NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
How we produce and consume food has a bigger impact on Americans' well-being than any other human activity. The food industry is the largest sector of our economy; food touches everything from our health to the environment, climate change, economic inequality, and the federal budget. From the earliest developments of agriculture, a major goal has been to attain sufficient foods that provide the energy and the nutrients needed for a healthy, active life. Over time, food production, processing, marketing, and consumption have evolved and become highly complex. The challenges of improving the food system in the 21st century will require systemic approaches that take full account of social, economic, ecological, and evolutionary factors. Policy or business interventions involving a segment of the food system often have consequences beyond the original issue the intervention was meant to address.
A Framework for Assessing Effects of the Food System develops an analytical framework for assessing effects associated with the ways in which food is grown, processed, distributed, marketed, retailed, and consumed in the United States. The framework will allow users to recognize effects across the full food system, consider all domains and dimensions of effects, account for systems dynamics and complexities, and choose appropriate methods for analysis. This report provides example applications of the framework based on complex questions that are currently under debate: consumption of a healthy and safe diet, food security, animal welfare, and preserving the environment and its resources.
A Framework for Assessing Effects of the Food System describes the U.S. food system and provides a brief history of its evolution into the current system. This report identifies some of the real and potential implications of the current system in terms of its health, environmental, and socioeconomic effects along with a sense for the complexities of the system, potential metrics, and some of the data needs that are required to assess the effects. The overview of the food system and the framework described in this report will be an essential resource for decision makers, researchers, and others to examine the possible impacts of alternative policies or agricultural or food processing practices.
Contents
- THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
- COMMITTEE ON A FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE HEALTH, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND SOCIAL EFFECTS OF THE FOOD SYSTEM
- Reviewers
- Preface
- Summary
- I. The U.S. Food System
- II. Effects of the U.S. Food System
- 3. Health Effects of the U.S. Food System
- 4. Environmental Effects of the U.S. Food System
- 5. Social and Economic Effects of the U.S. Food System
- POTENTIAL SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS ON THE FOOD PRODUCTION SECTOR
- POTENTIAL SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS ON THE FOOD INDUSTRY
- POTENTIAL SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS ON U.S. CONSUMERS
- COMPLEXITIES OF THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS
- METHODOLOGIES TO LINK THE FOOD SYSTEM WITH SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS
- SUMMARY
- REFERENCES
- III. The Framework
- 6. The U.S. Food and Agriculture System as a Complex Adaptive System
- 7. A Framework for Assessing the Food System and Its Effects
- FRAMEWORKS FOR ASSESSMENT
- RECOMMENDED FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING HEALTH, ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF THE FOOD SYSTEM
- ASSESSMENT STEPS
- ANALYSIS: METHODS FOR ANALYZING FOOD SYSTEM EFFECTS
- SYNTHESIS: INTERPRETATION, SYNTHESIS, AND TRADE-OFFS
- BUDGETARY CONSIDERATIONS
- ENGAGING STAKEHOLDERS
- USING THE FRAMEWORK
- SUMMARY
- REFERENCES
- 7-A. Annexes: Examples to Illustrate the Framework
- ANNEX 1. DIETARY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FISH CONSUMPTION
- ANNEX 2. U.S. BIOFUELS POLICY
- ANNEX 3. ATTAINING RECOMMENDED AMOUNTS OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES IN THE AMERICAN DIET
- ANNEX 4. NITROGEN IN AGROECOSYSTEMS
- ANNEX 5. COMPARING HEN HOUSING PRACTICES AND THEIR EFFECTS ON VARIOUS DOMAINS
- 8. Epilogue
- APPENDIXES
This study was supported by a grant between the National Academy of Sciences and the JPB Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project.
Suggested citation:
IOM (Institute of Medicine) and NRC (National Research Council). 2015. A framework for assessing effects of the food system. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- [Brazil: agricultural modernisation and food production restructuring in the international crisis].[Tiers Monde (1960). 1985][Brazil: agricultural modernisation and food production restructuring in the international crisis].Bertrand JP. Tiers Monde (1960). 1985 Oct-Dec; 26(104):879-98.
- Review Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.[J Toxicol Environ Health B Cri...]Review Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.Jardine C, Hrudey S, Shortreed J, Craig L, Krewski D, Furgal C, McColl S. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec; 6(6):569-720.
- Review Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.[Food Chem Toxicol. 2008]Review Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1:S2-70. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
- Review Cost-Effectiveness and Affordability of Interventions, Policies, and Platforms for the Prevention and Treatment of Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders.[Mental, Neurological, and Subs...]Review Cost-Effectiveness and Affordability of Interventions, Policies, and Platforms for the Prevention and Treatment of Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders.Levin C, Chisholm D. Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders: Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 4). 2016 Mar 14
- Review Critical Role of Animal Science Research in Food Security and Sustainability[ 2015]Review Critical Role of Animal Science Research in Food Security and SustainabilityCommittee on Considerations for the Future of Animal Science Research, Science and Technology for Sustainability Program, Policy and Global Affairs, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Division on Earth and Life Sciences, National Research Council. 2015 Mar 31
- A Framework for Assessing Effects of the Food SystemA Framework for Assessing Effects of the Food System
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...