U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.

Cover of StatPearls

StatPearls [Internet].

Show details

Chromoblastomycosis

; ; ; .

Author Information and Affiliations

Last Update: March 1, 2024.

Continuing Education Activity

Chromoblastomycosis is a chronic granulomatous infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue caused by dematiaceous fungi endemic to tropical and subtropical areas. These melanized fungi invade cutaneous tissue through an inoculation site (usually by traumatic skin penetration when exposed to infected soil), resulting in slow-growing warty plaques and cauliflower-like lesions that may ulcerate. The diagnosis of chromoblastomycosis is usually made by the histopathologic identification of clusters of thick-walled cells in cutaneous tissue (called medlar bodies, muriform bodies, or sclerotic bodies).

A neglected tropical disease, chromoblastomycosis can have serious complications (eg, disabling cutaneous fibrosis, secondary infection) that may be irreversible. Recognizing and diagnosing chromoblastomycosis can be challenging, and many infectious and noninfectious etiologies must be excluded. Because chromoblastomycosis is a chronic, indolent condition, treatment is challenging and can include surgical excision for mild cases to long-term oral antifungal medications for moderate-to-severe cases. However, the treatment course is long and may be refractory to treatment, requiring other therapies. Even after treatment is initiated, long-term monitoring is essential to ensure the best patient outcomes and prevent recurrence. This activity describes the epidemiology, microbiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of chromoblastomycosis, providing healthcare professionals with the knowledge and tools to improve patient care for this complex condition.

Objectives:

  • Identify the clinical features of chromoblastomycosis, recognizing its varied presentations from pink macules to warty plaques and nodules.
  • Differentiate the myriad microbiological characteristics of different fungal strains, understanding their implications for disease severity and treatment.
  • Identify key clinical findings, assess laboratory findings, and review objective information to diagnose chromoblastomycosis.
  • Collaborate with the interprofessional team to educate, treat, and monitor patients with chromoblastomycosis to improve patient outcomes and prevent complications.
Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.

Introduction

Chromoblastomycosis is a chronic granulomatous infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue caused by several different dematiaceous fungi (ie, fungi containing pigment in the cell wall, whether melanin or melanin-like).[1][2] The indolent infection begins with the cutaneous inoculation of fungi, usually through some portion of the fungal cell capable of reproduction or propagation (eg, conidia, mycelia), into exposed skin, typically due to trauma.[3][4] The infection has wide morphologic variability but typically begins as a pink-to-red macule or papule and evolves in later stages to a verrucous, hyperkeratotic plaque, tumor, or nodule; ultimately, the slow-growing, warty (eg, cauliflower-like) lesions may ulcerate.[2][5] 

The disease is most common in tropical and subtropical areas, where it is endemic and a neglected tropical disease; as such, it should be most strongly considered in patients who have recently traveled to or originated from these areas.[6] Diagnosis of chromoblastomycosis requires the identification of multicellular clusters of pigmented fungal cells, which produce a characteristic finding called sclerotic bodies (ie, muriform bodies, copper pennies, medlar bodies) on a potassium hydroxide stain or with histopathologic analysis of a skin biopsy.[4] Although other differential diagnoses may include infectious and noninfectious verrucous lesions, the treatment of chromoblastomycosis includes surgical removal for mild disease and antifungal therapy for moderate-to-severe disease.[7] If left untreated, chromoblastomycosis complications can include debilitating tissue fibrosis, squamous cell carcinoma in the site of prior infection, lymphedema, or secondary bacterial infection.[8][9]

Etiology

Many melanized fungi can cause chromoblastomycosis, but the main causes are usually from 2 genera: Fonsecaea spp (especially F pedrosoi) and Cladophialophora spp (especially C carrionii).[10][11] Demiataceous fungi (ie, phaeoid, black fungi, pigmented) pathogenic to humans include those nonopportunistic organisms that cause chromoblastomycosis and the opportunistic pathogens that cause pheohyphomycosis, the latter of which is more likely associated with internal organ involvement.[12] Important species for chromoblastomycosis include:

  • Fonsecaea spp: F pedrosoi, F monophora, F nubica, F pugnacious, F brasiliensis, F erecta)
  • Cladophialophora spp: C carrioniiC yegresii
  • Exophiala spp: E dermatitidis (formerly Wangiella dermatitidis), E spiniferaE jeanselmeiE alcalophila
  • Phialophora spp: P verrucosaP americana, P chinensis, P macrospora
  • Rhinocladiella spp:  similis, R mackenziei, R aquaspersa  [10] [13] [14] [15] [16]

These etiologic organisms exist in cutaneous tissue in various yeast-like forms and reproduce through asexual reproduction, though at least one species has been shown to reproduce through a cleistothecium-like structure.[13][17] The saprophytic fungi have been isolated from wood, soil, and other plant material in many rural communities, thus implicating their method of entry into the host through trauma and after exposure to plant material.[7][18][7]

Epidemiology

Chromoblastomycosis is a disease in the humid, semiarid climates of the tropical and subtropical world.[19] In 1 review of over 2081 patients from South America and the Caribbean, 80.3% were male, and the mean age was 56.1 years.[20] Disease duration was 10.8 years, with lesions mostly on the lower limbs (60%), and the most common presenting symptoms were itching and pain; the most common forms of the lesion at presentation were verrucous (46.4%) or tumorous (21.7%).[20] The most frequent comorbidity in patients with chromoblastomycosis was postkidney transplantation, though leprosy was a common concomitant infection.[20] Chromoblastomycosis leads to significant disability in agricultural workers in rural areas, particularly as the disease is spread via direct inoculation into the skin from soil or other plant material. However, adult male agricultural workers are most likely to be diagnosed with chromoblastomycosis; the condition has also been reported in children.[20][21]

The incidence of chromoblastomycosis is difficult to determine since few studies describe its distribution; however, it is a neglected tropical disease more likely to be found in tropical climates and less likely in areas like the United States.[22] Even in India, chromoblastomycosis represents one of the rare fungal infections seen in 1 study in the population.[22] Although underestimated because it is not classified as a notifiable disease to public authorities in many nations, it is reported to be most common in 3 different continents (South America, Africa, and Asia), with higher reported rates in Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Venezuela, French Guyana, Comoros, Madagascar, and Gabon, among others.[23]

Pathophysiology

Chromoblastomycosis follows a similar pattern explaining its pathophysiology; namely, after traumatic inoculation from the environment leading to a chronic cutaneous granulomatous and fibrotic reaction, multiple microabscesses with tissue proliferation develop, leading to a T-helper cell type 2 (Th2) immune reaction and the embedding of sclerotic bodies in infected tissue and a polymorphous clinical appearance.[24] After cutaneous inoculation, purportedly following trauma, a dematiaceous fungal species enters the skin and rarely disseminates further.[4] 

Several days after traumatic implantation, the pigmented fungi differentiate into muriform cells (ie, sclerotic bodies) within phagocytic cells, which explain the fungal globe-shaped, multiseptate morphology.[25][26] The sclerotic bodies—brown septate cells that resemble copper pennies—are extruded transepidermally, ultimately appearing as black dots clinically, a characteristic clinicopathologic correlate on physical examination.[27] During phagocytosis, toll-like receptor dysfunction has been implicated in the host cell's ability to mount an appropriate eradication response, resulting in a granulomatous reaction.[28] 

Few virulence factors are known in the pathogenesis of chromoblastomycosis, but many elements of organisms that cause chromoblastomycosis have been implicated. 

  • Melanin: The presence of melanin has been implicated as a protective mechanism in chromoblastomycosis. Melanin is thought to have unpaired electrons to protect fungal elements from reactive oxygen species produced by macrophages and neutrophils.[29][30]
  • Cell adhesion, invasion, and survival antigens: Some species that cause chromoblastomycosis have been found to contain specific elements to aid in cell adhesion.[31] One study showed that peptide-breaking enzymes of Fonsecaea spp aid in disseminating and invading fungal elements throughout the cutaneous tissue.[32] Other species have been shown to have active phospholipase, allowing easy invasion by lipolysis of the cell membrane and the conversion of arachidonate to prostaglandins (eg, prostaglandin E2), which helps downregulate macrophages, allowing microbial survival.[33][34]
  • Muriform cell architecture: Muriform cells have thicker polyhedral cell walls than the thinner ones of hyphae, which may improve the organism's ability to diminish host response, resulting in fibrous tissue formation; this may be implicated in the chronicity of infection since the fungi can be dormant and proliferate with immune evasion.[35][36]

The immune response also plays an important role in propagating chromoblastomycosis infection. Complement proteins involved in opsonization can be activated by some Fonsacaea spp, resulting in chemoattract proteins (eg, C5a) increasing the local inflammatory response.[37] For unclear reasons, neutrophils have specificity in their toll-like receptor types to eliminate conidia or hyphae forms of fungi, suggesting specificity among fungal elements and the immune system for fungal elimination.[38] However, both neutrophils and macrophages have limited ability to kill intracellular fungi, even with an oxidative response, likely related to melanin produced by the fungi.[39][30] 

Organisms causing chromoblastomycosis have been shown to have resistance to microbicidal molecules, impacting the effects of major histocompatibility complex class II, CD80, interleukin-12, and T-helper cell type 1 (Th1) responses.[40][41] Other studies have shown the effect of chromoblastomycosis organisms on interleukin-17, interleukin-10, and Langerhans cells, promoting chronic infection.[42][43][44] Meanwhile, the humoral immune response is poorly understood, and immunoglobulins are not yet known to be involved to a great extent. However, some immunodeficiency syndromes (eg, CARD9 mutations) and genetic associations (eg, HLA-A29 or HLA-B*4802 deletion) have been associated with developing chromoblastomycosis.[45][46][45][47]

Histopathology

Once a skin biopsy is performed for both histopathologic analysis and culture, a microscopic examination will reveal the findings below.[24]

  • Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia of the epidermis
  • Irregular acanthosis and hyperkeratosis alternating with atrophy
  • Neutrophilic microabscesses with muriform cells (ie, polyhedral, chestnut-like cells measuring 5-12 μm with longitudinal septa resembling a brick wall)
  • Dermal granulomas with epithelioid cells
  • Increased number of dermal capillaries
  • Variable dermal fibrosis associated with mononuclear cells (eg, histiocytes, plasma cells, lymphocytes)

However, the most pertinent finding is the presence of sclerotic bodies (ie, medlar bodies, muriform cells, copper pennies) in the dermis (see Image. Chromomycosis of skin).[48][49] The tissue between the bodies may show variable levels of fibrosis, depending on the extent and duration of the disease. When ulceration has occurred, there may be a secondary bacterial infection.[27]

History and Physical

Following trauma to the skin, usually in an outdoor environment with exposure to soil or plant material, fungi proliferate in the cutaneous tissue.[50] The evolution of chromoblastomycosis usually starts with a small, pink-to-red macule or papule and can progress to myriad variable morphologic varieties, which depend on the virulence, location, and advancement of the disease; some common morphologies are listed below.[5]

  • Verrucous papule
  • Nodules
  • Scaly plaque
  • Exophytic or ulcerative tumor (ie, cauliflower-like mass)
  • Cicatricial plaques

Typically, most lesions are on the lower extremities (see Image. Chromoblastomycosis), and nearly all patients with the disease have had exposure to hot, tropical environments, with the disease progressing in an indolent course, even lasting many weeks prior to presentation.[5] For this reason, after appreciation of the physical findings, the skin examination should focus on the extent of the disease, the presence of satellite lesions, or the involvement of deeper organs, which is rare and may instead represent a diagnosis of pheohyphomycosis.[51][52] Lymphatic spread should be evaluated near the existing lesion or lesions.[53]

Once the physical examination shows characteristic findings that could indicate chromoblastomycosis, history-taking should emphasize questions intended to rule out other differential diagnoses. Pruritus is a dominant complaint among patients with chromoblastomycosis, with pain at a later time; however, these findings may present late in the clinical course of the disease, particularly in trauma-prone locations.[54] Patients should be asked about:

  • Recent travel to endemic tropical or subtropical areas
  • History of prior surgeries or skin changes in the location (eg, squamous cell carcinoma, keloid)
  • Exposure of skin to trauma or injury previously (eg, gardening)
  • Outdoor recreation (eg, hiking, camping)
  • Occupation (eg, farmer, agricultural worker, outdoor occupations)
  • Exposure of skin to the environment (eg, walking barefoot, exposure to volcanic soil)
  • History of malignancy (eg, mycosis fungoides)
  • History of other infections (eg, bacterial, fungal, protozoan, viral)
  • History of inflammatory diseases that can present with disfiguring skin lesions (eg, lupus, sarcoidosis)
  • Family history of fungal infections
  • Other issues relevant to the history or course of chromoblastomycosis [55][56][57] 

The absence of these historical findings should not exclude chromoblastomycosis since patients may not remember the lesions.

Evaluation

The diagnosis of chromoblastomycosis should be suspected in patients who have indolent courses of verrucous papules, nodules, or plaques who are from or have recently traveled to endemic tropical or subtropical areas; however, it has also been found in nonendemic areas.[50][58][50] Dermoscopy may be used to identify black dots on the lesion, resembling "cayenne pepper" spots, which are associated with the transdermal extrusion of sclerotic bodies.[59] Scraping the lesion and applying a potassium hydroxide stain on the glass slide for viewing under a microscope can reveal the presence of copper pennies, the clusters of fungal cells.[2].

However, performing a skin biopsy is most prudent to observe the granulomatous reaction with medlar bodies, the thick-walled pigmented copper bodies in the dermis; either 1 biopsy should be divided for histopathology and culture each, or 2 punch biopsies should be performed.[60] A calcifluor white stain may be used if the fungal elements are challenging to identify since the fluorescent stain binds fungal cell walls when exposed to ultraviolet light.[24][61][62][24] Fungal cultures may be used to identify the genus, in which case an antibiotic may be needed to inhibit bacterial growth, but further molecular testing is needed to identify the species causing chromoblastomycosis.[63] Serologic by immunosorbent assay (eg, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) is not commercially available but has been used in research studies.[64][65][66]

Treatment / Management

Chromoblastomycosis treatment depends on the severity and extent of the disease, including the size of lesions, number of lesions, presence of complications, and prior response to treatment.[26] There are few randomized clinical trials to evaluate treatment success. Generally, mild disease is more amenable to surgical excision, whereas moderate-to-severe disease is best addressed with antifungal therapy.[67][58] Disease severity is classified as follows:

  • Mild: Scales or nodules up to 5 cm in diameter
  • Moderate: Single or multiple lesions in verrucous, tumoral, or plaque forms on 1 or 2 adjacent body areas up to 15 cm in diameter
  • Severe: Single or multiple lesions in extensive areas beyond moderate [26]

Mild Disease

Mild disease is most appropriately treated with procedural intervention, usually surgical excision with 5-mm margins of healthy tissue, to prevent fungal spread through lymphatic channels.[26] Mohs micrographic surgery or skin grafting can be considered on a case-by-case basis.[68] Other procedural interventions, which may be used with or without oral medications, have included:

  • Photodynamic therapy
  • Long-pulsed 1064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser
  • Carbon dioxide fractional laser
  • Heat therapy (beyond 46 °C for fungicidal activity)

Moderate-to-Severe Disease

For moderate-to-severe disease, antifungal drugs should be initiated. The primary recommended treatments are terbinafine and itraconazole, administered on dual oral therapy at 200 to 400 mg/kg/day and 250 to 500 mg/kg/day, respectively.[26]

  • Itraconazole: An azole drug that inhibits fungal 14-α demethylase, treatment with 100 to 200 mg has been used as monotherapy for 12 to 24 months with varying success.[74] Another study showed that 200 to 400 mg of itraconazole needed to be used for up to 30.5 months for the clinical cure of F pedrosoi.[75] However, monotherapy is sometimes avoided for improved efficacy, and instead, terbinafine or 5-fluorocytosine (50-150 mg/kg/day) has been used in conjunction with itraconazole at 100 to 400 mg/kg/day for chromoblastomycosis.[76][77] Pulsed itraconazole at 200 mg daily for 7 days monthly has also been used successfully in patients with chromoblastomycosis.[78]
  • Amphotericin B: Amphotericin B was shown to be effective when administered locally in chromoblastomycosis lesions; however, the dose may be too high and cause significant adverse effects, including pain, hemolysis, fibrosis, and gangrene.[79][80]
  • Terbinafine: Terbinafine is an allylamine that inhibits squalene epoxidase; it was previously used at 500 mg/kg/day for 6 to 12 months for monotherapy of chromoblastomycosis.[81] Terbinafine is not successful as monotherapy in other studies, but dual therapy with terbinafine and an azole antifungal (eg, itraconazole, voriconazole) is thought to be synergistic.[82][83][84]
  • Posaconazole and voriconazole: Both posaconazole and voriconazole have been used for chromoblastomycosis at 800 mg (as 2 or 4 doses) or 400 mg (as 2 doses), respectively, but these are usually limited to refractory cases or cases in which cost or other medications are an issue.[85][86]
  • Imiquimod: Imiquimod is a toll-like receptor 7 agonist found to significantly improve the lesions of chromoblastomycosis when used with itraconazole with or without terbinafine.[87][88]
  • Glucan: Glucan is a pathogen-associated molecular pattern that was found to improve the treatment of chromoblastomycosis when used at 5 mg/week with itraconazole at 400 mg/day.[89][90]
  • Retinoids: Synthetic retinoids like acitretin have been used in combination with other medications (eg, imiquimod, itraconazole) for chromoblastomycosis.[91]
  • Melanin Inhibitors: Molecules like tricyclazole, which inhibits melanin, have been thought to help with fungicidal activity in chromoblastomycosis.[92] The use of melanin inhibitors in conjunction with antifungal therapy might be useful to reduce fungal defenses for better antifungal penetration.[93]

Other medications of interest for fungicidal properties include HIV peptidase inhibitors and ajoene (garlic extract that inhibits phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis).[94] The presence of adverse effects (eg, hepatotoxicity in terbinafine) may change drug choice, and complications of the disease (eg, fibrosis) can affect the availability of the medication in cutaneous tissue. For example, although liver function monitoring may be required for terbinafine, it has fewer drug-drug interactions compared with itraconazole, which may warrant its selection.

Because fungi can spread to adjacent healthy skin, monitoring after complete clinical resolution for several months without symptoms is necessary and can include regular skin biopsies with culture and fungal assessments. Regular follow-up should be performed to ensure complete treatment, barring expected atrophic scarring.

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of chromoblastomycosis should include infectious and noninfectious causes that can appear clinically similar. Infectious causes that appear similar and should be considered include:

  • Fungal: Lobomycosis, Pheohyphomycosis, Eumycetoma, Blastomycosis, Coccidioidomycosis, Sporotrichosis, Majocchi granuloma, Paracoccidiomycosis)
  • Bacterial: Tuberculosis, Actinomycetoma, Botryomycosis, Syphilis, Yaws, Nontuberculous mycobacterial infection
  • Viral: Verruca vulgaris, Papilloma
  • Protozoan: Leishmaniasis, Rhinosporidiosis
  • Helminth: Filariasis
  • Alga: Protothecosis [26]

Noninfectious causes should also be considered due to similar clinical appearance or due to complications of chromoblastomycosis, including:

  • Melanoma
  • Squamous cell carcinoma (eg, keratoacanthoma)
  • Keloid
  • Sarcoidosis
  • Podoconiosis
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus [26]

Prognosis

Although treatable, there are many cases refractory to treatment; therefore, early intervention with regular follow-up is essential to reduce morbidity and mortality. Because there is rare internal organ involvement and the disease remains mostly cutaneous, there is less likely to be mortality due to the disease, except in certain cases, such as those with disseminated disease.[26] Without treatment, complications are likely to occur, and with treatment, monitoring must be performed to observe patients for adverse effects of treatment (eg, hepatotoxicity).

Complications

The most common complications of chromoblastomycosis include scarring (especially atrophic scarring), disabling tissue fibrosis (which could lead to ectropion or joint immobility), ulceration, secondary bacterial infection, lymphatic spread in a sporotrichoid pattern, and lymphedema resulting in elephantiasis.[9][26] There have been rare, documented cases of malignant transformation of chromoblastomycosis to squamous cell carcinoma and other rare cases of disseminated diseases, though this is unlikely as compared with other dematiaceous fungi.[95][96][97]

Deterrence and Patient Education

Patients should receive significant education on the prevention of chromoblastomycosis. Avoidance of cutaneous trauma in endemic areas is essential, and wearing protective equipment is important if individuals work outdoors or are engaged in outdoor recreation.[26] However, many patients susceptible to chromoblastomycosis live in low-resource settings with high temperatures, so reasonable planning should be discussed with patients who are manageable. Vaccination studies are limited, and no commercial vaccine exists for chromoblastomycosis.[26] During treatment, patients should be educated on the expected treatment course ( which may be lengthy with multiple treatments) to ensure patient compliance with treatment. Discussion on the myriad adverse effects of treatment medications should be discussed thoroughly, and any drug-drug interactions should be discussed.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Chromoblastomycosis is a rare fungal infection and is best managed by an interprofessional team that includes an infectious disease consultant, surgeon, emergency department physician, wound care nurse, dermatologist, and an internist. Chromoblastomycosis is a chronic granulomatous infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue caused by several different dematiaceous fungi (brown pigment-producing), resulting in the formation of slow-growing, warty plaques, cauliflower-like lesions that may ulcerate.[98][99][100]

The prognosis depends on lesion size and extent. The clinician can excise single small lesions followed by antifungal therapy. Oral antifungal agents alone are an alternative approach if surgery is not feasible or if the disease is advanced.[27][101]

Review Questions

Image

Figure

Chromoblastomycosis DermNet New Zealand

Image

Figure

Chromomycosis of skin Image courtesy S Bhimji MD

References

1.
Hartsough EM, Foreman RK, Martinez-Lage M, Branda J, Sohani AR, Zukerberg L. Dematiaceous fungal infections: clinical and pathologic conundrums. J Clin Pathol. 2024 Apr 18;77(5):352-357. [PubMed: 38272660]
2.
Shenoy MM, Girisha BS, Krishna S. Chromoblastomycosis: A Case Series and Literature Review. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2023 Sep-Oct;14(5):665-669. [PMC free article: PMC10506812] [PubMed: 37727562]
3.
Borman AM, Fraser M, Patterson Z, Linton CJ, Palmer M, Johnson EM. Fungal Infections of Implantation: More Than Five Years of Cases of Subcutaneous Fungal Infections Seen at the UK Mycology Reference Laboratory. J Fungi (Basel). 2022 Mar 25;8(4) [PMC free article: PMC9028115] [PubMed: 35448574]
4.
Khan S, Khan M, Khan F, Ahmad Z, Zia-Ur-Rehman A. A Rare Case of Chromoblastomycosis in a 12-year-old boy. J Pak Med Assoc. 2019 Sep;69(9):1390-1393. [PubMed: 31511733]
5.
Mugleston BJ, Usatine RP, Rosen T. Wide Morphologic Variability of Chromoblastomycosis in the Western Hemisphere. Skinmed. 2016;14(6):423-427. [PubMed: 28031127]
6.
Enbiale W, Bekele A, Manaye N, Seife F, Kebede Z, Gebremeskel F, van Griensven J. Subcutaneous mycoses: Endemic but neglected among the Neglected Tropical Diseases in Ethiopia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Sep;17(9):e0011363. [PMC free article: PMC10561858] [PubMed: 37756346]
7.
Garzon LM, Rueda LJ, Celis AM, Cardenas M, Guevara-Suarez M. Exophiala psychrophila: A new agent of chromoblastomycosis. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2019 Mar;23:31-33. [PMC free article: PMC6263014] [PubMed: 30533349]
8.
Torres E, Beristain JG, Lievanos Z, Arenas R. Chromoblastomycosis associated with a lethal squamous cell carcinoma. An Bras Dermatol. 2010 Mar-Apr;85(2):267-70. [PubMed: 20520950]
9.
Rios JE, Paiva CB, Paula GM, Figueiredo WR, Arantes JC, Almeida FM, Limongi RM. Chromomycosis, an unusual cause of cicatricial ectropion: a case report. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2017 Jan-Feb;80(1):46-48. [PubMed: 28380102]
10.
Potenciano da Silva KL, Moraes D, Lechner B, Lindner H, Haas H, Almeida Soares CM, Silva-Bailão MG, Bailão AM. Fonsecaea pedrosoi produces ferricrocin and can utilize different host iron sources. Fungal Biol. 2023 Dec;127(12):1512-1523. [PubMed: 38097325]
11.
Abadías-Granado I, Gómez-Mateo MC, Stchigel AM, López C. Chromoblastomycosis due to Cladophialophora immunda: An emerging pathogen in immunocompromised patients? Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2023 Jan;41(1):51-53. [PubMed: 36443189]
12.
Abliz P, Fukushima K, Takizawa K, Nishimura K. Identification of pathogenic dematiaceous fungi and related taxa based on large subunit ribosomal DNA D1/D2 domain sequence analysis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2004 Jan 15;40(1):41-9. [PubMed: 14734185]
13.
Voidaleski MF, Gomes RR, Azevedo CMPES, Lima BJFS, Costa FF, Bombassaro A, Fornari G, Cristina Lopes da Silva I, Andrade LV, Lustosa BPR, Najafzadeh MJ, de Hoog GS, Vicente VA. Environmental Screening of Fonsecaea Agents of Chromoblastomycosis Using Rolling Circle Amplification. J Fungi (Basel). 2020 Nov 17;6(4) [PMC free article: PMC7712894] [PubMed: 33212756]
14.
Sudhadham M, de Hoog GS, Menken SB, Gerrits van den Ende AH, Sihanonth P. Rapid screening for genotypes as possible markers of virulence in the neurotropic black yeast Exophiala dermatitidis using PCR-RFLP. J Microbiol Methods. 2010 Feb;80(2):138-42. [PubMed: 19961882]
15.
Ahmed SA, Bonifaz A, González GM, Moreno LF, Menezes da Silva N, Vicente VA, Li R, de Hoog S. Chromoblastomycosis Caused by Phialophora-Proven Cases from Mexico. J Fungi (Basel). 2021 Jan 29;7(2) [PMC free article: PMC7910919] [PubMed: 33572699]
16.
González GM, Rojas OC, González JG, Kang Y, de Hoog GS. Chromoblastomycosis caused by Rhinocladiella aquaspersa. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2013 Aug 31;2:148-51. [PMC free article: PMC3885939] [PubMed: 24432242]
17.
Ibrahim-Granet O, de Bièvre C. Study of the conidial development and cleistothecium-like structure of some strains of Fonsecaea pedrosoi. Comparison with other close Dematiaeae. Mycopathologia. 1984 Feb 15;84(2-3):181-6. [PubMed: 6538933]
18.
Guevara A, Nery AF, de Souza Carvalho Melhem M, Bonfietti L, Rodrigues AM, Hagen F, de Carvalho JA, de Camargo ZP, de Souza Lima BJF, Vicente VA, Hahn RC. Molecular epidemiology and clinical-laboratory aspects of chromoblastomycosis in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Mycoses. 2022 Dec;65(12):1146-1158. [PMC free article: PMC9828117] [PubMed: 35869803]
19.
Queiroz-Telles F. CHROMOBLASTOMYCOSIS: A NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASE. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2015 Sep;57 Suppl 19(Suppl 19):46-50. [PMC free article: PMC4711190] [PubMed: 26465369]
20.
Guevara A, Siqueira NP, Nery AF, Cavalcante LRDS, Hagen F, Hahn RC. Chromoblastomycosis in Latin America and the Caribbean: Epidemiology over the past 50 years. Med Mycol. 2021 Dec 08;60(1) [PubMed: 34637525]
21.
Verma S, Thakur BK, Raphael V, Thappa DM. Epidemiology of Subcutaneous Mycoses in Northeast India: A Retrospective Study. Indian J Dermatol. 2018 Nov-Dec;63(6):496-501. [PMC free article: PMC6233045] [PubMed: 30504979]
22.
Ray A, Aayilliath K A, Banerjee S, Chakrabarti A, Denning DW. Burden of Serious Fungal Infections in India. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Dec;9(12):ofac603. [PMC free article: PMC9792086] [PubMed: 36589484]
23.
Santos DWCL, de Azevedo CMPES, Vicente VA, Queiroz-Telles F, Rodrigues AM, de Hoog GS, Denning DW, Colombo AL. The global burden of chromoblastomycosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Aug;15(8):e0009611. [PMC free article: PMC8360387] [PubMed: 34383752]
24.
Queiroz-Telles F, de Hoog S, Santos DW, Salgado CG, Vicente VA, Bonifaz A, Roilides E, Xi L, Azevedo CM, da Silva MB, Pana ZD, Colombo AL, Walsh TJ. Chromoblastomycosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017 Jan;30(1):233-276. [PMC free article: PMC5217794] [PubMed: 27856522]
25.
López Martínez R, Méndez Tovar LJ. Chromoblastomycosis. Clin Dermatol. 2007 Mar-Apr;25(2):188-94. [PubMed: 17350498]
26.
Passero LFD, Cavallone IN, Belda W. Reviewing the Etiologic Agents, Microbe-Host Relationship, Immune Response, Diagnosis, and Treatment in Chromoblastomycosis. J Immunol Res. 2021;2021:9742832. [PMC free article: PMC8575639] [PubMed: 34761009]
27.
Brito AC, Bittencourt MJS. Chromoblastomycosis: an etiological, epidemiological, clinical, diagnostic, and treatment update. An Bras Dermatol. 2018 Jul-Aug;93(4):495-506. [PMC free article: PMC6063100] [PubMed: 30066754]
28.
Queiroz-Telles F, Fahal AH, Falci DR, Caceres DH, Chiller T, Pasqualotto AC. Neglected endemic mycoses. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Nov;17(11):e367-e377. [PubMed: 28774696]
29.
Peltroche-Llacsahuanga H, Schnitzler N, Jentsch S, Platz A, De Hoog S, Schweizer KG, Haase G. Analyses of phagocytosis, evoked oxidative burst, and killing of black yeasts by human neutrophils: a tool for estimating their pathogenicity? Med Mycol. 2003 Feb;41(1):7-14. [PubMed: 12627799]
30.
Rozental S, Alviano CS, de Souza W. The in vitro susceptibility of Fonsecaea pedrosoi to activated macrophages. Mycopathologia. 1994 May;126(2):85-91. [PubMed: 8065435]
31.
Kneipp LF, Magalhães AS, Abi-Chacra EA, Souza LO, Alviano CS, Santos AL, Meyer-Fernandes JR. Surface phosphatase in Rhinocladiella aquaspersa: biochemical properties and its involvement with adhesion. Med Mycol. 2012 Aug;50(6):570-8. [PubMed: 22320857]
32.
Palmeira VF, Goulart FRV, Granato MQ, Alviano DS, Alviano CS, Kneipp LF, Santos ALS. Fonsecaea pedrosoi Sclerotic Cells: Secretion of Aspartic-Type Peptidase and Susceptibility to Peptidase Inhibitors. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1383. [PMC free article: PMC6033999] [PubMed: 30008700]
33.
Montoya AM, Montesino CA, Carrión-Álvarez D, González GM, Rojas OC. A comparative study of extracellular enzymes from chromoblastomycosis agents reveals the potential association of phospholipase with the severity of the lesions. Microb Pathog. 2020 Oct;147:104367. [PubMed: 32649963]
34.
Palmeira VF, Kneipp LF, Alviano CS, dos Santos AL. Phospholipase and esterase production by clinical strains of Fonsecaea pedrosoi and their interactions with epithelial cells. Mycopathologia. 2010 Jul;170(1):31-7. [PubMed: 20195904]
35.
Siqueira IM, de Castro RJA, Leonhardt LCM, Jerônimo MS, Soares AC, Raiol T, Nishibe C, Almeida N, Tavares AH, Hoffmann C, Bocca AL. Modulation of the immune response by Fonsecaea pedrosoi morphotypes in the course of experimental chromoblastomycosis and their role on inflammatory response chronicity. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Mar;11(3):e0005461. [PMC free article: PMC5391973] [PubMed: 28355277]
36.
Ricard-Blum S, Esterre P, Grimaud JA. Collagen cross-linking by pyridinoline occurs in non-reversible skin fibrosis. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 1993 Nov;39(7):723-7. [PubMed: 8268758]
37.
Torinuki W, Okohchi K, Takematsu H, Tagami H. Activation of the alternative complement pathway by Fonsecaea pedrosoi. J Invest Dermatol. 1984 Oct;83(4):308-10. [PubMed: 6481182]
38.
Breda LCD, Breda CNS, de Almeida JRF, Paulo LNM, Jannuzzi GP, Menezes IG, Albuquerque RC, Câmara NOS, Ferreira KS, de Almeida SR. Fonsecaeapedrosoi Conidia and Hyphae Activate Neutrophils Distinctly: Requirement of TLR-2 and TLR-4 in Neutrophil Effector Functions. Front Immunol. 2020;11:540064. [PMC free article: PMC7609859] [PubMed: 33193308]
39.
Bocca AL, Brito PP, Figueiredo F, Tosta CE. Inhibition of nitric oxide production by macrophages in chromoblastomycosis: a role for Fonsecaea pedrosoi melanin. Mycopathologia. 2006 Apr;161(4):195-203. [PubMed: 16552481]
40.
Zhang J, Wang L, Xi L, Huang H, Hu Y, Li X, Huang X, Lu S, Sun J. Melanin in a meristematic mutant of Fonsecaea monophora inhibits the production of nitric oxide and Th1 cytokines of murine macrophages. Mycopathologia. 2013 Jun;175(5-6):515-22. [PubMed: 23054330]
41.
Hayakawa M, Ghosn EE, da Gloria Teixeria de Sousa M, Ferreira KS, Almeida SR. Phagocytosis, production of nitric oxide and pro-inflammatory cytokines by macrophages in the presence of dematiaceous [correction of dematiaceus] fungi that cause chromoblastomycosis. Scand J Immunol. 2006 Oct;64(4):382-7. [PubMed: 16970678]
42.
Teixeira de Sousa Mda G, Ghosn EE, Almeida SR. Absence of CD4+ T cells impairs host defence of mice infected with Fonsecaea pedrosoi. Scand J Immunol. 2006 Dec;64(6):595-600. [PubMed: 17083615]
43.
d'Avila SC, Pagliari C, Duarte MI. The cell-mediated immune reaction in the cutaneous lesion of chromoblastomycosis and their correlation with different clinical forms of the disease. Mycopathologia. 2003;156(2):51-60. [PubMed: 12733624]
44.
Alves de Lima Silva A, Criado PR, Nunes RS, Kanashiro-Galo L, Seixas Duarte MI, Sotto MN, Pagliari C. Langerhans Cells Express IL-17A in the Epidermis of Chromoblastomycosis Lesions. Biomed Hub. 2017 May-Aug;2(2):1-8. [PMC free article: PMC6945965] [PubMed: 31988913]
45.
Tsuneto LT, Arce-Gomez B, Petzl-Erler ML, Queiroz-Telles F. HLA-A29 and genetic susceptibility to chromoblastomycosis. J Med Vet Mycol. 1989;27(3):181-5. [PubMed: 2778577]
46.
Naranjo F, Márquez I, Gendzekhadze K, Zhang S, Fernández-Mestre M, Yegres F, Richard-Yegres N, Navas T, Montagnani S, Ogando V, Layrisse Z. Human leukocyte antigen class I and MICA haplotypes in a multicase family with Cladophialophora carrionii chromoblastomycosis. Tissue Antigens. 2006 Oct;68(4):287-92. [PubMed: 17026462]
47.
Huang C, Deng W, Zhang Y, Zhang K, Ma Y, Song Y, Wan Z, Wang X, Li R. CARD9 deficiency predisposing chromoblastomycosis: A case report and comparative transcriptome study. Front Immunol. 2022;13:984093. [PMC free article: PMC9500462] [PubMed: 36159827]
48.
Sali AP, Sahay A. Chromoblastomycosis of the leg. Pol J Pathol. 2017;68(2):182-184. [PubMed: 29025254]
49.
Gajurel K, Ahrens WA. Medlar bodies of chromoblastomycosis. Transpl Infect Dis. 2023 Jun;25(3):e14047. [PubMed: 36852755]
50.
Dokic Y, Verstovsek G, Rosen T. Chromoblastomycosis Presenting as a Solitary Lesion in a Non-endemic Region. Cureus. 2023 Dec;15(12):e49791. [PMC free article: PMC10758271] [PubMed: 38164315]
51.
Dupont C, Duong TA, Mallet S, Mamzer-Bruneel MF, Thervet E, Bougnoux ME, Dupont B. Unusual presentation of chromoblastomycosis due to Cladophialophora carrionii in a renal and pancreas transplant recipient patient successfully treated with posaconazole and surgical excision. Transpl Infect Dis. 2010 Apr;12(2):180-3. [PubMed: 20002358]
52.
Schieffelin JS, Garcia-Diaz JB, Loss GE, Beckman EN, Keller RA, Staffeld-Coit C, Garces JC, Pankey GA. Phaeohyphomycosis fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients: clinical presentation, pathology, and treatment. Transpl Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;16(2):270-8. [PubMed: 24628809]
53.
Kimura TFE, Romera LMD, de Almeida SR. Fonsecaea pedrosoi Conidia Induces Activation of Dendritic Cells and Increases CD11c+ Cells in Regional Lymph Nodes During Experimental Chromoblastomycosis. Mycopathologia. 2020 Apr;185(2):245-256. [PubMed: 32008205]
54.
Shen Y, Jiang B, Zhang H, Feng J, Hua H. Combination therapy for an elderly patient with chromoblastomycosis caused by Fonsecaea monophora: a case report. Ann Transl Med. 2022 Jan;10(2):114. [PMC free article: PMC8848360] [PubMed: 35282094]
55.
Guevara A, Vicente VA, de Souza Lima BJF, Nery AF, Hagen F, Hahn RC. Chromoblastomycosis-Leprosy Co-Infection in Central West Brazil. Presentation of Three Cases and Literature Review. Mycopathologia. 2022 Aug;187(4):363-374. [PMC free article: PMC9325793] [PubMed: 35764905]
56.
Wang J, Zhu M, Wang P. Chromoblastomycosis by Exophiala jeanselmei associated with squamous cell carcinoma. J Mycol Med. 2021 Mar;31(1):101105. [PubMed: 33422739]
57.
Mutalik VS, Bissonnette C, Kalmar JR, McNamara KK. Unique Oral Presentations of Deep Fungal Infections: A Report of Four Cases. Head Neck Pathol. 2021 Jun;15(2):682-690. [PMC free article: PMC8134600] [PubMed: 32889592]
58.
Lanzoni A, Rapparini L, Pagliara A, Misciali C, Starace M, Piraccini BM. Chromoblastomycosis, A Neglected Fungal Infection. Mycopathologia. 2023 Dec;188(6):1103-1105. [PubMed: 37856009]
59.
Kim JSTW, Santos FGD, Enokihara MMSES, Hirata SH, Tomimori J, Ogawa MM. Cutaneous chromoblastomycosis mimicking melanoma in a renal transplant recipient. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2022 Dec;38:41-43. [PMC free article: PMC9647092] [PubMed: 36393996]
60.
Assefa W, Sinatayehu R, Sendeku MA, Dires M. Chromoblastomycosis: delayed diagnosis with extensive cutaneous lesions. Int J Infect Dis. 2023 Jun;131:50-52. [PubMed: 36972782]
61.
Hamza SH, Mercado PJ, Skelton HG, Smith KJ. An unusual dematiaceous fungal infection of the skin caused by Fonsecaea pedrosoi: a case report and review of the literature. J Cutan Pathol. 2003 May;30(5):340-3. [PubMed: 12753177]
62.
Sousa IS, Mello TP, Pereira EP, Granato MQ, Alviano CS, Santos ALS, Kneipp LF. Biofilm Formation by Chromoblastomycosis Fungi Fonsecaea pedrosoi and Phialophora verrucosa: Involvement with Antifungal Resistance. J Fungi (Basel). 2022 Sep 15;8(9) [PMC free article: PMC9504689] [PubMed: 36135688]
63.
Maubon D, Garnaud C, Ramarozatovo LS, Fahafahantsoa RR, Cornet M, Rasamoelina T. Molecular Diagnosis of Two Major Implantation Mycoses: Chromoblastomycosis and Sporotrichosis. J Fungi (Basel). 2022 Apr 09;8(4) [PMC free article: PMC9027143] [PubMed: 35448613]
64.
Borges JR, Ximenes BÁS, Miranda FTG, Peres GBM, Hayasaki IT, Ferro LCC, Ianhez M, Garcia-Zapata MTA. Accuracy of direct examination and culture as compared to the anatomopathological examination for the diagnosis of chromoblastomycosis: a systematic review. An Bras Dermatol. 2022 Jul-Aug;97(4):424-434. [PMC free article: PMC9263652] [PubMed: 35643736]
65.
Oberto-Perdigón L, Romero H, Pérez-Blanco M, Apitz-Castro R. [An ELISA test for the study of the therapeutic evolution of chromoblastomycosis by Cladophialophora carrionii in the endemic area of Falcon State, Venezuela]. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2005 Mar;22(1):39-43. [PubMed: 15813682]
66.
Vidal MS, de Castro LG, Cavalecate SC, Lacaz Cda S. Immunoprecipitation techniques and Elisa in the detection of anti-Fonsecaea pedrosoi antibodies in chromoblastomycosis. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2003 Nov-Dec;45(6):315-8. [PubMed: 14762630]
67.
Rolon AM, Tolaymat LM, Sokumbi O, Bodiford K. The Role of Excision for Treatment of Chromoblastomycosis: A Cutaneous Fungal Infection Frequently Mistaken for Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Dermatol Surg. 2023 Jul 01;49(7):649-653. [PubMed: 37093678]
68.
Pavlidakey GP, Snow SN, Mohs FE. Chromoblastomycosis treated by Mohs micrographic surgery. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1986 Oct;12(10):1073-5. [PubMed: 3760315]
69.
Luo J, Feng P, Hu Y, Yang Y, Zhou S, Huang S, Jadad A, Zhong Z, Zheng Y, Liu K, Lu Y, Hu Y, Zhou X. [Long-pulsed 1064 nm Nd: YAG laser combined with terbinafine against chromoblastomycosis caused by Fonsecaea nubica and the effect of laser therapy in a Wistar rat model]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2019 Jun 30;39(6):712-717. [PMC free article: PMC6743912] [PubMed: 31270051]
70.
Lan Y, Lu S, Zhang J. Retinoid combined with photodynamic therapy against hyperkeratotic chromoblastomycosis: A case report and literature review. Mycoses. 2021 Jan;64(1):18-23. [PubMed: 32989774]
71.
Tsianakas A, Pappai D, Basoglu Y, Metze D, Tietz HJ, Luger TA, Bonsmann G. Chromomycosis--successful CO2 laser vaporization. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008 Nov;22(11):1385-6. [PubMed: 18331317]
72.
Bonifaz A, Martínez-Soto E, Carrasco-Gerard E, Peniche J. Treatment of chromoblastomycosis with itraconazole, cryosurgery, and a combination of both. Int J Dermatol. 1997 Jul;36(7):542-7. [PubMed: 9268758]
73.
Huang TH, Lan CE. Cutaneous chromoblastomycosis effectively treated with local heat monotherapy. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2019 Jun;44(4):461-462. [PubMed: 30280420]
74.
Restrepo A, Gonzalez A, Gomez I, Arango M, de Bedout C. Treatment of chromoblastomycosis with itraconazole. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;544:504-16. [PubMed: 2850755]
75.
Queiroz-Telles F, Purim KS, Fillus JN, Bordignon GF, Lameira RP, Van Cutsem J, Cauwenbergh G. Itraconazole in the treatment of chromoblastomycosis due to Fonsecaea pedrosoi. Int J Dermatol. 1992 Nov;31(11):805-12. [PubMed: 1330949]
76.
Antonello VS, Appel da Silva MC, Cambruzzi E, Kliemann DA, Santos BR, Queiroz-Telles F. Treatment of severe chromoblastomycosis with itraconazole and 5-flucytosine association. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2010 Nov-Dec;52(6):329-31. [PubMed: 21225217]
77.
Polak A. Combination therapy with antifungal drugs. Mykosen Suppl. 1988;2:45-53. [PubMed: 3078023]
78.
Ranawaka RR, Amarasinghe N, Hewage D. Chromoblastomycosis: combined treatment with pulsed itraconazole therapy and liquid nitrogen cryotherapy. Int J Dermatol. 2009 Apr;48(4):397-400. [PubMed: 19335426]
79.
DERBES VJ, FRIEDMAN L, KRAFCHUK JD. Chromoblastomycosis treated by vibrapuncture injection of amphotericin B. Arch Dermatol. 1959 Sep;80:286-7. [PubMed: 13816006]
80.
Whiting DA. Treatment of chromoblastomycosis with high local concentrations of amphotericin B. Br J Dermatol. 1967 Jun;79(6):345-51. [PubMed: 6027196]
81.
Esterre P, Inzan CK, Ramarcel ER, Andriantsimahavandy A, Ratsioharana M, Pecarrere JL, Roig P. Treatment of chromomycosis with terbinafine: preliminary results of an open pilot study. Br J Dermatol. 1996 Jun;134 Suppl 46:33-6; discussion 40. [PubMed: 8763467]
82.
Bonifaz A, Saúl A, Paredes-Solis V, Araiza J, Fierro-Arias L. Treatment of chromoblastomycosis with terbinafine: experience with four cases. J Dermatolog Treat. 2005 Feb;16(1):47-51. [PubMed: 15897168]
83.
Criado PR, Careta MF, Valente NY, Martins JE, Rivitti EA, Spina R, Belda W. Extensive long-standing chromomycosis due to Fonsecaea pedrosoi: three cases with relevant improvement under voriconazole therapy. J Dermatolog Treat. 2011 Jun;22(3):167-74. [PubMed: 20666671]
84.
Yu J, Li R, Zhang M, Liu L, Wan Z. In vitro interaction of terbinafine with itraconazole and amphotericin B against fungi causing chromoblastomycosis in China. Med Mycol. 2008 Nov;46(7):745-7. [PubMed: 18608889]
85.
da Silva Hellwig AH, Heidrich D, Zanette RA, Scroferneker ML. In vitro susceptibility of chromoblastomycosis agents to antifungal drugs: A systematic review. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019 Mar;16:108-114. [PubMed: 30266638]
86.
Lima AM, Sacht GL, Paula LZ, Aseka GK, Goetz HS, Gheller MF, Torraca PF. Response of chromoblastomycosis to voriconazole. An Bras Dermatol. 2016 Sep-Oct;91(5):679-681. [PMC free article: PMC5087237] [PubMed: 27828652]
87.
de Sousa Mda G, Belda W, Spina R, Lota PR, Valente NS, Brown GD, Criado PR, Benard G. Topical application of imiquimod as a treatment for chromoblastomycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jun;58(12):1734-7. [PMC free article: PMC4036686] [PubMed: 24633683]
88.
Belda W, Criado PR, Passero LFD. Successful treatment of chromoblastomycosis caused by Fonsecaea pedrosoi using imiquimod. J Dermatol. 2020 Apr;47(4):409-412. [PubMed: 31960479]
89.
Batbayar S, Lee DH, Kim HW. Immunomodulation of Fungal β-Glucan in Host Defense Signaling by Dectin-1. Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2012 Sep;20(5):433-45. [PMC free article: PMC3762275] [PubMed: 24009832]
90.
Azevedo Cde M, Marques SG, Resende MA, Gonçalves AG, Santos DV, da Silva RR, de Sousa Mda G, de Almeida SR. The use of glucan as immunostimulant in the treatment of a severe case of chromoblastomycosis. Mycoses. 2008 Jul;51(4):341-4. [PubMed: 18444974]
91.
Belda W, Criado PR, Domingues Passero LF. Case Report: Treatment of Chromoblastomycosis with Combinations including Acitretin: A Report of Two Cases. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Nov;103(5):1852-1854. [PMC free article: PMC7646813] [PubMed: 32815507]
92.
Heidrich D, Pagani DM, Koehler A, Alves KO, Scroferneker ML. Effect of Melanin Biosynthesis Inhibition on the Antifungal Susceptibility of Chromoblastomycosis Agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Jul 16;65(8):e0054621. [PMC free article: PMC8284458] [PubMed: 33972246]
93.
Tawade Y, Gaikwad A, Deodhar A, Bhide D, Romi E, Pradhan A, Satpute M. Uncommon presentation of chromoblastomycosis. Cutis. 2018 Jun;101(6):442;447;448. [PubMed: 30063772]
94.
San-Bias G, Urbina JA, Marchán E, Contreras LM, Sorais F, San-Blas F. Inhibition of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis by ajoene is associated with blockade of phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis. Microbiology (Reading). 1997 May;143 ( Pt 5):1583-1586. [PubMed: 9168609]
95.
Sharma N, Marfatia YS. Genital elephantiasis as a complication of chromoblastomycosis: A diagnosis overlooked. Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS. 2009 Jan;30(1):43-5. [PMC free article: PMC3168040] [PubMed: 21938115]
96.
de Azevedo CM, Gomes RR, Vicente VA, Santos DW, Marques SG, do Nascimento MM, Andrade CE, Silva RR, Queiroz-Telles F, de Hoog GS. Fonsecaea pugnacius, a Novel Agent of Disseminated Chromoblastomycosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Aug;53(8):2674-85. [PMC free article: PMC4508443] [PubMed: 26085610]
97.
Queiróz AJR, Pereira Domingos F, Antônio JR. Chromoblastomycosis: clinical experience and review of literature. Int J Dermatol. 2018 Nov;57(11):1351-1355. [PubMed: 30113072]
98.
Bhattacharjee R, Narang T, Chatterjee D. Cutaneous Chromoblastomycosis: A Prototypal Case. J Cutan Med Surg. 2019 Jan/Feb;23(1):98. [PubMed: 30789034]
99.
Huang X, Han K, Wang L, Peng X, Zeng K, Li L. Successful treatment of chromoblastomycosis using ALA-PDT in a patient with leukopenia. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019 Jun;26:13-14. [PubMed: 30769166]
100.
Rojas-García OC, García-Martínez JM, Carrión-Álvarez D. [Chromoblastomycosis in Mexico. A forgotten disease]. Salud Publica Mex. 2019 Ene-Feb;61(1):3. [PubMed: 30753765]
101.
He L, Ma J, Mei X, Lu S, Li X, Xi L. Successful treatment of chromoblastomycosis of 10-year duration due to Fonsecaea nubica. Mycoses. 2018 Apr;61(4):231-236. [PubMed: 29178398]

Disclosure: George Kurien declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Kavin Sugumar declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Nishad Sathe declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Veena Chandran declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Copyright © 2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits others to distribute the work, provided that the article is not altered or used commercially. You are not required to obtain permission to distribute this article, provided that you credit the author and journal.

Bookshelf ID: NBK470253PMID: 29261968

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...