U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Whitlock EP, Williams SB, Gold R, et al. Screening and Interventions for Childhood Overweight [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2005 Jul. (Evidence Syntheses, No. 36.)

  • This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

Cover of Screening and Interventions for Childhood Overweight

Screening and Interventions for Childhood Overweight [Internet].

Show details

Appendix P. Methods for Figures 4 and 5

Ages 8 to 12 Years: Modeled Data

Percent overweight was a common measure used to describe the entry weights and post-intervention weights of participants in studies of children aged 8–12 years. Percent overweight is calculated as follows: 100% × (actual weight - ideal weight for age, height, & sex) ÷ ideal weight for age, height, & sex. The ideal weight for age, height, and sex was typically taken from a reference dataset such as the World Health Organization's report on the assessment of community nutritional status published in 1966.1 In a majority of studies conducted in children aged 8–12, the participants were on average 40%–60% overweight prior to the intervention. The average change in percent overweight at the time of the last post-intervention follow-up measurement was -10% to -20%. To model these typical entry weight and results, we have calculated the BMI associated with being 50% overweight (i.e., typical mean entry weight), 40% overweight (i.e., change in percent overweight of -10%), 30% overweight (i.e., change in percent overweight of -20%), and ideal weight. These BMI data were plotted on the gender-specific CDC 2000 BMI-for-age growth charts to visually demonstrate how percentage overweight corresponds to BMI percentiles. The entry BMI that is equivalent to 50% overweight is displayed for ages 8, 10, and 12 years and corresponding -10% and -20% changes in overweight are displayed for ages 9, 11, and 13 years in order to demonstrate that the participants grew older during the course of the study. Plots for boys and girls were similar, therefore we present the data for girls only.

Calculation of age-, height-, and sex-specific BMI based on percent overweight: For ages 8–13, the median height was estimated for each age based on the CDC's 2000 sex-specific stature-for-age growth charts. Ideal weight for height, age, and sex was then taken from the same reference dataset used in several of the original studies.1 Weight if 50%, 40%, or 30% overweight was determined by multiplying the ideal weight by 1.5, 1.4, or 1.3, respectively. The BMI for each age for each category of % overweight was then calculated as follows: 10,000 × weight in kg ÷ (height in cm)2. Data for each age between 8 and 13 years are displayed in Table P-1.

Table P-1Data for Modeled Results in Girls Ages 8 to 13 years (Figure 4)

GenderAgeMedian Ht for Agea (cm)If Ideal Body Weightb If 50% Overweightb If 40% Overweightb If 30% Overweightb
Wtc (kg)BMIe (kg/m2)Wtd (kg)BMIe (kg/m2)Wtd (kg)BMIe (kg/m2)Wtd (kg)BMIe (kg/m2)
Girls812825.815.738.723.63622.033.520.5
913328.616.242.924.34022.637.221.0
1013831.616.647.424.94423.241.121.6
1114435.617.253.425.85024.046.322.3
1215140.817.961.226.85725.15323.3
1315746.518.969.828.36526.460.524.5
a

Median height for age based on CDC 2000 stature-for-age growth charts.

b

Height-, age-, and sex-specific.

c

Ideal weight for height, age, sex from Jelliffe 1966.1

d

Calculated by multiplying ideal weight by 1.5, 1.4, or 1.3, respectively for 50%, 40%, or 30% overweight.

e

BMI calculated as follows: 10,000 × (wt in kg) ÷ (ht in cm)2.

Data from Individual Studies in Adolescents (Figure 5)

For studies that included mostly participants 13 years and older, actual entry weight and outcomes are plotted if these measures were presented using BMI or percentage overweight.27 One study of participants in this age group8 presented triceps skinfold thickness and percentage body fat and is therefore not included in the figure.

In general, the mean entry BMI and post-intervention change in BMI are reported for the treatment group that had the larger decrease in BMI, and these data are plotted at the mean age at entry for the group with the better result. The center of the box symbol corresponds to the entry BMI. The tip of the arrow drawn for each box represents the average change in BMI at the time of the latest post-intervention measurement. Data for plotted values are presented in Table P-2.

Four studies reported actual mean entry BMI and post-intervention BMI.3, 57 However, only two of these reported both the BMI data and mean entry age stratified by treatment groups.3, 7 One study5 presents mean entry age for all participants across treatment groups, so the BMI data for the treatment group with the best results (Healthy Habits group) are plotted at that age. One study6 presents entry and post-intervention BMI results across treatment subgroups but presents mean age at entry stratified by treatment subgroup. For this study, the BMI data across subgroups are presented in Figure 4 at the age corresponding to the mean of the mean ages presented for each subgroup.

Of the two studies that did not present mean entry BMI and post-intervention BMI, one2 presented all age and weight data stratified by treatment subgroups, but the outcomes as percent change in BMI from baseline BMI. In this study, the group that received both sibutramine and behavioral therapy had the better results on average, -8.5% change in BMI from baseline. The actual post-intervention BMI for this treatment group was calculated as follows: mean BMI at entry + (% change in BMI from baseline) × (mean BMI at entry). Entry BMI and post-intervention BMI data were plotted at the mean age at entry for the sibutramine plus behavioral therapy group. The other study4 presented entry and post-intervention data as percent overweight. Age and height specific BMI were calculated similar to how they were calculated for the 8 to 12 year old age group using the mean age at entry for the group with the best result. For this study, post-intervention BMI was calculated for a participant 17 years old.

Table P-2Data for Treatment Group with Best Post-Intervention Outcome in Studies of Adolescents That Report BMI-Based or % Overweight-Based Outcomes

StudyTreatment Group with Best ResultMean Age at EntryMean BMI (kg/m2)at EntryPost-Intervention Outcomes1 Length of f/u Period
Non-BMI OutcomeMean BMI (kg/m2)
Berkowitz et al 20032 sibutramine + BT14.1 years37.5-8.5% (% decrease in BMI from baseline)34.36 mos
Ebbeling et al 20033 Reduced glycemic load diet16.9 years34.9N/A33.76 mos
Mellin et al 19874 SHAPEDOWN15.6 years27.62 -9.9% (change in % overweight)25.82 15 mos
Saelens et al 20025 Healthy Habits14.2 years3 31.0N/A31.17 mos
Wadden et al 19906 Mother and Child together14.04 35.25 N/A35.45 6 mos
White 20037 Behavioral13.135.3N/A35.16 mos
1

All results are reported at the latest time point measured.

2

Calculated from mean % overweight.

3

Mean age for participants in both treatment groups.

4

Mean of mean ages for each subgroup.

5

BMI values reported across subgroups.

References for Appendix P

1.
Jelliffe DB. The Assessment of the Nutritional Status of the Community. Monograph Series #53 ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1966. [PubMed: 4960818]
2.
Berkowitz RI, Wadden TA, Tershakovec AM, Cronquist JL. Behavior therapy and sibutramine for the treatment of adolescent obesity: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;289(14):1805–1812. [PubMed: 12684359]
3.
Ebbeling CB, Leidig MM, Sinclair KB, Hangen JP, Ludwig DS. A reduced-glycemic load diet in the treatment of adolescent obesity. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 2003;157(8):773–779. [PubMed: 12912783]
4.
Mellin LM, Slinkard LA, Irwin CE Jr. Adolescent obesity intervention: validation of the SHAPEDOWN program 3987. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 1987;87(3):333–338. [PubMed: 3819254]
5.
Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Wilfley DE, Patrick K, Cella JA, Buchta R. Behavioral weight control for overweight adolescents initiated in primary care. Obesity Research. 2002;10(1):22–32. [PubMed: 11786598]
6.
Wadden TA, Stunkard AJ, Rich L, Rubin CJ, Sweidel G, McKinney S. Obesity in black adolescent girls: a controlled clinical trial of treatment by diet, behavior modification, and parental support 3928. Pediatrics. 1990;85(3):345–352. [PubMed: 2304788]
7.
White MA, Kohlmaier JR, Varnado-Sullivan P, Williamson DA. Racial/ethnic differences in weight concerns: protective and risk factors for the development of eating disorders and obesity among adolescent females. Eating & Weight Disorders: EWD. 2003;8(1):20–25. [PubMed: 12762621]
8.
Kang HS, Gutin B, Barbeau P, Owens S, Lemmon CR, Allison J. et al. Physical training improves insulin resistance syndrome markers in obese adolescents. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2002;34(12):1920–1927. [PubMed: 12471297]

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...