NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Food and Nutrition Board; Committee to Review WIC Food Packages. Review of WIC Food Packages: Improving Balance and Choice: Final Report. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2017 May 1.
Review of WIC Food Packages: Improving Balance and Choice: Final Report.
Show detailsThe committee conducted a gap analysis to determine the average intake of a nutrient that would be needed to ensure an acceptable level of inadequacy in a population (for this report, 5 percent of the population subgroup or less). For nutrients with an Estimated Averaged Requirement (EAR) and for which intake was inadequate, the gap is the difference between the EAR and the 5th percentile of intake; for nutrients with an Adequate Intake (AI) and for which intake was below the AI, the gap is the difference between the AI and the median intake; for sodium, for which there is excess intake, the gap is the difference between the Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) and the 95th percentile of intake. For added sugars and saturated fat, the gap is the difference between the upper limit (the value that is 10 percent of the associated kcal pattern) and the 95th percentile of intake. Two gaps were evaluated for nutrients with an EAR: the gap to shift the subgroup to 5 percent inadequacy or less and to 10 percent inadequacy or less.
Results of the gap analysis for nutrients that were categorized as higher, middle, or lower priority in Chapter 5, Tables 5-2 through 5-6 are presented below in Tables L-1 through L-6. Within each priority group, nutrients are ordered from the highest to lowest percent of inadequacy. Nutrients for which intakes exceeded a recommended upper limit (sodium, saturated fat, and added sugars) are presented last in the order. The gap was not evaluated for nutrients for which intakes exceeding the UL were not of concern, as described in Chapter 4. Meeting the gap identified for the nutrients that were evaluated did not result in any subgroups with nutrient intakes over the UL.
REFERENCES
- IOM (Institute of Medicine). Dietary Reference Intakes for calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, vitamin D, and fluoride. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997. [PubMed: 23115811]
- IOM. Dietary Reference Intakes for thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B6, folate, vitamin B12, pantothenic acid, biotin, and choline. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1998. [PubMed: 23193625]
- IOM. Dietary Reference Intakes for vitamin C, vitamin E, selenium, and carotenoids. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. [PubMed: 25077263]
- IOM. Dietary Reference Intakes for vitamin A, vitamin K, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium, and zinc. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. [PubMed: 25057538]
- IOM. Dietary Reference Intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2002/2005. [PubMed: 12449285]
- IOM. Dietary Reference Intakes for water, potassium, sodium, chloride, and sulfate. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2005.
- IOM. Dietary Reference Intakes for calcium and vitamin D. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. [PubMed: 21796828]
- USDA/ARS (U.S. Department of Agriculture/Agriculture Research Service). What We Eat in America, NHANES 2005-2012. 2005-2012. [November 29, 2016]. http://www
.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/wweia.htm. - USDA/ARS. What We Eat in America, NHANES 2009-2012. 2009-2012. [November 29, 2016]. http://www
.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/wweia.htm. - USDA/ARS. What We Eat in America, NHANES 2011-2012. 2011-2012. [November 29, 2016]. http://www
.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/wweia.htm. - USDA/HHS (U.S. Department of Agriculture/U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 2016. [August 29, 2016]. https://health
.gov/dietaryguidelines /2015.
- PubMedLinks to PubMed
- Gap Analysis - Review of WIC Food PackagesGap Analysis - Review of WIC Food Packages
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...