NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Paynter R, Bañez LL, Berliner E, et al. EPC Methods: An Exploration of the Use of Text-Mining Software in Systematic Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Apr.
EPC Methods: An Exploration of the Use of Text-Mining Software in Systematic Reviews [Internet].
Show detailsTable E-2Evaluation components and choices
| Item | Description | Choices |
|---|---|---|
| Name | The full name of the tool or resource | Any |
| Acronym | Acronym or alternate name of the tool or resource | Any |
| URL | The URL to the web-based tool or resource or to the file download | Any |
| Availability | Availability, either freely available to all users or proprietary or commercial product | FR, Free| FRT, Free limited time trial| CP, Commercial Product| UC, Unclear| OTH, Other| NA, Not Applicable |
| Cost | Cost of the tool or resource or subscription to services in U.S. dollars | Any |
| Web-Based | Is the tool accessible for use via the internet using a URL? | 0, No| 1, Yes| UC, Unclear |
| Platform | Supported operating system for tools or resources that require download or installation | WIN, Windows| MAC, Macintosh |LIN, Linux| MULTI, Multiple| OTH, Other| UC, Unclear| NA, Not Applicable |
| Developer | Company, institution, or individual credited as the developer of the tool or resource | Any |
| Multiuser | Does the tool or resource support multiple concurrent users for collaboration on an individual project | 0, No| 1, Yes| UC, Unclear |
| Literature | Has literature been identified that describes the development, validation, or evaluation of the tool or resource? | 0, No| 1, Yes| UC, Unclear |
| Citation(s) | List the publication(s) that describe development, validation, or evaluation of the tool or resource. | Any/ link to PubMed UI |
| Applicability | Is the tool or resource designed to support, or could it be easily modified to support, the conduct of a systematic reviews? | 0, No| 1, Yes| UC, Unclear |
| Prior Use in a Systematic Review | Has the tool or resource previously been used to support a systematic reviews? | 0, No| 1, Yes| UC, Unclear |
| Systematic Review Support | How the tool has been or could be used to support conduct of the systematic review. | TR, topic refinement, scope, or question development| FI, searching, collecting, retrieving literature or data| IE, screening or eligibility assessment| EX, data extraction or synthesis| OTH, other| UC, unclear |
| Deploy Status | Is the tool or resource fully functional and available for use (i.e., not in development or pilot status)? | 0, No| 1, Yes| UC, Unclear |
| Tech Level | Degree of technical expertise or support expected for an average user to install, customize and/or run the tool or resource. | 0, Low| 1, Medium| 2, High| UC, Unclear |
| Features | Broad list of functions or features specific to text mining. | ATM, Automatic Term Recognition| DCT, Document Clustering| DCL, Document Classification| DTM, Document Term Matrix| IEX, Information Extraction| IR, Information Retrieval| NLP, Natural Language Processing| TRV, Text Retrieval | TCA, Text Categorization| TCL, Text Cluster| TSM, Text Summarization| VIZ, Visualization| WFA, Word Frequency Analysis |
| Help | Availability of instructions or other help documentation for use and installation of the tool | Any, link to help documentation or manual |
| Comments | Comments | Any |
| Registration | Is registration or an account required? | 0, No| 1, Yes| UC, Unclear |
- Table E-2, Evaluation components and choices - EPC Methods: An Exploration of th...Table E-2, Evaluation components and choices - EPC Methods: An Exploration of the Use of Text-Mining Software in Systematic Reviews
- MULTISPECIES: LpxI family protein [Leptospira]MULTISPECIES: LpxI family protein [Leptospira]gi|446439271|ref|WP_000517126.1|Protein
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...