NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
On May 28-29, 2008, AHRQ hosted a working meeting to discuss particularly challenging methodological issues in assessing medical tests. This working meeting included a group of investigators from the Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPCs), other experts in government, industry, and academia and also marked the launch of a Medical Test Evaluation Work Group within the EPC program. This Work Group was charged with developing guidance for conducting comparative effectiveness reviews of medical test technologies for the AHRQ Effective Health Care Program. A series of scientific publications (white papers) were commissioned for the meeting. These white papers have been published in Medical Decision Making and were intended to serve as background papers for the Work Group, which is expected to complete their draft guidance in the first part of 2010.
Contents
- Decision-Analytic Modeling to Evaluate Benefits and Harms of Medical Tests—Uses and LimitationsThomas A Trikalinos, MD, Uwe Siebert, MD, MPH, MSc, ScD, and Joseph Lau, MD.Published: November 9, 2009.
- Using the Principles of Randomized Controlled Trial Design To Guide Test EvaluationSarah J Lord, MBBS, MS, Les Irwig, MBBCh, PhD, and Patrick MM Bossuyt, PhD.Published: November 9, 2009.
- Proposals for a Phased Evaluation of Medical TestsJeroen G Lijmer, MD, PhD, Mariska Leeflang, PhD, and Patrick MM Bossuyt, PhD.Published: November 9, 2009.
- Additional Patient Outcomes and Pathways in Evaluations of TestingPatrick MM Bossuyt, PhD and Kirsten McCaffery, PhD.Published: November 9, 2009.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Review Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews[ 2012]Review Methods Guide for Medical Test ReviewsChang SM, Matchar DB, Smetana GW, Umscheid CA. 2012 Jun
- Review Prioritization Criteria Methodology for Future Research Needs Proposals Within the Effective Health Care Program: PiCMe-Prioritization Criteria Methods[ 2013]Review Prioritization Criteria Methodology for Future Research Needs Proposals Within the Effective Health Care Program: PiCMe-Prioritization Criteria MethodsAndrews J. 2013 Jan
- How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?[Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008]How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?Allen D, Rixson L. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110.
- Review Decision and Simulation Modeling in Systematic Reviews[ 2013]Review Decision and Simulation Modeling in Systematic ReviewsKuntz K, Sainfort F, Butler M, Taylor B, Kulasingam S, Gregory S, Mann E, Anderson JM, Kane RL. 2013 Feb
- Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.[Eur J Health Econ. 2008]Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J. Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1:5-29.
- Medical Tests-White Paper SeriesMedical Tests-White Paper Series
- Cataract, ataxia, short stature, and intellectual disabilityCataract, ataxia, short stature, and intellectual disabilityMedGen
- Neurodegeneration with ataxia, dystonia, and gaze palsy, childhood-onsetNeurodegeneration with ataxia, dystonia, and gaze palsy, childhood-onsetMedGen
- Nystagmus, hereditary verticalNystagmus, hereditary verticalMedGen
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...