Methods of evaluating lumbar and cervical fusion

Spine J. 2014 Mar 1;14(3):531-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.459. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

Abstract

Introduced in 1911, spinal fusion is now widely used to stabilize the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. Despite advancements in surgical techniques, including the use of instrumentation and optimizing bone graft options, pseudarthrosis remains one of the most significant causes of clinical failure following attempted fusion. Diagnosis of this common complication is based on a focused clinical assessment and imaging studies. Pseudarthrosis classically presents with the onset of or return of axial or radicular symptoms during the first postoperative year. However, this diagnosis is complicated because other diagnoses can mimic these symptoms (such as infection or adjacent segment degeneration) and because many cases of pseudarthrosis are asymptomatic. Computed tomography and assessment of motion on flexion/extension radiographs are the two preferred imaging modalities for establishing the diagnosis of pseudarthrosis. The purpose of this article was to review the current status of imaging and clinical practices for assessing fusion following spinal arthrodesis.

Keywords: Cervical fusion; Diagnostics; Lumbar fusion; Pseudarthrosis.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cervical Vertebrae / diagnostic imaging
  • Cervical Vertebrae / pathology
  • Cervical Vertebrae / surgery*
  • Diagnostic Imaging / methods
  • Humans
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / diagnostic imaging
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / pathology
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / surgery*
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Pseudarthrosis / diagnosis
  • Pseudarthrosis / etiology
  • Spinal Fusion / adverse effects*
  • Spinal Fusion / methods*
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Ultrasonography