NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Between 1973 and 2016, the ways to manipulate DNA to endow new characteristics in an organism (that is, biotechnology) have advanced, enabling the development of products that were not previously possible. What will the likely future products of biotechnology be over the next 5–10 years? What scientific capabilities, tools, and/or expertise may be needed by the regulatory agencies to ensure they make efficient and sound evaluations of the likely future products of biotechnology?
Preparing for Future Products of Biotechnology analyzes the future landscape of biotechnology products and seeks to inform forthcoming policy making. This report identifies potential new risks and frameworks for risk assessment and areas in which the risks or lack of risks relating to the products of biotechnology are well understood.
Contents
- The National Academies of SCIENCES • ENGINEERING • MEDICINE
- COMMITTEE ON FUTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY PRODUCTS AND OPPORTUNITIES TO ENHANCE CAPABILITIES OF THE BIOTECHNOLOGY REGULATORY SYSTEM
- BOARD ON LIFE SCIENCES
- BOARD ON AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES
- BOARD ON CHEMICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Select Acronyms and Abbreviations
- Summary
- 1. Introduction and Context
- 2. Emerging Trends and Products of Biotechnology
- 3. The Current Biotechnology Regulatory System
- 4. Understanding Risks Related to Future Biotechnology Products
- 5. Opportunities to Enhance the Capabilities of the Biotechnology Regulatory System
- 6. Conclusions and Recommendations
- Glossary
- APPENDIXES
Suggested citation:
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Preparing for Future Products of Biotechnology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/24605.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals.[William Mary Law Rev. 2004]Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals.Mandal GN. William Mary Law Rev. 2004 Apr; 45(5):2167-259.
- Review Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.[J Toxicol Environ Health B Cri...]Review Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.Jardine C, Hrudey S, Shortreed J, Craig L, Krewski D, Furgal C, McColl S. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec; 6(6):569-720.
- The attitudes of religious, environmental, and science policy leaders toward biotechnology.[Recomb DNA Tech Bull. 1985]The attitudes of religious, environmental, and science policy leaders toward biotechnology.Miller JD. Recomb DNA Tech Bull. 1985 Dec; 8(4):141-64.
- Review Current status of regulating biotechnology-derived animals in Canada: animal health and food safety considerations.[Theriogenology. 2007]Review Current status of regulating biotechnology-derived animals in Canada: animal health and food safety considerations.Kochhar HP, Evans BR. Theriogenology. 2007 Jan 1; 67(1):188-97. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
- The worsening divergence of biotechnology: the importance of risk culture.[Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023]The worsening divergence of biotechnology: the importance of risk culture.Trump BD, Cummings CL, Loschin N, Keisler JM, Wells EM, Linkov I. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1250298. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
- Preparing for Future Products of BiotechnologyPreparing for Future Products of Biotechnology
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...