Included under terms of UK Non-commercial Government License.
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Headline
In this study, we found that after-school dance sessions did not have any effect on levels of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity in Year 7 girls. The intervention was relatively inexpensive to deliver but it was not cost-effective, as there was no positive intervention effect.
Abstract
Background:
Many children do not meet UK physical activity (PA) guidelines. Girls are less active than boys, and the age-related decline in activity is steeper for girls. Dance is the favourite form of PA among adolescent girls in the UK. Participation in after-school dance classes could significantly contribute to girls’ PA. Therefore, after-school dance may be effective for increasing PA levels.
Objectives:
To determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a dance-based intervention to increase the objectively assessed mean weekday minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) of Year 7 girls (11- and 12-year olds) 1 year after baseline measurement.
Design:
Two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. Year 7 girls in participant schools received a ‘taster’ session and were invited to participate. Up to 33 girls per school were able to participate. Schools were randomly assigned (equal numbers) to intervention or control arms.
Setting:
A total of 18 mainstream secondary schools across greater Bristol.
Participants:
Year 7 girls in participating schools who could participate in physical education.
Intervention:
Nine intervention schools received an after-school dance intervention (40 × 75-minute sessions) underpinned by self-determination theory, which attempts to improve intrinsic motivation for being active, and delivered by external dance instructors. Control schools continued as normal.
Main outcome measures:
The main outcome was accelerometer-assessed mean minutes of MVPA at T2. Measures were assessed at baseline (T0), the end of the intervention (T1) and at T0 + 52 weeks (T2).
Results:
Baseline MVPA levels were high. A total of 508 girls were included in the primary analysis, which found no difference in weekday MVPA between trial arms. There was no effect on secondary accelerometer outcomes. Data were subjected to a per-protocol analysis and no effect was found. However, at T1, girls who attended dance classes had 4.61 minutes more of MVPA and 14.27 minutes more of light-intensity activity between 15.00 and 17.00 on the days on which they attended intervention sessions. The intervention was inexpensive at £73 per participant (£63 when excluding dance instructor travel) but was not cost-effective owing to the ineffectiveness of the intervention. The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Youth survey data were unresponsive to changes in the sample. The process evaluation reported that girls in attendance enjoyed the sessions, that exertion levels were low during sessions and that attendance was low and declined. Fidelity to the session-plan manual was low but theoretical fidelity (to self-determination theory) was good. Qualitative information provides information for improving future interventions.
Conclusions:
The intervention was enjoyed by participants. However, there was no difference in the MVPA levels (which were high at baseline) of girls allocated to receive dance compared with girls receiving the control. High baseline MVPA levels indicate that the study appealed to an already active cohort and, therefore, may not have targeted those most in need of an intervention. Dance is an enjoyable activity for adolescent girls and could be further trialled as a means by which to increase PA. Research might consider the impact of dividing the intervention period into smaller blocks.
Trial Registration:
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN52882523.
Funding:
The National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research programme. The work was also undertaken with the support of the Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), a UK Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC) PHR Centre of Excellence. Joint funding (MR/KO232331/1) from the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, the Welsh Government and the Wellcome Trust, under the auspices of the UKCRC, is gratefully acknowledged. This study was designed and delivered in collaboration with the Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, a UKCRC Registered Clinical Trials Unit in receipt of NIHR Clinical Trials Unit support funding. All intervention costs were funded by the respective councils to which the participant schools were affiliated, namely North Somerset Council, Bristol City Council, and Bath and North East Somerset Council.
Contents
- Plain English summary
- Scientific summary
- Chapter 1. Introduction/background
- Benefits of physical activity
- Girls’ physical activity
- Interventions to increase girls’ physical activity
- Dance as a method to improve girls’ physical activity levels
- Theories of behaviour change: self-determination theory in physical activity research
- Formative work
- Summary and rationale for the Bristol Girls Dance Project trial
- Chapter 2. Trial design and methods
- Aims and objectives
- Research design
- Study population and recruitment
- Public and patient involvement
- Baseline data
- Randomisation
- Intervention group
- Development of dance instructor training and manual
- Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist
- Control group
- Measurements
- Sample size
- Blinding
- Process evaluation methods
- Qualitative analysis
- Statistical analysis
- Economic evaluation
- Chapter 3. Trial results
- Chapter 4. Economic evaluation
- Chapter 5. Process evaluation overview
- Chapter 6. Process evaluation: main findings
- Chapter 7. Theory-based process evaluation
- Dance instructor training and acceptance of the intervention theory (self-determination theory)
- Observed dance instructor teaching practices
- Need support and satisfaction
- Challenges of delivering a self-determination theory-based physical activity intervention for girls
- Motivation
- Theory-based process evaluation summary
- Conclusion
- Chapter 8. Lessons learnt from the delivery of Active7
- Chapter 9. Discussion
- Chapter 10. Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Appendix 1 Excerpts from the ‘Guide for dance instructors’
- Appendix 2 Excerpts from the ‘dance diary’
- Appendix 3 Child focus group guide
- Appendix 4 Dance instructor interview guide
- Appendix 5 School contact interview guide
- Appendix 6 Convergence coding matrix
- Appendix 7 Trustworthiness of qualitative data
- Appendix 8 Summary of qualitative assessment of fidelity to self-determination theory and improvements
- Appendix 9 Dissemination letter for intervention schools
- Appendix 10 Dissemination letter for control schools
- Appendix 11 Dissemination postcard for Active7 girls
- Appendix 12 Dissemination letter for parents
- Appendix 13 Dissemination poster for schools
- List of abbreviations
Article history
The research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the PHR programme as project number 11/3050/01. The contractual start date was in April 2013. The final report began editorial review in July 2015 and was accepted for publication in December 2015. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The PHR editors and production house have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors’ report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the final report document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.
Declared competing interests of authors
Professor Jago has been a member of the Research Funding Board for the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research (PHR) board since October 2014. Professor Powell was a member of the NIHR PHR Funding Board from June 2011 to September 2015.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Review A peer-led physical activity intervention in schools for adolescent girls: a feasibility RCT[ 2019]Review A peer-led physical activity intervention in schools for adolescent girls: a feasibility RCTSebire SJ, Banfield K, Campbell R, Edwards MJ, Kipping R, Kadir B, Garfield K, Matthews J, Blair PS, Lyons RA, et al. 2019 Sep
- Bristol girls dance project (BGDP): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of an after-school dance programme to increase physical activity among 11-12 year old girls.[BMC Public Health. 2013]Bristol girls dance project (BGDP): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of an after-school dance programme to increase physical activity among 11-12 year old girls.Jago R, Edwards MJ, Sebire SJ, Cooper AR, Powell JE, Bird EL, Simon J, Blair PS. BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 24; 13:1003. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
- Review A school-based intervention (‘Girls Active’) to increase physical activity levels among 11- to 14-year-old girls: cluster RCT[ 2019]Review A school-based intervention (‘Girls Active’) to increase physical activity levels among 11- to 14-year-old girls: cluster RCTHarrington DM, Davies MJ, Bodicoat D, Charles JM, Chudasama YV, Gorely T, Khunti K, Rowlands AV, Sherar LB, Tudor-Edwards R, et al. 2019 Feb
- Effect and cost of an after-school dance programme on the physical activity of 11-12 year old girls: The Bristol Girls Dance Project, a school-based cluster randomised controlled trial.[Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015]Effect and cost of an after-school dance programme on the physical activity of 11-12 year old girls: The Bristol Girls Dance Project, a school-based cluster randomised controlled trial.Jago R, Edwards MJ, Sebire SJ, Tomkinson K, Bird EL, Banfield K, May T, Kesten JM, Cooper AR, Powell JE, et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Oct 6; 12:128. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
- Review A school-based, peer-led programme to increase physical activity among 13- to 14-year-old adolescents: the GoActive cluster RCT[ 2021]Review A school-based, peer-led programme to increase physical activity among 13- to 14-year-old adolescents: the GoActive cluster RCTCorder KL, Brown HE, Croxson CHD, Jong ST, Sharp SJ, Vignoles A, Wilkinson PO, Wilson ECF, van Sluijs EMF. 2021 Apr
- Bristol Girls Dance Project: a cluster randomised controlled trial of an after-s...Bristol Girls Dance Project: a cluster randomised controlled trial of an after-school dance programme to increase physical activity among 11- to 12-year-old girls
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...