Over the past two years there has been a great deal of international discussion about how to harness health research more effectively in order to achieve the United Nations' Millenium Development Goals as well as other national health goals in low- and middle-income countries.
Our objective was to identify organisations around the world, and especially in low- and middle-income countries, that are in some way successful or innovative in supporting the use of research evidence in the development of clinical practice guidelines, health technology assessments, and health poligy, and to describe their experiences.
The study’s seven main implications for those establishing or administering organisations to produce clinical practice guidelines or health technology assessments or organisations to support the use of research evidence in developing health policy include: 1. Collaborate with other organisations 2. Establish strong links with policymakers and involve stakeholders in the work 3. Be independent and manage conflicts of interest among those involved in the work 4. Build capacity among those working in the organisation 5. Use good methods and be transparent in the work 6. Start small, have a clear audience and scope, and address important questions 7. Be attentive to implementation considerations even if implementation is not a remit
The study’s four main implications for the World Health Organisation and other international organisations include: 1. Support collaborations among organisations 2. Support local adaptation efforts 3. Mobilize support 4. Create knowledge-related global public goods, including methods and evidence syntheses
Preliminary version: HTML in process
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Evidence-informed health policy 1 - synthesis of findings from a multi-method study of organizations that support the use of research evidence.[Implement Sci. 2008]Evidence-informed health policy 1 - synthesis of findings from a multi-method study of organizations that support the use of research evidence.Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Moynihan R, Paulsen EJ. Implement Sci. 2008 Dec 17; 3:53. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
- Evidence-informed health policy 3 - interviews with the directors of organizations that support the use of research evidence.[Implement Sci. 2008]Evidence-informed health policy 3 - interviews with the directors of organizations that support the use of research evidence.Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Moynihan R, Paulsen EJ. Implement Sci. 2008 Dec 17; 3:55. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
- Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process.[Health Res Policy Syst. 2006]Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process.Fretheim A, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006 Nov 29; 4:15. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
- Review The role of informal networks in creating knowledge among health-care managers: a prospective case study[ 2014]Review The role of informal networks in creating knowledge among health-care managers: a prospective case studyWard V, West R, Smith S, McDermott S, Keen J, Pawson R, House A. 2014 May
- Review Supporting countries in establishing and strengthening NITAGs: lessons learned from 5 years of the SIVAC initiative.[Vaccine. 2015]Review Supporting countries in establishing and strengthening NITAGs: lessons learned from 5 years of the SIVAC initiative.Adjagba A, Senouci K, Biellik R, Batmunkh N, Faye PC, Durupt A, Gessner BD, da Silva A. Vaccine. 2015 Jan 29; 33(5):588-95. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
- Evidence-Informed Health Policy: Using Research to Make Health Systems HealthierEvidence-Informed Health Policy: Using Research to Make Health Systems Healthier
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...