Except where otherwise noted, this work is distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
The objective of this review is to evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of galsulfase 1 mg/kg IV infusion once weekly as long-term enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis VI (Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome) (MPS VI).
Contents
- Clinical Review Report
- ABBREVIATIONS
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 2. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS
- 3. RESULTS
- 4. DISCUSSION
- 5. CONCLUSIONS
- APPENDIX 1. PATIENT INPUT SUMMARY
- APPENDIX 2. LITERATURE SEARCH STRATEGY
- APPENDIX 3. EXCLUDED STUDIES
- APPENDIX 4. DETAILED OUTCOME DATA
- APPENDIX 5. VALIDITY OF OUTCOME MEASURES
- APPENDIX 6. SUMMARY OF OTHER STUDIES
- REFERENCES
- Pharmacoeconomic Review Report
- CADTH CANADIAN DRUG EXPERT COMMITTEE FINAL RECOMMENDATION
This review report was prepared by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). In addition to CADTH staff, the review team included a clinical expert in inherited metabolic diseases who provided input on the conduct of the review and the interpretation of findings.
Through the CADTH Common Drug Review (CDR) process, CADTH undertakes reviews of drug submissions, resubmissions, and requests for advice, and provides formulary reimbursement recommendations to all Canadian publicly funded federal, provincial, and territorial drug plans, with the exception of Quebec.
The report contains an evidence-based clinical and/or pharmacoeconomic drug review, based on published and unpublished material, including manufacturer submissions; studies identified through independent, systematic literature searches; and patient-group submissions. In accordance with CDR Update — Issue 87, manufacturers may request that confidential information be redacted from the CDR Clinical and Pharmacoeconomic Review Reports.
The information in this report is intended to help Canadian health care decision-makers, health care professionals, health systems leaders, and policy-makers make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. The information in this report should not be used as a substitute for the application of clinical judgment with respect to the care of a particular patient or other professional judgment in any decision-making process, nor is it intended to replace professional medical advice. While CADTH has taken care in the preparation of this document to ensure that its contents are accurate, complete, and up-to-date as of the date of publication, CADTH does not make any guarantee to that effect. CADTH is not responsible for the quality, currency, propriety, accuracy, or reasonableness of any statements, information, or conclusions contained in the source documentation. CADTH is not responsible for any errors or omissions or injury, loss, or damage arising from or relating to the use (or misuse) of any information, statements, or conclusions contained in or implied by the information in this document or in any of the source documentation.
This document is intended for use in the context of the Canadian health care system. Other health care systems are different; the issues and information related to the subject matter of this document may be different in other jurisdictions and, if used outside of Canada, it is at the user’s risk. This disclaimer and any questions or matters of any nature arising from or relating to the content or use (or misuse) of this document will be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein, and all proceedings shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Province of Ontario, Canada.
CADTH takes sole responsibility for the final form and content of this document, subject to the limitations noted above. The statements and conclusions in this document are those of CADTH and not of its advisory committees and reviewers. The statements, conclusions, and views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of Health Canada or any Canadian provincial or territorial government. Production of this document is made possible by financial contributions from Health Canada and the governments of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, Nova Scotia, Nunavut, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Saskatchewan, and Yukon.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- A systematic review of new advances in the management of mucopolysaccharidosis VI (Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome): focus on galsulfase.[Biologics. 2009]A systematic review of new advances in the management of mucopolysaccharidosis VI (Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome): focus on galsulfase.El Dib RP, Pastores GM. Biologics. 2009; 3:459-68. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
- Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of recombinant human N-acetylgalactosamine 4-sulfatase after 6months of therapy in cats using different IV infusion durations.[Mol Genet Metab. 2016]Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of recombinant human N-acetylgalactosamine 4-sulfatase after 6months of therapy in cats using different IV infusion durations.Ruane T, Haskins M, Cheng A, Wang P, Aguirre G, Knox VW 4th, Qi Y, Tompkins T, O'Neill CA. Mol Genet Metab. 2016 Feb; 117(2):157-63. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
- Clinical utility of endurance measures for evaluation of treatment in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis VI (Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome).[J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2010]Clinical utility of endurance measures for evaluation of treatment in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis VI (Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome).McDonald A, Steiner R, Kuehl K, Turbeville S. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2010; 3(2):119-27.
- Review Spinal cord compression in Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome: case report and review of the literature with effects of enzyme replacement therapy.[Pediatr Neurosurg. 2012]Review Spinal cord compression in Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome: case report and review of the literature with effects of enzyme replacement therapy.Jurecka A, Opoka-Winiarska V, Jurkiewicz E, Marucha J, Tylki-Szymańska A. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2012; 48(3):191-8. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
- Review Therapy for mucopolysaccharidosis VI: (Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome) present status and prospects.[Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2014]Review Therapy for mucopolysaccharidosis VI: (Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome) present status and prospects.Giugliani R, Herber S, Lapagesse L, de Pinto C, Baldo G. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2014 Sep; 12 Suppl 1:152-8.
- Galsulfase (Naglazyme)Galsulfase (Naglazyme)
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...