U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Iliffe S, Waugh A, Poole M, et al.; for the CAREDEM research team. The effectiveness of collaborative care for people with memory problems in primary care: results of the CAREDEM case management modelling and feasibility study. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2014 Aug. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 18.52.)

Cover of The effectiveness of collaborative care for people with memory problems in primary care: results of the CAREDEM case management modelling and feasibility study

The effectiveness of collaborative care for people with memory problems in primary care: results of the CAREDEM case management modelling and feasibility study.

Show details

Chapter 7Implementing case management for people with dementia in general practice: views of key stakeholders

This chapter summarises the results of the nested qualitative study and presents the views of key stakeholders. Participants’ perspectives are presented in terms of three stakeholder groupings:

  • patients and carers
  • health and social care professionals from participating GP practices and associated voluntary sector services
  • case managers, case manager mentor and members of the research team.

For all three stakeholder groups, key findings were amalgamated into three specific themes:

  • knowledge and skills that they felt were required for case management
  • practical delivery of case management compared with the theoretical concept, including the perceived and actual benefits of case management and clarity, or lack of it, over the case manager role
  • delivery of case management through primary care.

Knowledge and skills required for case management: patient and carer perspectives

Core knowledge and skills

In terms of knowledge and skills required by case managers, participants expected them to be able to provide information around dementia and local services. Participants felt that case managers should have sufficient knowledge to signpost people to appropriate services and provide information. Access to information about dementia was crucial in enabling participants to manage the practicalities and uncertainties of the condition and to empower patients and carers to understand their condition and plan for the future:

Professional carers that’s their vocation they understand it, they’ve been trained for it. If you’re a son, the child, who’s been doing something else you don’t know what the nature of the beast is and if you misunderstand it you can say ‘well that person is just being difficult’ even though they’ve never, they’ve been a beautifully loving person up until that point when they sort of change. If you don’t, if you haven’t been counselled, it hasn’t been explained to you, you misinterpret that can cause for stress. The more you understand this disease and the behavioural symptoms then the better you are to deal with it. So again somebody like [case manager] you know being a point of contact.

Care, A04

Professional background

Most patients and carers expressed no strong preference regarding the professional background of case managers. Although one participant felt that the nursing/medical status was important, another patient–carer dyad felt more comfortable with a non-medical professional as so much of their life was already medicalised. Benefits of both a nursing and social work background were identified, but neither was seen as a core requirement. From the perspectives of patients and carers, nurses were perceived as providing a more direct link to the GP and advice and support around comorbidities and minor ailments:

Interviewer:

And obviously [case manager] is a nurse and is that important to you that she’s got a nursing background, a medical background?

A02:

Yes, oh yes it’s always very important, yes it’s because as I say I have got different things wrong with me but I feel pretty good most of the time, I don’t feel like an invalid, not yet anyway.

Patient, A02

In contrast, social workers were seen as closely linked to formal or paid support services. There was also a feeling that there were established routes for seeking help with medical issues, whereas patients and carers were less familiar with where and how to seek help for social problems and therefore valued the specialist knowledge of case managers with a social work background:

I don’t think the clinical side probably comes into it, it’s probably more having access to knowing what services are available and more helpful in that way. I mean obviously the doctors would be the ones that would be doing the medical side of things as regards the illness, but it’s more about managing the problem and it wouldn’t make any difference to me where it came from, and what department or whatever, so no, it’s not a problem.

Carer, B01

Interpersonal skills

In describing the skills needed for case management, patients and carers emphasised interpersonal skills such as empathy, the ability to listen, making people feel at ease and not rushing people. Advocacy was also suggested as an important professional skill by one carer. In addition to skills, personal attributes of case managers were considered important. Case managers were described positively and adjectives were used such as ‘nice’, ‘pleasant’, ‘bubbly’, ‘lovely’, ‘easy to talk to’, ‘a friendly face’, ‘comforting’ and ‘supportive’:

I think the most important thing is the care. That’s what I think. Because having worked in that sort of industry there were people who came along that obviously had fantastic qualifications to see the people that I was looking after but they didn’t seem to have any empathy.

Carer, A02

Case management in theory and practice: patient and carer perspectives

Potential and actual benefits of case management

The perceived and actual benefits of a case manager from the patient and carer perspective included acting as a first point of contact and also as a ‘safety net’ for all concerns, potentially providing a one-to-one, therapeutic relationship for future ongoing support and offering information and direct links to the practice and other services. Some participants suggested that the case managers should also be able to take on a more active role in negotiating or brokering with local services. Participants valued the ability of case managers to address both health-care and social care problems. Patients and carers were generally satisfied with their experience of case management and several participants were clear that they wished the service to remain in place (both for their own benefit and to benefit others). The service created feelings of security or comfort for some patients and carers. In addition, a number of practical benefits were reported, including easier access to GP appointments, benefit checks and links with other services:

What was very useful was when I told her that trying to get appointments is really difficult; she’s actually used a pop-up system now in the surgery to get the earliest appointment without me having to say ‘is it possible, can you bring the appointment a bit forward?’ Because I might be off on a particular day. She used the pop-up system so it comes up on the screen to let us have, without debating, the earliest appointment in view of my being a carer and at work and mum being not been able to wait a long time for an appointment.

Carer, A06

At the minute, we’re going through a care plan [for a personal budget], and that’s where you get an amount of money and it’s done through the council, which we never know about. It was [case manager] who directed us in that way and we can go and spend it like – [patient], basically, can go out and spend it. It covers your care needs and everything, and that’s something we never knew about. It was just [case manager] directed us in that, and checking that our benefits were in place.

Carer, B02

However, outcomes were less positive for some patients and carers. For example, one carer was waiting for information on whether or not her mother could keep a cat in sheltered accommodation:

Carer:

It’s the one thing that my mum said that she really, really would love to happen but as I say I don’t know whether it would be possible.

Interviewer:

And has there been any follow up with [case manager]?

Carer:

We haven’t heard anything. No we haven’t heard anything yet. But it wasn’t that long ago so maybe she’s tried to get in touch with them.

Carer, A02

A key aspect of case management valued by patients and carers was the idea of background support that could easily be called on at a time of need. This was described as providing a sense of back-up, a safety net, security and knowledge that help was available if needed. This concept of contingency was considered key to avoiding or averting crisis:

Carer:

She [case manager] was good. She said if there was anything, ‘Don’t sit there worrying. Pick up the phone and we’ll sort something out.’

Interviewer:

Did you ever have the opportunity to pick up the phone and call her?

Carer:

No, no, but it was just nice to have that safety blanket there, because I’ve got her number in my phone now, so if there’s anything that comes up, or anything like that, I know the phone number is there to get in touch with [case manager]. So it’s really good.

Carer, B02

For patients and carers to feel comfortable about contacting the case manager in the event of difficulties, there needed to be time and opportunities to develop a deeper relationship. Regular contact, the provision of case management from the early stages of the condition and continuity were seen as crucial for establishing a good relationship:

Carer:

I think it needs to be regular […]

Interviewer:

Right, even from that early stage?

Carer:

I think so.

PWD:

Yes.

Carer:

So that then when it gets to a stage when we really do need help we’ve got the confidence in the person you’ve been seeing all along.

PWD and carer, C04

Face-to-face and telephone contact were both considered acceptable, although face-to-face contact was often preferred as it facilitated relationship building better than telephone contact. One participant would have preferred more face-to-face visits at regular intervals rather than just telephone follow-ups:

I was hoping that we’ll get regular support and I think visits on a regular basis . . . it would be nice to think that I know that we are going to have another visit say every 3 months or something like that.

Carer, C04

Clarity over the case manager role

The remit of case managers was unclear to some patients and carers and there was a degree of uncertainty about the specific areas of support available:

Interviewer:

Do you think a case manager could have helped to support you in that role, or . . .

Carer:

Eeh, I don’t know, is it their job to do that is it?

Interviewer:

Well, case managers can support the carer and the person with dementia as well, so, or did you feel that you navigated it fine by yourself?

Carer:

Well no, I didn’t – I had to go to the, I’m still going to the council, I was there yesterday.

Carer, B13

In addition, there was some overlap of roles, with dementia advisors (piloted in one site) and case managers being perceived as offering similar types of support. The potential for case management to offer continuity of care was one aspect of case management that was potentially distinct from other services. Participants reported having been discharged from other services and even in primary care found it difficult to consistently see the same GP unless they were prepared to wait for an appointment:

Carer:

We never had that [ongoing contact] before. It was just like, we’d got the diagnosis, go to the doctors’ appointments and things, and then that was it; we were just sort of left.

Carer, B02

PWD:

Because very often you can’t get in to see a doctor

Interviewer:

Right, is it difficult?

PWD:

It can be. It is yes. I mean I just see whoever, not like the old days when you used to see your doctor.

Patient, C02

Implementing case management in practice

Key issues for patients and carers included access to and availability of the case manager, the most appropriate time for them to access case management and the perceived severity of the problems that the case manager would deal with.

Access and availability

Although all carers in one area were aware of the case manager’s time constraints, often spontaneously mentioning how busy she was, they reported that she had nonetheless made time for them during assessment visits. They also reported that they would have no qualms in contacting her should the need arise:

I think [case manager] is a very busy woman so to pile things onto her would be wrong but it’s lovely knowing she’s there if I need her, I can pick that phone up, I can even ring her at the surgery and she’d listen which is nice, but I wouldn’t want to say to you ‘oh I’d like to see her two more times a week’ or something like that where at the moment she’s running, she’ll get here at a gallop won’t she, if I want to see her too much, so it’s just nice her being there so I can ring.

Carer, C03

One issue that arose for patients and carers recruited later in the study was the lack of time to build up a relationship with the case manager, although first impressions had generally been very positive:

She is . . . very nice, I could only say as I, she’s amazing, she’s nice, she’s a lovely person, well she came over as lovely to me. As I say I don’t know her very well, sometimes it does take a while to get to know people.

Patient, A02

The relatively short duration of the pilot study meant that relatively few changes occurred and the situation of most patients and carers remained stable. Contingency therefore remained a hypothetical concept rather than one that participants had personally experienced. It was also clear that there were some tensions and inconsistencies around the concept of contingency. Despite their apparent enthusiasm for flexibility and responsiveness, participants frequently expressed a reluctance to initiate contact with the case manager, somewhat undermining the idea that they could ask for help when needed:

I wouldn’t personally ask. I’m happy to accept it all, if somebody points me in the right direction, I just won’t initially ask. I mean I wouldn’t say to you, ‘I’m struggling with this. Can you help me with that?’ I just wouldn’t do it. I’ve never done it. I just don’t feel comfortable with it.

Patient, B02

Timing of case management

Many participants reported that their greatest need for information was at the point of diagnosis and in the early phases of the condition when they had been faced with navigating the system without any support. They felt that the lack of information at this point had compounded the difficulties of coming to terms with the diagnosis. However, those patients and carers who were still at the early stages often felt that they did not need any support at the moment but could see a point in the future when they might have needs requiring input. This mismatch in the views of people in the early and later stages of the illness trajectory may reflect the possibility that patients and carers are able to see their needs more clearly retrospectively than at the time.

In the light of these difficulties in recognising and articulating needs, it was interesting that some participants explicitly commented on the problems of identifying their own needs. Whereas they were too immersed in the situation, they felt that a case manager might bring a more detached perspective and could be in a better position to identify needs through regular contact and monitoring:

You need somebody to be able to look at the bigger picture, who knows where you’re going, who’s seen it before and [who could] deem and assess your situation to be stable and tenable or not and either talk to you about it, get you the right support or what have you but you can’t be the judge of your own situation. I mean obviously you know it’s bad but sometimes you just don’t know what to do.

Carer, A04

Although early intervention was considered to be the optimal way of identifying and addressing needs, this was somewhat at odds with the ability of patients and carers to identify low-level needs and to initiate contact with the case manager. Achieving the benefits of case management in practice may require a more structured, formal approach in which the case manager initiates regular contact with patients and carers.

Identification of patient and carer concerns about case management: major problems compared with ‘day-to-day’ issues

A further barrier was the difficulty that patients and carers appeared to have in identifying their needs, with many having few or no needs (any identified were considered low level). Both patients and carers frequently stated that they did not have any needs:

And she also rang me since she came to say ‘have you got any problems?’ At that stage we haven’t got really anything to report.

Carer, C04

We haven’t, luckily we haven’t had any major problems; it’s just day-to-day things.

Carer, C02

It appeared that many patients and carers seemed to associate case management with ‘major’ problems, with input being seen as most relevant in times of significant change (e.g. move to a care home). The ‘day-to-day things’ described above may have been a legitimate focus of attention for the case manager but tended not to be raised by patients and carers. This limited the ability of the case manager to provide a preventative, proactive service. Rather than focusing on current needs, participants tended to emphasise past and future needs, for example describing how case management either would have been helpful in the past or would be helpful in the future:

The things that [case manager] had to offer were perhaps something that I would have found very useful at the beginning of my mum’s Alzheimer’s and not so much [now] because I’ve learnt by trial and error on how to deal with it.

Carer, B01

At the moment you see with my wife things are in early stage, aren’t they? [mmh mmh] so you know we might be very, very glad of [case manager] in months, years, a couple of years to come you know, I hope she’s still about to help us, of course with her doing this she’s the person you want to help you.

Carer, C03

Delivery of case management through primary care: patient and carer perspectives

For most people, going to the GP surgery is an ordinary thing that ordinary people do in their everyday lives. It is not a new experience or a ‘special’ experience such as a hospital attendance or intervention through another agency such as social work. Neither patients nor carers expressed any concerns about going to their surgery, which was an accepted activity for many because of their management of other conditions.

Participants often described general practice as the ‘gateway’ to the ‘formal’ system of care and support. The GP was considered as the first point of contact for participants. The most appropriate way to access case management was thought to be through the GP around the time of diagnosis. This would ensure support at a time when participants have identified that it would be most beneficial. It would also avoid the difficulties that carers reported in negotiating support systems and allow people to ‘seamlessly’ access the service, as the following interview extract illustrates:

Interviewer:

How important is it to you that [case manager] is based at the medical practice?

Carer:

Because it’s more linked with doctors and any service that I need it’s all linked through the GP. So [case manager] will know us and they must have meetings there if there’s anything that sort of crops up she can say that she knows us and can actually trace things happening through the system if she feels there is a need for that and it’s the centre rather than have her placed in a different area. [. . .] It’s the most appropriate place that she’s there attached to the GP and let’s face it I can’t get any service for mum or any care unless I go through that point so it’s very important.

Carer, A06

Another aspect of being in primary care was the perception that this would provide a ‘one-stop shop’ in the sense that other conditions as well as dementia could be managed through the practice rather than having to engage with multiple agencies, as this carer suggested:

Interviewer:

What are the advantages [of case manager being based at the surgery]?

Carer:

Well probably because she’s got other medical staff there that she can, if there’s a bigger problem, then she can discuss it with them and then.

Carer, C02

Although the case manager was located within the practice, participants generally thought home visits were the most appropriate way of engaging with the case manager. Given the choice, patients tended to opt for a home visit rather than arrange to see the case manager at the practice. Aside from the logistics of organising an appointment, some carers also acknowledged the broader benefits of home visits in relation to assisting with assessing need. The option of surgery appointments was valued when the carer wished to see the case manager in private. The primary care setting was seen as offering a range of opportunities for contact, some serendipitous and some organised more formally:

At the moment I can just ring [case manager], you know we’ve got so used to [case manager] now, seeing her at the surgery, seeing her coming here, I think she’s going to come round and see us again which she said yesterday didn’t she? She said ‘I’m going to pop round and see you’, so another little moment I can have you see, so this is handy isn’t it?

Carer, C03

The only potential disadvantage of case management being delivered through primary care related to the issue of ‘medicalisation’, which was raised by one couple.

Knowledge and skills required for case management: perspectives of health and social care professionals

Professionals felt that a core knowledge of dementia and excellent interpersonal skills were essential attributes for case management; the professional background of case managers, either social work or nursing, was felt on the whole not to be important. Having the ability to adopt a holistic approach to care was also fundamental.

Core knowledge and skills

Participants generally felt that having an interest in working with people with dementia was the most important aspect of the role:

I think it’s knowing something about dementia and handling dementia.

GP

It seems to me that you need to be a dementia specialist but you don’t necessarily need to be a nurse.

Voluntary sector worker

It was suggested that knowledge about dementia was crucial for supporting carers, who often had limited understanding about the behavioural changes and illness trajectory of dementia. For carers, an empathic approach and practical strategies were seen as more important than medical knowledge:

So a lot of carers who come to us are struggling with coming to terms with how different that person has become, with perhaps that they’re beginning not to recognise them, that they are in some cases quite difficult, their behaviour is difficult at times. So it’s about information but also a discussion then around how that impacts and kind of validating how that person feels about that and helping them to think about strategies and communication techniques that will improve that, because they’re dealing with it all day every day. So slightly the medical knowledge is almost less important than how you deal with that day in and day out.

Voluntary sector worker

Professional background

The professional background of the case manager was not felt to be crucial to adopting a case manager role.

Well I think that the important thing is really the background of the worker and the fact that they’ve got experience in working with people with dementia and an interest in continuing to do so. So their professional background is less important I think than that. But I wouldn’t have said that it needed to be a role that any particular profession is best at, I think it very much depends on the individual rather than what their background is.

CMHT worker

Although many respondents felt that a clinical background was not important, some professionals thought that a nursing background would equip case managers with appropriate skills:

I do think the nursing team are the place where most of the skills are to help to do things like case management. Yes, there’s the medical and there’s tablets now so doctors suddenly and neurologists suddenly get all excited about dementia, but actually a lot of it is to do with a more nursing perspective and looking at problem-solving around practical things a lot of the time.

GP

One participant thought that the stigma associated with having a social worker might prove to be a barrier to accepting case management in the early stages of dementia and suggested that a nurse might be more acceptable to patients and carers:

We do get people who find it very difficult to feel that they’ve got social workers involved, there’s still that certain stigma involved isn’t there? Having you know, in your family, having a social worker. So I can see that particularly at an early stage there could be some advantages in it being a practice nurse.

Voluntary sector worker

Interpersonal skills

Some participants identified the importance of good interpersonal skills and the need to build up the relationship with the patient and carer over time:

Going into someone’s home and assessing the situation fully takes a lot of time and my own experience is that carers are often a little bit anxious about what you’re going to suggest and what you’re going to try and do and whether you’re going to be critical of – they might know that their care is falling short of the ideal a lot of the time but it’s their husband or their wife and they want to carry on. I think people are very scared and it takes a while to build up a relationship, to actually develop that – so I think half a day a week in a practice like this which has got a large elderly population, you could easily use that and double it and possibly more.

GP

Although some professionals recognised the value of a series of face-to-face contacts, they suggested that telephone calls could also be an effective way of maintaining links with patients and carers:

Well I think it depends on the patient but . . . I don’t think it has to be a rigid structure. I think it doesn’t necessarily have to be visits; I’m a big fan of the phone call. I think because they take two minutes, you know, but actually people just really appreciate the ringing up to say ‘oh you know we talked about this last time, how’s it going?’ and ‘oh it’s great!’ or ‘no it’s not quite working’ or ‘we’ll do some tests’. It takes no time at all but patients really appreciate it, or patients and carers.

GP

Holistic approach

Professionals thought that case managers needed to use a holistic approach that allowed them to ‘see the bigger picture’. Rather than a medical focus an in-depth exploration of the impact of the disease was required:

If there were specific medical questions they [case managers] would be able to direct somebody to whoever could give them those answers. It’s more important from our point that it’s a sensitive discussion around ‘how does that feel for you?’ ‘Do you feel you are going to be able to look after, is the family going to be able to do some of this looking after?’ ‘What impact is that going to have on you, do you need some support around you?’ That sort of thing. In a, you know [laughs] a more sensitive way maybe than I’ve just done but that’s the discussion that we need somebody to have and I think that’s about the way you have that discussion rather than a particular expertise around the medical side of dementia. I can’t see that that would make that much difference.

Voluntary sector worker

The lack of attention of existing services to the psychosocial aspects of diagnosis was highlighted by the recent professional experience of a dementia support worker:

I saw a couple in [place] last week and it’s a recent diagnosis. She said, ‘of all the medical professionals, no one has asked me how I feel about it’. This had been going on 2 months. Had the diagnosis, she was seeing someone about medication. ‘Nobody has said to me, except for you, how are you feeling?’

Voluntary sector worker

Case management in theory and practice: perspectives of health and social care professionals

Potential and actual benefits of case management

Professionals focused on potential benefits to those with dementia, their carers and then finally the GP practice. Case management was seen as potentially benefiting the person with dementia by providing continuing care, with an individual maintaining contact over a long period of time and dealing with problems at an early stage. It was seen as complementary to existing secondary care and social services, neither of which had the capacity to monitor patients and carers nor to provide support at an early stage in the illness trajectory:

We do know that people with dementia, their needs change dramatically over time in different ways and ideally we would keep them on and monitor and follow up and provide support as their needs do change, but that’s impossible. So they have to be discharged, and then hopefully are re-referred before a crisis occurs but sadly it’s often at the point of crisis so, that’s one area where the case manager in primary care can plug that gap.

CMHT worker

So people at the beginning of their dementia actually don’t come to us. It’s when they’re wandering or they’re not safe or if they’re a risk to themselves.”

Commissioner

The lack of routine reviews for people with dementia was highlighted as a shortcoming of existing services (although the introduction of the dementia reviews within primary care will ensure at least annual follow-up):

That would be great if everybody who was given a diagnosis had a review a year later because they don’t at the moment. . . . I sit there at these multidisciplinary team meetings, and people write in and say: ‘Mr Bloggs has got dementia and it’s got worse. Can he be re-reviewed?’ Basically, the mental health team will say, well, unless there are any specific behavioural problems, unless there are any other particular problems, and something has changed; if it’s just the fact the dementia’s got worse, they won’t pick them up.

Voluntary sector worker

By introducing regular, informal contact with patients and carers, case management was seen as having the potential to identify problems at an early stage and facilitate appropriate support:

I think that if you can induce sort of joined up care and if you can almost form a circle around a patient, these vulnerable people and if something happens or you’re worried or something goes wrong or they’re not quite so well, if you can communicate with other people involved often you can catch them. Whereas if you don’t know who’s involved it can take you ages or it can send you off on another referral pathway or get too many cooks involved and I think that’s the secret of looking after these people – is to have a few people involved but who are involved all of the time. The advantage of it is that I think the patient gets better care, things get picked up sooner, there’s less upheaval for them if they’re moved from one person to the other, there’s less duplication of investigations and possibly conflict even of treatments and from a personal point of view as a GP it’s actually less hard work if you know who to ring and you’re all on the same page.

GP

It was also suggested that carers would benefit from early and ongoing support:

From our point of view, the earlier that the carer is recognised as part of the care that needs to be given, the better, so if they’re part of care planning right from the beginning then they’re going to feel recognised and valued. They’re also going to recognise some of the stresses on themselves and be able to make informed decisions about how much care they want to give and how much they want to ensure is given by other services. So you just get a more balanced development in terms of a caring role. I think unfortunately what quite often happens is that carers arrive here at the point where they’ve hit a brick wall.

Voluntary sector worker

There were also perceived to be benefits for the practice, in terms of potentially saving appointment time, having a specialist in dementia within the practice and, on a personal level, the opportunities for professional development for any practice nurse who took on the role of case management:

I think several things for the patients and their carers, someone in the practice who was known to them as having an interest in dementia and would be a point of contact for them. And also some professional, not, professional development is not quite the right word, but some increasing professional self-esteem really for [case manager] who was doing it.

GP

All participants found it difficult to evaluate the extent to which these potential benefits of case management had been realised in practice. The lack of feedback from case managers about their work with patients meant that GPs were often unaware of which patients and carers had received the service:

To tell you truthfully, I have no idea if you had picked the two, the people up that I referred and I have no idea what has been done with them on behalf of the project and I have no idea if it’s made a difference.

GP

Health and social care professionals beyond primary care similarly found it difficult to assess the impact of case management other than having received a small number of referrals or requests for information from the case manager. Even when positive feedback from patients and carers had been received, there was recognition that they were often very grateful for help and that it was often difficult to get anything other than positive feedback:

Certainly one or two, and certainly good feedback, they like her . . . I think patients and carers obviously kind of value almost anything that’s offered and that they’re very grateful for any additional support that can be provided and particularly if it’s just on their doorstep . . . you get good feedback, but actually in terms of being constructively critical you need to actually dig a bit deeper don’t you?

CMHT worker

Clarity over the case manager role

Although, in theory, professionals could see that case management potentially ‘plugged a gap’ in services, in practice there was confusion over the boundaries between case management and other professional roles. Concerns were expressed over potential duplication of roles and the difficulties of identifying the most appropriate referral pathway:

I just remember at the time we all sat there and said, ‘Well, where do you fit in?’ This was the mental health nurses and myself: ‘Where do you fit in compared to all the people who are already visiting these people with dementia?’ . . . I think it was felt that there was going to be some duplication.

Voluntary sector worker

The provision of support for people with dementia and their care is so stretched that somebody else providing a kind of direct link between if you like the primary care and other services would be a good idea. So yes, I was very supportive of the plan . . . I think that the problem sometimes is that roles aren’t clearly, or maybe not clearly defined enough, between for example our community mental health nurses, the dementia advisor that we work with and the case manager. And I do admit sometimes that, when I’ve got somebody who I know needs support, I’m not at all sure necessarily who would be best to refer to. And so, if I think if anything I think the definition of roles and responsibilities needs to be much clearer for it to be most effective.”

CMHT worker

Implementing case management in practice

Several practical issues were raised about the implementation of case management in practice. The time required for the role was identified as a potential issue by several professionals:

I know [case manager]’s feeling quite pressured in actually trying to find the time to do this – my impression was that this was feeling like something additional that had to and I think it’s just that whole thing of having to, even if you’ve got funding for something, you still have to fight for the time and fight for other people to recognise it as being important, and that’s quite hard sometimes.

GP

Although home visits were recognised as taking significant time, there was a strong view that the ability to offer home visits was essential with this client group, partly because of mobility issues for older people but also to gain a better understanding of their social environment:

You know you see the nicest turned out people who they make an effort, they come into the doctors but you go home and then you realise there’s mouldy food in the fridge and the milk’s still on the doorstep or they’re sleeping downstairs or you walk in and you get a picture straight away usually, particularly about circumstances. . . . If they know they’re coming to the doctors, often you dress and think appropriately and plan that out. Also, the other thing is quite often if they do have dementia and unfortunately they quite often forget their appointment and it means that you don’t get any follow-up anyway.

GP

For the purposes of the feasibility study, patients with dementia were identified from the practice dementia registers and so the patients who were included were at different points on the illness trajectory. We asked professionals when they felt that case management should be provided. Overall, early intervention was seen as the best practice, although views varied whether it should be offered at diagnosis or slightly after diagnosis (e.g. on discharge from the CMHT at the memory service):

Probably it should happen at diagnosis so that the patient and the carers are aware that the service is there without being awfully intrusive, so that they get used to the idea. So I would have thought from the word go . . . and then we go in say once every 3 months or if there’s a crisis, or even once every 6 months depending on what they’re like.

GP

I don’t think it should be offered at diagnosis, because I think that’s where in fact patients get the most contact from us, and in particular if somebody is starting on Alzheimer meds [medication] then they’re seen sort of fairly regularly by ourselves. I think what would be helpful would be for us to be able to offer the case manager at the point of discharge from ourselves and . . . maybe we’ll arrange for you to see her once just so you can say ‘hello’ and then you know that she’s there if you’ve got any concerns. I think that as I said before, I think that would kind of plug the gap really, and to some extent at least, rather than people feel they’ve been discharged so they’re not quite sure where they can go now to get help.

CMHT worker

Some of the GPs noted that similar systems of providing a contact for a known person within the primary care team were already in place for other patient groups, such as those with cancer:

We’ll have a cancer watch list so as soon as they’re diagnosed there may be absolutely no need at that time but I’ll make contact and the district nurse will make contact so at that point there might be nothing, but at least they’ve met us, we’ve said ‘hello, we’re available get in touch’.

GP

Potential barriers to case management were that some people often do not identify themselves as a ‘carer’, particularly in the early stages of their relative’s dementia, and that people from some minority ethnic groups were reluctant to be diagnosed because of the perceived stigma:

So if you look at some of the minority ethnic communities often there’s a reluctance to get a diagnosis for dementia; there’s still a lot of stigma attached to it . . . and even more of a difficulty in terms of people recognising themselves as a carer because it’s just seen as the role within the family. I’ve done some work with older Bangladeshi women . . . and one of the things that that you discover is that there isn’t a word in their language that directly translates the word carer because there isn’t that concept. Do you see what I mean? It’s just seen as within the family, that’s what happens.

Voluntary sector worker

Delivery of case management through primary care: perspectives of health and social care professionals

Advantages and disadvantages of siting case management in primary care

A range of advantages and disadvantages of case management being based in primary care was identified (Box 2). Ease of access was identified as a key benefit; professionals working for a local voluntary service felt that being based at the GP surgery would facilitate uptake of support:

Box Icon

BOX 2

Perceived advantages and disadvantages of delivering case management through primary care (views of health and social care professionals) I think a lot of people feel that going to the GP practice is more, it’s kind of more normal for them isn’t (more...)

If we sat in a surgery we’d pick up a lot more trade, wouldn’t we? We’d have a lot more people than we do at the minute, if we were based in the surgery.

Voluntary sector worker

Overall, the benefits of being based in primary care far outweighed the disadvantages identified.

Although primary care was seen as the most appropriate site for case management, the importance of being linked with other local services (either the voluntary sector or CMHTs) was highlighted. It was thought that this would help clarify role boundaries and facilitate joint case work. One suggestion was for the case manager to attend CMHT meetings:

I know she’s on the end of the phone but . . . maybe not weekly, but maybe every now and again [she could come to the CMHT meeting] to discuss the people that she’s got on her caseload and the people we’ve got on our caseload, and in particular the ones that are shared.

CMHT worker

Embedding case management in primary care

A key advantage of being based in primary care was the potential for the case manager to liaise with colleagues in the event of concerns about individual patients and carers. The extent to which these links were enacted in practice varied considerably. There seemed to be particular challenges in developing effective working relationships for the case manager from a social work background who had not previously been known to the practices. From the GPs’ perspectives, the lack of visibility of the case manager, together with the lack of feedback on work carried out with patients and carers, meant that liaison had been minimal:

If I’m honest we hardly ever saw [case manager] within the practice. We only saw the person twice, once at the very start and once after I think I’d met with you and said we haven’t heard or seen her and she then turned up once again.

GP

Two participants suggested that the lack of embeddedness of this particular case manager was perhaps more to do with the individual than the role:

That might be an issue with her rather than the role as a whole.

GP

Even in practices in which existing practice nurses took on the role of case manager, it was unclear exactly how familiar their colleagues were with their activities:

Interviewer:

Do you think the other practice staff knew what [case manager]’s role was when she was doing this other role?

Administrative staff:

I don’t think they did necessarily because you are right, we are a large practice. We’ve got 15,500 patients. We’ve got 19 doctors, three nurses, etc. Nine or eight loads of people to staff, receptionists, etc. So I don’t think, everyone just gets on with their parts of the work and one or two might decide to find out and so on. But we might have mentioned it in the newsletter or one of the staff meetings on a couple of occasions last year, but I don’t think anyone really knows. But then if you ask me ‘do they know that there’s a midwifery service?’ I don’t think they know what’s on here. Do you see what I mean?

In general, primary care staff had little knowledge of what was actually being delivered to patients. This was compounded by different approaches to recording case management work in the primary care notes. Only one case manager made detailed entries; one simply noted times and dates of contacts; and the final case manager felt that it was inappropriate to record any details in the GP notes. Instead, a summary of the work with each patient–carer dyad was sent to the GPs at the end of the project; however, although the GPs found this very useful, they would have preferred more timely feedback.

A number of participants felt that having a summary or key points recorded in the patients’ notes would facilitate communication; it was suggested that the model of recording used by counsellors attached to GP practices would be ideal. It was also suggested that regular feedback through practice meetings would have been beneficial. Furthermore, appropriate meetings were identified that a case manager might usefully attend, including CMHT meetings, district nurse meetings or the multidisciplinary team meeting:

Every 3 months we have a meeting with [name] who is our consultant psychiatrist and I think that could be a useful tag on to that. It could be, if that was inconvenient, it could be a tag on to our regular meetings with the district nurses.

GP

I think for benefit further would be for [case manager], and maybe [mentor], to host an education meeting for the GPs, and to cascade what they’ve learnt. I know we do have, every Friday lunchtime, an education meeting and . . . if it wasn’t ever discussed, it’s a route that we ought to go, so the nurses, peers and the GPs, they all can learn.

Administrative staff

The value of informal ad hoc meetings was also mentioned:

I think if it could be from somebody who was in and around the building who you bumped into or who you could have internal e-mail contact with that would be the ideal.

GP

The extent to which the practice nurses engaged in these meetings within their own practices was unclear, although no comments were made about their integration (or lack of it) in the interviews with their primary care colleagues. Although the practice nurses had the advantage of already being embedded within the practice, the potential difficulties of integrating an ‘outsider’ were not seen as insurmountable, provided that they had the necessary communication skills and desire to link with the primary care team. There were, however, other advantages to having existing members of the team act as case managers. These included their existing knowledge of patients and practice information systems, the benefits to the practice of developing the skills and roles of existing team members and the perception that using an existing member of staff was somehow more holistic:

But how would she know how to use the system? Time wise because obviously she’d have to go to someone to find out, how do I source these patients, how do I go through their records, just to get to know a medical system I know from just my experience here that you know it isn’t just a quick lesson, there really isn’t. My gut feeling would say it’s a downside. I would think it’s far better where people are familiar with the system.

Administrative staff

I think it makes her work seem more valid, rather than just being an add-on. And I think for patients it feels – I think for our patients, we know our patients, they like the surgery here, they like the nursing team, and it feels more solid, it feels more a part of their overall health care and their overall, that they’re being looked after holistically rather someone else coming in and doing an add-on.

GP

The one benefit of being an ‘outsider’ to the practice and coming in to the case manager role was the perceived ability to legitimately ‘ring fence’ one’s time. Professionals working in small practices felt that it would not be appropriate to have a case manager embedded within their practice, but suggested that a different model was needed, such as a mobile service that could attach itself to the practice at certain times:

You can’t have an embedded person because actually they haven’t got the resources to do it so you’re probably looking at a model where you do have one person covering several practices. So for example we have, I know it’s not the same thing but one of the things that’s come up, is the 24-hour blood pressure monitoring which is a new NICE [National Institute for Health and Care Excellence] guideline. We have a lady who comes in every two weeks because our population’s smaller and that suits our population so they get seen quickly and efficiently and it actually only takes one afternoon a week to cover our patient load.

GP

Supervision and support of case managers

Although existing line management arrangements continued for all case managers, there was little evidence that this had included any detailed discussion of work with clients for the practice nurses involved. Only minimal contact between the lead GP and case managers was reported in three of the four participating practices:

But I’ve just let her get on with things really, and I sought her out I don’t know, probably end of November time, a bit before Christmas just to see how things were going and touch base at that point.

GP

The extent and form of supervision provided by existing line managers seemed inadequate to support the case managers in their new role. There was no evidence that line managers facilitated or encouraged case managers to participate in relevant practice meetings, checked that work was being recorded in the primary care notes, helped them to ring fence the time available for case management or reviewed their work with individual clients:

So what [case manager] was doing was she was also going on home visits to meet these patients on our register. When she went on these visits she’d either let me or her colleagues and the nursing team know that she’s on these visits. I think they took about over an hour or so, a long time for a consultation. She’d come back and do the documentation, etc. and so on. My question with her was ‘Do you need as much time as you’re spending for six patients?’ . . . I always received the answer ‘Yes’. I didn’t bother going beyond that really.

Administrative staff

With more robust practice-based support and supervision, it is possible that the case managers could have achieved more within the time and resources available.

Knowledge and skills required for case management: perspectives of case managers, the mentor and the research team

The case managers brought different skills, professional backgrounds and experiences to their role (Table 26), which impacted on their training needs and the implementation of case management. In addition, the dedicated time available for case management varied between practices. Although there were only three case manager posts, with one post designed to cover both of the north-east GP practices, these were covered by four case managers as one resigned to take up a new post and was replaced during the period when patients and carers were still being recruited. The case manager who resigned and the replacement were similar in terms of gender, professional background (social work) and experience, with the exception that one had more experience of working with people with dementia. The details in Table 26 are for the case manager who was in post for the majority of the feasibility study. To maintain confidentiality, quotes from interviews are not attributed to individual case managers.

TABLE 26

TABLE 26

Characteristics of case managers

Core knowledge and skills

There was recognition by the mentor and members of the research team of the range of knowledge and skills required by the case managers. Knowledge of dementia and available interventions and awareness of local services were highlighted as core skills. Existing knowledge of dementia varied significantly between case managers; although one person had no direct experience of working with people with dementia, two case managers had a specific interest in dementia and were keen to develop or utilise their skills in this new role:

Dementia’s my special interest anyway; I’ve worked for many, many years in dementia care. I’ve got a diploma in dementia care as well.

Case manager

The process of recruiting case managers varied between sites; whereas the social workers had to formally apply for secondment to the role, arrangements for the practice nurses were less formal:

I was nominated and I had the right to refuse but I was nominated . . . I suppose as soon as they got a whiff of my case management experience my fate was sealed.

Case manager

Although this practice nurse had extensive case management experience (in paediatrics), she had little knowledge or experience of dementia. The feasibility of developing sufficient expertise within the time available was questioned and it was suggested that a more formal interview process, perhaps including discussion of scenarios, would be useful in ensuring that the case managers had core knowledge and skills relating to dementia:

For me one of the fundamental flaws was perhaps recruiting people into a dementia case management role where not everyone had a basic understanding around dementia.

Mentor

The value of knowledge of local services was emphasised by the case managers and mentor, who saw signposting as a key part of their role:

I think families will want to know about ‘what’s the name of that day centre, two streets away?’ but I think that will come with the practitioner’s knowledge and I think that’s when I would say ‘well actually I’ve got a leaflet on [a particular] day centre, here it is’ or ‘I can talk about that’.

Case manager

Although the case manager with a social work background had a good knowledge of local services (and often had contacts within such services that further facilitated the process of referral and liaison), developing this knowledge was challenging for practice nurses, particularly in one setting where the practice population spanned two local authorities:

I’ve learnt a lot about different services and networking and I feel like there’s a lot to learn still, loads and loads and loads, I still feel ‘oh, I don’t know who to turn to with this’.

Case manager

Professional background

Views on the relative merits of different professional backgrounds for case management varied. In addition to their knowledge of local services and their skill set, social workers were also more familiar with working independently in the community, visiting people at home and working within existing policies for activities such as out-of-hours working. Practice nurses were used to working within the GP surgery and had some concerns about home visits:

They [practice nurses] don’t see themselves as doing many home visits and they are concerned about insurance cover for doing that.

Team member

Whereas the practice nurses were familiar with the primary care environment and culture, being based in primary care was a significant shift for the social worker, in terms of both the physical environment and the lack of formal structure for their work:

I suppose it’s quite a unique situation where you’re not tied down by statutory frameworks, I suppose what I’m conscious of is that sort of freedom, that flexibility that’s quite a unique situation to be in; I don’t need to see the person every 6 weeks, I don’t have to make sure that I’ve done that document in time and I’ve done particular things. I suppose I’ve just absorbed so much organisational policy that I’m so used to and it’s just putting that different hat on, that’s going to be hard.

Case manager

In addition to bringing their own professional knowledge and expertise, the case managers also brought their preconceptions about other agencies to the role. The views expressed by one case manager from a social work background may have impacted on her ability to work effectively with primary care colleagues:

I think medics have a very different approach from social workers. Obviously medics are quite problem orientated there is something wrong, we shall fix that, move on. Whereas obviously adult services, social services are more looking at the wider aspects, the bigger picture, more long-term changes which is certainly the way I see the care manager’s role. It’s [a] more holistic approach; it’s not about there’s a problem, diagnose it, cure it.

Case manager

Although one of the social workers argued that a social work background was essential for case management, none of the other case managers had a strong view on the relative values of different professional backgrounds.

Interpersonal skills

Developing relationships with people with dementia and their carers, and managing potentially conflicting needs, were seen as key skills for the case managers. Again, case managers with a social work background felt that their training had equipped them with the necessary interpersonal skills:

The core social work skill is in communication, it’s in observing, reflecting, evaluating information, being analytical with information, being able to probe deeper into systems, into relationships and from that being able to problem solve a situation.

Case manager

She knows how to think about information, synthesise it, check it with people and so on. She’s aware of a lot of the issues around things like capacity and engaging family and social networks, managing the dynamics that can emerge.

Team member

Case management in theory and practice: perspectives of case managers, the mentor and the research team

Potential and actual benefits of case management

Among the case managers and members of the research team there was strong commitment in theory to the case management approach. A range of potential benefits of case management was identified (Box 3). The key differences between case management and other services related to continuity of care and flexibility over input:

Box Icon

BOX 3

Perceived benefits of case management (views of case managers) you see the patient and it’s for a short, predictable space of time. An allotted space of time so it will be nice to get back into people’s lives rather than just what they’ve (more...)

It would be supporting people across the whole journey, and that’s what families need and that’s what they ask for, and they’ve been asking for it repeatedly for many, many years.

Team member

Only one potential negative consequence of case management was identified and this was the risk of creating dependency and disempowering patients and carers:

certain people will hold on too long and do too much for people and with the best will in the world, the best intentions will foster dependency . . . the potential [is] there for crossing a boundary of being too close, of de-skilling people and making people dependent.

Case manager

There was a sense of frustration among the case managers and mentor that there had been insufficient time in the feasibility study to really demonstrate the potential of case management. The time available for case management had been curtailed by the considerable delay (of almost 5 months) in obtaining ethical approval for a substantial amendment relating to recruitment and slow recruitment. As a result, the case managers had had relatively little time to develop their work with patients and carers and could identify relatively few concrete benefits for participating patients and carers. Several participants had gained financially through claiming benefits or a council tax reduction, and feedback from patients and carers to the case managers had generally been positive.

I mean all I’ve really been able to put in has been a few sort of like basic stuff things like welfare rights checks, benefits checks, some equipment like grab rails.

Case manager

they [patients and carers] all said the same thing to me anyway that it was nice to know somebody was there and they all kind of appreciated that although I wasn’t there 24/7 I was still a name and they could put a face to the name as well and they weren’t always expecting me to know all the answers but they knew that I would do my level best to help them find the answer to whatever that may be.

Case manager

it was such a short project I feel almost frustrated we didn’t have a bit more time to get through what I think are natural initial hurdles and actually get our teeth stuck in and make a proper go of it, so that’s just a sense of frustration.

Mentor

Although the primary focus was on the benefits for participating patients and carers, there were also benefits for the case managers and their practices:

I think it’s just flagged me up as being a member of the team who does have the special interest, does have some skills that I can bring to the practice concerning dementia care and now that’s got the ball rolling with me doing the dementia QOF and reviewing patients that way.

Case manager

Clarity over the case manager role

A key issue for case managers (and team members) concerned the lack of understanding over what case management involved and how it differed from existing services such as Admiral nursing and dementia advisors:

Well I think there’s a big question about what we mean by case management. I don’t think there’s any kind of real clarity about what the term means.

Team member

Certainly in the early stages it didn’t seem very clear at all to me what was expected or what I was supposed to be doing, or how I was supposed to go about it. And I was relying on [mentor] a lot more, I didn’t really fully understand what I was doing. But, now that I’m kind of on the road as it were, I feel, yes, a bit more confident in my own skills really.

Case manager

This lack of clarity occasionally led to case managers having misconceptions about their role. For example, one case manager carried out some ‘informal’ assessments with carers. When asked how these ‘informal’ assessments differed from the more usual assessments, the case manager explained:

I mean obviously the project is designed to work with the patient as opposed to the carer, so the informal ones have been basically where the patient hasn’t wanted to be involved.

Case manager

Even towards the end of the project, case managers still expressed confusion about their role. The situation may have been compounded by the interest/background in Admiral nursing among some members of the research team and the mentor. This led to some concepts from Admiral nursing being incorporated into the project and also to inappropriate comparisons of case managers with their own role and that of the mentor:

I mean I don’t really still understand the role of a case manager anyway I don’t feel, I feel like I’m still learning because I’m not a case manager, I feel like I’m probably just giving people advice, I don’t see it as case managing as such, not like [mentor] does.

Case manager

In contrast to the other case managers, the practice nurse with previous experience of case management felt that there was ‘clear guidance’ about her role.

Implementing case management in practice

A range of issues concerning the practical implementation of case management was highlighted, including time constraints for case management, the timing of the intervention and identification of needs. Issues relating to the documentation of case management activities have been explored in Chapter 6.

Time available for case management

As already described, the practice nurses had one session a week (4 hours) available for case management; in contrast, the social worker was full-time but covered two practices (equivalent to five sessions per week per practice). Although discussions with practice managers suggested that cover had been arranged for the practice nurses, neither of the practice nurses was aware of any additional staffing. The feasibility of effectively case-managing clients in the available time was repeatedly questioned:

How was I going to case manage 11 patients in 4 hours a week? . . . how was I going to manage with them if they were phoning me up and it was not Monday afternoon? . . . and anyway I kind of grew with it and said ‘well you know I won’t be able to answer you straight away but I will get back to you’.

Case manager

The time constraints for practice nurses were exacerbated by interruptions during the dedicated sessions:

The last time I went to see her, she was pulled out to do two practical procedures in the middle of our meeting.

Mentor

After several months, the situation was partially resolved by a member of the research team visiting one case manager each week to facilitate the process of recruitment and to discourage the frequent interruptions from colleagues:

I can’t do without it. You can’t do the project without it. So she’s [researcher] been able to really be my bodyguard so I’ve had time to do things. That’s been very, very helpful.

Case manager

Although the other practice nurse experienced similar problems initially, she was more successful in preserving the time allocated. By the end of the feasibility study, she was negotiating with the practice to take over responsibility for the QOF dementia register and annual dementia reviews:

Well I’ve suggested actually that because everybody is now used to me having Monday afternoons for dementia that we keep that as a dementia afternoon so I can focus on all my reviews and the patients within the practice who have got ongoing problems.

Case manager

For both of the practice nurses, a period of reacclimatising to CAREDEM work was needed at the beginning of each session. One potential difficulty of confining the case manager role to one afternoon per week was managing both routine follow-ups and urgent requests from patients and carers. The situation was further exacerbated by the time required for travelling to home visits for the practice nurse working in a rural area. Concerns about access to the case managers were raised by the mentor and members of the research team after experiencing difficulties in getting through to the case managers by telephone:

From a patient perspective I could perceive problems with some practices in actually accessing the case manager because of the other responsibilities they have . . . when I’ve tried to get hold of case managers I’ve thought well I could be a patient trying to get hold of them and I’ve left three messages, they’ve got clinics back to back for example, when am I going to get my call back?

Mentor

Despite these concerns, access to the case managers did not emerge as a significant problem in the interviews with patients and carers. To some extent, expectations were carefully managed by one of the case managers and, following discussions with the mentor, the case managers set aside 30 minutes at the start of their dedicated afternoon for telephone calls:

They have both allocated half an hour at the beginning of the session where they can be contacted by families who know they’re there. So that’s a dedicated slot and if this family have had to call someone in practice on a non-CAREDEM day, the case manager in the practice will have to use that slot to do a follow-up call.

Mentor

To some extent, the potential difficulties with access were offset by either serendipitous or planned meetings at the surgery. One carer arranged a long appointment with the case manager during one of her normal clinics at which she had the opportunity to speak at length about her difficulties in managing the patient’s repetitive questions. At other times the practice nurses were able to quickly catch up with patients and carers when they attended the surgery for other reasons:

one of the ladies that’s a carer, she came to see me outwith CAREDEM, she left her husband at home and came to see me in a practice nurse appointment and we were able to talk about how to sort of understand repetitive behaviours and forgetfulness and things like that.

Case manager

I’ve done flu jabs for some of the people . . . so there’s been continuity but I haven’t done any second home visits but it’s been corridor catch ups which can be very, very powerful.

Case manager

To manage the time constraints, one case manager relied on telephone contact rather than face-to-face follow-up visits, but recognised that this was not always ideal:

actually quite often if I’ve got a carer on the phone they were clearly trying to choose their words very carefully and I would be left saying ‘I can see that it’s difficult for you to talk to me at the moment’.

Case manager

Timing of the intervention

It was generally agreed that the best time to offer case management was at the point of diagnosis, although there was also recognition that some patients and carers would not be ready to engage with the service at that point. One of the case managers felt that there had been limited opportunities for case management with the patients and carers participating in the study:

We’ve either got people who are very, very highly functioning still who are still going out on their own, who are still doing their own housework, who are still going to the pub every other night in some cases on their own. Or we’ve got people who are a lot more incapacitated but have . . . carers going in four times a day and the sons and daughters have a very clear schedule of visiting their mum and dad. There’s not so far the unmet needs which we need for people to be contacting us, which again is quite frustrating.

Case manager

For some of the clients, it was felt that the service was offered too late to be of benefit as the carers had already single-handedly negotiated services and support:

At the end of the assessment with her mum and with her, she was like . . . ‘this would have been a godsend two or three years ago. It’s exactly what I wanted, someone like you to come out and discuss and go through stuff, have time to discuss it, tell us what help is available and just to have someone to listen to us’.

Case manager

The recruitment process was thought to have influenced the types of participants recruited. A situation in which patients and carers self-referred to the service was thought to facilitate the provision of case management:

This wouldn’t be the approach we’d have in normal case management engaging with families, we may have a different referral process or people could readily access or self-refer or relatives could self-refer, and then I think you’d probably have a more realistic cohort of people who would have already engaged through actually approaching and asking to speak to the case manager and be halfway there already into identifying the needs.

Mentor

Other case managers also felt that the clients involved were generally at a fairly stable stage in the illness trajectory and only in need of ‘light touch’ support. However, it is not clear to what extent the apparent low needs of participating patients and carers reflected the stage in the illness trajectory or the difficulties in identifying unmet needs, described in the following section.

Identification of needs

The time constraints of two of the case managers were a key factor influencing the scope to spread the assessment over a number of visits, and concerns were expressed that this may have impacted on their ability to gain an accurate picture of patient and carer needs:

The potential for patient and carers’ needs to naturally emerge over time was lost. In addition, as the main assessment took place over one visit, there was little opportunity to see either the patient or family carer on their own, which may have facilitated a more open discussion as to what the main concerns were.

Mentor

The case managers acknowledged that most of their work had consisted of one-off assessment visits, but they were less likely to perceive this as a problem than the mentor:

My second visits have not actually been at people’s homes. They’ve been much more I’ve seen people or I’ve spoken to people [in the surgery]. I don’t think I’ve actually been back to anyone’s house again, which feels okay because I haven’t had to do tasks that need me to go back to the homes. I think if I was staying on longer I probably would, as a matter of not routine but standard follow-up, because you need to see people. Actually they need to see you as well.

Case manager

Well really it’s been an assessment role. I was hoping it would be a therapeutic role and I think there are certain elements of that in the assessment process but mostly it’s been assessing people’s needs and finding very surprisingly that there weren’t really any needs there to be met, or if there were needs that they already are being met.

Case manager

Despite the apparent enthusiasm to deliver interventions to patients and carers, there was little evidence of such work in practice. This was justified in terms of the needs of the clients:

I’m dying to do a bit of CBT [cognitive–behavioural therapy] with someone . . . I love the psychosocial interventions, but no-one wants or needs them at the moment.

Case manager

However, analysis of the documentation seemed to indicate scope for therapeutic work. The reasons for this mismatch are unclear. Two of the case managers emphasised the need for patients and carers to be willing to engage, but did not seem to see it as part of their role to help people to move towards the stage of accepting help:

I think they probably need rehousing, but it’s privately rented. It’s a big choice for them. I suppose for [one patient], who rents it, it’s about his independence even though I think his independence is so compromised and challenged. But I’m sure a lot more could be done for them. But they’ve got to want it. They’ve got to be willing to be scrutinised before anything will change.

Case manager

Even when one of the case managers acknowledged that it would fall within the remit of her role to encourage openness about the diagnosis in a family in which the person with dementia had not been told the diagnosis at her husband’s request, this had not followed up:

The fact that he’s not willing to admit it says as much about how he’s dealing with it as she potentially would. So I would think that’s exactly the kind of thing a case manager would do, but of course it depends on whether or not they let you, if they’re willing to take part or not. But I think that kind of thing over time when you work with someone is probably one of the key things you would do.

Case manager

The fact that social workers were used to working within Fair Access to Care Services (FACS) criteria and focusing on people with substantial and critical needs may have influenced their ability to identify low level of needs when working with patients and carers. This may particularly have affected the case manager who had been working as a duty social worker, to whom calls were typically from people in crisis:

They end up coming to social services because they’re reaching absolute point of crisis where they literally can’t cope and end up phoning up the GP and saying ‘the carer has walked out or had a nervous breakdown’.

Case manager

Delivery of case management through primary care: perspectives of case managers, the mentor and the research team

Advantages and disadvantages of primary care

Views varied on whether or not primary care was the most appropriate place for case management and a range of advantages and disadvantages were identified (Box 4). Although the key task for the social worker was to become integrated and embedded into the primary care team, the challenge for the practice nurses was to have their new role recognised and to be given the time to do it. The importance of support from the practice to enable the practice nurses to have protected time for case management was highlighted:

Box Icon

BOX 4

Advantages and disadvantages of case management in primary care (views of the case managers, mentor and research team members) People come to the doctor for all sorts of things . . . It’s not like having to go to see the psychiatrist (more...)

They need to be fully supported by the practice and I don’t see that happening. It seems to be a bit tokenistic to me. They need that dedicated time and everything to be in place to support them in their role.

Mentor

The potential difficulties for the social workers of integrating into the primary care team were recognised by members of the research team:

My experience of working with multidisciplinary teams is that’s it’s been really very hard for social workers to become part of the system in that way.

Team member

Embedding case management in primary care

All of the participating practices had identified a lead GP with a particular interest in dementia; however, the contact between the lead GP and case manager varied between practices. Although one lead GP held regular meetings with the case manager, in other practices contact was limited, typically to one or two meetings to discuss case management throughout the whole period of implementation:

I think people are interested but people have to have the head space to be interested and yes they know I’m doing it but it’s probably not that relevant to them on a daily [basis].

Case manager

It’s been challenging to be honest. I’m quite confused over the reaction from the surgeries. . . . I don’t know, it’s whether it’s a priority or whether it’s been lost in the mix, or people just don’t know, quite know what expectations of roles are, but they don’t seem as involved as I would desire . . . there doesn’t really seem a huge interest in it through some quarters.

Case manager

One case manager was proactive in taking on the dementia reviews and thereby created a continuing specialist role within the practice. However, there was little evidence that either of the other case managers thought strategically about their role or sought to create structures to support their activities within the practice:

I would imagine if the role became a permanent one, case managers and the GPs would have regular meetings and they would go through the lists, and discuss people, not just reliant on the QOF but a much more robust examination of who’s on the books, as it were. And you know targeting people that way.

Case manager

Although this would have been a useful way of increasing the case manager’s profile within the practice, there was no attempt to arrange any such meetings or to become involved in existing meetings within the practice that might have been relevant. The lack of involvement of other members of the primary care team became clear towards the end of the project when we asked case managers to suggest colleagues whom we could interview about their perspectives on case management:

Regarding the interviews – I’m not sure who to suggest really. I doubt if anyone here at the surgery would have any inkling of how the case management I have done will have impacted (or not) on the practice as a whole.

E-mail from case manager

Supervision and support of case managers

Developing case management skills

Each case manager received an induction session, lasting between 90 minutes and 3 hours, to orient them to the project, clarify their role and enable them to complete and discuss an educational needs assessment form. The variation in time was, in part, because of the different needs of the case managers and, in part, because of the time available, highlighting some of the difficulties encountered in preserving the nurse case managers’ dedicated time in practices. The induction was supplemented by individual meetings with the mentor, the provision of the CAREDEM manual (developed in WP1; see Chapter 2), additional tailored materials provided by the mentor and self-directed learning. The educational needs assessment enabled the mentor to provide individualised training and support to each case manager:

What it [educational needs assessment] did do for me, is where there was an identified need it helped frame how I would support or ensure that need was met for that case manager either through training that I would deliver or direct them to access that training elsewhere but it was a document where we had written and agreed before we left about what the needs were and what we would do next, so I found that helpful.

Mentor

The educational needs assessment tool developed in WP1 focused on dementia-specific knowledge; one result of this may have been that there was less emphasis on assessing and developing the other skills outlined earlier:

[The] needs assessment’s built around the trajectory of dementia, loosely speaking, so it starts with working with the person who has recently acquired or is just about to acquire the diagnosis and coping with the confusion that arises then and the other types of psychological responses you can encounter, managing that and then working through crisis in the support system, admission to hospitals and having some hospital in-reach function, advocating for the patient in the hospital. Relocation to a nursing home and the issues that arise there and end of life care so those are the five components of the needs assessment tool and we go through them.

Team member

Some reservations were expressed about self-identification of needs. There was a potential for training needs to be missed if the case manager was either unaware of her training needs or was reluctant to voice them at the induction meeting, which took place at an early stage in the project. Although in the current project the induction sessions were individual, this was not seen as viable for a larger project. Views varied on whether case managers would be more or less willing to voice their training needs in a group session. A more rigorous interview process was suggested as an alternative way of assessing the extent to which the case managers possessed the required skill set:

You’re very reliant on the openness of the case manager and I’m not sure how you would assess for that; my own feelings are that some of those things could be assessed at interview.

Mentor

Interestingly, the documentation provided (the CAREDEM manual and supplementary materials) seemed to be valued most by those case managers with an existing interest in dementia; in particular, some of the assessment tools and information provided by the mentor were seen as potentially useful:

[They] are going to be very useful in the future, so I’m going to get a lot out of it, lots of assessment tools and things like that . . . I’ll be able to see myself using these in the future, I’m very pleased with that.

Case manager

I’ve used a document that [mentor] gave me which is a summary, like a leaflet/pamphlet that she has produced, and there are just some really good ways of talking about dementia, that are accessible to older people.

Case manager

The leaflets for patients and carers produced as part of WP1 were seen as a useful resource for the case managers, particularly when they first started out in the role, but were rarely given to patients or carers. This seemed to be because they were not currently perceived to be relevant to the patients and carers recruited.

Although the intention was to provide on-the-job training, opportunities for training were limited by the time restrictions of the mentor and practice nurses. It was suggested that more time should be made available at the beginning to ensure that case managers had the basic skills:

I discussed some more front-loading of support and induction because all they’ve had is a couple of hours on MCA [Mental Capacity Act 2005] as part of the provision of the assessment.

Mentor

Support networks of case managers

The existing line management arrangements for all of the case managers continued throughout the study. In addition, a mentor was available to provide training and support with case management. It was clear that case managers also derived support from other sources:

I’ve got obviously support from yourselves, support from [mentor] and there’s (lead GP) if I need to speak to her and there’s that network of other case managers on e-mail . . . and I’ve also got my adult services’ supervision as well so there’s lots of different kinds of support that I can access which is good.

Case manager

Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2014. This work was produced by Iliffe et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.

Included under terms of UK Non-commercial Government License.

Bookshelf ID: NBK262348

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (21M)

Other titles in this collection

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...