Snapshot of a Specialty: Results of the ABR 2016 Radiation Oncology Clinical Practice Analysis

J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Apr;16(4 Pt A):513-517. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Dec 22.

Abstract

Purpose: Beginning in 2010, the ABR has administered triennial clinical practice analysis surveys to inform examination development volunteers and staff about the actual state of radiation oncology practice.

Methods and materials: As reported here, the 2016 survey was designed to provide objective data regarding actual patient volumes of specific disease sites and subjective insight as to the importance and relevance of site-specific therapy to individual practices.

Results: The survey instrument was circulated to 4,075 radiation oncologists listed in the membership database of the American Society for Radiation Oncology, and responses were received from 690 (16.9%); a total of 287 (41.5%) self-identified as being in academic practice. Even in the academic setting, a majority (216 of 287, or 75.3%) indicated that they spend most of their time in clinical practice.

Conclusions: Data from the survey are informative regarding changes in the practice of radiation oncology over the past 6 years.

Keywords: ABR; clinical practice analysis; radiation oncology practice; snapshot of radiation oncology.

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Radiation Oncology / trends*
  • Societies, Medical
  • Specialty Boards
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • United States