U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Bunn F, Burn AM, Goodman C, et al. Comorbidity and dementia: a mixed-method study on improving health care for people with dementia (CoDem). Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 Feb. (Health Services and Delivery Research, No. 4.8.)

Cover of Comorbidity and dementia: a mixed-method study on improving health care for people with dementia (CoDem)

Comorbidity and dementia: a mixed-method study on improving health care for people with dementia (CoDem).

Show details

Appendix 4Additional tables for the scoping review

TABLE 12

Details of studies included in the scoping review

Study IDCountryStudy designNumber of participantsAims/research questionsStudy focusaComorbidityAge (years)bSex (% female)
Allan et al., 200589 (Allan 2006162)UKQualitativeTotal: 43 (n = 12 service users with hearing impairment, n = 16 practitioners, n = 8 relatives, n = 7 British Sign Language interpreters)Consultation exercise looking at issues for people with dementia with hearing lossVHearing impairmentNRNR
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care 201388AustraliaRapid reviewNATo identify best practice in caring for patients with cognitive impairment in acute hospital settingsSGeneralNANA
Alshekhlee et al., 2011151USACohort study35,557 patients with a diagnosis of dementia; 207 (0.58%) had received thrombolysisTo establish the impact of dementia on hospital mortality and intracerebral haemorrhage rates associated with thrombolysis therapy for AISAStrokeMost aged > 8063
Balfour and O’Rourke 200390CanadaCross-sectionalTotal: 460 PLWD (n = 245 with arthritis, n = 215 no arthritis)Are patients with Alzheimer’s disease inappropriately prescribed neuroleptics and benzodiazepinesQArthritis84.3373
Barnett et al., 201291 (Guthrie et al., 20124)UKCross-sectional1,751,841 patients from database of primary care practicesExamined distribution of multimorbidity and comorbidity in relation to age and socioeconomic deprivationPGeneral multimorbidity but includes information on diabetes and stroke16.6% aged ≥ 6550.5
Bartlett and McKeefry 201193 (Bartlett and McKeefry 2009158)UKQualitative and scoping7 practitioners, 4 studentsTo increase knowledge of visual issues and eye health for people with dementiaVVINRNR
Bartlett and Clarke 201292UKQualitative5 HCPsHow HCPs assess the needs of and communicate with a person dying from cancer with a coincidental dementiaVCancerNR100
Bayer et al., 199494UKPrevalence study26 older people with diabetes (in all but five, diabetes predated dementia)Impact of dementia on diabetic careVDiabetesMedian 78.5 (range 70–91)73
Beishon et al., 2014149NASystematic reviewIncludes six RCTsAssess the evidence for the treatment of hypertension in older people with dementiaAHypertension≥ 65NR
Bruce et al., 200395AustraliaCross-sectional223 older people with diabetesDetermine whether or not the prevalence of dementia in older diabetics warrants an active screening approachPDementia and depression in people with diabetes76.548.8
Busl et al., 2013154USARetrospective cross-sectional153 (13.6% pre-stroke dementia)To determine whether or not pre-stroke dementia contributed to poor outcomes in stroke patients aged > 80 years who underwent intravenous and/or IAT reperfusionAStroke86NR
College of Optometrists 201296UKGuidelinesNAGuidelines for optometrists examining a patient with dementia or cognitive impairmentSVINANA
Connolly et al., 2013161 (Connolly et al., 201297)UKObservational, cross-sectional review of primary care records700 PLWD (compared with people without dementia on QOF register)Evaluate the quality of medical care for vascular diseases provided to people with dementiaQStroke and diabetes82.1 (43–102)66
Curtis et al., 201298USARetrospective cohort study284,380 (with and without dementia)Examine use of treatments for AMDQVI (AMD)8164
Dewing and Dijk 201499UKLiterature reviewNAReview of the literature on the acute care of PLWD in general hospitalsV, SGeneralNANA
Doraiswamy et al., 20021USACross-sectional679 older people with Alzheimer’s diseaseExamine the prevalence of comorbid medical illness in Alzheimer’s disease patientsPGeneral87Community 55.6, assisted living 75.8, nursing home 83.5
Doucet et al., 2008100FranceCross-sectional238 older people with diabetesIdentify characteristics of elderly diabetic patients and evaluate relationship between glycaemic control and complications of diabetesQDiabetes82.258
Feil et al., 2003101USALongitudinal cross-sectional7482 older adultsExamine relationship between cognitive impairment, common chronic medical illnesses and risk of mortality in older peoplePSeveral but includes diabetes and stroke51% aged ≥ 8561
Feil et al., 2009103USALongitudinal cross-sectional51 people with diabetes (n = 27 with caregiver)Examine role of cognitive impairment and caregiver support in diabetes care adherence and glycaemic controlP, QDiabetes78 (62–90)0
Feil et al., 2011102USAQualitative21 caregivers of PLWD and diabetesExplore caregivers’ challenges and quality-of-life issues managing diabetes in PLWDVDiabetes65–90Majority female (numbers not given)
Feil et al., 2011104USACross-sectional database analysis497,000 veterans with diabetes (with and without cognitive impairment/dementia)Examine the relationship between management of diabetes and hypoglycaemia in older adults with dementiaP, QDiabetes100% aged > 65, 44% aged > 752
Formiga et al., 2009105SpainProspective population-based survey515 PLWDEvaluate comorbidity in elderly with dementia to determine differences according to dementia severityPGeneral8170
George et al., 2011106UKSystematic reviewExamine literature to determine the evidence for the effectiveness of joint geriatric/psychiatric wardsSGeneralNANA
Gillespie et al., 2014153NASystematic review/scoping10 studies (n = 5 USA, n = 2 UK, n = 2 Australia, n = 1 Canada)To explore published literature that describes what is known about the role of informal caregivers as they manage medications for older adults and/or PLWD resident in the communityVGeneralNRNR
Gladman et al., 2012107UKQualitative study (and review)60 HCPs, 36 patient and carer interviewsElicit staff and organisational attitudes to dealing with older patients with cognitive impairment, understand the impact on patients, carers and staff and identify potential improvementsVGeneralPatients 86.8 (70–99), carers 63 (46–79)HCPs 80, patients 56
Gold et al., 1996108USACase–control52 patients attending a memory clinic (n = 30 dementia, n = 22 cognitive impairment)Determine prevalence and characteristics of hearing loss and whether screening tools are adequate and patients with Alzheimer’s disease can adequately report hearing problemsPHearing lossNR83
Goldberg et al., 2013109UKRCT310 intervention group, 290 control groupDevelop and evaluate a best practice model of general hospital acute medical care for older people with cognitive impairmentSGeneralMedian 85Intervention group 55, control group 40
Guijarro et al., 2010110SpainCohort40,482 PLWDDetermine prevalence and clinical characteristics of hospitalised dementia patientsP, QSeveral including cataracts and diabetes78NR
Heun et al., 201312UKRetrospective case–control634 with Alzheimer’s disease, 72,244 control groupDifferences between Alzheimer’s disease and non-Alzheimer’s disease patients in terms of comorbid diseases at hospital admission and which comorbidities contribute to mortalityPGeneralAlzheimer’s disease 85.1 (SE 8.2), control 80.8 (SE 7.4)Alzheimer’s disease 65, control 51
Hewitt et al., 201020UKQuestionnaire survey1047 older people with type 2 diabetesExamine knowledge and management of diabetes in older peopleP, VDiabetes80.9 (75–100)53.3
Hill et al., 2013112UKGuidanceNAHighlight importance of recognising relationship between diabetes and dementia, the impact one condition has on the other and maximising the benefits and safety of diabetes treatments while minimising risksQDiabetesNANA
Hoffman et al., 2011111GermanyCohort1848 PLWDDetermine whether or not comorbidity and polypharmacy influence prescription of cholinesterase inhibitors in PLWDQGeneral comorbidity but some mention of visual disturbances78.747.6
Holmes et al., 2010113UKLiterature review, mapping and case study10 case study sites: recruited 757 participants in the referred cohort and 975 participants in the comparison cohortEstablish what service models are being used to improve the care of older people with mental health problems in general hospitals and what impact these models might have on outcomesSGeneral80Comparison cohort 55, referred cohort 64%
Ishii et al., 2008114JapanCase series88 people with VIEvaluate the influence of cataract surgery on cognitive function and depressive mental status of elderly patientsQVI75.3 (55–93)64
Jara et al., 2011144USA (but UK data)Retrospective cohort8124 Alzheimer’s disease cohort, 642,325 non-Alzheimer’s disease cohortEvaluate the occurrence of cataracts in people with Alzheimer’s disease compared with the general populationPVI64+Alzheimer’s disease cohort 68, non-Alzheimer’s disease cohort 54
Jefferis et al., 2011115UKLiterature reviewNAWhat are the implications for practice relating to the benefits of cataract surgery for PLWD?QVI (cataracts)NANA
Jones and Trigg 2007116 (Trigg and Jones 200573)UKScoping reviewNAReview of research on PLWD and serious sight lossP, QVINANA
Keenan 2014117UKCohort65,894 AMD cohort, 168,092 dementia cohortAre PLWD more or less likely to be admitted to hospital for AMD treatmentQVI (AMD)Majority > 6561
Lawrence et al., 200972 (Lawrence et al., 2008,156 2010,160 2011157)UKQualitative17 PLWD and VI, 17 family caregivers, 18 HCPsThe experiences and needs of older adults with VI and dementiaVVI65–99 (18/19 aged ≥ 75)63
Löppönen et al., 2004118FinlandCross-sectional population-based study1260 older people, 112 PLWDStudy of undiagnosed diseases in older people with and without dementiaP, QSeveral including diabetes, stroke and VI64+58
Lyketsos et al., 2005119USACase–control695 older people; 149 PLWD, 225 without cognitive impairment, 321 cognitive impairment no dementiaInvestigated medical comorbidity in persons with dementia and cognitive impairmentPGeneralDementia 83.89, CIND 82.38, no dementia 79.93Dementia 64.4, CIND 53.8, no dementia 54.8
MacKenzie et al., 2011120CanadaRCT56 stroke and MCI patientsInvestigate whether nurse case management interventions result in lowered blood pressureSMainly stroke but includes diabetes59% > 6530
McCormick et al., 1994121USACase–controlTotal: 375 (n = 154 with dementia, n = 92 with cognitive impairment, n = 129 control group)Compare comorbidity in Alzheimer’s disease patients and non-Alzheimer’s disease patientsPGeneral76Dementia 68, cognitive impairment 57, control 63
McKeefry and Bartlett 2010122 (McKeefry and Bartlett 201074)UKScoping reviewNATo develop guidelines for optometrists for best practice with patients with dementia and sight lossSVINANA
Müther et al., 2010123GermanyRetrospective matched control study216 PLWD, 216 matched control subjects without dementiaAre patients with dementia treated differently from patients without dementia?QSeveral, includes diabetesdementia group 82.7, non-dementia group 82.277.3
Parke et al., 2011124CanadaScoping reviewIncluded 15 evaluation studiesScope research on cognitive impairment in older adults who visited the emergency department of an acute care hospital and evaluation of effectiveness of programmesSGeneral65+NA
Parke et al., 2013125CanadaQualitative10 adult–family caregiver dyads, 10 emergency department nurses, 4 nurse practitionersIdentify factors that facilitate or impede safe transitional care in the emergency department for community-dwelling older adultsS, VGeneralPLWD 83.17 (77–90), carer 57.81 (51–84)Not specified
Pendlebury and Rothwell 200969NASystematic review22 hospital-based and 8 population-based cohortsIdentify the risk factors for dementia and whether or not there are any differences in the risk factors associated with pre-stroke and post-stroke dementiaPStrokeNANA
Pendlebury et al., 2015146UKCross-sectional1236 patients with acute transient ischemic attack or strokeTo determine the impact of study entry criteria on measured rates of pre- and post-event dementiaPStroke7553
Poblador-Plou et al., 201414SpainCross-sectional72,815 [3971 (5.45%) diagnosed with dementia]To look at the prevalence of chronic conditions in PLWDPGeneral70 whole sample, 80 PLWD70
Poland et al., 2014148UKQualitative9 carers of PLWDTo identify carers’ views gained from experiences of medication management in dementiaVGeneralNR89
Rabadi et al., 2008126USARetrospective analysis668 (n = 435 with cognitive impairment)Can stroke patients with cognitive impairment benefit from admission to an acute rehabilitation unit?SStroke70.3 (22–96)53
Rait et al., 2010127UKCohort22,529 PLWD, 112,645 matched non-dementia participants. Ratio of 1 : 5 dementia : non-dementiaEstimate survival after diagnosis of dementia in primary care compared with people without dementia and determine incidence of dementiaP, QSeveral including stroke and diabetes82.2Dementia 67.9, no dementia 55.8
Sakurai et al., 2010128JapanPrevalence study113 PLWDInvestigated prevalence of coexisting diseases in PLWDPSeveral including diabetes78.673
Saposnik et al., 2011129CanadaRetrospective cohort877 with pre-existing dementia, 877 control subjects (no pre-existing dementia)Determine if pre-existing dementia is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and disability after ischaemic strokeP, QStroke8260
Schubert et al., 20062USACross-sectionalTotal: 3013 (107 PLWD)Compare the medical comorbidity of older patients with and without dementia in primary carePSeveral including stroke and diabetes73.466.6
Shah et al., 2007130UKSurvey100 optometry practicesInvestigate the accessibility of a sight test for an older person with dementiaQVINANA
Shamy and Jaigobin 2013152CanadaSurveyNR but say they had a response rate of 69%To better understand the decision-making process surrounding the administration of IV tPAAStrokeNot knownNot known
Sinclair et al., 200021UKCase–control396 with diabetes, 393 matched control subjectsWhether cognitive impairment is associated with changes in self-care behaviour and health service use in older diabeticsQDiabetesDiabetics 74.9, control 74.851
Sinclair et al., 2011131EuropeGuidanceNASupport clinical decisions in older people with diabetes and enhance high-quality diabetes care by the use of best available evidenceSDiabetesNANA
Sinclair et al., 2014147UKGuidanceNAOutline key steps in integrated care pathway for dementia and diabetes, produce guidance on identifying each condition, deal with potentially hazardous issue of hypoglycaemia and outline important competencies for HCPs in both settingsSDiabetesNANA
Sloan et al., 2004155USACross-sectional (retrospective chart review)5851 admitted for acute myocardial infarction with dementia, 123,241 admitted for AMI without dementiaDifferences in mortality after admission for AMI and in treatments for AMI between patients with and without dementiaSAMIDementia 81.6, no dementia 75.5Dementia 57.2, no dementia 46.3
Spencer et al., 2013132UKQualitativeTotal: 40 (n = 20 from specialist unit, n = 20 standard care)Examine carers’ views and experiences of delivery of patient care for PLWD in acute general hospital in order to evaluate specialist medical and mental health unit compared with standard hospital wardsVGeneralNRNot clear
Stenvall et al., 2012133SwedenRCT64 patients with fractured neck of femur (n = 28 intervention group, n = 36 control group)Whether or not a multidisciplinary postoperative intervention programme reduced postoperative complications and improved functional recovery among people with dementiaSHip fracture> 70Intervention group 79, control group 69
Stephan et al., 2011134UKCross-sectionalTotal: 13,004 (n = 587 PLWD, n = 319 MCI, n = 608 no cognitive impairment)Compared the pattern of disease comorbidity across different cognitive groups and whether or not comorbidity is a risk factor for dementia progressionPSeveral but includes diabetes and strokeDementia group – with health conditions 79.8, no health conditions 81.9Dementia group – with health conditions 60.1, no health conditions 73.2
Tadros et al., 2013135UKRetrospective analysisNot givenEvaluate whether or not implementation of the RAID integrated model improves access to psychiatric assessment and reduces costs of health service provision in an acute hospitalSGeneralMean age of referrals from all wards 65.7; 23% of RAID group and 20% of control group were aged > 75RAID group 54, comparison group 40
Thorpe et al., 2012136USARetrospective cohortTotal: 288,805 (n = 44,717 PLWD)Examined how recommended monitoring of diabetes differed for people with and without comorbid dementiaP, QDiabetes26% aged 65–69, 48% aged 70–79, 25.9% aged 80+60
Uhlmann et al., 1989138USACase–control200 with hearing impairment (n = 100 with dementia, n = 100 control subjects)Whether or not hearing impairment contributes to cognitive dysfunction in older adultsPHearing impairment7758
Uhlmann et al., 1991137USACase–control87 PLWD, 87 matched control subjectsHow impaired visual acuity is associated with dementia and cognitive dysfunction in older adultsPVI7758
Vitry et al., 2010139AustraliaRetrospective cohort20,134 veterans with diabetes (includes people with dementia/cognitive impairment but numbers not clear)Whether or not the number of comorbid conditions unrelated to diabetes delays therapeutic progression of diabetes treatmentQDiabetes77.336
Whitson et al., 2010140USACross-sectional101 people with macular diseasePrevalence of comorbid cognitive impairment among older adults referred to low-vision rehabilitation for macular diseasePVI (macular disease)80.165
Yochim et al., 2012141USACase series41 glaucoma patientsPrevalence of cognitive impairment, depression and anxiety in older adults with glaucomaPVI7070
Zamrini et al., 2004142USACase–control999 people with Alzheimer’s diseasePrevalence of comorbid illness in black and white patients with probable Alzheimer’s diseasePSeveral but includes diabetes and eye diseaseFemale patients 75.1, male patients 73.149
Zekry et al., 2008143SwitzerlandCohort349 inpatients (43.3% dementia, 10.6% MCI)Comorbid conditions and functional and nutritional status in hospitalised patients with dementia and MCIPSeveral but includes data on stroke and diabetes8576
Zhang et al., 2010145AustraliaRetrospective cohort17,095 veterans with and without diabetes (4.4% on dementia medication)Impact of comorbidity on health service utilisation by Australian veterans with diabetesQDiabetes8144

AMI, acute myocardial infarction; IAT, intra-arterial reperfusion therapy; NA, not applicable; NR, not reported; RAID, Rapid Assessment, Interface and Discharge; SE, standard error.

a

P, prevalence; Q, quality of care; S, service organisation and management; V, views and experiences.

b

Unless otherwise stated refers to mean age and range.

TABLE 13

Prevalence studies: information on study populations, recruitment and participation

Study and countryType of studyType of populationEligibility criteria defined?Method of selectionNature of populationNumber of participantsParticipation rate
Barnett et al., 2012,91 UK (Scotland)Cross-sectionalGeneralAlive, permanently registered with a participating practiceNational data setPrimary care (about one-third of all Scottish population)11,139All patients registered with primary care practice
Bruce et al., 2003,95 AustraliaLongitudinal cross-sectionalDiabetesDefined by postcode, age ≥ 70 years, diabetesInitial 223 members of a cohort of 529 participantsCommunity-based volunteers who consented to take part223Initially recruited 63% of those who were eligible
Doraiswamy et al., 2002,1 USACross-sectionalDementiaDiagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, age ≥ 50 yearsFrom a variety of community health-care sitesVolunteers who consented to take part679Not clear
Feil et al., 2003,101 USALongitudinal cross-sectionalCognitive impairmentGeographically defined, age ≥ 65 yearsSecondary data analysis of data set from community-based studyCommunity-based volunteers who consented to take part7482 (1774 with cognitive impairment)80% (baseline interview)
Feil et al., 2009,103 USALongitudinal cross-sectionalDiabetesDiagnosis of type 2 diabetes, age ≥ 60 yearsElectronic medical diagnosis of type 2 diabetesGeriatric medical clinic51Not clear
Feil et al., 2011,104 USACross-sectionalDiabetesVeterans aged ≥ 65 with diabetesSecondary data analysis of research administration database (Veterans Health Administration, Medicare and Medicaid)Population-based sample – large national health-care system database497,000All patients on database
Heun et al., 2013,12 UKRetrospective case–controlDementiaDiagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, age 70+ years, inpatient care for at least 24 hoursConsecutively admitted inpatientsHospital634All patients who met criteria were included
Hewitt et al., 2010,20 UKQuestionnaireDiabetes (cognitive impairment)Type 2 diabetes, age ≥ 75 years, not resident in a nursing homeSecondary data analysis of intervention arm of RCTPrimary care1047Not clear
Jara et al., 2011,144 UKRetrospective cohortDementiaAge ≥ 64 years, at least 24 months’ enrolment, no cataract diagnosis at baselineNational data setPrimary care650,325 (8124 with dementia)All patients registered with primary care practice
Löppönen et al., 2004,118 FinlandCross-sectionalDementiaGeographically defined, age ≥ 65 yearsAll those who met criteria invited in random orderPopulation based11282%
Lyketsos et al., 2005,119 USACase–controlDementia/cognitive impairmentGeographically defined, age ≥ 65 yearsAll those who met criteria invited to participatePopulation based695 (374 with dementia)90%
McCormick et al., 1994,121 USACase–controlDementia/cognitive impairmentAge ≥ 60 years, member of HMO, geographically definedSubsample recruited from database (not clear how chosen)From HMO database154Not clear
Pendlebury et al., 2015146Cross-sectionalStrokeAll patients with stroke or TIAAll those with stroke or TIA within defined population area. Recruited through general practice or secondary carePopulation based1236 (from a population of 92,728)92%
Poblador-Plou et al., 2014,14 SpainCross-sectionalDementiaAge ≥ 65 years, consulted physician at least once during the 12-month period of the studyPrimary care data set (19 primary health-care centres)Primary care72,815 (3971 with dementia)All patients who visit GP at least once during 2008
Rait et al., 2010,127 UKCohortDementiaAge 60+ years with first code for dementia during the study period, at least 6 months of dataNational data set (practices that met standards for acceptable levels of data recording)Primary care135,174 (22,529 with dementia)All patients registered with primary care practice
Sakurai et al., 2010,128 JapanCross-sectionalDementiaDementia or MCIConsecutive outpatients attending memory clinicMemory clinic160Not clear
Saposnik et al., 2011,129 CanadaRetrospective cohortStroke and dementiaAge ≥ 18 years, first ischaemic strokeStroke registerClinical database10,658All stroke patients attending 12 regional stroke centres
Schubert et al., 2006,2 USACross-sectionalDementiaAge ≥ 65, seen primary care physician within 2 year. Excluded nursing home residents and non-English-speaking patientsPrimary care practice centresPrimary care3013 (107 dementia)Not clear
Stephan et al., 2011,134 UKCross-sectionalMCIAge ≥ 65 yearsRandomly selected from health authority lists in five areas of the UKPopulation based13,004 (1486 dementia)Not clear
Uhlmann et al., 1991,137 USACase–controlDementiaAge ≥ 65 years, English speaking, eighth grade of higher level of education, ability to complete audiometric evaluationComputer searches of clinic recordsOutpatient clinic174 (87 dementia)70%
Whitson et al., 2010,140 USACross-sectionalVI (macular disease)Age ≥ 65 years, macular disease diagnosesAll eligible patients attending clinic invited to participateOutpatient clinic10174%
Yochim et al., 2012,141 USACase seriesVI (glaucoma)Age ≥ 50 years, diagnosis of glaucomaAll eligible patients attending clinic invited to participateOutpatient clinic41Not reported
Zamrini et al., 2004,142 USACase–controlDementiaProbable Alzheimer’s disease, black or white (white participants matched non-randomly to black participants)Computer searches of clinic recordsMemory clinic334All those eligible during study period
Zekry et al., 2008,143 SwitzerlandCohortDementiaAge ≥ 75 years. Excluded those with a terminal illness or disorders interfering with psychometric assessmentRandom sample of all patients admitted selected each dayHospital inpatients349 (188 dementia)85%
Zhang et al., 2010,145 AustraliaRetrospective cohortDiabetesVeterans, age ≥ 65, received prescription for diabetes in previous 6 monthsResearch administration database (Department of Veterans Affairs)From database of veteransAll eligible patients on database

HMO, health maintenance organisation; TIA, transient ischaemic attack.

TABLE 14

Prevalence studies: information on methods for data collection

Study and countryType of studyType of populationMethod of data collectionHow dementia/cognitive impairment defined/assessed?How diabetes defined/recorded?How stroke defined/recorded?How VI defined/recorded?Other
Barnett et al., 2012,91 UK (Scotland)Cross-sectionalGeneralElectronic medical recordsRead code ever recordedRead code ever recordedRead code ever recordedNA
Bruce et al., 2003,95 AustraliaLongitudinal cross-sectionalDiabetesFace-to-face interview and clinical examinationMMSE (< 24/30), IQCODE (> 3.61), Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly and diagnostic examinationClinical and biochemical assessment
Doraiswamy et al., 2002,1 USACross-sectionalDementiaFace-to-face interview and medical recordsDiagnostic criteria for probable Alzheimer’s disease (NINADS-ADRDA)NANANACumulative Illness Rating Scale–Geriatric
Feil et al., 2003,101 USALongitudinal cross-sectionalCognitive impairmentFace-to-face interviewModified version of Pfeiffer’s Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ)Self-reportedSelf-reportedNA
Feil et al., 2009,103 USALongitudinal cross-sectionalDiabetesFace-to-face interviewCognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI)Diagnosis confirmed by physician and patientNANA
Feil et al., 2011,104 USACross-sectionalDiabetesMedical recordsICD codesTwo or more diabetes-specific ICD codes (ICD-9-CM)NANA
Heun et al., 2013,12 UKRetrospective case–controlDementiaRetrospective data from clinical recordsICD-10 diagnostic categoryRegistered diagnosis in medical recordsRegistered diagnosis in medical notesRegistered diagnosis in medical notes
Jara et al., 2011,144 UKRetrospective cohortDementiaElectronic medical recordsNot specifiedCataract-related surgical/diagnostic codes
Löppönen et al., 2004,118 FinlandCross-sectionalDementiaFace-to-face interview and clinical examinationDiagnostic criteria for probable Alzheimer’s disease (NINADS-ADRDA), DSM-IV – clinical examinationDiagnosis in medical records and/or history of stroke verified by clinical examinationDiagnosis in medical records and/or treatment with antidiabetic agents and/or fasting plasma glucose level ≥ 7.0 mmol/lNA
Lyketsos et al., 2005,119 USACase–controlDementia/cognitive impairmentFace-to-face interview and clinical examinationModified MMSE (3MS) or IQCODE plus clinical examinationSelf- or informant responseSelf- or informant response
McCormick et al., 1994,121 USACase–controlDementia/cognitive impairmentClinical examination and medical recordsDiagnostic criteria for probable Alzheimer’s disease (NINADS-ADRDA), DSM-III-R (clinical examination)Diagnosis in medical recordsDiagnosis in medical recordsDiagnosis in medical recordsCharleston Comorbidity Index
Poblador-Plou et al., 2014,14 SpainCross SectionalDementiaElectronic medical recordsExpanded Diagnostic Clusters NUR11 category ‘dementia and delirium’Diagnosis in medical records (ICD codes)Diagnosis in medical records (ICD codes)medical records (ICD codes)
Rait et al., 2010,127 UKCohortDementiaElectronic medical recordsRead codesRead codesRead codes
Sakurai et al., 2010,128 JapanCross-sectionalDementiaFace-to-face interview and clinical examinationDiagnostic criteria for probable Alzheimer’s disease (NINADS-ADRDA) – clinical examinationReceiving diabetes therapy or HbA1c > 5.9% or diagnosis according to ADA guidelinesNANA
Saposnik et al., 2011,129 CanadaRetrospective cohortStroke and dementiaMedical records and clinical examinationAny type of dementia recorded in notesNACanadian Neurological Scale – clinical examinationNA
Schubert et al., 2006,2 USACross-sectionalDementiaMedical records and clinical examinationICD-10 – clinical examinationCoded ICD diagnosisCoded ICD diagnosisNAChronic Disease Score
Stephan et al., 2011,134 UKCross-sectionalMCIFace-to-face interviewMayo Clinic criteria for MCISelf- or information responseSelf- or information response
Uhlmann et al., 1991,137 USACase–controlDementiaMedical recordsDiagnostic criteria for probable Alzheimer’s disease (NINADS-ADRDA)NANASnellen and Rosenbaum methods249
Whitson et al., 2010,140 USACross-sectionalVI (macular disease)Clinical examinationTelephone Interview for Cognitive Status–Modified, Wechsler Memory Scale–Revised, letter fluency (FASa)NANADiagnosis in medical records
Yochim et al., 2012,141 USACase seriesVI (glaucoma)Data collection face to face or by telephoneCalifornia Verbal Learning Test Short Form, verbal fluency test (Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System)Diagnosis in medical records
Zamrini et al., 2004,142 USACase–controlDementiaMedical recordsDiagnostic criteria for probable Alzheimer’s disease (NINADS-ADRDA)Diagnosis in medical recordsDiagnosis in medical recordsDiagnosis in medical records
Zekry et al., 2008,143 SwitzerlandCohortDementiaClinical examination and medical recordsMMSE and short cognitive evaluation; diagnosis based on clinical criteria (clinical examination)Diagnosis in medical recordsDiagnosis in medical recordsDiagnosis in medical recordsCharleston Comorbidity Index
Zhang et al., 2010,145 AustraliaRetrospective cohortDiabetesMedical claims databaseDatabase information on whether or not medication for dementia was dispensedICD codes

ADA, American Diabetes Association; Revised; DSM-III-R, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd Edition Revised HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; ICD-9-CM, International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification; ICD-10, International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision; IQCODE, Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly; NA, not applicable; NINADS–ADRDA, National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke–Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association.

a

Letters used in the letter fluency test (FAS).250

Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016. This work was produced by Bunn et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.

Included under terms of UK Non-commercial Government License.

Bookshelf ID: NBK344396

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (1.7M)

Other titles in this collection

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...