Notes:

• 1) Duplicate name. This name, above species rank, is duplicated within the NCBI classification 1) due to its independent use within separate Codes of Nomenclature; 2) its valid duplication at different ranks within a single Code (e.g. genus and subgenus); 3) unresolved lineage placement; or 4) as unresolved homonym within a single Code.

Comments and References:

IPNI (Mar 02, 2010) Name verified on 2 March 2010, in: The International Plant Names Index (2004). Published on the Internet http://www.ipni.org

APNI (Mar 02, 2010) Name verified on 2 March 2010 in: The Australian Plant Name Index (Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research, Australian National Herbarium, Australian National Botanic Gardens and the Australian Biological Resources Study).

External Information Resources (NCBI LinkOut)

Notes:

Groups interested in participating in the LinkOut program should visit the LinkOut home page.
A list of our current non-bibliographic LinkOut providers can be found here.

Disclaimer: The NCBI taxonomy database is not an authoritative source for nomenclature or classification - please consult the relevant scientific literature for the most reliable information.

Reference: How to cite this resource - Schoch CL, et al. NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools. Database (Oxford). 2020: baaa062. PubMed: 32761142 PMC: PMC7408187.