NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This report is the second edition of the 1992 COSEPUP report "Science and Technology Leadership in American Government: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments." As was the case with the original report, this report analyzes the federal government's capacity to recruit highly qualified individuals for the top science and technology (S&T)-related leadership positions in the executive branch and makes appropriate recommendations.
Contents
Financial Support: The development of this report was funded by the National Research Council.
NOTICE: This volume was produced as part of a project approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), the National Academy of Engineering (NAE), and the Institute of Medicine (IOM). It is a result of work done by a panel of the Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP). This report had been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures approved by COSEPUP and the Report Review Committee.
The Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP) is a joint committee of the NAS, the NAE, and the IOM. It includes members of the councils of all three bodies. For more information on COSEPUP see www.nationalacademies.org/cosepup.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Beyond "safe and effective": the role of the federal government in supporting and disseminating comparative-effectiveness research.[Ann Health Law. 2012]Beyond "safe and effective": the role of the federal government in supporting and disseminating comparative-effectiveness research.Francis MH. Ann Health Law. 2012 Winter; 21(2):329-82, 5 p preceding i.
- Take it from the top.[Nurs Stand. 2011]Take it from the top.Agnew T. Nurs Stand. 2011 Sep 21-27; 26(3):22-3.
- Review Allocating Federal Funds for Science and Technology[ 1995]Review Allocating Federal Funds for Science and TechnologyNational Academy of Sciences (US) Committee on Criteria for Federal Support of Research and Development. 1995
- Review Observations on the President's Fiscal Year 2003 Federal Science and Technology Budget[ 2002]Review Observations on the President's Fiscal Year 2003 Federal Science and Technology BudgetNational Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the FY 2003 Federal Science and Technology Budget. 2002
- Review Severely handicapped infants with life-threatening conditions: federal intrusions into the decision not to treat.[Am J Law Med. 1986]Review Severely handicapped infants with life-threatening conditions: federal intrusions into the decision not to treat.Huefner DS. Am J Law Med. 1986; 12(2):171-205.
- Science and Technology in the National InterestScience and Technology in the National Interest
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...