NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Comparative Effectiveness Review Summary Guides for Clinicians [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2007-.
This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.
Research Focus for Clinicians
In response to a request from the public, the Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center, funded by AHRQ, performed a systematic review of the literature to examine the comparative effectiveness and adverse effects of interventions to prevent kidney stone recurrence in adults aged 18 years or older. Biochemical measurements for predicting the risk of stone recurrence after treatment were also evaluated. Studies that addressed acute pain management and treatment to promote expulsion of ureteral stones were excluded. This review focused on recurrent calcium stones in patients with or without residual stones or stone fragments. Many of the studies assessed in this review included patients with idiopathic calcium stones, although not all studies specified the etiology of kidney stones in the included population. For evaluating the relative effectiveness of interventions for preventing stone recurrence, only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. For assessing adverse effects of the interventions, in addition to RCTs, prospective observational studies of at least 100 participants being treated for secondary prevention of kidney stones were included. A search of the clinical study literature published from 1948 through 2011 using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria yielded 28 RCTs that were included in the systematic review. The full report, listing all studies, is available at www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/kidney-stones.cfm. This summary, based on the full report of research evidence, is provided to inform discussions of options with patients and to assist in decisionmaking along with consideration of a patient’s values and preferences. However, reviews of evidence should not be construed to represent clinical recommendations or guidelines.
Background
Eighty percent of adults with kidney stones have calcium-based stones, with uric acid and struvite stones representing much of the remainder. Risk of stone formation may represent an interaction of both genetic and environmental factors. Data from large cohort studies suggest an association between the increased risk of stone formation and dietary factors such as low fluid intake, low calcium intake, high sodium intake, high animal protein intake, and high fructose intake. The risk of kidney stones may also be increased by medical conditions such as obesity, diabetes, primary hyperparathyroidism, and gout. Stones may be asymptomatic or may present with abdominal and flank pain, nausea and vomiting, urinary tract obstruction, and infection. Stone recurrence increases the risk of developing chronic kidney disease. Recurrence can be diagnosed by radiographic studies and/or by symptomatic stone recurrence. The 5-year recurrence rate in the absence of specific treatment is 35 to 50 percent.
Clinical uncertainty exists about the comparative effectiveness and adverse effects of pharmacological and dietary (e.g., increased fluids and adequate calcium) preventive treatments. Current guidelines recommend pretreatment biochemical analysis of blood and urine, but it is not clear if using the results of these analyses to tailor treatment is associated with better outcomes than empiric therapy. The authors of this systematic review examined the evidence around these uncertainties.
Conclusions
The published evidence regarding the effectiveness of dietary interventions to reduce the risk of calcium stone recurrence is limited. There is low-strength evidence that fluid intake to maintain urine excretion of at least 2 L per day may provide a clinically significant reduction in risk of stone recurrence. Similarly, low levels of evidence from a single study support abstaining from soft drinks or eliminating soft drinks containing only phosphoric acid but not citric acid in men who frequently consume such drinks. A normal-calcium (1,200 mg/day), low-sodium, low-animal protein diet may reduce the risk for stone recurrence, but the independent effects of increasing dietary calcium or reducing dietary sodium or animal protein have not been determined. Diets with high fiber or reduced animal protein as solitary interventions may not help prevent stone recurrence. The effectiveness of other dietary interventions is not clear.
When added to increased fluid intake, thiazide diuretics, citrate, and allopurinol pharmacotherapy each significantly decreased the risk of recurrent calcium kidney stones more than increased fluid intake alone. Allopurinol treatment reduced the rate of stone recurrence for patients with elevated blood or urine levels of uric acid. Thiazides or citrates may be preferred initial therapy over allopurinol in patients with calcium stones and no hyperuricosuria or hyperuricemia. Patients receiving pharmacological interventions may experience adverse effects that lead to withdrawal from treatment.
Other than allopurinol treatment in patients with high levels of blood or urine uric acid, clinical studies have not clearly established the general utility of baseline blood and 24-hour urine biochemical measures. No RCTs reported and prospectively compared subsequent stone recurrence outcomes between treatments stratified by followup biochemistry levels or by changes in these measures from pretreatment baseline values.
Regarding applicability, nearly all trials were limited to patients with a history of calcium stones and were conducted primarily in young to middle-aged men. Many trials excluded participants with biochemical abnormalities, and nearly all excluded individuals with specific conditions that could predispose them to stone formation. Applicability is also limited by the absence of reported data on participant characteristics including race, body morphometry, and comorbid conditions that increase the risk for kidney stones or affect treatment outcomes.
Clinical Bottom Line
Dietary Interventions | |
---|---|
Benefits | Adverse Effects |
|
|
Pharmacological Interventions | |
Benefits | Adverse Effects |
Trials were designed to evaluate the effects of pharmacological agents given in addition to standard dietary recommendations (e.g., increase fluids, limit oxalate-containing foods, limit sodium).
|
|
Baseline and Followup Blood and Urine Biochemical Evaluations To Predict Stone Recurrence* | |
Baseline Biochemical Evaluations | Followup Biochemical Evaluations |
|
|
- *
Composite endpoint refers to stones detected by either symptoms or scheduled radiographs.
ARR = absolute risk reduction; NNT = number needed to treat; RCT = randomized controlled trial; RR = relative risk; 95% CI = 95-percent confidence interval
- *
The strength of evidence in support of these conclusions was not rated.
- **
Composite endpoint refers to stones detected by either symptoms or scheduled radiographs.
RCT = randomized controlled trial; RR = relative risk; 95% CI = 95-percent confidence interval
Strength of Evidence Scale
High: | High confidence that the evidence reflects the true effect. Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect. | |
Moderate: | Moderate confidence that the evidence reflects the true effect. Further research may change our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. | |
Low: | Low confidence that the evidence reflects the true effect. Further research is likely to change the confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. | |
Insufficient: | Evidence either is unavailable or does not permit a conclusion. |
Gaps in Knowledge
A review of RCTs to assess the benefits and of RCTs and observational studies to assess the adverse effects revealed a number of gaps in knowledge as reflected in these particular types of studies.
- There is no direct evidence from RCTs about whether diets that increase calcium or lower sodium, oxalate, or purine (independent of other dietary components) reduce the risk of recurrent kidney stones.
- It is unknown whether the efficacy of dietary interventions differs as a function of participant characteristics.
- Direct comparisons of dietary interventions to each other, of pharmacological interventions to each other, and between these two types of interventions are rare or absent.
- The effects of dietary and pharmacological interventions on stone types other than calcium stones, and of acetohydroxamic acid for other than struvite stones, is unexamined in RCTs that report the effects of these treatments on the risk of recurrent stones.
- No trial assessed the effectiveness of lower thiazide doses, a drug class often used to treat hypertension (hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 to 25 mg per day and chlorthalidone < 25 mg per day), for reducing the risk of recurrent stones.
- Studies are needed to formally test whether the risk for stone recurrence after either dietary or pharmacological treatment can be stratified according to blood and urine biochemical measures either at baseline or at followup.
What To Discuss With Your Patients
- That kidney stones have a high chance of recurring if not managed properly
- The importance of maintaining daily fluid intake to achieve urine output of > 2 L per day
- The benefits and adverse effects of medicines for preventing kidney stone recurrence
- Dietary changes that may be beneficial in reducing the risk of kidney stones (i.e., eliminating soft drinks acidified solely with phosphoric acid, increasing calcium-rich foods to achieve the recommended daily intake, and limiting oxalate-containing foods)
Resource for Patients
Lowering the Chance of Getting Another Calcium Kidney Stone, A Review of the Research for Adults is a free companion to this clinician research summary. It can help patients talk with their health care professionals about the many options for treatment. It provides information about:
- The causes of kidney stones and the risk of recurrence
- The role of dietary therapies in preventing kidney stones
- The benefits and adverse effects of medicines that can be added to dietary therapies
Ordering Information
For electronic copies of Lowering the Chance of Getting Another Calcium Kidney Stone, A Review of the Research for Adults, this clinician research summary, and the full systematic review, visit www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/kidney-stones.cfm. To order free print copies, call the AHRQ Publications Clearinghouse at 800-358-9295.
Source
The information in this summary is based on Recurrent Nephrolithiasis in Adults: Comparative Effectiveness of Preventive Medical Strategies, Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 61, prepared by the Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, July 2012. Available at www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/kidney-stones.cfm. This summary was prepared by the John M. Eisenberg Center for Clinical Decisions and Communications Science at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
- Review Nonpharmacologic Interventions for Treatment-Resistant Depression in Adults.[Comparative Effectiveness Revi...]Review Nonpharmacologic Interventions for Treatment-Resistant Depression in Adults.John M. Eisenberg Center for Clinical Decisions and Communications Science. Comparative Effectiveness Review Summary Guides for Clinicians. 2007
- Review Comparative Effectiveness of Diagnosis and Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults.[Comparative Effectiveness Revi...]Review Comparative Effectiveness of Diagnosis and Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults.John M. Eisenberg Center for Clinical Decisions and Communications Science. Comparative Effectiveness Review Summary Guides for Clinicians. 2007
- Review Off-Label Use of Atypical Antipsychotics: An Update.[Comparative Effectiveness Revi...]Review Off-Label Use of Atypical Antipsychotics: An Update.John M. Eisenberg Center for Clinical Decisions and Communications Science. Comparative Effectiveness Review Summary Guides for Clinicians. 2007
- Review Non-surgical Treatments for Urinary Incontinence in Adult Women: Diagnosis and Comparative Effectiveness.[Comparative Effectiveness Revi...]Review Non-surgical Treatments for Urinary Incontinence in Adult Women: Diagnosis and Comparative Effectiveness.John M. Eisenberg Center for Clinical Decisions and Communications Science. Comparative Effectiveness Review Summary Guides for Clinicians. 2007
- Review Drug Therapy for Psoriatic Arthritis in Adults: Comparative Effectiveness.[Comparative Effectiveness Revi...]Review Drug Therapy for Psoriatic Arthritis in Adults: Comparative Effectiveness.John M. Eisenberg Center for Clinical Decisions and Communications Science. Comparative Effectiveness Review Summary Guides for Clinicians. 2007
- Recurrent Nephrolithiasis in Adults: Comparative Effectiveness of Preventive Med...Recurrent Nephrolithiasis in Adults: Comparative Effectiveness of Preventive Medical Strategies - Comparative Effectiveness Review Summary Guides for Clinicians
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...