 through 2014-15 (Figure 1). However, the percentage of children ages 5-12 with a reported diagnosis of ADHD increased from 8.5 percent in 2008-09 to 10.4 percent in 2014-15, a 22 percent increase in reported diagnosis. The percentage of children ages 5-12 with a reported diagnosis was consistently lower than for those ages 13-17 across the time periods shown.

Figure 1

Percentage of children with reported ADHD diagnosis, by age, 2008-09 to 2014-15.

Trends in prescription usage among those with a reported diagnosis

For all two-year periods from 2008-09 to 2014-15, half or fewer of those ages 13-17 with a reported ADHD diagnosis had a prescription filled to treat ADHD, compared to at least 59.6 percent of those ages 5-12 (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Percentage of children with prescription treatment among those with reported ADHD diagnosis, by age, 2008-09 to 2014-15.

Trends in ADHD prescription fills by drug type

Stimulants are the most prevalent type of drug prescribed to treat ADHD (Figure 3). In 2014-15, 92.1 percent of children ages 5-12 and 93.2 percent of those ages 13-17 with prescription treatment had a stimulant purchase. Across the time periods examined, children ages 5-12 with prescription treatment were somewhat more likely to have used both stimulants and non-stimulants than those ages 13-17 (e.g., 17.5 versus 13.1 percent in 2014-15). In both age groups, the proportion that received only non-stimulants was 10.5 percent or less in all periods.

Figure 3

Percentage of types of prescription for children with ADHD diagnosis and prescription treatment, by age, 2008-09 to 2014-15.

Variation in ADHD reported diagnosis by poverty status and by insurance coverage

In 2014-15, the percent of those ages 5-17 with a reported diagnosis of ADHD declined as family income increased, with 14.5 percent of those in poor households and 9.3 percent of those in upper income households having a reported diagnosis (Figure 4). About 15 percent of children with only public insurance had a reported ADHD diagnosis, which was higher than for children with any private insurance (9.6 percent) or no insurance (8.8 percent).

Figure 4

Percentage of children with reported ADHD diagnosis, ages 5-17, by poverty and insurance status, 2014-15.

Variation in prescription fills by poverty status and insurance coverage

Of the children with a reported diagnosis of ADHD, approximately half of those living in households with incomes less than 400 percent of the poverty level filled a prescription that treats ADHD (Figure 5), and those children living in upper income households were more likely to have prescription treatment than those in other households. The proportion of children with a reported diagnosis who had a filled prescription was lower for those with no insurance (35.5 percent) relative to those with any private insurance (57.0 percent) or only public insurance (51.9 percent).

Figure 5

Percentage with prescription treatment among those with reported ADHD diagnosis, ages 5-17, 2014-15.

The estimates in this Statistical Brief are based on data from the restricted prescription medicine files (available through the AHRQ Data Center), Full Year Consolidated Data Files (HC-121, HC-129, HC-138, HC-147, HC-155, HC-163, HC-171, HC-181), Medical Conditions Files (HC-120, HC-128, HC-137, HC-146, HC-154, HC-162, HC-170, HC-180), and Conditions Link Files (HC-118I, HC-126I, HC-135I, HC-144I, HC-152I, HC-160I, HC-168I, HC-178I) for 2008 through 2015.

Reported ADHD diagnosis

Diagnosis was based on the priority condition question for ADHD (public use file variable ADHDADDX) which asks if persons ages 5 through 17 have ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that they have Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder or Attention Deficit Disorder. If the respondent answered yes, the child is considered to have a reported diagnosis.

Age

Age was defined as age on the last date of MEPS eligibility during the calendar year.

Prescription treatment

The analysis is restricted to those prescription records that were associated with an ICD9 code of 314 ("ADHD"). Of the drugs identified in these records, only those for which a peer-reviewed paper identified through PubMed or Google Scholar mentioned the use of the drug as a monotherapy for ADHD are categorized as treating ADHD. These restrictions excluded drugs that might be commonly prescribed for conditions that are comorbid with ADHD but are not prescribed for the treatment of ADHD.

Prescription type

Therapeutic class and subclass were assigned to MEPS prescribed medicines using Multum Lexicon variables from Cerner Multum, Inc.

• Stimulant: For the purpose of this Brief, stimulants are those drugs that treat ADHD and have the Multum subclass 1 (TC1S1) code of 71 ("CNS Stimulants").
• Non-stimulant: For the purpose of this Brief, non-stimulants are those drugs that treat ADHD but do not have the Multum subclass 1 (TC1S1) code of 71.

Health insurance coverage

• Any private health insurance: Individuals who, at any time during the year, had insurance that provides coverage for hospital and physician care (other than Medicare, Medicaid, or other public hospital/physician coverage) were classified as having private insurance. Coverage by TRICARE (Armed Forces-related coverage) was also included as private health insurance. Insurance that provides coverage for a single service only, such as dental or vision coverage, was not included.
• Public coverage only: Individuals were considered to have public coverage only if they met both of the following criteria: 1) They were not covered by private insurance at any time during the year, 2) they were covered by any of the following public programs at any point during the year: Medicare, Medicaid, or other public hospital/physician coverage.
• Uninsured: The uninsured were defined as people not covered by private hospital/physician insurance, Medicare, TRICARE, Medicaid, or other public hospital/physician programs at any time during the entire year or period of eligibility for the survey.

Utilization

Utilization was defined as purchasing (or obtaining) an outpatient prescription in the year of interest. Refills as well as original prescriptions are included in utilization estimates.

Poverty status

• Poor: Family income less than 100 percent of the federal poverty level.
• Low Income: Family income between 100 percent and less than 200 percent of the federal poverty level.
• Middle Income: Family income between 200 percent and 400 percent of the federal poverty level.
• Upper Income: Family income greater than 400 percent of the federal poverty level.

MEPS-HC is a nationally representative longitudinal survey that collects detailed information on health care utilization and expenditures, health insurance, and health status, as well as a wide variety of social, demographic, and economic characteristics for the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population. It is cosponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Center for Health Statistics.

Anderson, J. Reported Diagnosis and Prescription Utilization Related to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children Ages 5-17, 2008-2015. Statistical Brief #514. August 2018. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. https://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_files/publications/st514/stat514.pdf

AHRQ welcomes questions and comments from readers of this publication who are interested in obtaining more information about access, cost, use, financing, and quality of health care in the United States. We also invite you to tell us how you are using this Statistical Brief and other MEPS data and tools and to share suggestions on how MEPS products might be enhanced to further meet your needs. Please email us at MEPSProjectDirector@ahrq.hhs.gov or send a letter to the address below: