NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
As a number of diseases emerge or reemerge thus stimulating new vaccine development opportunities to help prevent those diseases, it can be especially difficult for decision makers to know where to invest their limited resources. Therefore, it is increasingly important for decision makers to have the tools that can assist and inform their vaccine prioritization efforts.
In this first phase report, the IOM offers a framework and proof of concept to account for various factors influencing vaccine prioritization-demographic, economic, health, scientific, business, programmatic, social, policy factors and public concerns. Ranking Vaccines: A Prioritization Framework describes a decision-support model and the blueprint of a software-called Strategic Multi-Attribute Ranking Tool for Vaccines or SMART Vaccines. SMART Vaccines should be of help to decision makers. SMART Vaccines Beta is not available for public use, but SMART Vaccines 1.0 is expected to be released at the end of the second phase of this study, when it will be fully operational and capable of guiding discussions about prioritizing the development and introduction of new vaccines.
Contents
- THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
- Committee on Identifying and Prioritizing New Preventive Vaccines for Development
- Reviewers
- Foreword
- Preface
- Disclaimer
- Summary
- 1. Introduction: From Smallpox to SMART Vaccines
- 2. Modeling Strategy: From Single Attribute to Multiple Attributes
- 3. Data Evaluation and Software Development
- Selection of vaccine candidates
- Data sourcing and analysis
- SMART Vaccines submodels
- Development of the computational submodel
- Evaluation of the computational submodel
- Simulation of the value submodel
- The value experiment and scenarios
- Software development: Operational features of SMART Vaccines Beta
- Consideration of uncertainty
- Current capability for sensitivity analysis
- Beta concept evaluation
- 4. Observations and Looking Forward
- References
- A Mathematical Functions
- B Candidate Disease Profiles and Data
- C Stakeholder Speakers
- D Biographical Information
This study was supported by Contract No. HHSP23337024T, TO #45 between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Vaccine Program Office of the Department of Health and Human Services. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the organizations or agencies that provided support for this project.
Suggested citation:
IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2012. Ranking vaccines: A prioritization framework: Phase I: Demonstration of concept and a software blueprint. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Informing vaccine decision-making: A strategic multi-attribute ranking tool for vaccines-SMART Vaccines 2.0.[Vaccine. 2017]Informing vaccine decision-making: A strategic multi-attribute ranking tool for vaccines-SMART Vaccines 2.0.Knobler S, Bok K, Gellin B. Vaccine. 2017 Jan 20; 35 Suppl 1:A43-A45. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
- Review Ranking Vaccines: A Prioritization Software Tool: Phase II: Prototype of a Decision-Support System[ 2013]Review Ranking Vaccines: A Prioritization Software Tool: Phase II: Prototype of a Decision-Support SystemMadhavan G, Sangha K, Phelps C, Fryback D, Rappuoli R, Martinez RM, King L, Committee on Identifying and Prioritizing New Preventive Vaccines for Development, Phase II, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, Board on Global Health, et al. 2013 Oct 17
- Review Ranking Vaccines: Applications of a Prioritization Software Tool: Phase III: Use Case Studies and Data Framework[ 2015]Review Ranking Vaccines: Applications of a Prioritization Software Tool: Phase III: Use Case Studies and Data FrameworkMadhavan G, Phelps C, Rappuoli R, Martinez RM, King L, Committee on Identifying and Prioritizing New Preventive Vaccines for Development, Phase III, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, Board on Global Health, Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Engineering. 2015 Feb 20
- Review Bridging the gap: need for a data repository to support vaccine prioritization efforts.[Vaccine. 2015]Review Bridging the gap: need for a data repository to support vaccine prioritization efforts.Madhavan G, Phelps C, Sangha K, Levin S, Rappuoli R. Vaccine. 2015 Jun 8; 33 Suppl 2(0 2):B34-9.
- Strategic Planning in Population Health and Public Health Practice: A Call to Action for Higher Education.[Milbank Q. 2016]Strategic Planning in Population Health and Public Health Practice: A Call to Action for Higher Education.Phelps C, Madhavan G, Rappuoli R, Levin S, Shortliffe E, Colwell R. Milbank Q. 2016 Mar; 94(1):109-25.
- Ranking VaccinesRanking Vaccines
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...