Included under terms of UK Non-commercial Government License.
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Alton EWFW, Armstrong DK, Ashby D, et al.; on behalf of the UK Cystic Fibrosis Gene Therapy Consortium. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of repeated nebulisation of non-viral cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 Jul. (Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation, No. 3.5.)
A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of repeated nebulisation of non-viral cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Show detailsTransgene-specific DNA and mRNA
Nasal
In the nasal arm of the substudy, the assay could quantify a dosing-dependent increase in vector-specific DNA in 15 out of 15 active-dose subjects post treatment, although in four of these modest levels of DNA were detected prior to dosing. In the placebo patients, DNA could also be detected in samples from three out of four subjects post dosing (none prior to dosing); no vector-specific mRNA was quantifiable in either group.
Potential difference measurements
Nasal
The nasal arm comprised 24 patients in the ITT group, 20 of whom were in the PP. One patient had a mean total chloride secretory response ≥ 5 mV pre-dosing and was, therefore, excluded as prespecified in the protocol. Day 28 post-treatment recordings for two active-treatment patients had to be delayed beyond a window of > 7 days of the prespecified interval and were therefore excluded; both patients had usable values at the day 14 post treatment time point. Overall, 75 out of 106 (70.8%) of zero chloride, and 70 out of 106 (66.0%) of isoproterenol recordings were interpretable.
There were no significant changes in baseline values or amiloride responses in either the placebo or active-treatment groups. No significant changes in either the zero chloride or isoproterenol responses were seen. For the zero chloride component 10 out of 14 active-treatment patients and three out of six placebo patients showed net secretion (i.e. a more negative value post treatment than pretreatment); 4 out of 14 active-treatment patients showed mean pre–post-treatment responses (ranging from –3.4 mV to –7.0 mV), which were more negative than the largest placebo response. For the isoproterenol component, 11 out of 12 active-treatment patients and three out of six placebo patients showed net secretion (Figure 31).
Bronchial
In the bronchial subgroup, one active-treatment patient withdrew after six doses, but consented to post-dosing bronchoscopy within the prespecified timing (28 ± 5 days) after the last dose; values for this patient are included in the analysis. Post-dosing bronchoscopy was performed on two placebo patients 58 and 62 days after their last doses, and on two active-treatment patients 49 and 111 days after their last dose. The data for the two placebo patients are included in the final analysis, on the basis that the natural history of bronchial electrophysiology is unlikely to be influenced by a dose of saline approximately 60 days previously. Values for the two active-treatment patients were omitted from the final analysis given the monthly dosing schedule in the trial based on previously generated gene expression data, although their samples were included in the safety analysis. Overall, 66 out of 102 (64.7%) recordings fulfilled the acceptability criteria.
There were no significant changes in basal values in either the placebo or active-treatment groups. Figure 32 shows bronchial chloride responses using the mean of all available interpretable tracings for each patient; a negative value indicates a non-CF direction. The placebo group (n = 7) had a median pre–post trial change of +3.1 mV (range +9.3 to –1.2 mV) and the active-treatment group (n = 10) –1.3 mV (range +4.0 to –5.8 mV) (p = 0.032). Five out of 10 active-treatment patients had values more negative than the largest placebo response. Figure 32b shows the same analysis with only the most negative value recorded for each patient at any time point. The placebo group showed a median pre–post trial change of +2.6 mV (range +9.3 to –1.2 mV) and the active group –2.8 mV (range + 4.0 to –16.8 mV) (p = 0.087). Six out of 10 active-treatment patients had values more negative than the largest placebo response.
- Results of mechanistic substudy - A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled...Results of mechanistic substudy - A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of repeated nebulisation of non-viral cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis
- Sympathetic ophthalmiaSympathetic ophthalmiaMedGen
- C0029077[conceptid] (1)MedGen
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...