NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Millions of women undergo screening mammography regularly with the hope of detecting breast cancer at an earlier and more curable stage. But the ability of such screening to accurately detect early cancers depends on the quality of mammography, including high-quality image acquisition and interpretation. To help ensure the quality of mammography, Congress passed the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) in 1994 and last reauthorized it in 2004. In advance of its expected reauthorization in 2007, Congress requested a consensus study from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommending ways to improve the quality of mammography, with an emphasis on image interpretation. The resulting report, Improving Breast Imaging Quality Standards, highlighted the need to decrease variability in mammography interpretation in the United States and identified gaps in the evidence needed to develop best practices. The consensus committee found that mammography interpretation remained quite variable, and that this variability limited the full potential of mammography to reduce breast cancer mortality by detecting breast cancers at an early stage.
In May 2015, the IOM convened a workshop to address this issue. The participants discussed challenges in the delivery of high-quality mammography, the impact of training and experience on interpretive performance, how best to measure interpretive performance, and the potential impact of new technologies and supplemental imaging on interpretation of breast screening and diagnostic images. Assessing and Improving the Interpretation of Breast Images summarizes the presentations and discussions from this workshop.
Contents
- The National Academies of SCIENCES • ENGINEERING • MEDICINE
- WORKSHOP PLANNING COMMITTEE
- NATIONAL CANCER POLICY FORUM
- Reviewers
- Acknowledgments
- Acronyms
- Workshop Summary
- INTRODUCTION
- HISTORY OF MAMMOGRAPHY OVERSIGHT AND EFFORTS TO IMPROVE QUALITY
- CHALLENGES OF QUALITY INTERPRETATION
- TRAINING AND EDUCATION
- ASSESSING INTERPRETIVE PERFORMANCE
- INTERVENTIONS FOR IMPROVING INTERPRETIVE PERFORMANCE
- MAMMOGRAPHY REGULATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE IN OTHER COUNTRIES
- RESEARCH NEEDS
- POTENTIAL OPTIONS FOR ADDRESSING MAMMOGRAPHY QUALITY CHALLENGES
- WRAP-UP
- REFERENCES
- Appendix. Statement of Task and Workshop Agenda
Rapporteurs: Sharyl J. Nass and Margie Patlak.
Suggested citation:
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Assessing and improving the interpretation of breast images: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Review Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force[ 2016]Review Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Service Task ForceMelnikow J, Fenton JJ, Whitlock EP, Miglioretti DL, Weyrich MS, Thompson JH, Shah K. 2016 Jan
- The negative impact of MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act) on rural mammography programs.[Radiol Manage. 1998]The negative impact of MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act) on rural mammography programs.Inman M. Radiol Manage. 1998 Jul-Aug; 20(4):31-9.
- Review Saving Women's Lives: Strategies for Improving Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis: A Breast Cancer Research Foundation and Institute of Medicine Symposium[ 2005]Review Saving Women's Lives: Strategies for Improving Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis: A Breast Cancer Research Foundation and Institute of Medicine SymposiumInstitute of Medicine (US) Committee on New Approaches to Early Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, Herdman R, Norton L. 2005
- Review Use of mammography in screening for breast cancer.[Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. ...]Review Use of mammography in screening for breast cancer.Sierra AE, Potchen EJ. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1990 Dec; 17(4):927-38.
- [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].[Epidemiol Prev. 2013][Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].Paci E, Mantellini P, Giorgi Rossi P, Falini P, Puliti D, TBST Working Group. Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Jul-Oct; 37(4-5):317-27.
- Assessing and Improving the Interpretation of Breast ImagesAssessing and Improving the Interpretation of Breast Images
- Homo sapiens archaelysin family metallopeptidase 2 (AMZ2), transcript variant 25...Homo sapiens archaelysin family metallopeptidase 2 (AMZ2), transcript variant 25, non-coding RNAgi|1890350881|ref|NR_144443.2|Nucleotide
- RecName: Full=AP-2 complex subunit alpha-1; AltName: Full=100 kDa coated vesicle...RecName: Full=AP-2 complex subunit alpha-1; AltName: Full=100 kDa coated vesicle protein A; AltName: Full=Adaptor protein complex AP-2 subunit alpha-1; AltName: Full=Adaptor-related protein complex 2 subunit alpha-1; AltName: Full=Alpha-adaptin A; AltName: Full=Alpha1-adaptin; AltName: Full=Clathrin assembly protein complex 2 alpha-A large chain; AltName: Full=Plasma membrane adaptor HA2/AP2 adaptin alpha A subunitgi|262527580|sp|O95782.3|AP2A1_HUMAProtein
- MAG: Olavius algarvensis Gamma 3 endosymbiont isolate Gamma3_OalgB6SA genome ass...MAG: Olavius algarvensis Gamma 3 endosymbiont isolate Gamma3_OalgB6SA genome assembly, contig: NODE_106163+_length_24157_cov_167.733, whole genome shotgun sequencegi|1981678167|emb|CAJINB010000017.1Nucleotide
- NBB2001-086NBB2001-086biosample
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...