NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Structured Abstract
Objectives:
To conduct a pilot study of three dissemination products for an evidence report targeting decision makers in a health system.
Methods:
We selected a recent evidence report that presented information about a specific decision. We then prepared three dissemination products for the report: key points, newsletter item, and an evidence to decision (EtD) framework. We identified and sought feedback from those in a health system who make the specific decision.
Results:
We received responses from four of the five decision makers. The key points and newsletter item products were considered useful by one respondent. The other responses were not comprehensive but suggested that none of the products were helpful.
Conclusions:
Dissemination alone or “pushing” information not requested does not seem to be seen as informative or useful by decision makers. Identifying what information to provide when, especially when not requested by the health system decision makers, needs further consideration.
Contents
Suggested citation:
Robinson KA. Disseminating Findings from EPC Reports: Pilot Project of Three Products. Methods Research Report. (Prepared by the Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No.290-2015-00006-I) AHRQ Publication No. 18-EHC024-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; October 2018. Posted final reports are located on the Effective Health Care Program search page. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23970/AHRQEPCMETHENGAGEDISSEM.
This report is based on research conducted by the Johns Hopkins University EPC under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. 290-2015-00006-I). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its contents; the findings and conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. Therefore, no statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
None of the investigators have any affiliations or financial involvement that conflicts with the material presented in this report.
The information in this report is intended to help health care decisionmakers—patients and clinicians and health system leaders, among others—make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for the application of clinical judgment. Anyone who makes decisions concerning the provision of clinical care should consider this report in the same way as any medical reference and in conjunction with all other pertinent information (i.e., in the context of available resources and circumstances presented by individual patients).
This report is made available to the public under the terms of a licensing agreement between the author and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. This report may be used and reprinted without permission except those copyrighted materials that are clearly noted in the report. Further reproduction of those copyrighted materials is prohibited without the express permission of copyright holders.
AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of any derivative products that may be developed from this report, such as clinical practice guidelines, other quality-enhancement tools, or reimbursement or coverage policies may not be stated or implied.
This report may periodically be assessed for the currency of conclusions. If an assessment is done, the resulting surveillance report describing the methodology and findings will be found on the Effective Health Care Program Web site at: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov. Search on the title of the report.
Persons using assistive technology may not be able to fully access information in this report. For assistance contact vog.shh.qrha@eraChtlaeHevitceffE.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Review Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.[J Toxicol Environ Health B Cri...]Review Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.Jardine C, Hrudey S, Shortreed J, Craig L, Krewski D, Furgal C, McColl S. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec; 6(6):569-720.
- Do health-care decision makers find economic evaluations useful? The findings of focus group research in UK health authorities.[Value Health. 2002]Do health-care decision makers find economic evaluations useful? The findings of focus group research in UK health authorities.Hoffmann C, Stoykova BA, Nixon J, Glanville JM, Misso K, Drummond MF. Value Health. 2002 Mar-Apr; 5(2):71-8.
- Evidence-based priority-setting: what do the decision-makers think?[J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004]Evidence-based priority-setting: what do the decision-makers think?Mitton C, Patten S. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004 Jul; 9(3):146-52.
- Information service on new and emerging health technologies: identification and prioritization processes for a European union-wide newsletter.[Int J Technol Assess Health Ca...]Information service on new and emerging health technologies: identification and prioritization processes for a European union-wide newsletter.Wild C, Simpson S, Douw K, Geiger-Gritsch S, Mathis S, Langer T. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Dec; 25 Suppl 2:48-55.
- Review Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.[Health Technol Assess. 2010]Review Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.Chilcott J, Tappenden P, Rawdin A, Johnson M, Kaltenthaler E, Paisley S, Papaioannou D, Shippam A. Health Technol Assess. 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107.
- Disseminating Findings From EPC Reports: Pilot Project of Three ProductsDisseminating Findings From EPC Reports: Pilot Project of Three Products
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...