Continuing Education Activity

Deformities and angular variations of the lower extremities are one of the most common reasons for referral to pediatric orthopedics, with in-toeing seen mostly in infants and young children. Pigeon intoeing, also known as pigeon-toeing, is caused by a rotational variation anywhere in the lower extremity that causes the foot to point inward. This activity reviews pigeon intoeing and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in its management.

Objectives:

• Identify the etiology of pigeon intoeing.
• Describe the typical presentation of a patient with pigeon intoeing.
• Outline the treatment options available for pigeon intoeing.
• Review interprofessional team strategies for optimizing care coordination to advance the treatment of pigeon intoeing and improve outcomes.

Introduction

Deformities and angular variations of the lower extremities are one of the most common reasons for referral to pediatric orthopedics, with in-toeing seen mostly in infants and young children. Also known as “pigeon-toeing,” this is caused by a rotational variation anywhere in the lower extremity that causes the foot to point inward.[1][2][3][4]

In coming to understand variational pathologies of the lower limb, it is important to be familiar with the normal growth and development of children’s lower extremities. Neonates are born with about 40 degrees of femoral anteversion or forward rotation of the femoral neck. This increased internal rotation of the hip decreases over time. By about 10 years old, the degree of anteversion decreases by about half. Any deviation from the expected course of limb development and rotation should be recognized and differentiated from the persistence of early angulation, to pathologies preventing normal rotation.

Etiology

The 3 major causes of pediatric in-toeing are metatarsus adductus, internal tibial torsion, and femoral anteversion. Each has unique typical findings and age of presentation. Other causes to keep in mind as differentials will be discussed below.[5][6]

Epidemiology

The most common condition in children younger than one year of age is metatarsus adductus. It is seen between 0.1% to 1% of births, and more frequent in girls compared to boys.

Between the ages of 1 and 4 years, the most common condition causing in-toeing is internal tibial torsion. There is no gender predilection or attributable cause.

Increased femoral anteversion is the third common cause of in-toeing in children. This can present during infancy but typically is notably after the age of 3, with an average age of diagnosis between 3 and 6 years of age. This condition is twice as common in females.

Pathophysiology

Metatarsus adductus is attributed to intrauterine positioning, and defined as angulation of the metatarsals toward the midline, giving the appearance of a "C" shaped foot.

The tibia is normally internally rotated at birth, but there are wide variations in the amount of angulation.

Femoral anteversion is also brought about by increased intrauterine pressures, causing undue pressure in areas of growth. In these cases, the neck of the femur is rotated inwards, which rotates the greater trochanter posteriorly. The resulting in-toeing becomes more evident with age, as there is a physiologic external rotation of the hip during toddler development.[7][8]

History and Physical

Physical examination should include inspecting the entire lower extremity, with particular attention to the hip/femur, the knee/tibia, and the feet. The patient's gait should be assessed while walking and while running, as age and developmentally appropriate.

Metatarsus adductus is the adduction of the forefoot, with varying degrees of flexibility. Classifications of metatarsus adductus are based on the degree of foot flexibility. Based on this they are classified as flexible, semi-flexible and rigid[9]. It is important to differentiate between metatarsus adductus and Talipes Equino varus. Metatarsus adductus is purely a forefoot deformity and the foot is not in equinus. If the forefoot can be passively overcorrected to reach abduction then it is classified as a flexible deformity. If the forefoot can just be brought to neutral then it is classified as a semiflexible deformity. If the forefoot cannot be brought to neutral then it is termed as rigid. 

In patients with tibial torsion, the tibia is found to be internally rotated (medial rotation of the shin). Internal tibial torsion is most frequently bilateral, and may at times present with metatarsus adductus, femoral anteversion, or physiologic bow legging. Pertinent clinical findings on examination include a forward or outward-facing patella, or in a seated position, there may be a posterior rotation of the medial malleolus (in comparison to the lateral malleolus). The last notable clinical finding on examination is the thigh-foot angle (TFA). With the patient in a prone position and the knees flexed, the TFA can be assessed by the degree of angulation of the foot towards or away from the midline. Expected variation is an angle between 10 to 15 degrees. Another method to evaluate tibial torsion is to quantify the difference between the knee axis and the transmalleolar axis. The child is made to lie supine and the hip and knees are flexed by 90 degrees. When the femur is perpendicular to the couch the knee axis is parallel to the couch. Evaluating the transmalleolar axis to the knee axis can be performed with a gravity goniometer [10]

On the physical examination of femoral anteversion, the patella is midline when walking or standing but point inward when running. The characteristic appearance during running is described as a “windmill” or “egg-beater” pattern, in which the patient’s lower leg pushes off and swings laterally when coming off the ground. While seated, the patient tends to prefer sitting in the “W” position, appearing to mount the floor with knees forward, and feet facing posteriorly. The discomfort and distaste these patients have for lateral rotation improve with time, evident by them showing improved comfort in being able to sit cross-legged.

Evaluation

Diagnosis is made clinically with no need for imaging. The only indication for radiography would be for potential surgery with severe cases of metatarsus adductus. Outside of this, the utility in radiologic studies would be in excluding pathologic conditions.

Treatment / Management

A majority of cases are managed primarily by observation with emphasis placed on parental reassurance. Guidance can be provided to parents in improving sleeping postures for children. Some children lie prone with the hips and knees fully flexed and the foot rotated internally under the hips. This may exacerbate the deformity. Parents can be counselled to encourage better sleeping positions that do not exacerbate the deformity[11]. Metatarsus adductus is expected to resolve by 2 years of age, and any persistence is not associated to have any symptomatology. Rigid and severe metatarsus adductus with no flexibility should be referred for possible serial casting.[12]

Those with tibial torsion should be reassured that it is normal for developing children to have increased internal angles as they grow in age. Physiologic progression slowly returns somewhat towards the midline after the second decade. Again, parental reassurance is emphasized, as the patient is observed for spontaneous resolution by 5 years of age. Like metatarsus adductus, it is uncommon to have chronic issues with any persistence of internal tibial torsion. Rare cases that cause cosmetic or functional deformities may be considered for surgical correction by a distal tibial derotational osteotomy.

Akin to the other common physiologic conditions mentioned above, the natural course for femoral anteversion is also spontaneous resolution over time. Femoral anteversion has the longest course, resolving around 11 years of age. Persistence may also be seen in a small number of patients, with the rare likelihood of developing symptoms or complications. The mainstays of management are observation and to reassure parents of the natural course of decreasing anteversion. There are no recommended non-operative treatments, and the only notably effective surgical management is femoral derotational osteotomy. Becuase of the high likelihood of complications from surgery, it is only considered for those older than 11 years old, with severe functional sequelae or cosmetic deformities.

Differential Diagnosis

The bulk of causes of in-toeing are most often secondary to physiologic conditions that resolve over time. It is important to elicit pathologies in the history and physical examination to rule out the less common conditions that may present similarly. As mentioned above, developmental dysplasia of the hip can be associated with metatarsus adductus but can present as an isolated finding as well. Careful follow-up and timely imaging can differentiate between the physiologic laxity of the hip and normal hip development, versus hip dysplasia. Deformities of the lower leg can be distinguished from the common physiologic causes through a detailed physical examination. Clubfoot is a foot deformity that is associated with multiple foot findings, including plantarflexion (cavus), adductus, varus, and equinus, made memorable by using the mnemonic CAVE. Secondary causes due to underlying conditions can include cerebral palsy or other neuromuscular diseases. These conditions should be considered when the physical exam is notable for other findings outside of the lower extremities.

Prognosis

The overall prognosis of the three pathologies is good, with their respective time frames for resolution.

Complications

Direct complications are uncommon, but the interplay between possible associations between the conditions should be considered. Metatarsus adductus is attributed to intrauterine positioning, and the clinician should be aware that other comorbidities associated with intrauterine positioning include torticollis and developmental dysplasia of the hip, which is commonly bilateral.

Consultations

Although one study found that 86% of children referred to orthopedic surgery by their primary physician were discharged after the initial visit, a referral may be indicated for particular circumstances, such as limitation in activity, cosmetic concerns, or courses of in-toeing that do not progress as expected.

Deterrence and Patient Education

The mainstay of management is regular follow-up with the primary care physician for observation and family reassurance. Family members may be familiar with previous modalities used for in-toeing, ranging from bracing, orthotics, shoe modifications, and splinting at night. Families should be reassured of the natural course of lower limb development with the above interventions not recommended for these conditions.

Pearls and Other Issues

In assessing patients with in-toeing, it is important to remember the age of the patient and the natural course of the lower leg development. The physiologic conditions causing in-toeing will have a spontaneous resolution, requiring good follow up, and parental reassurance. Rare causes will persist past the age of normal correction, but patients do not typically develop sequelae or symptoms. Detailed examination of the feet, ankles, knees, and hips will allow the examiner to differentiate between in-toeing of the possible areas that may be affected.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Disorders of the lower leg are not uncommon in children. Pigeon intoeing is commonly seen in clinical practice and is best managed by an interprofessional team that include orthopedic nurses. Pigeon intoeing may appear unsightly but clinicians should be aware that most cases resolve as the child gets older. A majority of cases are managed primarily by observation with emphasis placed on parental reassurance. Metatarsus adductus is expected to resolve by 2 years of age, and any persistence is not associated to have any symptomatology. Rigid and severe metatarsus adductus with no flexibility should be referred for possible serial casting. Premature surgery can cause more harm than good.

Review Questions

• Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.
• Click here for a simplified version.
• Comment on this article.

References

1.

Gonzales AS, Saber AY, Ampat G, Mendez MD. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Jul 22, 2023. Intoeing. [PubMed: 29763169]

2.

Boyer ER, Patterson A. Gait pathology subtypes are not associated with self-reported fall frequency in children with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2018 Jun;63:189-194. [PubMed: 29763815]

3.

Dobbe AM, Gibbons PJ. Common paediatric conditions of the lower limb. J Paediatr Child Health. 2017 Nov;53(11):1077-1085. [PubMed: 29148202]

4.

Evans AM. Mitigating clinician and community concerns about children's flatfeet, intoeing gait, knock knees or bow legs. J Paediatr Child Health. 2017 Nov;53(11):1050-1053. [PubMed: 29148191]

5.

Rerucha CM, Dickison C, Baird DC. Lower Extremity Abnormalities in Children. Am Fam Physician. 2017 Aug 15;96(4):226-233. [PubMed: 28925669]

6.

Faulks S, Brown K, Birch JG. Spectrum of Diagnosis and Disposition of Patients Referred to a Pediatric Orthopaedic Center for a Diagnosis of Intoeing. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017 Oct/Nov;37(7):e432-e435. [PubMed: 28471818]

7.

Heflin JA, Ford S, Stevens P. Guided growth for tibia vara (Blount's disease). Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(41):e4951. [PMC free article: PMC5072935] [PubMed: 27741108]

8.

Williams CM, James AM, Tran T. Metatarsus adductus: development of a non-surgical treatment pathway. J Paediatr Child Health. 2013 Sep;49(9):E428-33. [PubMed: 23647850]

9.

Harris E. The intoeing child: etiology, prognosis, and current treatment options. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013 Oct;30(4):531-65. [PubMed: 24075135]

10.

Eamsobhana P, Rojjananukulpong K, Ariyawatkul T, Chotigavanichaya C, Kaewpornsawan K. Does the parental stretching programs improve metatarsus adductus in newborns? J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 Jan;25(1):2309499017690320. [PubMed: 28215117]

11.

Ryan DJ. Intoeing: a developmental norm. Orthop Nurs. 2001 Mar-Apr;20(2):13-8. [PubMed: 12024629]

Disclosure: Anter Gonzales declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Ahmed Saber declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: George Ampat declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Magda Mendez declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.