Background and purpose The facial nerve is unique among cranial nerves in demonstrating normal enhancement of particular segments. The effect of varying T1 relaxivities of gadolinium-based contrast agents on facial nerve enhancement is unclear. In this study, we assess differences in normal facial nerve enhancement with two different gadolinium-based contrast agents, gadobutrol and gadopentetate dimeglumine. In addition, we evaluate differences in facial nerve enhancement with spin-echo (SE) T1 versus 3D inversion recovery prepared fast spoiled gradient-echo (FSPGR) post-contrast sequences. Methods A total of 140 facial nerves in 70 individuals were evaluated (70 with gadobutrol and 70 with gadopentetate dimeglumine) by two blinded reviewers. Differences in enhancement of facial nerve segments between the two agents were analyzed. Differences in enhancement between SE T1 and FSPGR imaging were also evaluated. Results There was no significant difference in facial nerve enhancement between gadobutrol and gadopentetate dimeglumine. Enhancement was commonly observed in the geniculate, tympanic and mastoid segments (98%-100%) with either contrast agent; enhancement was less common in the labyrinthine segments (9%-14%) and lateral canalicular segment (2%-5%). There was a smaller enhancing proportion of labyrinthine and tympanic segments with FSPGR as compared to SE T1 images with gadobutrol. Conclusion There is no significant difference in overall enhancement of the facial nerve between gadobutrol and gadopentetate dimeglumine. Mild enhancement of the lateral canalicular portion of the facial nerve may be a normal finding. With FSPGR sequence, there is lesser perceived enhancement of the labyrinthine and tympanic segments of the facial nerve with gadobutrol.
Keywords: Cranial nerve; contrast enhancement; gadolinium; relaxivity.