NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
In recent years, the U.S. federal government has invested approximately $463 billion annually in interventions that affect the overall health and well-being of children and youth, while state and local budgets have devoted almost double that amount. The potential returns on these investments may not only be substantial but also have long-lasting effects for individuals and succeeding generations of their families.
Ideally, those tasked with making these investments would have available to them the evidence needed to determine the cost of all required resources to fully implement and sustain each intervention, the expected returns of the investment, to what extent these returns can be measured in monetary or nonmonetary terms, and who will receive the returns and when. As a result of a number of challenges, however, such evidence may not be effectively produced or applied. Low-quality evidence and/or a failure to consider the context in which the evidence will be used may weaken society's ability to invest wisely, and also reduce future demand for this and other types of evidence.
Advancing the Power of Economic Evidence to Inform Investments in Children, Youth, and Families highlights the potential for economic evidence to inform investment decisions for interventions that support the overall health and well-being of children, youth, and families. This report describes challenges to the optimal use of economic evidence, and offers recommendations to stakeholders to promote a lasting improvement in its quality, utility, and use.
Contents
- The National Academies of SCIENCES • ENGINEERING • MEDICINE
- COMMITTEE ON THE USE OF ECONOMIC EVIDENCE TO INFORM INVESTMENTS IN CHILDREN, YOUTH, AND FAMILIES
- BOARD ON CHILDREN, YOUTH, AND FAMILIES
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Summary
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Setting the Stage
- METHODS FOR ECONOMIC EVALUATION
- STAKEHOLDERS OF THE PRODUCTION AND USE OF ECONOMIC EVIDENCE
- CURRENT USES OF ECONOMIC EVALUATION TO INFORM INVESTMENTS IN CHILDREN, YOUTH, AND FAMILIES
- CHALLENGES IN THE USE OF ECONOMIC EVALUATION TO INFORM INVESTMENTS IN CHILDREN, YOUTH, AND FAMILIES
- ECONOMIC EVIDENCE AS PART OF THE EVIDENCE ECOSYSTEM
- REFERENCES
- 3. Producing High-Quality Economic Evidence to Inform Investments in Children, Youth, and Families
- DETERMINING WHETHER AN INTERVENTION IS READY FOR ECONOMIC EVALUATION
- DEFINING THE SCOPE OF THE ECONOMIC EVALUATION
- EVALUATING INTERVENTION COST
- DETERMINING INTERVENTION IMPACTS
- VALUING OUTCOMES
- GETTING TO RESULTS: THE DEVELOPMENT AND REPORTING OF SUMMARY MEASURES
- HANDLING UNCERTAINTY IN ECONOMIC EVALUATION
- ADDRESSING EQUITY CONSIDERATIONS
- RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BEST PRACTICES FOR PRODUCING AND REPORTING HIGH-QUALITY ECONOMIC EVIDENCE
- Checklist of Best Practices for Producing High-Quality Economic Evidence
- Recommended Best Practices for Reporting Economic Evidence
- Checklist of Best Practices for Reporting Economic Evidence
- REFERENCES
- 4. Context Matters
- 5. A Roadmap for Improving the Use of High-Quality Economic Evidence
- APPENDIXES
- Glossary
Suggested citation:
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Advancing the Power of Economic Evidence to Inform Investments in Children, Youth, and Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23481.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Investing in river health.[Water Sci Technol. 2002]Investing in river health.Bennett J. Water Sci Technol. 2002; 45(11):85-90.
- Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.[Pediatrics. 2003]Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.Schor EL, American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on the Family. Pediatrics. 2003 Jun; 111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
- Similarities and differences between stakeholders' opinions on using Health Technology Assessment (HTA) information across five European countries: results from the EQUIPT survey.[Health Res Policy Syst. 2016]Similarities and differences between stakeholders' opinions on using Health Technology Assessment (HTA) information across five European countries: results from the EQUIPT survey.Vokó Z, Cheung KL, Józwiak-Hagymásy J, Wolfenstetter S, Jones T, Muñoz C, Evers SM, Hiligsmann M, de Vries H, Pokhrel S, et al. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 May 26; 14(1):38. Epub 2016 May 26.
- Review IMPRoving Outcomes for children exposed to domestic ViolencE (IMPROVE): an evidence synthesis[ 2016]Review IMPRoving Outcomes for children exposed to domestic ViolencE (IMPROVE): an evidence synthesisHowarth E, Moore THM, Welton NJ, Lewis N, Stanley N, MacMillan H, Shaw A, Hester M, Bryden P, Feder G. 2016 Dec
- Review Returns on Investment in the Continuum of Care for Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health.[Reproductive, Maternal, Newbor...]Review Returns on Investment in the Continuum of Care for Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health.Stenberg K, Sweeny K, Axelson H, Temmerman M, Sheehan P. Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health: Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 2). 2016 Apr 5
- Advancing the Power of Economic Evidence to Inform Investments in Children, Yout...Advancing the Power of Economic Evidence to Inform Investments in Children, Youth, and Families
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...