Aim: In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), hyperphosphataemia and an elevated calcium-phosphorus (Ca-P) product contribute to morbidity and mortality. Suggested target goals for serum phosphorus concentration and calcium-phosphorus product have recently been lowered. As a result, long-term comparative studies of the efficacy of phosphate binders are critical. This study compares the long-term efficacy of sevelamer hydrochloride to calcium-containing binders (CCB).
Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted in 30 patients receiving sevelamer hydrochloride for >1 years and 25 patients receiving CCB.
Results: Patients on sevelamer hydrochloride had lower serum bicarbonate concentration than those on CCB, 18.6 +/- 2.7 versus 20.3 +/- 1.8 mmol/L (P = 0.0017). Serum phosphorus concentration was higher in patients on sevelamer hydrochloride compared to CCB 2.10 +/- 0.87 versus 1.74 +/- 0.28 mmol/L (P = 0.0013), as was the Ca-P product 4.97 +/- 0.94 mmol2L2 (62.1 +/- 11.8 mg2/dL2) versus 3.97 +/- 1.18 mmol2/L2 (49.7 +/- 14.7 mg2/dL2), P = 0.0009). Only 36% of patients on sevelamer hydrochloride compared with 68% on CCB (P = 0.015) met the serum phosphorus goal of < or =1.78 mmol/L.
Conclusion: Patients on sevelamer hydrochloride for >1 years compared to those on CCB had a lower serum bicarbonate concentration, a higher serum phosphorus concentration and a higher Ca-P product. Clinicians should balance the increase in calcium load with CCB versus the cost and effectiveness of sevelamer hydrochloride in choosing a phosphate binder for ESRD patients.