All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: tni.ohw@sredrokoob). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: tni.ohw@snoissimrep).
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Peden M, Oyegbite K, Ozanne-Smith J, et al., editors. World Report on Child Injury Prevention. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
VUSI’S STORY
![Image ch4f4.jpg](/books/NBK310640/bin/ch4f4.jpg)
Five years ago, when he was 13 years old, Vusi suffered serious burns. He woke up one night to find his blanket and bedroom ablaze from a candle that had fallen over. The flames injured his face, hands and feet.
After many months in hospital, he left wearing a brown elasticized pressure garment around his face and hands so that his scars would not become thick and raised, as often happens.
From the start, Vusi was very sensitive about his appearance. People on the streets and at school used to tease him about the mask-like pressure garment, comparing him to a masked television entertainer. The long hospital stay and the psychological stress led to problems at school and his education was delayed. Despite all he went through, though, Vusi has become a charming, friendly person with an engaging smile. He loves music and voluntarily spends time with blind children and others with disabilities, encouraging them to exercise more.
Africa’s first burns charity, “Children of Fire”, has, for the past twelve years, been helping severely burned children to obtain complex surgery, therapy and education. They now also work on community safety, teaching those at risk how to prevent fire burns, as well as imparting first aid and fire-fighting skills. The organization also helps inventors of safer paraffin or biofuel stoves to publicize their inventions more widely, and in a similar way promotes the use of safer candlesticks.
In June 2007, 15 teenaged burns survivors, along with other young volunteers, climbed Mount Kilimanjaro in a campaign to raise awareness of burn injuries and how to prevent them, and to increase tolerance of disability and disfigurement. Vusi was one of those who climbed to above 5000 metres and 12 others reached the summit.
Adapted from the Children of Fire web site (http://www.firechildren.org, accessed 9 June 2008).
Introduction
Children are naturally curious. As soon as they are mobile, they begin to explore their surroundings and play with new objects. In this way, they acquire the skills they need to survive in the world. At the same time, though, they come into contact with objects that can cause severe injuries. Playing with fire or touching hot objects can result in burns. This is a debilitating condition accompanied by intense pain and often by longer-term illness that creates suffering not only for the child but for the wider family and community. Fortunately, the prevention, acute care and rehabilitation of burns have improved greatly over the past few decades. There is now ample evidence that a number of measures are effective in preventing burns. These include the introduction and enforcement of items such as smoke alarms, residential sprinklers and fire-safe lighters, and laws regulating the temperature of hot-water taps. Nonetheless, considerable disparities exist between countries in the extent of their prevention, care and rehabilitation of burns.
This chapter describes what is currently known about childhood burns and how to prevent and manage them. In doing so, it summarizes the epidemiology of burns in children and the risk factors and discusses in detail both proven and promising interventions. The chapter concludes with a set of recommended interventions and a description of areas where further research is required.
For the purpose of this chapter, a burn is defined as an injury to the skin or other organic tissue caused by thermal trauma. It occurs when some or all of the cells in the skin or other tissues are destroyed by hot liquids (scalds), hot solids (contact burns), or flames (flame burns). Injuries to the skin or other organic tissues due to radiation, radioactivity, electricity, friction or contact with chemicals are also considered as burns (1).
Burns may be distinguished and classified by their mechanism or cause, the degree or depth of the burn, the area of body surface that is burned, the region or part of the body affected, as well as the extent. Box 4.1 summarizes three of the most commonly used classifications.
![Box Icon](/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/img/box-icon.gif)
BOX 4.1
Classification of burns. There are several ways of classifying burns. The following are three commonly used typologies, based respectively on the cause, extent and severity of the burn. Causally, burns may be classified as thermal or inhalational.
Epidemiology of burns
According to the WHO Global Burden of Disease estimates for 2004, just over 310 000 people died as a result of fire-related burns, of whom 30% were under the age of 20 years (see Statistical Annex, Table A.1). Fire-related burns are the 11th leading cause of death for children between the ages of 1 and 9 years. Overall, children are at high risk for death from burns, with a global rate of 3.9 deaths per 100 000 population. Among all people globally, infants have the highest death rates from burns. The rate then slowly declines with age, but increases again in elderly adults.
The long-term consequences and the disability that can result from burns place a considerable strain on individuals and their families, as well as on health-care facilities. According to WHO data, approximately 10% of all unintentional injury deaths are due to fire-related burns (see Statistical Annex Table A.1). In addition, fire-related burns are among the leading causes of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost in low-income and middle-income countries (see Statistical Annex A.2).
Mortality
Globally, nearly 96 000 children under the age of 20 years were estimated to have been fatally injured as a result of a fire-related burn in 2004. The death rate in low-income and middle-income countries was eleven times higher than that in high-income countries, 4.3 per 100 000 as against 0.4 per 100 000 (see Statistical Annex, Table A.1). However, as can be seen in Figure 4.1, burn-related deaths show great regional variability. Most of the deaths occur in poorer regions of the world – among the WHO regions of Africa and South-East Asia, and the low-income and middle-income countries of the Eastern Mediterranean Region. The death rates in the Americas and the high-income countries of the Europe and the Western Pacific regions are among the lowest in the world.
![FIGURE 4.1. Mortality rates due to fire-related burns per 100 000 childrena by WHO region and country income level, 2004.](/books/NBK310640/bin/ch4f1.gif)
FIGURE 4.1
Mortality rates due to fire-related burns per 100 000 childrena by WHO region and country income level, 2004. a These data refer to those under 20 years of age. HIC = High-income countries; LMIC = low-income and middle-income countries.
Every year 70 Member States – mainly middle-income and high-income countries –submit to WHO mortality data that include the fourth digit of the International Classification of Disease codes, which allows disaggregation into subtypes of burns. Analysis of these data show that, in 2002, fire-related burns made up 93.0% of all burn deaths, scalds contributed 5.4% and the rest, 1.6%, were as a result of contact, chemical or electrical burns (8).
Studies from high-income countries suggest that smoke inhalation is the strongest determinant of mortality from burns, mostly from house fires or other conflagrations. For children over three years of age, smoke inhalation is strongly associated with mortality, despite improvements in the care of burns (9).
Age
Figure 4.2 shows child death rates from burns by age group. Infants have the highest rates, while those aged between 10 and 14years havethe lowest rates. The death rate climbs again in the 15–19-year age range, possibly as a result of greater exposure, experimentation and risk-taking, as well as the fact that many in that group are beginning employment.
![FIGURE 4.2. Fatal fire-related burn rates per 100 000 children by age and country income level, World, 2004.](/books/NBK310640/bin/ch4f2.gif)
FIGURE 4.2
Fatal fire-related burn rates per 100 000 children by age and country income level, World, 2004. HIC = High-income countries; LMIC = low-income and middle-income countries. Source: WHO (2008), Global Burden of Disease: 2004 update.
Gender
Burns are the only type of unintentional injury where females have a higher rate of injury than males. The fire-related death rate for girls is 4.9 per 100 000 population, as against 3.0 per 100 000 for boys. The difference is particularly pronounced in infants and also in adolescents between the ages of 15 and 19 years (see Figure 4.3).
![FIGURE 4.3. Fatal fire-related burn rates per 100 000 children by age and sex, World, 2004.](/books/NBK310640/bin/ch4f3.gif)
FIGURE 4.3
Fatal fire-related burn rates per 100 000 children by age and sex, World, 2004. Source: WHO (2008), Global Burden of Disease: 2004 update.
The greatest gender discrepancies are found in the WHO South-East Asia Region and in the low-income and middle-income countries of the Eastern Mediterranean Region. In these regions, girls in the 15–19-year age bracket have death rates that are substantially higher than rates for the same age group in any other region (see Statistical Annex, Table A.1).
Morbidity
Global data on non-fatal outcomes from burns is not readily available. However, the WHO Global Burden of Disease project for 2004 makes it clear that burns are an important contributor to the overall disease toll in children in the low-income and middle-income countries of the African, South-East Asia and the Eastern Mediterranean regions (see Statistical Annex, Table A.2).
While burns from fire contribute to the majority of burn related deaths in children, scalds and contact burns are an important factor in overall morbidity from burns and a significant cause of disability. Chemical and electrical burns among children, though, are relatively rare (10–12).
Age
In high-income countries, children under the age of five years old are at the highest risk of hospitalization from burns, although 15–19-year-olds, as already stated, are also a group at high risk. Nearly 75% of burns in young children are from hot liquid, hot tap water or steam. Infants under the age of one year are still at significant risk for burns, even in developed countries. The burns they suffer are most commonly the result of scalds from cups containing hot drinks or contact burns from radiators or hot-water pipes (13).
The following give an indication of the situation in some high-income countries:
- In Finland, an 11-year study found that scalds were responsible for 42.2% of children being admitted to two paediatric burns units. Among children under three years of age, 100% of burns were the result of hot water. In the 11–16-year group, 50% of burns were due to electricity, with the other 50% resulting from fire and flames (16).
- In Kuwait, the incidence of burns in children under 15 years of age was 17.5 per 100 000 population. Scalds (67%), followed by flames (23%), were the leading causes of burns (17).
- In the United States, one of the leading causes of injury from scalding in children is hot soup, particularly prepackaged instant soup (18).
In low-income and middle-income countries, children under the age of five years have been shown to have a disproportionately higher rate of burns than is the case in high-income countries. In Kenya, for example, 48.6% of children presenting to the Kenyatta National Hospital were under the age of five years. Although scalds were the most common type of burn, those caused by open flames were also prominent (19). Other examples from low-income and middle-income countries show rather different age patterns and leading causes.
- In Shandong Province, China, a 5-year review of data from the burns unit revealed that children under the age of 10 years were admitted in the greatest numbers, followed by adults aged between 20 and 30 years. Scalds and fire-related burns were seen in roughly similar numbers (20).
- Burns from boiling liquids, most frequently water boiled for bathing, were among the leading causes of injuries to children under the age of 10 years in Cuernavaca, Mexico (21).
- In Maiduguri, north-east Nigeria, the commonest cause of burns was scalds (64.4%). Children under the age of three years were disproportionately represented (22).
- In Fars Province in the Islamic Republic of Iran, the annual hospitalization rate for children under 15 years was 11.8 per 100 000 population. Scalds accounted for 46.2% of the burns, whereas flames accounted for 42.8%. Most burns occurred at home (26).
Similar results have been found in a recent study in four low-income countries. In this study, 53% of burns in children under 12 years of age were the result of a hot liquid, followed by fire and flame in 19% of cases and electricity in 14% of cases (see Statistical Annex, Table C.1).
Infants in Africa under one year of age have an annual incidence of fire-related burns of 35 per 100 000 – more than three times the world average for this age group (27).
Gender
The gender distribution of non-fatal burns differs between countries – a fact that may be related to cultural practices, particularly with regard to cooking. Some African and Asian countries – including Angola, Bangladesh, China, Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya and Nigeria – report a higher number of cases among males (19, 20, 22, 24, 28, 29). Others, such as Egypt and India, have a greater proportion among girls, particularly teenage girls (30–32).
The increasing proportion of burn injuries recorded in girls as they grow older might be explained by the changing activities of the two genders. While girls are increasingly involved in the kitchen, helping their mothers – and therefore more exposed to fire, and hot liquids and other substances – boys tend to stay more outdoors (see Box 4.2). In some cultures, “bride burning” is still practised and may be linked to a higher incidence of burns in adolescent females (33).
Location
Most studies suggest that burns in children occur most frequently in the home, or else – among older children – in the workplace. A study in four low-income countries found that 65% of childhood burns had occurred in and around the home (Statistical Annex, Table C.1). The kitchen is usually the most common part of the house. In this room, children may upset receptacles with hot liquids, be injured by exploding stoves, stand on hot coals or be splashed with hot cooking oil.
Most burns occur in urban areas. Those burns that take place in rural areas with inadequate prehospital care, though, can lead to greater volumes of illness and disabilities.
Nature and severity of burns
Few empirical studies have described burn injuries by the body part affected. Among those that have, though, the most common sites are reported to be the following:
- –
- –
- –
from contact burns: the hands (40);
- –
from electrical burns: there may be little external evidence of the burn but extensive internal damage. Small children who bite or suck on extension cords can burn their mouth and lips. Such burns may cause cosmetic deformities and impair growth of the teeth, mandibles and maxilla (41).
- –
from chemical burns: the site depends on whether the chemical is ingested, splashed or inhaled.
The total surface area of the body that is affected depends on the cause of burn, the mechanism of injury and the age of the child. In general, scalds and contact burns are less severe than fire-related burns. Lung damage, as a result of inhalation injuries, is the most frequent cause of death and is largely unpreventable (42).
Consequences of non-fatal burns
The study already mentioned that was conducted in four low-income countries found that the average injury severity score for children who had been burned was 5. In addition, 49% of affected children suffered some form of disability after a burn, with 8% being left with a permanent physical disability (see Table 1.5 in Chapter 1). There were similar results in Bangladesh, where a community-based survey revealed an annual disability rate of 5.7 per 100 000 children as a result of burns (29).
Burns can result in significant long-term consequences which – in the absence of a comprehensive and coordinated rehabilitation programme – can leave children scarred, physically and psychologically, for the rest of their lives. Most rehabilitation programmes seek to prevent long-term problems – such as scarring, contractures and other physical problems that limit functioning. However, attention should also be paid to managing pain as well as psychological issues such as anxiety, post-traumatic stress, phobias and isolation (43, 44).
The most common physical long-term consequences following a burn include hypertrophic scarring, extensive contractures, the formation of keloids and the need to amputate an extremity (43). Hypertrophic scarring in particular has been found to be one of the most significant long-term consequences of childhood burns, occurring in almost half of severe cases (45). Keloid formation is relatively more common among children of African descent (46).
“My worst experience took place on a crowded bus. Other passengers kept looking at me so I took my jacket off and covered my head. I just wanted to be invisible and I wanted them all to disappear too.” (Michael, aged 17, Changing Faces – a United Kingdom nongovernmental organization for people with disfigurements)
The outcome following a burn depends on a number of interrelated factors. These include:
- –
the child’s age;
- –
the body part affected;
- –
the proportion of body surface area burned;
- –
the length of time from injury to care;
- –
the type of care applied – such as dressings or debridement (the removal of damaged tissue from a wound);
- –
post-burn complications.
Burns to the face resulting in gross disfiguration can lead to poor self-esteem in children and adolescents (47). Children suffering burns when they are young, though, appear to be very resilient, adapting to their disfiguration with greater ease than those similarly affected during adolescence. A recent study from India showed that only adolescents in the study required psychosocial rehabilitation (48).
As one of the factors in the child’s long-term social adjustment is that of self-esteem (49), social support networks may help the process. This is the case not only for the child, but also for parents, and in particular mothers, who often experience post-traumatic stress disorder after their child has suffered a large burn (50, 51). Nongovernmental organizations can play an important role in providing such support. So can “burn camps” for children, that were first set up in 1983 (52). Siblings of a child who has suffered burns should also be taken into consideration, as overprotecting the child can have an adverse behavioural impact on other children in the family (53).
Impact on families and communities
Evaluating the cost of burns and their treatment is difficult. It is certain, though, that burns create a heavy economic load on health-care services. A study of hospitalizations in Bangkok, for example, found that the cost of burn injuries was not sufficiently reimbursed to the hospitals. As a result, the hospitals had to divert resources from other areas of care (54).
The cost of treating burns is dependent on the type and severity of the burn. In the United Kingdom, a recent study found the average cost of an uncomplicated minor paediatric scald to be £1850 (US$ 3618) (55). Another study from the United States found that the cost of hospitalizations from burns ranged from US$ 1187 for scalds to US$ 4102 for those resulting from fires (56).
In addition there are also costs to the families of children associated with hospitalization, the need for long-term rehabilitation, lost school days and education, possible future unemployment, social rejection and other psychosocial issues (51, 57).
The potential to reduce individual and societal costs by carrying out effective burn prevention interventions is huge. A recent study in Ontario, Canada (58), for instance, found that – through a combination of educational and legislative measures – preventing scald burns could save 531 Canadian dollars (US$ 507) per scald.
Limitations of data
There are wide differences between countries in data on childhood burns – as regards their availability, quality and reliability. The WHO Global Burden of Disease project data used in this chapter relies only on fire-related burns. Although these account for nearly 97% of fatal burns in children, the data still underestimate the total number of burns cases. This could be rectified if more countries submitted data that included the 4th digit of the ICD coding.
While there is no global morbidity database, there now exist many studies from both high-income and low-income countries on the epidemiology and risk factors for burns. Using these hospital-based studies researchers have tried to estimate the global extent of non-fatal burns. However, these attempts have been hampered by the lack of population-based information and also by the differing definitions of the age range of childhood (59).
Risk factors
Various studies, using descriptive and case-control designs, have found a range of risk factors for childhood burns. However, because of the way in which burns are coded in many countries, it is often impossible to distinguish between the different mechanisms that lead to burns. For example, the risk factors for burns caused by chemical agents, and the population most frequently affected by such burns, are both very different from the risk factors for and populations affected by scalds from boiling fluids. Thus, while the existing data identify children and young people as a high-risk population for burns, information on mechanisms and causal factors is largely missing. This section makes use of the Haddon matrix (60) to highlight the child, agent and environmental risk factors. Some risk factors are applicable, of course, only to certain types of burns (see Table 4.1).
TABLE 4.1
Haddon Matrix applied to the risk factors for fire-related burns among children.
Child-related factors
Age and development
Burns in very young children often occur from a mixture of curiosity and awkwardness. In children under the age of four years, the level of motor development does not match the child’s cognitive and intellectual development and injuries can thus occur more easily (61).
Infants under the age of one year are in a particular category, as their mobility starts to develop and they reach out to touch objects (13). Consequently, burns to the palms of the hands are particularly common, as a result of touching heaters or hot-water pipes. Because a child has thinner skin on the palms and slower withdrawal reflexes, such contact burns may be deep and thus require prolonged and careful therapy during the healing phase to prevent flexure contractures of the hand (40).
Scald burns are the most frequent type of burn among children under the age of six years – an observation that appears to cut across geographic and economic groups. Typical scald burns occur when a child pulls down a container of hot fluid, such as a cup of coffee, onto his or her face, upper extremities and trunk. These are typically superficial second-degree burns. Apart from the pain they cause the child and the distress for the parents, these burns will typically heal within weeks, leaving little or no permanent damage.
As children grow older, they become less likely to be injured by common household objects and more interested in the world outside. There is then an increased likelihood that they will be involved in serious fires. In particular, boys older than 6 or 8 years of age often become curious about fire, leading to experimentation with matches, lighters or fireworks. In some cases, younger siblings are injured while watching the experimentation of an older brother or sister (62).
Gender
As already mentioned, burns are the only type of fatal injury that occurs more frequently among girls than boys in three WHO regions (see Table 4.2). For non-fatal burns, the pattern is not quite as clear, and in some settings boys may be at a greater risk of burns than girls, perhaps as a result of the more inquisitive nature of boys and their greater risk-taking behaviours (63, 64).
TABLE 4.2
Fatal fire-related burn rates per 100 000 children by sex, WHO region and country income level, World, 2004.
Local customs of using open fires for cooking and heating, together with the wearing of loose-fitting clothing, particularly among teenage girls in the South-East Asia and Eastern Mediterranean regions (30), are associated with an increased rate of burns among young women (1).
Vulnerability
Some children are more vulnerable to burns than others. Disabled children have a significantly higher incidence of burn injuries than non-disabled children (65). Although not specific to children, those who suffer from uncontrolled epilepsy appear to be at greater risk for burn injuries. Such injuries are often severe enough to require admission to hospital (66).
Other vulnerable groups – such as children of asylum seekers (67), those living in high-income countries but born to foreign parents (68), as well as children in rural areas distant from medical care – have higher incidences of burns and of their consequences (69).
Among street children, there have been numerous journalistic reports, though few scientific studies, on how they may be burned while sleeping in derelict buildings, underground sewers or close to open fires. Apart from the danger from flames, the inhalation of hydrocarbons or the sniffing of glue among street children can lead to burns of the trachea (70).
Studies have also found that the children of parents who smoke while in bed are at higher risk of burns than those who do not have parents who smoke (71).
Poverty
Mortality and morbidity from burns are strongly associated with poverty. In addition to the markedly higher incidence of burns among children in low-income and middle-income countries, there are also differences by socioeconomic class within high-income countries, with studies from Sweden and the United Kingdom showing an increased risk of burns among poorer children (72, 73). In Sweden, the relative risk of being hospitalized for a burn was 2.3 times higher for children in the poorest socioeconomic group than among those in the most prosperous group. Furthermore, within the poorest group, the risk for burns was greater than for any other childhood injury (73). In Australia, too, the risk of fire-related burns and scalds requiring a hospital stay was found by one study to increase as income decreases (74). This finding was confirmed by a systematic review of the risk factors for injury in a house fire. The review found that those in the lowest quintile of income were 2.4 times more likely to die in a house fire than those in the highest two income quintiles (71).
Agent factors
Unsafe equipment
Heat, light sources and cooking equipment – especially those relying on fossil fuels – all carry inherent risks (75). In particular, heating or cooking on open fires that are not enclosed or that stand at ground level pose significant dangers to children. There are similar dangers in the use of small kerosene stoves or lanterns, candles for lighting, and other volatile or highly flammable fuels within the house (75–78). Easy access for children to cooking appliances or pots with boiling liquids is a further risk factor for burns (76, 79, 80).
Unsafe electrical appliances, plugs, wires and other connections all increase the risk of electrical burns for children (21, 80).
Flammable substances
Flammable substances such as kerosene and paraffin should not be stored in the house. However, for practical reasons, they are not usually stored in this way. Apart from the obvious danger of fire, they are also a poisoning risk for small children, being frequently kept in containers lacking child-resistant closures (see Chapter 6).
Fireworks
Many countries celebrate religious or national festivals by setting off fireworks and many burn injuries regularly occur around these holidays (75, 81, 82). Fireworks pose a significant risk for children, particularly adolescent boys. In Greece, 70% of firework burn injuries recorded by the country’s injury surveillance system involved boys aged 10 to 14 years, usually as a result of setting off the fireworks themselves. Girls who were injured by fireworks were usually bystanders (81). In Australia, 50% of those injured by fireworks were boys under 18 years of age (83).
Fireworks have been banned in many high-income countries unless they are safely set off by professionals as part of a public display. In most low-income and middle-income countries, there are no laws restricting the use of fireworks. However, in some countries that ban the private use of fireworks, injuries from them nevertheless occur, usually in adolescent males (62, 83, 84). In the state of Minnesota in the United States, after a law banning private fireworks had been repealed, there was an increase in the number of children suffering burns (85).
Environmental factors
Cooking and living areas
The overwhelming majority of childhood burns occur in the home, and in particular in the kitchen. It has been suggested that the location within the home of the heating equipment and the structure of the kitchen may present significant risks to children (86). In South Africa, for example, many homes consist of one or two main rooms, that are divided by temporary internal divisions made of curtains or cardboard. These rooms are utilized for functions such as sleeping, washing, cooking and eating, depending on the time of day and the requirements of the family (86, 87), or else as a work space (88). This type of domestic arrangement may greatly increase the exposure of a child to domestic equipment and sources of heat (89, 90).
Socioeconomic environment
A number of case-control and descriptive studies conducted in different parts of the world have identified several socioeconomic factors that increase the risk of childhood burns (74, 75, 77, 79, 91–93). These factors include:
- –
a low rate of literacy within the family;
- –
living in overcrowded dwellings or with cluttered areas in the home;
- –
a failure of proper supervision of children;
- –
a history of burns among siblings;
- –
the absence of laws and regulations relating to building codes, smoke detectors and flammable clothing.
Time of incident
Two peak times of the day have been reported for incidents involving burns – the late morning, when domestic tasks are being done, and around the time for the evening meal (29, 94). There have also been peaks noted, in some regions of the world, by season of the year. In tropical climates, where heating, even in winter, is not generally required, there is a fairly even distribution of cases of burns throughout the year (28, 38). In places where the winters are cold, though, an increased incidence of burns tends to be recorded during winter (94–97). The association, in many countries, of incidence of burns with public or religious holidays has already been noted.
Lack of access to water
Inadequate access to a good supply of water – in the form of a tap, hosepipe or sprinkler system – to douse flames or stop the flames spreading, is a strong risk factor (74). Similarly, a lack of smoke detectors or the presence of non-functioning smoke detectors appears to be related, in some developed countries, to an increased risk for childhood burns (98).
Protective factors
Several protective factors have been shown to reduce the risk of burns or to minimize their consequences (74, 75, 77, 99), including:
- –
literacy, particularly among mothers;
- –
knowledge of the risk of burns and of health-care services;
- –
ownership of the house;
- –
having living rooms separate from the kitchen;
- –
the use of fire-retardant fabrics for clothes;
- –
the installation of smoke detectors and water sprinklers;
- –
appropriate first-aid and emergency response systems;
- –
the existence of good quality health-care services.
Interventions
This section summarizes some of the interventions to prevent various types of burn injuries among children. The main protective factors for burns are briefly listed, and three broad approaches for prevention are described, namely:
- –
engineering, design and environmental measures;
- –
the introduction of legislation and standards;
- –
educational measures.
A fourth, and effective, approach consists of a combination of the three earlier ones. The management of burns, in particular first aid, and the value of dedicated trauma centres and of proper rehabilitation are discussed in a separate section.
Engineering measures
Safer lamps and stoves
In many low-income and middle-income countries, the lamps and stoves for lighting and heating use fossil fuels. These lamps and stoves are commonly linked to childhood burns. Developing safe stoves and moving them out of doors and off the ground would not only reduce the number of burns sustained by children but also reduce their exposure to indoor fumes. A trial in rural Guatemala of an improved wooden stove produced a decrease in both acute lower respiratory infections and fire-related burns. Rigorous evaluation of this trial is still in progress (100).
In Sri Lanka, an intervention using safe lamps for lighting is being implemented (see Box 4.3). Although this project too is awaiting evaluation, the initial results appear promising.
Families in many developing countries will continue to use fossil fuels for heating and cooking, until such time as the cost of electricity and of essential electrical appliances becomes affordable (101).
Smoke alarms
Evidence for the effectiveness of interventions exists most markedly in the case of smoke detectors, which have been found to reduce the risk of deaths by over 70% (102). The problem, though, is to make sure that all homes have working smoke alarms on all levels of the residence, including in the sleeping areas. People often remove the batteries from their smoke detectors to avoid the nuisance of false alarms, or else do not check the batteries regularly. For optimum protection, most smoke detectors require that they be tested monthly and that their battery be changed twice a year. However, there are new devices, which – while more expensive – make use of a 10-year battery. Fully integrated, hard-wired smoke alarms often now come with the new types of residential construction, at least in some developed countries.
A systematic review of controlled trials of interventions promoting smoke alarms found that approaches that used only education produced only modest benefits. Programmes that provided and installed smoke alarms appeared to reduce fire-related injuries (103). However, programmes that combined legislation on smoke alarms with installation and education seemed to result in the greatest benefit (104).
A study in the United States (105) evaluated the cost-effectiveness of smoke detectors and found the ratio of the cost of detectors to the saving in health-care costs to be 1:26.
Residential sprinklers
Fire sprinkler systems have been proved to be effective (106) and can now be found widely in public and commercial property in many countries. Home sprinkler systems, on the other hand, are recommended but not widely used, though in some countries governments require them to be installed in the construction of new homes.
Fire-retardant household materials
Modifying products associated with fire-related burns is a promising approach. Following the introduction in Australia of fire-retardant material for children’s bedclothes in 1979, the annual number of burns related to clothing dropped from around 300 to 30 (107). In the United States, children’s bedclothes are regulated by the United States Product Safety Commission. Certain types and sizes of clothes need to pass a flammability test or else be tight-fitting, so as to reduce the risk of burns (108). In addition, many countries require that bedding, mattresses and upholstered furniture be fire-retardant.
Environmental measures
Promising environment modifications that may reduce the incidence of burns include, among others:
- –
introducing new or stricter building codes and standards;
- –
modifying or improving construction materials;
- –
improving heating and lighting equipment in homes;
- –
raising cooking facilities off the ground;
- –
separating cooking areas from living areas.
Unfortunately, although promising, such prevention measures have not been well evaluated, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries.
A Cochrane review of interventions that altered the home environment to reduce all types of injury, including burns, concluded that there is still insufficient evidence to determine their effectiveness (109).
Laws and regulations
Laws and regulations are one of the most efficient ways to get people to adopt safe behaviours. In addition to legislation enforcing smoke detectors, which has proven effective in many high-income countries, three other measures appear to be effective – laws on the temperature of hot-water taps, banning fireworks and standards for child-resistant lighters.
Temperature of hot-water taps
Interventions to prevent scald burns focus primarily on education together with laws and their enforcement regulating the temperature of hot water from household taps (110). In the United States, the control of hot-water temperature in taps in the state of Washington reduced the number of domestic hot-water scalds by combining an educational programme with laws cutting the temperature in preset water heaters from 60°C to 49°C (111, 112). As a result, 84% of homes changed to lower temperature. Other educational interventions in Norway (113) and New Zealand (114) aimed at reducing the hot-water temperature were also successful in reducing burns. A Canadian study evaluated the effectiveness of a combined educational and legislative approach to reduce thermostat settings and found a 56% reduction in scald burns (58).
Child-resistant lighters
A survey in the United States in 1985 showed that children playing with lighters were the cause of residential fires resulting in 170 deaths and 1150 injuries annually in the country (115). As a result, the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission developed a standard for cigarette lighters that applied to all products manufactured or imported into the country. A study after this standard was introduced found that fires, deaths and injuries caused by young children playing with lighters had been reduced by as much as 58%, saving over half a billion US dollars in societal costs in 1998 alone (116). Other countries followed the United States example. In 2007, the European Union introduced laws requiring manufacturers and importers to comply with the European standard for child-resistant lighters (117). Although child-resistant lighters are not a substitute for parental supervision, considerable savings to the health sector and society could be made if all countries adopted similar standards.
Banning of fireworks
Many high-income countries have banned firework purchase or ownership by children. A recent review in the United Kingdom revealed that since the introduction of the Fireworks Act in 2003 and the Fireworks regulation in 2004 which limited the sale of fireworks to the three weeks surrounding Bonfire Night, and banned the sale or possession of fireworks by under 18 year olds, more than 80% of children’s firework injuries were seen in the three weeks surrounding Bonfire Night. Tey concluded that the law had a definite impact on reducing non-Bonfire related firework injuries, but that stricter enforcement was required (118).
Educational approaches
Increased knowledge about burns among young children has been shown to result from educational programmes in schools and communities (119). It is unclear, though, whether these programmes have any effect in reducing the incidence of burns, as they lack a rigorous evaluation of the long-term outcomes of burn injuries (120).
Community programmes to ensure good supervision of children, particularly those with disabilities, to educate parents about burns and to advise against the storage of flammable substances in the home, have all been proposed as primary prevention strategies for burns (92). A programme in Bangladesh involves children being placed in nurseries for a number of hours each day. The purpose is to give the mothers free time for their domestic tasks, so that they can be more attentive when the children return home. The programme has yet to be evaluated for its effectiveness in preventing burns or drowning.
Educating parents about the use of safety equipment has been shown to result in increased knowledge, but again it has not been possible so far to demonstrate that as a result there is better use of such equipment (121, 122). The effectiveness of home visitation programmes is similarly uncertain. In general, educational programmes appear more successful when coupled with increasing access to safety products or with changes in the law.
Combined strategies
Strategies which combine legislation and standards, product modification and education appear to have the most far-reaching effects in reducing the incidence of burns (see Box 4.4).
Managing burns
Access to treatment and rehabilitation
Although the care of burns depends largely on the availability of financial and human resources, many countries still manage to deliver good quality care despite limited health budgets. A number of cheaper options for burns management are currently being evaluated. These include:
In addition, practical guides for managing paediatric burns are being promoted in developing countries (125).
In many places the cost of treatment is high and only those who are well-off can afford to take their children to hospital (38). This can result in delayed healing, contractures and superimposed infections.
Families frequently resort to using traditional methods of healing before attempting to access modern medicine, because of the difficulty of accessing such health care (27, 126).
First aid for burns
Following a burn, the child should be stabilized before being transported to hospital. This is usually done by family, bystanders or first responders and should follow the basic rules of what should and should not be done in these circumstances (see Table 4.3). The overall aim must be to cool the burn, prevent ongoing burning and prevent contamination.
TABLE 4.3
First aid for burns.
There are many studies assessing the first aid of burns in high-income countries, and from these, examples of good practices – such as to “cool the burn” – are drawn. Cooling the burn surface is one of the oldest methods of treatment (127). However, only a handful of studies have examined burn interventions in low-income and middle-income countries. A survey in India found that only 22.8% of patients had received appropriate first aid for their burns. The remainder had either received no first aid or else inappropriate treatment – such as raw eggs, toothpaste, mashed potato or oil being rubbed into the burn (32). In Viet Nam, a study compared children who had received immediate cooling with water after a burn with those who had not. It turned out that those who had received proper first aid needed 32% less subsequent grafting (128). Education on the effect of immediate application of cool (not ice cold) water to burns should be promoted widely as an effective first-aid treatment.
Acute management of burns
Medical care for burns has markedly improved survival. In the United States in 1940, 50% of children with burns involving 30% or more of their total body surface died. In 2000, a study in the same country found no deaths in children with burns involving as much as 59% of body surface area (129). In Pakistan, on the other hand, burns of over 40% in children are still often fatal (see Box 4.5).
Once a child suffering burns has been transported to an acute care facility, assessment and stabilization initially focus on a survey of airway, breathing and circulation. There should also be a careful examination of the child from head to toe, looking for other signs of trauma. Children with second-degree burns usually present with intense pain and typically hold the affected limbs immobile in a position of comfort. The site of the burn should immediately be assessed to determine its severity. Pain management in such cases is essential.
For reasons that are not yet understood, when the size of a burn exceeds 15% to 20% of body surface area of the affected child, the inflammatory response extends beyond the local site of injury. Blood pressure becomes dangerously low, and if fluids are not given fast enough, the child will go into shock and die. If the child does survive the first 48 hours, there is still a risk of death from infectious complications, since the barrier to bacteria is broken and the immune system suppressed.
The overall aim of managing burn wounds is to close the wound as quickly as possible, either by allowing the skin to heal by secondary intention (allowing the wound to heal over on its own) or through surgical closure (grafting). The management of small, deep second-degree burns has evolved into an efficient and effective plan of treatment that nowadays produces highly satisfactory cosmetic and functional results with minimal morbidity. The treatment plan has two components: excising the burn wound before suppuration occurs; and covering the excised wound with synthetic or biological wound coverings. However, large, deep second-degree or third-degree burns, particularly in children, continue to pose a significant problem for the burn surgeon.
The surgical approach to early excision and grafting of burn wounds involves trained personnel and safe and effective resources. As removing the burn wound is a procedure associated with a high volume of blood loss, the operation cannot be performed unless there are facilities in the hospital to provide blood for transfusions. The management of children around the time of such an operation is very complicated and requires collaboration with experienced anaesthesiologists (125). The post operative care of the grafted wounds and the areas from which skin has been taken for the grafts calls for a team of trained nurses and occupational and physical therapists. For these reasons, early excision and grafting may not be an appropriate course to be taken in some low-income countries.
Sadly, the usual fate of a child with an extensive third-degree burn in a low-income country is death. The risk of mortality from burns covering over 30% of total body surface area is roughly 50%. The risk of burns covering more than 50% of total body surface area is nearly 100% (56). For those children who survive such severe burns, most are left with unsightly scarring, resulting in both physical and psychological disability.
Dedicated trauma centres
Not all children require treatment from a dedicated trauma centre. A large number of countries now have such centres and criteria exist for deciding which patients are transferred to them. The American College of Surgeons and the American Burn Association recommend that children with the following conditions should be treated in a burns centre (130):
- –
partial thickness (second-degree) burns greater than 10% of the total surface area of the body;
- –
burns involvingthe face, hands, feet, genitalia, perineum or major joints;
- –
full-thickness (third-degree) burns;
- –
electrical burns, including injuries from lightning;
- –
chemical burns;
- –
injuries from inhaling smoke;
- –
pre-existing medical disorders that could complicate the management of burns, prolong recovery or affect survival;
- –
accompanying trauma, where the burn injury poses the greater risk of morbidity or mortality.
While it is well established that trauma systems prevent unnecessary deaths in patients with blunt or penetrating injuries (131), there are few data to sustain this argument in the care of burn patients (132). Nonetheless, expert opinion supports the claim that patients with serious burns will have better outcomes and with less costly management if they are in a dedicated burn centre (133).
Rehabilitation facilities
Children who sustain burns deserve the best rehabilitation facilities available, so that they are able to return to productive and meaningful roles within their community. The requirements for rehabilitation should be discussed during the acute phase and should involve not only physical but also psychological therapy (see Box 4.6). Inadequate rehabilitation can result in physical and psychological damage with a serious lifelong effect.
Adapting interventions
The extent to which interventions that work in one socioeconomic setting can be effectively transferred to another depends on several factors. The advantage of transferring an established intervention – if that is possible – is that resources are conserved. A decision, though, to implement a particular intervention measure in a particular place should always be based on solid scientific evidence, considerations of cost, cultural appropriateness and sustainability (134).
Potentially harmful interventions
First-aid treatment for burn injuries is best accomplished with cool water (127, 135). Traditional treatments, though, continue to be practised. These include putting butter or oil on sunburn, and ice, aloe, sugar water, toothpaste or other household products on a second-degree burn. All these traditional practices can be harmful, as they can cause the skin to slough away, leaving the tender lower layers susceptible to infection. Although some agents – such as honey or commercially available cold packs – may indeed have some beneficial effects, they are better avoided. Instead, people should be advised to use only cool, clean water.
Evaluating interventions
A number of evaluation studies have been conducted in high-income countries. These include an economic analysis of 1990 that found that three quarters of childhood fire-related deaths in the home could be prevented if there were working smoke alarms, sprinkler systems, anti-scald devices, slow-burning cigarettes and childproof lighters (136).
There are no systematic evaluations, though, of burn prevention strategies in low-income and middle-income countries. Nevertheless, a number of interventions appear promising. Among them are: separating cooking areas from living areas; eliminating the storage of flammable substances in the house; placing cooking surfaces higher than ground level; introducing smoke alarms; making first aid available; and increasing awareness about burns and their prevention (137). At the same time, others, such as community-based interventions and campaigns (138) and home visitation programmes for at-risk families (139), have insufficient evidence for them to be promoted as good practices.
Further research in these areas is needed so that model intervention programmes can be developed for implementation in countries that share a similar pattern of childhood burns.
Conclusions and recommendations
There is overwhelming evidence that childhood burns are largely environmentally conditioned and preventable (93). It would therefore seem natural that the prevention of burns should focus on a mixture of environmental modifications, parental education and product safety (see Table 4.4).
TABLE 4.4
Key strategies to prevent burns among children.
Special attention needs to be paid to the kitchen, the scene of the majority of burns. Programmes are needed to ensure proper supervision of children and their general well-being, particularly of those with disabilities. Parents should receive better information about all types of burns. There must be much greater awareness everywhere about the dangers of storing flammable substances in the home.
Recommendations
A range of measures to prevent burns have been discussed in this chapter. Many of these still require rigorous evaluation, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries.
- Those prevention interventions that have proved effective include:
- –
laws and enforcement for the installation of smoke alarms;
- –
child-resistant lighter standards;
- –
laws to regulate hot-water temperature.
- A number of other prevention interventions are considered highly promising. These include:
- –
the use of safe lamps;
- –
the separation of cooking areas from living areas;
- –
the development of safer stoves.
- As regards measures taken after the event, two fire related measures are strongly recommended:
- –
smoke alarms;
- –
residential sprinkler system.
- The management of burns, from first aid to rehabilitation, is an essential component of secondary and tertiary prevention strategies. Children who suffer burns require the best care available so as to minimize the potentially serious physical and psychological long term consequences of this type of injury.
- Educational programmes convey knowledge to children and parents. They are useful for creating a climate in which campaigns for changes in behaviour and in products will be supported. For prevention purposes, educational programmes are often combined with programmes involving legislation and standards and product modifications. Education and counselling on their own, though, whether at the individual level or within schools, appear to be ineffective in reducing the incidence of burns.
“Thermal burns are a common cause of accidental death in children worldwide. Despite various methods of prevention and care, such injuries are on the rise. Only through a deeper understanding of the underlying causes can we develop truly viable alternative solutions. If the proposals outlined in this report are implemented correctly, they can bring about the necessary changes.” Meh met Haberal, President, International Society for Burn Injuries.
References
- 1.
- Facts about injuries: burns. Geneva: World Health Organization and International Society for Burn Injuries; 2006. [17 April 2008]. http://www
.who.int/entity /violence_injury_prevention /publications /other_injury/en/burns_factsheet .pdf. - 2.
- Davies JW. Toxic chemicals versus lung tissue: an aspect of inhalation injury revisited. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation. 1986;7:213–222. [PubMed: 3036882]
- 3.
- Saffle JR, Davis B, Williams P. Recent outcomes in the treatment of burn injury in the United States: a report from the American Burn Association patient registry. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation. 1995;16:219–232. [PubMed: 7673300]
- 4.
- Moritz AR, Henriques FC. Studies of thermal injury II: the relative importance of time and surface temperature in the causation of cutaneous burns. American Journal of Pathology. 1947;23:695–720. [PMC free article: PMC1934304] [PubMed: 19970955]
- 5.
- Lund C, Browder N. The estimation of areas of burns. Surgical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 1944;79:352–358.
- 6.
- MacLennan N, Heimbach D, Cullen FB. Anesthesia for major thermal injury. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:749–770. [PubMed: 9743414]
- 7.
- Walton J, Mandara AR. Burns and smoke inhalation. Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine. 2005;6:317–321.
- 8.
- WHO mortality database: tables. Geneva: World Health Organization; [21 April 2008]. http://www
.who.int/healthinfo /morttables/en/index.html. - 9.
- Barrow RE, et al. Influence of demographics and inhalation injury on burn mortality in children. Burns. 2004;30:72–77. [PubMed: 14693089]
- 10.
- Achebe UJ, Akpuaka FC. Chemical burns in Enugu. West African Journal of Medicine. 1989;8:205–208. [PubMed: 2486798]
- 11.
- Chuang SS, Yang JY, Tsai FC. Electric water heaters: a new hazard for pediatric burns. Burns. 2003;29:589–591. [PubMed: 12927985]
- 12.
- Nursal TZ, et al. Burns in southern Turkey: electrical burns remain a major problem. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation. 2003;24:309–314. [PubMed: 14501400]
- 13.
- Nguyen DQ, et al. Infants under 1 year of age have a significant risk of burn injury. Burns. 2008;34:873–877. [PubMed: 18378092]
- 14.
- Child and youth unintentional injury: 10 years in review, 1994–2003. Toronto, ON: Safe Kids Canada; 2007. [18 April 2008]. http://www
.sickkids.ca /SKCForPartners/custom /NationalReportUpdatedENG.pdf. - 15.
- Canadian Institute for Health Information. National Ambulatory Care Reporting System. [9 April 2008]. http://secure
.cihi.ca/cihiweb/dispPage .jsp?cw_page =services_nacrs_e. - 16.
- Papp A, et al. Paediatric ICU burns in Finland 1994–2004. Burns. 2008;34:339–344. [PubMed: 18207330]
- 17.
- Sharma PN, et al. Paediatric burns in Kuwait: incidence, causes and mortality. Burns. 2006;32:104–111. [PubMed: 16406370]
- 18.
- Palmieri RL, et al. Pediatric soup scald burn injury: etiology and prevention. Journal of Burn Care and Research. 2008;29:114–118. [PubMed: 18182907]
- 19.
- Ndiritu S, Ngumi ZW, Ngaim O. Burns:theepidemiological pattern, risk and safety awareness at Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi. East African Medical Journal. 2006;83:455–460. [PubMed: 17153660]
- 20.
- Yongqiang F, et al. Epidemiology of hospitalized burn patients in Shandong Province, 2001–2005. Journal of Burn Care and Research. 2007;28:468–473. [PubMed: 17438493]
- 21.
- Hijar-Medina MC, et al. Accidentes en el hogar en niños menores de 10 años: causas y consecuencias. [Home accidents in children less than 10 years of age: causes and consequences]. Salud Pública de México. 1992;34:615–625. [PubMed: 1475697]
- 22.
- Gali BM, Madziga AG, Naaya HU. Epidemiology of childhood burns in Maiduguri, north-eastern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Medicine. 2004;13:144–147. [PubMed: 15293833]
- 23.
- Rossi LA, et al. Childhood burn injuries: circumstances of occurrences and their prevention in Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. Burns. 1998;24:416–419. [PubMed: 9725680]
- 24.
- Vilasco B, Bondurand A. Burns in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire. Burns. 1995;21:291–296. [PubMed: 7662131]
- 25.
- Gupta M, Gupta OK, Goil P. Paediatric burns in Jaipur, India: an epidemiological study. Burns. 1992;18:63–67. [PubMed: 1558680]
- 26.
- Lari AR, et al. Epidemiology of childhood burns in Fars province, Iran. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation. 2002;23:39–45. [PubMed: 11803311]
- 27.
- Hyder AA, et al. Review on childhood burn injuries in Sub Saharan Africa: a forgotten public health challenge. African Safety Promotion: A Journal of Injury and Violence Prevention. 2004;2:43–49.
- 28.
- Adamo C, et al. Epidemiological data on burn injuries in Angola: a retrospective study of 7230 patients. Burns. 1995;21:536–538. [PubMed: 8540983]
- 29.
- Mashreky SR, et al. Epidemiology of childhood burn: yield of largest community based injury survey in Bangladesh. Burns. 2008;34:856–862. [PubMed: 18242869]
- 30.
- Bawa Bhalla S, Kale SR, Mohan D. Burn properties of fabrics and garments worn in India. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2000;32:407–420. [PubMed: 10776859]
- 31.
- Hemeda M, Maher A, Mabrouk A. Epidemiology of burns admitted to Ain Shams University Burns Unit, Cairo, Egypt. Burns. 2003;29:353–358. [PubMed: 12781613]
- 32.
- Ghosh A, Bharat R. Domestic burns prevention and first aid awareness in and around Jamshedpur, India: strategies and impact. Burns. 2000;26:605–608. [PubMed: 10925182]
- 33.
- Gupta RK, Srivastava AK. Study of fatal burn cases in Kanpur (India). Forensic Science International. 1988;37:81–89. [PubMed: 3371805]
- 34.
- McCullough JE, Henderson AK, Kaufman JD. Occupational burns in Washington State, 1989–1993. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 1998;40:1083–1089. [PubMed: 9871885]
- 35.
- Baggs J, Curwick C, Silverstein B. Work-related burns in Washington State, 1994 to 1998. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2002;44:692–699. [PubMed: 12134534]
- 36.
- Arshi S, et al. Prevention oriented epidemiologic study of accidental burns in rural areas of Ardabil, Iran. Burns. 2006;32:366–371. [PubMed: 16529866]
- 37.
- Mohammadi R, et al. Unintentional home-related injuries in the Islamic Republic of Iran: findings from the first year of a national programme. Public Health. 2005;119:919–924. [PubMed: 15939446]
- 38.
- Forjuoh SN, Guyer B, Smith GS. Childhood burns in Ghana: Epidemiological characteristics and home-based treatment. Burns. 1995;21:24–28. [PubMed: 7718113]
- 39.
- Kalayi GD, Muhammad I. Clothing burns in Zaria. Burns. 1994;20:356–359. [PubMed: 7945828]
- 40.
- Argirova M, Hadzhiyski O. Treatment of palm burns in children. Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters. 2005;18:190–193. [PMC free article: PMC3187999] [PubMed: 21991005]
- 41.
- Electrical injuries. The Merck Manuals Online Medical Library. 2005. [17 April 2008]. http://www
.merck.com /mmpe/sec21/ch316/ch316b .html?qt=electrical %20burns&alt=sh. - 42.
- Gore DC, et al. Assessment of adverse events in the demise of pediatric burn patients. Journal of Trauma. 2007;63:814–818. [PubMed: 18090010]
- 43.
- Esselman PC. Burn rehabilitation: an overview. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation. 2007;88(Suppl. 2):S3–S6. [PubMed: 18036978]
- 44.
- Smith JS, Smith KR, Rainey SL. The psychology of burn care. Journal of Trauma Nursing. 2006;13:105–106. [PubMed: 17052089]
- 45.
- Spurr ED, Shakespeare PG. Incidence of hypertrophic scarring in burn-injured children. Burns. 1990;16:179–181. [PubMed: 2383356]
- 46.
- Taylor SC. Epidemiology of skin diseases in people of color. Cutis. 2003;71:271–275. [PubMed: 12729089]
- 47.
- Clark A. Psychosocial aspects of facial disfigurement: problems, management and the role of a lay-led organization. Psychology, Health and Medicine. 1999;4:127–142.
- 48.
- Mathangi Ramakrishnan K, et al. Paediatric rehabilitation in a developing country, India, in relation to aetiology, consequences and outcome in a group of 459 burnt children. Pediatric Rehabilitation. 2004;7:145–149. [PubMed: 15204585]
- 49.
- Gilboa D. Long-term psychosocial adjustment after burn injuries. Burns. 2001;27:335–341. [PubMed: 11348741]
- 50.
- Rizzone LP, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder in mothers of children and adolescents with burns. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation. 1994;15:158–163. [PubMed: 8195257]
- 51.
- Kent L, King H, Cochrane R. Maternal and child psychological sequelae in pediatric burn injuries. Burns. 2000;26:317–322. [PubMed: 10751698]
- 52.
- Doctor ME. Burn camps and community aspects of burn care. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation. 1992;13:68–76. [PubMed: 1572861]
- 53.
- Mancuso MG, et al. Impact on the family: psychosocial adjustment of siblings of children who survive serious burns. Journal of Burn Care and Research. 2003;24:2. [PubMed: 12626932]
- 54.
- Siritongtaworn P, Peunchompoo N. Economic problem of referred trauma cases in Siriraj Hospital. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. 2006;89:1621–1629. [PubMed: 17128836]
- 55.
- Griffiths HR, et al. The cost of a hot drink scald. Burns. 2006;32:372–374. [PubMed: 16527419]
- 56.
- Forjuoh SN. The mechanisms, intensity of treatment, and outcomes of hospitalized burns: issues for prevention. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation. 1998;19:456–460. [PubMed: 9789183]
- 57.
- Joseph KE, et al. Parental correlates of unintentional burn injuries in infancy and childhood burns. Burns. 2002;28:455–463. [PubMed: 12163285]
- 58.
- Han RK, Ungar WJ, Macarthur C. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a proposed public health legislative/educational strategy to reduce tap water scald injuries in children. Injury Prevention. 2007;13:248–253. [PMC free article: PMC2598349] [PubMed: 17686935]
- 59.
- Burd A, Yuen C. A global study of hospitalized pediatric burn patients. Burns. 2005;31:432–438. [PubMed: 15896504]
- 60.
- Runyan CW. Using the Haddon matrix: introducing the third dimension. Injury Prevention. 1998;4:302–307. [PMC free article: PMC1730420] [PubMed: 9887425]
- 61.
- Chung ECH, et al. Burn injuries in China: a one year survey at the United Christian Hospital. Hong Kong Practice. 1996;18:631–636.
- 62.
- Ying SY, Ho WS. Playing with fire: a significant cause of burn injury in children. Burns. 2001;27:39–41. [PubMed: 11164663]
- 63.
- Chan KYO, et al. A review of burns patients admitted to the burns unit of hospital universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Medical Journal of Malaysia. 2002;57:418–425. [PubMed: 12733166]
- 64.
- Zhu ZX, Yang H, Meng FZ. The epidemiology of childhood burns in Jiamusi, China. Burns. 1988;14:394–396. [PubMed: 3228697]
- 65.
- Chen G, et al. Incidence and pattern of burn injuries among children with disabilities. Journal of Trauma. 2007;62:682–686. [PubMed: 17414347]
- 66.
- Spitz MC. Injuries and death as a consequence of seizures in people with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1998;39:904–907. [PubMed: 9701385]
- 67.
- Dempsey MP, Orr DJ. Are paediatric burns more common in asylum seekers? An analysis of paediatric burn admissions. Burns. 2006;32:242–245. [PubMed: 16448770]
- 68.
- Carlsson A, et al. Burn injuries in small children: a population-based study in Sweden. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2006;15:129–134. [PubMed: 16422729]
- 69.
- Soori H, Naghavi M. Childhood deaths from unintentional injuries in rural areas of Iran. Injury Prevention. 1998;4:222–224. [PMC free article: PMC1730396] [PubMed: 9788095]
- 70.
- Kane JM, Nazarian EB, Connolly H. Hydrocarbon inhalationinjury. eMedicine. 2006. [10 April 2008]. http://www
.emedicine .com/PED/topic2790.htm. - 71.
- Warda L, Tenenbein M, Moffat MEK. House fire prevention update (Part 1): a review of risk factors for fatal and non fatal house fires. Injury Prevention. 1999;5:145–150. [PMC free article: PMC1730498] [PubMed: 10385837]
- 72.
- Hippisley-Cox J, et al. Cross sectional survey of socioeconomic variations in severity and mechanism of childhood injuries in Trent 1992–7. British Medical Journal. 2002;324:1132–1134. [PMC free article: PMC107914] [PubMed: 12003886]
- 73.
- Reimers A, Laflamme L. Neighbourhood socio-economic composition and injury risks. Acta Paediatrica. 2005;94:1488–1494. [PubMed: 16299884]
- 74.
- Poulos R, et al. Area socioeconomic status and childhood injury morbidity in New South Wales, Australia. Injury Prevention. 2007;13:322–327. [PMC free article: PMC2610604] [PubMed: 17916889]
- 75.
- Delgado J, et al. Risk factors for burns in children: crowding, poverty, and poor maternal education. Injury Prevention. 2002;8:38–41. [PMC free article: PMC1730827] [PubMed: 11928972]
- 76.
- Daisy S, et al. Socioeconomic and cultural influence in the causation of burns in the urban children of Bangladesh. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation. 2001;22:269–273. [PubMed: 11482685]
- 77.
- Forjuoh SN, et al. Risk factors for childhood burns: a case-control study of Ghanaian children. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 1995;49:189–193. [PMC free article: PMC1060106] [PubMed: 7798049]
- 78.
- Werneck GL, Reichenheim ME. Paediatric burns and associated risk factors in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Burns. 1997;23:478–83. [PubMed: 9429025]
- 79.
- Katcher ML. Tap water scald prevention: it’s time for a worldwide effort. Injury Prevention. 1998;4:167–168. [PMC free article: PMC1730373] [PubMed: 9788084]
- 80.
- Munro S-A, van Niekerk A, Seedat M. Childhood unintentional injuries: the perceived impact of the environment, lack of supervision and child characteristics. Child: Care, Health and Development. 2006;32:269–279. [PubMed: 16634972]
- 81.
- Vassilia K, Eleni P, Dimitrios T. Firework-related childhood injuries in Greece: a national problem. Burns. 2004;30:151–153. [PubMed: 15019123]
- 82.
- Mohan D, Varghese M. Fireworks cast a shadow on India’s festival of lights. World Health Forum. 1990;11:323–326. [PubMed: 2291800]
- 83.
- Abdulwadud O, Ozanne-Smith J. Injuries associated with fireworks in Victoria: an epidemiological review. Injury Prevention. 1998;4:272–275. [PMC free article: PMC1730423] [PubMed: 9887417]
- 84.
- Witsaman RJ, Comstock RD, Smith GA. Pediatric fireworks-related injuries in the United States, 1990–2003. Pediatrics. 2006;118:296–303. [PubMed: 16818578]
- 85.
- Roesler JS, Day H. Sparklers, smoke bombs, and snakes, oh my! Effect of legislation on fireworks-related injuries in Minnesota, 1999–2005. Minnesota Medical Journal. 2007;90:46–47. [PubMed: 17725095]
- 86.
- Van Niekerk A, et al. Caregiver experiences, contextualisations and understandings of the burn injury to their child: accounts from low-income settings in South Africa. Child: Care, Health and Development. 2007;33:236–245. [PubMed: 17439435]
- 87.
- Seedat M, et al. The application of still photography in marshalling data for community-based initiatives. African Journal of Psychology. 2006;2:303–314.
- 88.
- Kellet P, Tipple AG. The home as workplace: a study of income-generating activities within the domestic setting. Environment and Urbanization. 2000;12:203–213.
- 89.
- Godwin Y, Hudson DA, Bloch CE. Shack fires: a consequence of urban migration. Burns. 1996;23:151–153. [PubMed: 9177883]
- 90.
- Zwi KJ, et al. Patterns of injury in children and adolescents presenting to a South African township health centre. Injury Prevention. 1995;1:26–30. [PMC free article: PMC1067537] [PubMed: 9345989]
- 91.
- Van Rijn OJ, et al. Aetiology of burn injuries among children aged 0–4 years: results of a case-control study. Burns. 1991;17:213–219. [PubMed: 1892554]
- 92.
- Forjuoh SN. Burns in low- and middle-income countries: a review of available literature on descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and prevention. Burns. 2006;32:529–537. [PubMed: 16777340]
- 93.
- Petridou E, et al. Risk factors for childhood burn injuries: a case-control study from Greece. Burns. 1998;24:123–128. [PubMed: 9625236]
- 94.
- Davies JWL. The problem of burns in India. Burns. 1990;16(Suppl. 1):S1–S24. [PubMed: 2282149]
- 95.
- Cheng JCY, et al. An analysis of 1704 burn injuries in Hong Kong children. Burns. 1990;16:182–184. [PubMed: 2383357]
- 96.
- Van Niekerk A, Rode H, Laflamme L. Incidence and patterns of childhood burn injuries in the Western Cape, South Africa. Burns. 2004;30:341–347. [PubMed: 15145192]
- 97.
- El-Badawy A, Mabrouk AR. Epidemiology of child burns in the burn unit of Ain Shams University in Cairo, Egypt. Burns. 1998;24:728–732. [PubMed: 9915673]
- 98.
- LeBlank JC, et al. Home safety measures and the risk of unintentional injury among young children: a multicentre case-control study. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2006;175:883–887. [PMC free article: PMC1586091] [PubMed: 16998079]
- 99.
- Koupil J, et al. Special features of burn injuries in elderly patients. Acta Chirurgiae Plasticae. 2001;43:57–60. [PubMed: 11505711]
- 100.
- Bruce N, et al. Prevention of burns among children in wood fuel using homes in rural Guatemala; 16th Annual Conference of the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology; New York, NY: Aug 1–4, 2004. [17 April 2008]. (Poster presentation) http://ehs
.sph.berkeley .edu/heh/guat/pubs /Burns%20poster%20ISEE %202004%20v230704.pdf. - 101.
- Madubansi M, Schackleton CM. Changes in fuelwood use and selection following electrification in the Bushbuckridge lowveld, South Africa. Journal of Environmental Management. 2007;83:416–426. [PubMed: 16930808]
- 102.
- Runyan CW, et al. Risk factors for fatal residential fires. New England Journal of Medicine. 1992;327:859–863. [PubMed: 1508246]
- 103.
- DiGuiseppi C, Higgins JPR. Systematic review of controlled trials of interventions to promote smoke alarms. Archives of Diseases in Children. 2000;82:341–348. [PMC free article: PMC1718310] [PubMed: 10799419]
- 104.
- Ballesteros MF, Jackson ML, Martin MW. Working towards the elimination of residential fire deaths: The Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s smoke alarm installation and fire safety (SAIFE) program. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation. 2005;26:434–439. [PubMed: 16151290]
- 105.
- Working to prevent and control injury in the United States: fact book for the year 2000. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2000.
- 106.
- Home fire protection: residential fire sprinkler systems. Emmitsburg, MD: Federal Emergency Management Agency, United States Fire Administration; 2004. [1 June 2008]. https://www
.usfa.dhs .gov/downloads/pdf/publications/fa-43 .pdf. - 107.
- Fires and burns fact sheet. Brisbane: Kidsafe Australia; [16 June 2008]. http://www
.gtp.com.au /kidsafeqld/inewsfiles/inews .25847.1.pdf. - 108.
- Children’s sleepwear regulations. Washington, DC: United States Consumer Product Safety Commission; 2001.
- 109.
- Lyons R, et al. Modification of the home environment for the reduction of injuries. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. 2003;4:1–33. CD003600. [PubMed: 14583986]
- 110.
- MacArthur C. Evaluation of Safe Kids Week 2001: prevention of scald and burn injuries in young children. Injury Prevention. 2003;9:112–116. [PMC free article: PMC1730947] [PubMed: 12810735]
- 111.
- Feldman KW, et al. Tap water scald burns in children. Injury Prevention. 1997;4:238–242. [PMC free article: PMC1730399] [PubMed: 9867427]
- 112.
- Rivara CF. Hot water scald burns in children. Pediatrics. 1998;102:256–258. [PubMed: 9651449]
- 113.
- Ytterstad B, Sogaard AJ. The Harstad injury prevention study: prevention of burns in small children by a community-based intervention. Burns. 1995;21:259–266. [PubMed: 7662125]
- 114.
- Waller AE, Clarke JA, Langley JD. An evaluation of a program to reduce home hot tap water temperatures. Australian Journal of Public Health. 1993;17:116–123. [PubMed: 8399703]
- 115.
- Smith L, Smith C, Ray D. Washington, DC: United States Consumer Product Safety Commission; Lighters and matches: an assessment of risk associated with household ownership and use. 1991
- 116.
- Smith LE, Greene MA, Singh HA. Study of the effectiveness of the US safety standard for child-resistant cigarette lighters. Injury Prevention. 2002;8:192–196. [PMC free article: PMC1730873] [PubMed: 12226114]
- 117.
- EU requires cigarette lighters to be child-resistant. Mar 14, 2007. [1 June 2008]. EUROPA Press Releases. http://europa
.eu/rapid /pressReleasesAction .do?reference=IP/07/325. - 118.
- Edwin AF, Cubison TC, Pape SA. The impact of recent legislation on paediatric fireworks injuries in the Newcastle upon Tyne region. Burns. 2008 May 26 [epub ahead of print] [PubMed: 18508200]
- 119.
- Kendrick D, et al. “Risk Watch”: cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating an injury prevention program” Injury Prevention. 2007;13:93–99. [PMC free article: PMC2610598] [PubMed: 17446248]
- 120.
- Warda LJ, Ballesteros MF. Interventions to prevent residential fire injury. In: Doll L, et al., editors. Handbook of injury and violence prevention. Atlanta, GA: Springer; 2007. pp. 97–115.
- 121.
- Gielen AC, et al. A randomized trial of enhanced anticipatory guidance for injury prevention. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine. 2001;155:42–49. [PubMed: 11177061]
- 122.
- Gielen AC, et al. The effects of improved access to safety counseling, products and home visits on parents’ safety practices. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine. 2002;156:33–40. [PubMed: 11772188]
- 123.
- Gosselin RA, Kuppers G. Open versus closed management of burn wounds in a low-income developing country. Burns. 2008. (in press) [PubMed: 18226462]
- 124.
- Herndon DN. Total burn care. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Harcourt; 2002.
- 125.
- Thomas J, Rode H. A practical guide to paediatric burns. Cape Town: SAMA Health and Medical Publishing Group; 2006.
- 126.
- Albertyn R, Bickler S, Rode H. Paediatric burn in injuries in Sub Sahara Africa: an overview. Burns. 2006;32:605–612. [PubMed: 16713683]
- 127.
- Davies JWL. Prompt cooling of burned areas: a review of benefits and the effector mechanisms. Burns. 1982;9:1–6. [PubMed: 6184139]
- 128.
- Nguyen NL, et al. The importance of immediate cooling: a case series of childhood burns in Vietnam. Burns. 2002;28:173–176. [PubMed: 11900942]
- 129.
- Sheridan RL, et al. Current expectations for survival in pediatric burns. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine. 2000;154:245–249. [PubMed: 10710021]
- 130.
- Resources of optimal care of the injured patient. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons, Committee on Trauma; 1999.
- 131.
- Cooper DJ, et al. Quality assessment of the management of road traffic fatalities at a level I trauma center compared with other hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Journal of Trauma. 1998;45:772–799. [PubMed: 9783620]
- 132.
- Sheridan RL, et al. Early burn center transfer shortens the length of hospitalization and reduces complications in children with serious burn injuries. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation. 1999;20:347–50. [PubMed: 10501318]
- 133.
- Organization and delivery of burn care. Practice Guidelines of the American Burn Association. 2001. [15 April 2008]. http://www
.ameriburn .org/PracticeGuidelines2001.pdf. - 134.
- Forjuoh SN, Li G. A review of successful transport and home injury interventions to guide developing countries. Social Science and Medicine. 1996;43:1551–1560. [PubMed: 8961399]
- 135.
- Yuan J, et al. Assessment of cooling on an acute scald burn injury in a porcine model. Journal of Burn Care Research. 2007;28:514–520. [PubMed: 17438497]
- 136.
- McLoughlin E, MacGuire A. The causes, cost and prevention of childhood burn injuries. American Journal of Diseases of Children. 1990;166:677–683. [PubMed: 2346149]
- 137.
- Norton R, et al. Jamison DT, et al., editors. Disease control priorities in developing countries. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press and World Bank; 2006. [14 February 2008]. Unintentional injuries. pp. 737–753. http://www
.dcp2.org/pubs/DCP/39/ [PubMed: 21250309] - 138.
- Turner C, et al. Community-based interventions for the prevention of burns and scalds in children. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. 2004;3:CD004335. [PMC free article: PMC6464795] [PubMed: 15266531]
- 139.
- Kenrick D, Mulvaney C, Watson M. Does targeting injury prevention towards families in disadvantaged areas reduce inequalities in safety practice? Health Education Research. 2008. [14 August 2008]. http://her
.oxfordjournals .org/cgi/content/full/cym083. [PubMed: 18203681]
- Burns - World Report on Child Injury PreventionBurns - World Report on Child Injury Prevention
- catalase [Glycine max]catalase [Glycine max]gi|18560|emb|CAA78056.1|Protein
- ZK632.10 [Caenorhabditis elegans]ZK632.10 [Caenorhabditis elegans]Gene ID:176395Gene
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...