Notes:

• 1) Duplicate name. This name, above species rank, is duplicated within the NCBI classification 1) due to its independent use within separate Codes of Nomenclature; 2) its valid duplication at different ranks within a single Code (e.g. genus and subgenus); 3) unresolved lineage placement; or 4) as unresolved homonym within a single Code.

Comments and References:

APNI (Jul 15, 2009) Name verified on 15 July 2009 in: The Australian Plant Name Index (Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research, Australian National Herbarium, Australian National Botanic Gardens and the Australian Biological Resources Study).

IPNI (Jul 15, 2009) Name verified on 15 July 2009, in: The International Plant Names Index (2004). Published on the Internet http://www.ipni.org

External Information Resources (NCBI LinkOut)

Notes:

Groups interested in participating in the LinkOut program should visit the LinkOut home page.
A list of our current non-bibliographic LinkOut providers can be found here.

Disclaimer: The NCBI taxonomy database is not an authoritative source for nomenclature or classification - please consult the relevant scientific literature for the most reliable information.

Reference: How to cite this resource - Schoch CL, et al. NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools. Database (Oxford). 2020: baaa062. PubMed: 32761142 PMC: PMC7408187.