U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Logo of Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU)

Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU): SBU Systematic Review Summaries [Internet].

Tympanostomy Tube Insertion for Otitis Media in Children: A Systematic Review

Summary and conclusions
SBU Yellow Report No. 189

September 2008

This SBU report reviews the scientific evidence for tympanostomy tube insertion in the tympanic membrane (eardrum) of children with recurrent acute otitis media (inflammation of the middle ear) or long-term episodes of secretory otitis media (with fluid accumulation in the middle ear). Although these conditions eventually heal, approximately 10,000 Swedish children a year have such severe problems due to episodes of pain, reduced quality of life or hearing loss that tympanostomy tube insertion is considered to be warranted.

Conclusions The systematic literature review, along with a survey of clinical practice, generated the following conclusions.

  • The scientific evidence for tympanostomy tube insertion in children with recurrent acute otitis media is insufficient. Given that more than 2,000 Swedish children a year receive the treatment for this indication, reliable studies are needed as soon as possible.
  • Tympanostomy tube insertion for long-term secretory otitis media improves hearing (strong scientific evidence) and quality of life (moderately strong scientific evidence) for at least 9 months. Treating children with this indication in such a manner is justified if they have objectively verified hearing loss and accompanying reduction in quality of life. Forms that have been tested for children with diseases of the ear can be used to assess quality of life.
  • Adenoidectomy improves hearing at 6-month follow-up as effectively as tympanostomy tube insertion in children with long-term secretory otitis media (limited scientific evidence). Combining tympanostomy tube insertion with adenoidectomy does not lead to further hearing improvement at 3-month follow up (moderately strong scientific evidence).
  • Suctioning out fluid in the middle ear in combination with tympanostomy tube insertion does not extend functionality or reduce obstruction of the tube. Routine removal of tubes that are not spontaneously discharged has not been shown to reduce the risk of complications.
  • Bathing and swimming do not increase the risk of tympanostomy tube otorrhoea (discharge) (limited scientific evidence). Preventive measures such as earplugs or eardrops when bathing or swimming have little or no effect (moderately strong scientific evidence).
  • The scientific evidence is insufficient to determine whether tympanostomy tube insertion is cost-effective for recurrent acute otitis media or secretory otitis media.

Preliminary version: HTML in process

Copyright © 2008 by the Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment. All content unless otherwise noted is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Bookshelf ID: NBK447997, PMID: 28876742, ISBN: 987-91-85413-22-5, ISSN: 1400-1403

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • Review Summary PDF (1.5M)

More in this collection

Related information

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...