NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.
Structured Abstract
Objectives:
This systematic review was undertaken to evaluate which complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies are being used for persons with back pain in the United States.
Data Sources:
MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, CINAHL® and Cochrane Central® and a variety of CAM specific databases were searched from 1990 to November 2007. A grey literature search was also undertaken, particularly for clinical practice guidelines (CPG) related to CAM.
Review Methods:
Standard systematic review methodology was employed. Eligibility criteria included English studies of adults with back pain, and a predefined list of CAM therapies.
Results:
A total of 103 publications were evaluated; of these 29 did not present CAM therapy use stratified for back pain. There were a total of 65 utilization studies, 43 of which were American. Four publications evaluated the concurrent use of four or more CAM therapies and these suggest that chiropractic/manipulation is the most frequently used modality followed by massage and acupuncture. A limited number of publications evaluated utilization rates within multiple regions of the back and show that CAM was used least for treating the thoracic spine and most for the low back. However, rates of use of massage were similar for neck and lower back regions. Concurrent use of different CAM or conventional therapies was not well reported.
From 11 eligible CPG, only one (for electro-acupuncture) provided recommendations for frequency of use for low back pain of all acuity levels.
Eighteen cost publications were reviewed and all but one publication (cost-effectiveness) were cost identification studies. There is limited information on the impact of insurance coverage on costs and utilization specific to back pain.
Conclusions:
There are few studies evaluating the relative utilization of various CAM therapies for back pain. For those studies evaluating utilization of individual CAM therapies, the specific characteristics of the therapy, the providers, and the clinical presentation of the back pain patients were not adequately detailed; nor was the overlap with other CAM or conventional treatments.
Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Executive Summary
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Methods
- 3. Results
- Question 1. What is the Relative Utilization for the Different CAM Therapies?
- Trends in CAM Utilization
- Assessment of Quality of Utilization Publications
- Question 2. What is the Utilization Recommended by Different Types of Healthcare Providers?
- Question 3. What are the Usual Costs for These Therapies per Treatment and for the Prescribed Course of Treatment?
- 4. Discussion
- Appendixes
- References
EPC Director: Parminder Raina, PhD. Principal Investigators: P Lina Santaguida, BScPT, PhD and Anita Gross, BScPT, MSc (Clin Epi).
Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.1 Contract No. 290-02-0020. Prepared by: McMaster University Evidence-based Practice Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Suggested citation:
Santaguida PL, Gross A, Busse J, Gagnier J, Walker K, Bhandari M, Raina P. Evidence Report on Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Back Pain Utilization Report. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 177. (Prepared by the McMaster University Evidence-based Practice Center, under Contract No. 290-02-0020.) AHRQ Publication No.09-E006) Rockville, MD. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. February 2009.
No investigators have any affiliations or financial involvement (e.g., employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties) that conflict with material presented in this report.
- 1
540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850. www
.ahrq.gov
- Review Complementary and alternative therapies for back pain II.[Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full ...]Review Complementary and alternative therapies for back pain II.Furlan AD, Yazdi F, Tsertsvadze A, Gross A, Van Tulder M, Santaguida L, Cherkin D, Gagnier J, Ammendolia C, Ansari MT, et al. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2010 Oct; (194):1-764.
- Review An integrative review of complementary and alternative medicine use for back pain: a focus on prevalence, reasons for use, influential factors, self-perceived effectiveness, and communication.[Spine J. 2015]Review An integrative review of complementary and alternative medicine use for back pain: a focus on prevalence, reasons for use, influential factors, self-perceived effectiveness, and communication.Murthy V, Sibbritt DW, Adams J. Spine J. 2015 Aug 1; 15(8):1870-83. Epub 2015 May 9.
- Review A review of the evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and cost of acupuncture, massage therapy, and spinal manipulation for back pain.[Ann Intern Med. 2003]Review A review of the evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and cost of acupuncture, massage therapy, and spinal manipulation for back pain.Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Deyo RA, Shekelle PG. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jun 3; 138(11):898-906.
- Complementary and alternative medical therapies for chronic low back pain: What treatments are patients willing to try?[BMC Complement Altern Med. 2004]Complementary and alternative medical therapies for chronic low back pain: What treatments are patients willing to try?Sherman KJ, Cherkin DC, Connelly MT, Erro J, Savetsky JB, Davis RB, Eisenberg DM. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2004 Jul 19; 4:9. Epub 2004 Jul 19.
- Use of complementary and alternative medicine by mid-age women with back pain: a national cross-sectional survey.[BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012]Use of complementary and alternative medicine by mid-age women with back pain: a national cross-sectional survey.Broom AF, Kirby ER, Sibbritt DW, Adams J, Refshauge KM. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012 Jul 18; 12:98. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Back Pain Utilization ReportComplementary and Alternative Medicine in Back Pain Utilization Report
- TTH_RS03760 [Thermus thermophilus HB8]TTH_RS03760 [Thermus thermophilus HB8]Gene ID:3169132Gene
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...