NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Tarrant C, Angell E, Baker R, et al. Responsiveness of primary care services: development of a patient-report measure – qualitative study and initial quantitative pilot testing. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2014 Nov. (Health Services and Delivery Research, No. 2.46.)

References

1.
Robert G, Cornwell J, Brearley S, Goodrich J, Joule N, Levenson R, et al. What Matters to Patients? Developing the Evidence Base for Measuring and Improving Patient Experience. Coventry: NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement; 2011.
2.
Campbell J, Ramsay J, Green J. Age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnic differences in patients’ assessments of primary health care. Qual Health Care 2001;10:90–5. 10.1136/qhc.10.2.90. [PMC free article: PMC1757978] [PubMed: 11389317] [CrossRef]
3.
Kontopantelis E, Roland M, Reeves D. Patient experience of access to primary care: identification of predictors in a national patient survey. BMC Fam Pract 2010;11:61. 10.1186/1471-2296-11-61. [PMC free article: PMC2936332] [PubMed: 20799981] [CrossRef]
4.
Mead N, Roland M. Understanding why some ethnic minority patients evaluate medical care more negatively than white patients: a cross sectional analysis of a routine patient survey in English general practices. BMJ 2009;339:b3450. 10.1136/bmj.b3450. [PMC free article: PMC2746268] [PubMed: 19762416] [CrossRef]
5.
Lyratzopoulos G, Elliott M, Barbiere J, Henderson A, Staetsky L, Paddison C, et al. Understanding ethnic and other socio-demographic differences in patient experience of primary care: evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey. BMJ Qual Saf 2012;21:21–9. 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000088. [PMC free article: PMC3240774] [PubMed: 21900695] [CrossRef]
6.
The King’s Fund. Improving the Quality of Care in General Practice. London: The King’s Fund; 2011.
7.
Department of Health. World Class Commissioning for GP services: Improving GP Access and Responsiveness. London: Department of Health; 2009.
8.
Lakhani M. No Patient Left Behind: How Can We Ensure World Class Primary Care for Black and Minority Ethnic People? London: Department of Health; 2008. pp. 3–29.
9.
Perloff RM, Bonder B, Ray GB, Ray EB, Siminoff LA. Doctor-patient communication, cultural competence, and minority health. Am Behav Sci 2006;49:835–52. 10.1177/0002764205283804. [CrossRef]
10.
Fernandez A, Schillinger D, Grumbach K, Rosenthal A, Stewart AL, Wang F, et al. Physician language ability and cultural competence. J Gen Int Med 2004;19:167–74. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30266.x. [PMC free article: PMC1492135] [PubMed: 15009796] [CrossRef]
11.
Cooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Gonzales JJ, Vu HT, Powe NR, Nelson C, et al. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient–physician relationship. JAMA 1999;282:583–9. 10.1001/jama.282.6.583. [PubMed: 10450723] [CrossRef]
12.
BMA General Practitioners Committee. Developing General Practice: Listening to Patients. London: BMA; 2009.
13.
NHS Primary Care Contracting. Primary Care Service Framework: Accessible and Responsive General Practice. London: NHS Primary Care Contracting; 2008.
14.
NHS Practice Management Network. Improving Access, Responding to Patients. A ‘How To’ Guide for GP Practices. London: NHS Practice Management Network; 2009.
15.
NHS Practice Management Network. Improving the Patient Experience. A Training DVD Resource for GP Practices. London: NHS Practice Management Network; 2010.
16.
Department of Health. Public Health White Paper. Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS. London: HMSO; 2010.
17.
Great Britain. Health and Social Care Act 2012. London: The Stationery Office; 2012.
18.
National Association for Patient Participation. Vision and Values. 2012. URL: www​.napp.org.uk/vision.html (accessed 23 November 2013).
19.
The King’s Fund. Highly Responsive to Patients’ Needs and Preferences. 2012. URL: www​.kingsfund.org.uk​/projects/francis-inquiry-creating-right-culture-care​/highly-responsive-patients-needs-and-preferences (accessed 23 November 2013).
20.
Royal College of General Practitioners. Quality Practice Award. URL: www​.rcgp.org.uk/professional​_development/team_quality/qpa​.aspx (accessed July 2011).
21.
NHS Improving Quality. Productive General Practice. URL: www​.nhsiq.nhs.uk/capacity-capability​/productive-gp.aspx (accessed 21 November 2013).
22.
The King’s Fund. Experience-Based Co-Design Toolkit: Working with Patients to Improve Care. URL: www​.kingsfund.org.uk/projects/ebcd (accessed 20 November 2013).
23.
Malmivaara A. On decreasing inequality in health care in a cost-effective way. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:79. 10.1186/1472-6963-14-79. [PMC free article: PMC3943459] [PubMed: 24552288] [CrossRef]
24.
Department of Health, Ipsos MORI. The GP Patient Survey 2008–09 Summary Report. London: Ipsos MORI; 2009.
25.
Cheraghi-Sohi S, Bower P, Mead N, McDonald R, Whalley D, Roland M. What are the key attributes of primary care for patients? Building a conceptual ‘map’ of patient preferences. Health Expect 2006;9:275–84. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00395.x. [PMC free article: PMC5060357] [PubMed: 16911142] [CrossRef]
26.
Entwistle V, Firnigl D, Ryan M, Francis J, Kinghorn P. Which experiences of health care delivery matter to service users and why? A critical interpretive synthesis and conceptual map. J Health Serv Res Policy 2012;17:70–8. 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011029. [PMC free article: PMC3336938] [PubMed: 21967821] [CrossRef]
27.
Department of Health. NHS Patient Experience Framework. London: Department of Health; 2011.
28.
Department of Health. A Framework For NHS Patient Experience. URL: www​.gov.uk/government​/news/a-framework-for-nhs-patient-experience (accessed 18 October 2013.)
29.
Coote A. Structures in healthcare: the role of citizens and service users in regulating healthcare. In Andersson E, Tritter J, Wilson R, editors. Healthy Democracy: The Future of Involvement in Health and Social Care. London: Involve and NHS National Centre for Involvement; 2006. pp. 53–66.
30.
Andersson E, Tritter J, Wilson R. Healthy Democracy: The Future of Involvement in Health and Social Care. London: Involve and NHS National Centre for Involvement; 2006.
31.
Public Health England. National General Practice Profiles. URL: http://fingertips​.phe​.org.uk/profile/general-practice/data (accessed 24 February 2014).
32.
Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: a Practical Guide to their Development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231881.001.0001. [CrossRef]
33.
Oppenheim AN. Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. London: Continuum; 1992.
34.
Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J Market 1985;49:41–50. 10.2307/1251430. [CrossRef]
35.
Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. SERVQUAL: a multiple item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality. J Retail 1988;64:12–40.
36.
Brand RR, Cronin JJ, Routledge JB. Marketing to older patients: perceptions of service quality. Health Mark Q 1998;15:1–31. 10.1300/J026v15n02_01. [PubMed: 10179448] [CrossRef]
37.
Zeithaml VA, Berry LL, Parasuraman A. The behavioral consequences of service quality. J Market 1996;60:31–46. 10.2307/1251929. [CrossRef]
38.
Institute of Customer Service. UK Customer Satisfaction Awards. URL: www​.instituteofcustomerservice​.com/11,167​/UK-Customer-Satisfaction-Awards.html (accessed 22 November 2012).
39.
Pongsupap Y, Lerberghe WV. Choosing between public and private or between hospital and primary care: responsiveness, patient-centredness and prescribing patterns in outpatient consultations in Bangkok. Trop Med Int Health 2006;11:81–9. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01532.x. [PubMed: 16398759] [CrossRef]
40.
Elliott MN, Kanouse DE, Edwards CA, Hilborne LH. Components of care vary in importance for overall patient-reported experience by type of hospitalization. Med Care 2009;47:842–9. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318197b22a. [PubMed: 19584764] [CrossRef]
41.
Parasuraman A, Zeithaml V, Berry L. Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. J Retail 2004;67:114.
42.
Yang Z, Jun M, Peterson RT. Measuring customer perceived online service quality: scale development and managerial implications. Int J of Operations Product Manage 2004;24:1149–74. 10.1108/01443570410563278. [CrossRef]
43.
Ye N, Jianmin J. Customers’ perceived service quality of Internet retailing. Proceedings of ICSSSM ’05: International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management, 13–15 June 2005. IEEE; 2005. pp. 514–19.
44.
Kilbourne WE, Duffy JA, Duffy M, Giarchi G. The applicability of SERVQUAL in cross-national measurements of health-care quality. J Serv Market 2004;18:524–33. 10.1108/08876040410561857. [CrossRef]
45.
Dean AM. The applicability of SERVQUAL in different health care environments. Health Mark Q 1999;16:1–21. 10.1300/J026v16n03_01. [PubMed: 10538736] [CrossRef]
46.
Clemes MD, Ozanne LK, Laurensen WL. Patients’ perceptions of service quality dimensions: an empirical examination of health care in New Zealand. Health Mark Q 2001;19:3–22. 10.1300/J026v19n01_02. [PubMed: 11727291] [CrossRef]
47.
Papanikolaou V, Zygiaris S. Service quality perceptions in primary health care centres in Greece. Health Expect 2012;17:197–207. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00747.x. [PMC free article: PMC5060715] [PubMed: 22296402] [CrossRef]
48.
Andaleeb SS. Service quality perceptions and patient satisfaction: a study of hospitals in a developing country. Soc Sci Med 2001;52:1359–70. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00235-5. [PubMed: 11286361] [CrossRef]
49.
Lam SS. SERVQUAL: a tool for measuring patients’ opinions of hospital service quality in Hong Kong. Total Qual Manage 1997;8:145–52. 10.1080/0954412979587. [CrossRef]
50.
De Man S, Gemmel P, Vlerick P, Van Rijk P, Dierckx R. Patients’ and personnel’s perceptions of service quality and patient satisfaction in nuclear medicine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:1109–17. 10.1007/s00259-002-0869-3. [PubMed: 12192553] [CrossRef]
51.
Scardina SA. SERVQUAL: a tool for evaluating patient satisfaction with nursing care. J Nurs Care Qual 1994;8:38–46. 10.1097/00001786-199401000-00008. [PubMed: 8312593] [CrossRef]
52.
Babakus E, Mangold WG. Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: an empirical investigation. Health Serv Res 1992;26:767. [PMC free article: PMC1069855] [PubMed: 1737708]
53.
Headley DE, Miller SJ. Measuring service quality and its relationship to future consumer behavior. J Health Care Mark 1993;13:32–41. [PubMed: 10131732]
54.
Oliver RL, Rust RT, Varki S. Customer delight: foundations, findings, and managerial insight. J Retail 1997;73:311–36. 10.1016/S0022-4359(97)90021-X. [CrossRef]
55.
World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2000. Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
56.
Darby C, Valentine N, Murray CJL, de Silva A. World Health Organization (WHO): Strategy on Measuring Responsiveness. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
57.
Gostin L, Hodge JG, Valentine N, Nygren-Krug H. The Domains of Health Responsiveness – a Human Rights Analysis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
58.
World Health Organization. Health System Responsiveness: Responsiveness Questionnaires. URL: www​.who.int/responsiveness/surveys/en/ (accessed 20 August 2014).
59.
de Silva A, Valentine N. Measuring Responsiveness: Results of a Key Informants Survey in 35 Countries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
60.
Valentine NB, de Silva A, Murray CJL. Estimating Responsiveness Level and Distribution for 191 Countries: Methods and Results. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
61.
Coulter A, Jenkinson C. European patients’ views on the responsiveness of health systems and healthcare providers. Eur J Public Health 2005;15:355–60. 10.1093/eurpub/cki004. [PubMed: 15975955] [CrossRef]
62.
Schoen C, Osborn R, Huynh PT, Doty M, Davis K, Zapert K, et al. Primary care and health system performance: adults’ experiences in five countries. Health Aff (Milllwood) 2004;W4:487–503. [PubMed: 15513956]
63.
Robone S, Rice N, Smith PC. Health systems’ responsiveness and its characteristics: a cross-country comparative analysis. Health Serv Res 2011;46:2079–100. 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01291.x. [PMC free article: PMC3393001] [PubMed: 21762144] [CrossRef]
64.
Hopkins J, Loeb S, Fick D. Beyond satisfaction, what service users expect of inpatient mental health care: a literature review. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2009;16:927–37. 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2009.01501.x. [PubMed: 19930367] [CrossRef]
65.
Haggerty J, Burge F, Lévesque JF, Gass D, Pineault R, Beaulieu MD. Operational definitions of attributes of primary health care: consensus among Canadian experts. Ann Fam Med 2007;5:336–44. 10.1370/afm.682. [PMC free article: PMC1934980] [PubMed: 17664500] [CrossRef]
66.
Haggerty J, Martin C. Evaluating Primary Health Care in Canada: the Right Questions to Ask. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada; 2005.
67.
Learning and Skills Council. Framework for Excellence: Survey Questions under Consideration for Inclusion within the Responsiveness to Learners’ Key Performance Indicator. London: Learning and Skills Council; 2007.
68.
Box G. Access and Responsiveness: What Matters to Patients? Walton-on-Thames: NAPP; 2008.
69.
Campbell SM, Gately C, Gask L. Identifying the patient perspective of the quality of mental healthcare for common chronic problems: a qualitative study. Chronic Illn 2007;3:46–65. 10.1177/1742395307079193. [PubMed: 18072697] [CrossRef]
70.
Opinion Leader Research (for National Consumer Council and Confederation of British Industry). Future Services: a Consumer Blueprint for Responsive Public Services. London: NCC/CBI; 2005.
71.
Cross V, Shah P, Bativala R, Spurgeon P. ReGAE 2: glaucoma awareness and the primary eye-care service: some perceptions among African Caribbeans in Birmingham UK. Eye 2006;21:912–20. 10.1038/sj.eye.6702461. [PubMed: 16902494] [CrossRef]
72.
Winiarski M, Beckett E, Salcedo J. Outcomes of an inner-city HIV mental health programme integrated with primary care and emphasizing cultural responsiveness. AIDS Care 2005;17:747–56. 10.1080/09540120412331336733. [PubMed: 16036261] [CrossRef]
73.
Department of Health. Report of the National Improvement Team for Primary Care Access and Responsiveness. London: Department of Health; 2008.
74.
Smith T. Towards a more responsive health system? Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:156–8. 10.1136/qhc.12.2.156. [CrossRef]
75.
Department of Health. Building on the Best. Choice, Responsiveness and Equity in the NHS. London: Department of Health; 2003. [PMC free article: PMC5060231] [PubMed: 15117392]
76.
Wright J, Williams R, Wilkinson JR. Health needs assessment: development and importance of health needs assessment. BMJ 1998;316:1310. 10.1136/bmj.316.7140.1310. [PMC free article: PMC1113037] [PubMed: 9554906] [CrossRef]
77.
Sheaff R, Pickard S, Smith K. Public service responsiveness to users’ demands and needs: theory, practice and primary healthcare in England. Public Admin 2002;80:435–52. 10.1111/1467-9299.00312. [CrossRef]
78.
Clarke JH, Clarke J, Newman J, Vidler E, Westmarland L, Smith N, et al. Creating Citizen-Consumers: Changing Publics and Changing Public Services. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press; 2007.
79.
Pickard S, Sheaff R, Dowling B. Exit, voice, governance and user-responsiveness: the case of English primary care trusts. Soc Sci Med 2006. 7;63:373–83. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.12.016. [PubMed: 16472899] [CrossRef]
80.
Vigoda E. From responsiveness to collaboration: governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Adm Rev 2002;62:527–40. 10.1111/1540-6210.00235. [CrossRef]
81.
National Association for Patient Participation. Growing Patient Participation – Promoting Quality and Responsiveness in General Practice. Walton-on-Thames: National Association for Patient Participation; 2009.
82.
Simoens S, Scott A. How are Scottish integrated primary care organisations managed? J Health Organ Manag 2003;17:25–36. 10.1108/14777260310469292. [PubMed: 12800278] [CrossRef]
83.
Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge; 1994. pp. 173–94. 10.4324/9780203413081_chapter_9. [CrossRef]
84.
Narver JC, Slater SF, MacLachlan DL. Responsive and proactive market orientation and new-product success. J Prod Innovation Manage 2004;21:334–47. 10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00086.x. [CrossRef]
85.
Saxe R, Barton A. Weitz. The SOCO scale: a measure of the customer orientation of salespeople. J Market Res 1982;19:343–51. 10.2307/3151568. [CrossRef]
86.
Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006;6:35. 10.1186/1471-2288-6-35. [PMC free article: PMC1559637] [PubMed: 16872487] [CrossRef]
87.
Faugier J, Sargeant M. Sampling hard to reach populations. J Adv Nurs 1997;26:790–7. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00371.x. [PubMed: 9354993] [CrossRef]
88.
Baker R. The reliability and criterion validity of a measure of patients’ satisfaction with their general practice. Fam Pract 1991;8:171–7. 10.1093/fampra/8.2.171. [PubMed: 1874365] [CrossRef]
89.
Mead N, Bower P, Roland M. The general practice assessment questionnaire (GPAQ) – development and psychometric characteristics. BMC Fam Pract 2008;9:13. 10.1186/1471-2296-9-13. [PMC free article: PMC2277420] [PubMed: 18289385] [CrossRef]
90.
Greco M, Powell R, Sweeney K. The Improving Practice Questionnaire (IPQ): a practical tool for general practices seeking patient views. Educ Prim Care 2003;14:440–8.
91.
The GP Patient Survey. GP Patient Survey Results – National Reports and Data. 2012. URL: www​.gp-patient.co.uk/results/ (accessed 12 November 2012).
92.
Office for Disability Issues. Easy Read and Makaton. URL: http://odi​.dwp.gov.uk​/inclusive-communications​/alternative-formats​/easy-read-and-makaton.php (accessed 22 November 2012).
93.
Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, Mail, and Mixed-mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 3rd edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
94.
Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, et al. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 2002;324:1183. 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183. [PMC free article: PMC111107] [PubMed: 12016181] [CrossRef]
95.
Beatty PC, Willis GB. Research synthesis: the practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opin Q 2007;71:287–311. 10.1093/poq/nfm006. [CrossRef]
96.
Priede C, Farrall S. Comparing results from different styles of cognitive interviewing: ‘verbal probing’ vs. ‘thinking aloud’. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2011;14:271–87. 10.1080/13645579.2010.523187. [CrossRef]
97.
DeMaio TJ, Landreth A. Do different cognitive interview techniques produce different results? In Presser S, Rothgeb JM, Couper MP, Lessier JT, Martin E, Singer E, editors. Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2004. pp. 89–108. 10.1002/0471654728.ch5. [CrossRef]
98.
Presser S, Couper MP, Lessler JT, Martin E, Martin J, Rothgeb JM, et al. Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Public Opin Q 2004;68:109–30. 10.1093/poq/nfh008. [CrossRef]
99.
MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Zhang S, Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Methods 1999;4:84. 10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84. [CrossRef]
100.
Comrey AL, Lee HB. A First Course in Factor Analysis. Abingdon: Psychology Press; 2013.
101.
Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005;37:360–3. [PubMed: 15883903]
102.
NHS England. The GP Patient Survey Analysis Tool. URL: http://results​.gp-patient​.co.uk/report/10/result.aspx (accessed 24 February 2014).
103.
Health and Social Care Information Centre. Quality and Outcomes Framework: GP Practice Results. URL: http://qof​.hscic.gov.uk/search/ (accessed 24 February 2014).
104.
Goodwin N, Dixon A, Poole T, Raleigh V. Improving the Quality of Care in General Practice: Report of an Independent Inquiry Commissioned by The King’s Fund. London: The King’s Fund; 2011.
105.
106.
Jordan K, Porcheret M, Croft P. Quality of morbidity coding in general practice computerized medical records: a systematic review. Fam Pract 2004;21:396–412. 10.1093/fampra/cmh409. [PubMed: 15249528] [CrossRef]
107.
Tarrant C, Wobi F, Angell E. Tackling health inequalities: socio-demographic data could play a bigger role. Fam Pract 2013;30:613–14. 10.1093/fampra/cmt071. [PubMed: 24249332] [CrossRef]
108.
Payne RA, Abel GA, Simpson CR. A retrospective cohort study assessing patient characteristics and the incidence of cardiovascular disease using linked routine primary and secondary care data. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000723. 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000723. [PMC free article: PMC3332248] [PubMed: 22505310] [CrossRef]
109.
Aspinall PJ, Jacobson B. Why poor quality of ethnicity data should not preclude its use for identifying disparities in health and healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:176–80. 10.1136/qshc.2006.019059. [PMC free article: PMC2465001] [PubMed: 17545342] [CrossRef]
110.
111.
HES Online. Data Dictionary: Outpatients. December 2010. URL: www​.hscic.gov.uk/media​/1359/HES-Hospital-Episode-Statistics-HES-Outpatient-Data-Dictionary​/pdf/HES_Outpatient_DD_Dec10​.pdf (accessed 20 August 2014).
112.
Eaton SC, Williams TJ, Puri S, Van-Staa T. The feasibility of linking the English Hospital Episode Statistics to the GPRD. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2008;17:S214.
113.
Hull SA, Rivas C, Bobby J, Boomla K, Robson J. Hospital data may be more accurate than census data in estimating the ethnic composition of general practice populations. Informatics in Primary Care 2009;17:67–78. [PubMed: 19807948]
114.
Dregan A, Moller H, Murray-Thomas T, Gulliford MC. Validity of cancer diagnosis in a primary care database compared with linked cancer registrations in England. Population-based cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol 2012;36:425–9. 10.1016/j.canep.2012.05.013. [PubMed: 22727737] [CrossRef]
115.
Bremner SA, Carey IM, DeWilde S, Richards N, Maier WC, Hilton SR, et al. Early-life exposure to antibacterials and the subsequent development of hayfever in childhood in the UK: case–control studies using the General Practice Research Database and the Doctors’ Independent Network. Clin Exp Allergy 2003;33:1518–25. 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01794.x. [PubMed: 14616863] [CrossRef]
116.
Calvert M, Shankar A, McManus RJ, Lester H, Freemantle N. Effect of the quality and outcomes framework on diabetes care in the United Kingdom: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2009;338:b1870. 10.1046/10.1136/bmj.b1870. [PMC free article: PMC2687510] [PubMed: 19474024] [CrossRef]
117.
DeWilde S, Carey IM, Richards N, Whincup PH, Cook DG. Trends in secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease in the UK 1994–2005: use of individual and combination treatment. Heart 2008;94:83–8. 10.1136/hrt.2006.111757. [PubMed: 17540684] [CrossRef]
118.
Shafe ACE, Lee S, Dalrymple JSO, Whorwell PJ. The LUCK study: Laxative Usage in patients with GP-diagnosed Constipation in the UK, within the general population and in pregnancy. An epidemiological study using the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2011;4:343–63. 10.1177/1756283X11417483. [PMC free article: PMC3187684] [PubMed: 22043228] [CrossRef]
119.
Calvert MJ, Shankar A, McManus RJ, Ryan R, Freemantle N. Evaluation of the management of heart failure in primary care. Fam Pracy 2009;26:145–53. 10.1093/fampra/cmn105. [PubMed: 19153098] [CrossRef]
120.
Jordan K, Clarke AM, Symmons DPM, Fleming D, Porcheret M, Kadam UT, et al. Measuring disease prevalence: a comparison of musculoskeletal disease using four general practice consultation databases. Br J Gen Pract 2007;57:7–14. [PMC free article: PMC2032694] [PubMed: 17244418]
121.
Kapur N, Hunt I, Lunt M, McBeth J, Creed F, Macfarlane G. Primary care consultation predictors in men and women: a cohort study. Br J Gen Pract 2005;55:108–13. [PMC free article: PMC1463184] [PubMed: 15720931]
122.
Myles PR, Hubbard RB, Gibson JE, Pogson Z, Smith CJP, McKeever TM. Pneumonia mortality in a UK general practice population cohort. Eur J Public Health 2009;19:521–6. 10.1093/eurpub/ckp081. [PubMed: 19549803] [CrossRef]
123.
Sammon CJ, McGrogan A, Snowball J, de Vries CS. Factors associated with uptake of seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccine among clinical risk groups in the UK: an analysis using the General Practice Research Database. Vaccine 2012;30:2483–9. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.077. [PubMed: 22133511] [CrossRef]
124.
Mathur R, Grundy E, Smeeth L. Availability and Use of UK Based Ethnicity Data for Health Research. Southampton: National Centre for Research Methods; 2013.
125.
Carey IM, Cook DG, De Wilde S, Bremner SA, Richards N, Caine S, et al. Developing a large electronic primary care database (Doctors’ Independent Network) for research. Int J Med Inf 2004;73:443–53. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.02.002. [PubMed: 15171985] [CrossRef]
126.
Herrett E, Thomas SL, Schoonen WM, Smeeth L, Hall AJ. Validation and validity of diagnoses in the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2010;69:4–14. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03537.x. [PMC free article: PMC2805870] [PubMed: 20078607] [CrossRef]
127.
Simkiss DE, Spencer NJ, Stallard N, Thorogood M. Health service use in families where children enter public care: a nested case control study using the General Practice Research Database. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:65. 10.1186/1472-6963-12-65. [PMC free article: PMC3361673] [PubMed: 22424404] [CrossRef]
128.
Hawkins NM, Scholes S, Bajekal M, Love H, O’Flaherty M, Raine R, et al. Community care in England: reducing socioeconomic inequalities in heart failure. Circulation 2012;126:1050–7. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.088047. [PubMed: 22837162] [CrossRef]
129.
Huerta C, Rivero E, Rodriguez LAG. Incidence and risk factors for psoriasis in the general population. Arch Dermatol 2007;143:1559–65. 10.1001/archderm.143.12.1559. [PubMed: 18087008] [CrossRef]
130.
Tsang C, Majeed A, Aylin P. Routinely recorded patient safety events in primary care: a literature review. Fam Pract 2012;29:8–15. 10.1093/fampra/cmr050. [PubMed: 21878467] [CrossRef]
131.
Martín-Merino E, Fortuny J, Rivero E, García-Rodríguez LA. Validation of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy diagnoses recorded in a UK primary care database. Diabetes Care 2012;35:762–7. 10.2337/dc11-2069. [PMC free article: PMC3308315] [PubMed: 22357184] [CrossRef]
132.
Hansell A, Hollowell J, Nichols T, McNiece R, Strachan D. Use of the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) for respiratory epidemiology: a comparison with the 4th Morbidity Survey in General Practice (MSGP4). Thorax 1999;54:413–19. 10.1136/thx.54.5.413. [PMC free article: PMC1763769] [PubMed: 10212105] [CrossRef]
133.
Cai B, Xu W, Bortnichak E, Watson DJ. An algorithm to identify medical practices common to both the General Practice Research Database and The Health Improvement Network database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2012;21:770–4. 10.1002/pds.3277. [PubMed: 22544805] [CrossRef]
134.
Taggar JS, Coleman T, Lewis S, Szatkowski L. The impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) on the recording of smoking targets in primary care medical records: cross-sectional analyses from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database. BMC Public Health 2012;12:329. 10.1186/1471-2458-12-329. [PMC free article: PMC4104830] [PubMed: 22559290] [CrossRef]
135.
Langley T, Szatkowski L, Wythe S, Lewis S. Can primary care data be used to monitor regional smoking prevalence? An analysis of The Health Improvement Network primary care data. BMC Public Health 2011;11:773. 10.1186/1471-2458-11-773. [PMC free article: PMC3198710] [PubMed: 21981754] [CrossRef]
136.
Hall G, Carroll D, McQuay H. Primary care incidence and treatment of four neuropathic pain conditions: a descriptive study, 2002–2005. BMC Fam Pract 2008;9:26. 10.1186/1471-2296-9-26. [PMC free article: PMC2413228] [PubMed: 18460194] [CrossRef]
137.
Blak BT, Smith HT, Hards M, Maguire A, Gimeno V. A retrospective database study of insulin initiation in patients with Type 2 diabetes in UK primary care. Diabetic Med 2012;29:e191–8. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03694.x. [PubMed: 22507537] [CrossRef]
138.
CSR Medical Research. URL: http://csdmruk​.cegedim​.com/about-us/about-us.shtml (accessed 20 August 2014).
139.
Young AH, Rigney U, Shaw S, Emmas C, Thompson JM. Annual cost of managing bipolar disorder to the UK healthcare system. J Affect Disord 2011;133:450–56. 10.1016/j.jad.2011.06.016. [PubMed: 21737141] [CrossRef]
140.
McColl BW, Allan SM, Rothwell NJ. Systemic infection, inflammation and acute ischemic stroke. Neuroscience 2009;158:1049–61. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.08.019. [PubMed: 18789376] [CrossRef]
141.
Hill A, Cooke H, Jenner D, Somervaille L. Mini-symposium – Public Health Observatories: building public health skills and capacity in the English regions. Public Health 2005;119:235–8. 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.01.002. [PubMed: 15733681] [CrossRef]
142.
Wilkinson J, Coyle E. Mini-symposium – Public Health Observatories: development of public health observatories in the UK, Ireland and Europe. Public Health 2005;119:227–34. 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.01.006. [PubMed: 15733680] [CrossRef]
143.
Bellis MA, Hughes K, Tocque K, Hennell T, Humphrey G, Wyke S. Mini-symposium – Public Health Observatories: assessing and communicating the health and judicial impact of alcohol use. Public Health 2005;119:253–61. 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.01.005. [PubMed: 15733684] [CrossRef]
144.
Battersby J. Using practice-level data to improve health. Pract Nurs 2012;23:207–10. 10.12968/pnur.2012.23.4.207. [CrossRef]
145.
Hayes L, Hawthorne G, Unwin N. Undiagnosed diabetes in the over-60s: performance of the Association of Public Health Observatories (APHO) Diabetes Prevalence Model in a general practice. Diabet Med 2011;29:115–20. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03389.x. [PubMed: 21781154] [CrossRef]
146.
Holman N, Forouhi NG, Goyder E, Wild SH. The Association of Public Health Observatories (APHO) Diabetes Prevalence Model: estimates of total diabetes prevalence for England, 2010–2030. Diabet Med 2011;28:575–82. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03216.x. [PubMed: 21480968] [CrossRef]
147.
HSCIC Indicator Panel. NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care. 2012. URL: https://indicators​.ic.nhs.uk/webview (accessed 20 August 2014).
148.
Purdy S, Griffin T, Salisbury C, Sharp D. Emergency admissions for coronary heart disease: a cross-sectional study of general practice, population and hospital factors in England. Public Health 2011;125:46–54. 10.1016/j.puhe.2010.07.006. [PubMed: 21183192] [CrossRef]
149.
Griffin T, Peters TJ, Sharp D, Salisbury C, Purdy S. Validation of an improved area-based method of calculating general practice–level deprivation. J Clin Epidemiol 2010. 7;63:746–51. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.07.019. [PubMed: 19914798] [CrossRef]
150.
Bottle A, Tsang C, Parsons C, Majeed A, Soljak M, Aylin P. Association between patient and general practice characteristics and unplanned first-time admissions for cancer: observational study. Br J Cancer 2012;107:1213–19. 10.1038/bjc.2012.320. [PMC free article: PMC3494442] [PubMed: 22828606] [CrossRef]
151.
National Cancer Intelligence Network. General Practice Profiles for Cancer. 2010. URL: www​.ncin.org.uk/cancer​_information_tools​/profiles/gp_profiles.aspx (accessed 11 October 2012).
152.
National Cancer Intelligence Network. General Practice Profiles for Cancer: Meta-Data for Profile Indicators. 2010. URL: www​.ncin.org.uk/cancer​_information_tools​/profiles/gp_profiles (accessed 20 August 2014).
153.
Saxena S, Car J, Eldred D, Soljak M, Majeed A. Practice size, caseload, deprivation and quality of care of patients with coronary heart disease, hypertension and stroke in primary care: national cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2007;7:96. 10.1186/1472-6963-7-96. [PMC free article: PMC1919365] [PubMed: 17597518] [CrossRef]
154.
Ashworth M, Seed P, Armstrong D, Durbaba S, Jones R. The relationship between social deprivation and the quality of primary care: a national survey using indicators from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework. Br J Gen Pract 2007;57:441–8. [PMC free article: PMC2078188] [PubMed: 17550668]
155.
Dixon A, Khachatryan A, Tian Y. Socioeconomic differences in case finding among general practices in England: analysis of secondary data. J Health Serv Res Policy 2012;17(Suppl. 2):18–22. 10.1258/jhsrp.2012.011112. [PubMed: 22572712] [CrossRef]
156.
NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. A Guide to Productive General Practice. Coventry: NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement; 2012.
157.
National Institute for health and Clinical Excellence. Health Needs Assessment. 2005. URL: http://admin​.nice.org​.uk/nicemedia/documents​/Health_Needs_Assessment​_A_Practical_Guide.pdf (accessed 20 August 2014).
158.
Mid Hampshire PCT. Health Needs Assessment Toolkit. 2002. URL: http://courses​.essex​.ac.uk/hs/hs915/Mid%20Hampshire​%20PCT%20HNA%20Toolkit.pdf (accessed 24 November 2013).
159.
Hutt P, Gilmour S. Tackling inequalities in general practice. London: The King’s Fund; 2010.
160.
Ali S, Burns C, Grant L. Equality and diversity in the health service: an evidence-led culture change. J Psycholo Issues Organ Culture 2012;3:41–60. 10.1002/jpoc.20095. [CrossRef]
161.
Lodge KM, Milnes D, Gilbody SM. Compiling a register of patients with moderate or severe learning disabilities: experience at one United Kingdom general practice. Ment Health Fam Med 2011;8:29–37. [PMC free article: PMC3134211] [PubMed: 22479290]
162.
Fulton R. Ethnic Monitoring: Is Health Equality Possible Without It? London: Race Equality Foundation; 2010.
163.
Thorlby R, Curry N. PCTs and Race Equality Schemes. London: The King’s Fund; 2007.
164.
Widger T, Prosser TS, Rogers S, Hutton C. The Performance of the Health Sector in Meeting Public Sector Equality Duties: Moving towards Effective Quality Outcomes. London: Equality and Human Rights Commission; 2011.
165.
Raleigh VS. Collection of data on ethnic origin in England. BMJ 2008;337:a1107. 10.1136/bmj.a1107. [PubMed: 18719007] [CrossRef]
166.
Lakhani M. No Patient Left Behind: How Can We Ensure World Class Primary Care for Black and Ethnic Minority People? London: Department of Health; 2008.
167.
Aspinall PJ. Informing progress towards race equality in mental healthcare: is routine data collection adequate? Adv Psychiatr Treat 2006;12:141–51. 10.1192/apt.12.2.141. [CrossRef]
168.
Jones M, Kai J. Capturing ethnicity data in primary care: challenges and feasibility in a diverse metropolitan population. Divers Health Soc Care 2007;4:211–20.
169.
Siva N. Race relations in the UK’s National Health Service. Lancet 2009;373:1935–6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61050-3. [PubMed: 19514113] [CrossRef]
170.
Iqbal G, Johnson MRD, Szczepura A, Wilson S, Gumber A, Dunn JA. UK ethnicity data collection for healthcare statistics: the South Asian perspective. BMC Public Health 2012;12:243. 10.1186/1471-2458-12-243. [PMC free article: PMC3339513] [PubMed: 22452827] [CrossRef]
171.
Ipsos MORI. The GP Patient Survey. 2011. URL: www​.gp-patient.co.uk/info/ (accessed February 2011).
172.
Perry G, Van Cleemput P, Peters J, Moore J, Walters S, Thomas K, et al. The Health Status of Gypsies and Travellers in England. Sheffield: School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield; 2004.
173.
Pringle M, Rothera I. Practicality of recording patient ethnicity in general practice: descriptive intervention study and attitude survey. BMJ 1996;312:1080–2. 10.1136/bmj.312.7038.1080. [PMC free article: PMC2350904] [PubMed: 8616418] [CrossRef]
174.
Lee B, Gardner KK, Jones B, Qassim TA. Ethnicity Profiling in Primary Care – the Princes Park Health Centre Model. Liverpool: Public Health Sector, Liverpool John Moores University; 2000.
175.
Mathur R, Hull SA, Badrick E, Robson J. Cardiovascular multimorbidity: the effect of ethnicity on prevalence and risk factor management. Br J Gen Pract 2011;61:e262. 10.3399/bjgp11X572454. [PMC free article: PMC3080231] [PubMed: 21619750] [CrossRef]
176.
Kumarapeli P, Stepaniuk R, De Lusignan S, Williams R, Rowlands G. Ethnicity recording in general practice computer systems. J Public Health 2006;28:283–7. 10.1093/pubmed/fdl044. [PubMed: 16840765] [CrossRef]
177.
Iqbal G, Johnson MR, Szczepura A, Gumber A, Wilson S, Dunn JA. Ethnicity data collection in the UK: the healthcare professional’s perspective. Divers Equal Health Care 2012;9:281–90.
178.
Race for Health. Lambeth PCT Peer Review. 2006. URL: www​.raceforhealth.org​/storage/files/Lambeth_Outcome.pdf (accessed 20 August 2014).
179.
Mitchell P. Patient Profiling Report Update. Liverpool: Liverpool Primary Care Trust; 2010.
180.
Race for Health. Liverpool PCT . . . Know Your Patients Better, Save More Lives. URL: www​.raceforhealth.org​/resources/case_studies/liverpool (accessed 21 November 2013).
181.
182.
Department of Health. Practical Guide to Ethnic Monitoring in the NHS and Social Care. London: Department of Health; 2012.
183.
Health Research and Educational Trust. HRET Disparities Toolkit. URL: www​.hretdisparities.org/ (accessed 22 November 2013).
184.
NHS Health Scotland. Happy to Ask, Happy to Tell: Handbook for Trainees. Edinburgh: NHS Health Scotland; 2012.
185.
Caton S, Starling S, Burton M, Azmi S, Chapman M. Responsive services for people with learning disabilities from minority ethnic communities. Br J Learn Disabil 2007;35:229–35. 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2007.00454.x. [CrossRef]
186.
Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R. Patients’ preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. Patient Educ Couns 2006. 2;60:102–14. 10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.003. [PubMed: 16442453] [CrossRef]
187.
Wilkinson S, Stöckl A, Taggart D, Franks W. Surveying Hard to Reach Groups – Final Report. NHS Great Yarmouth and Waveney; 2009.
188.
NHS England London. Transforming Primary Care in London: General Practice – A Call to Action. 2013.
189.
Royal College of General Practitioners. 2022 GP: a Vision for General Practice in the Future NHS. London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 2013.
190.
Atherton H, Dalton A, Fleming S, Hirst J, Nunan D, Selwood M, et al. Are there enough GPs in England to detect hypertension and maintain access? Br J Gen Pract 2013;63:346–7. 10.3399/bjgp13X669103. [PMC free article: PMC3693780] [PubMed: 23834865] [CrossRef]
191.
Health & Social Care Information Centre. Investment in General Practice 2008/09 to 2012/13 England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Leeds: Health & Social Care Information Centre; 2013.
192.
Baker R, Bankart MJ, Rashid A, Banerjee J, Conroy S, Habiba M, et al. Characteristics of general practices associated with emergency-department attendance rates: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20:953–8. 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.050864. [PubMed: 21685185] [CrossRef]
193.
Royal College of General Practitioners Centre for Commissioning. Working with Communities, Developing Communities. Guidance for Primary Care. London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 2013.
194.
Royal College of General Practitioners. General Practice and the Integration of Care. An RCGP Policy Report. London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 2013.
195.
Bickerstaffe S. Towards Whole Person Care. London: IPPR; 2013.
196.
Richards T. European health systems must adapt to austerity, conference hears. BMJ 2013;347:f6073. 10.1136/bmj.f6073. [PubMed: 24108243] [CrossRef]
197.
Gorecki C, Brown JM, Cano S, Lamping DL, Briggs M, Coleman S, et al. Development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure for patients with pressure ulcers: the PU-QOL instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013;11:95. 10.1186/1477-7525-11-95. [PMC free article: PMC3698102] [PubMed: 23764247] [CrossRef]
198.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Wheel and Spokes Diagram: Clinical Outcome Assessments. Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2013.
199.
McColl E, Jacoby A, Thomas L, Soutter J, Bamford C, Steen N, et al. Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technol Assess 2001;5(31). [PubMed: 11809125]
200.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010;19:539–49. 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8. [PMC free article: PMC2852520] [PubMed: 20169472] [CrossRef]
201.
Department of Health. The NHS Outcomes Framework 2014/15. London: Department of Health; 2013.
202.
NHS Commissioning Board. Commissioning Outcomes Framework – Engagement Document. Redditch: NHS England; 2011.
203.
NHS England. CCG Outcomes Indicator Set 2014/15: Technical Guidance. Redditch: NHS England; 2013.
204.
de Silva D. Measuring Patient Experience. London: Health Foundation; 2013.
205.
Fudge N, Wolfe CD, McKevitt C. Assessing the promise of user involvement in health service development: ethnographic study. BMJ 2008;336:313–17. 10.1136/bmj.39456.552257.BE. [PMC free article: PMC2234509] [PubMed: 18230646] [CrossRef]
Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2014. This work was produced by Tarrant et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.

Included under terms of UK Non-commercial Government License.

Bookshelf ID: NBK263685
Contents