NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU): SBU Systematic Review Summaries [Internet].
Conclusions
- More injuries to the anal sphincter can be detected and treated if an ultrasound examination is added to the routine visual and manual examinations currently performed on women immediately postnatally. Fewer women would therefore develop faecal incontinence and reductions to their quality of life.
- Fewer injuries to the anal sphincter are recorded when delivery ward staff are trained to promote slow delivery, to manually protect the perineal region with different handholds, and to use episiotomies when they are necessary. It is not possible to resolve which of these components are important.
- An episiotomy can prevent anal sphincter injuries when a woman, who is giving birth for the first time, requires vacuum extraction. However, the procedure itself causes a perineal injury. Even warm compresses applied to the perineum during the pushing stage of childbirth can provide some protection against anal sphincter injury. More research is needed to establish which examination methods can be routinely used directly postnatally to ensure that anal sphincter injuries do not go undetected. Rectal palpation after childbirth has not been assessed as a diagnostic method. Examination methods need to be simple as well as both accurate and sensitive. Unreliable methods for measuring outcomes and unclear diagnostic criteria make the existing research results difficult to assess.
Preliminary version: HTML in process
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Review Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions.[Int Urogynecol J. 2015]Review Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions.Kapoor DS, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Dec; 26(12):1725-34. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
- Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study.[Birth. 2006]Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study.Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW. Birth. 2006 Jun; 33(2):117-22.
- Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery.[BJOG. 2008]Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery.de Leeuw JW, de Wit C, Kuijken JP, Bruinse HW. BJOG. 2008 Jan; 115(1):104-8. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
- A prospective multicenter audit of labor-room episiotomy and anal sphincter injury assessment in the Netherlands.[Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010]A prospective multicenter audit of labor-room episiotomy and anal sphincter injury assessment in the Netherlands.van Dillen J, Spaans M, van Keijsteren W, van Dillen M, Vredevoogd C, van Huizen M, Middeldorp A. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Feb; 108(2):97-100. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
- Review [Pelvic floor and pregnancy].[Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2010]Review [Pelvic floor and pregnancy].Fritel X. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2010 May; 38(5):332-46. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
- Anal Sphincter Injuries: A Systematic Review and Assessment of Medical, Social a...Anal Sphincter Injuries: A Systematic Review and Assessment of Medical, Social and Ethical Aspects
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...