U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Cover of The Funding of Young Investigators in the Biological and Biomedical Sciences

The Funding of Young Investigators in the Biological and Biomedical Sciences

.

Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); .
ISBN-10: 0-309-05077-4

This book brings to light trends in the support of life scientists beginning their professional careers. In 1985, 3,040 scientists under the age of 36 applied for individual investigator (R01) grants from the National Institutes of Health, and 1,002 received awards, for a "success rate" of 33%. In 1993, 1,389 scientists under the age of 36 applied for R01 grants and 302 received awards, for a success rate of 21.7%. Even when R23/R29 grant awards (both intended for new investigators) are added to the R01 awards, the number of R01 plus R23 awards made in 1985 was 1,308, and in 1993, the number of R01 plus R29 was 527. These recent trends in the funding of young biomedical research scientists, and the fact that young nonbiomedical scientists historically have had a smaller base of support to draw upon when beginning their careers, raises serious questions about the future of life science research. It is the purpose of this volume to present data about the trends and examine their implications.

Contents

This study by the National Research Council's Commission on Life Sciences was sponsored by Department of Defense PO MDA903-91-M5267, Department of Energy grant DE-FG05-91-ER61167, National Institutes of Health PO 263-MD-107969 and 263-MD-12904, National Science Foundation grant BBS9023767, Markey Foundation grant 90-44, and the National Research Council Basic Science Fund.

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competence and with regard for appropriate balance.

The report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine.

Copyright 1994 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Bookshelf ID: NBK236697PMID: 25144098DOI: 10.17226/4746

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (3.3M)

Related information

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...