The effect of changing state health policy on hospital uncompensated care

Inquiry. 2000 Fall;37(3):253-67.

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of changing state policy, such as Medicaid eligibility, payment generosity, and HMO enrollment on provision of hospital uncompensated care. Using national data from the American Hospital Association for the period 1990 through 1995, we find that not-for-profit and public hospitals' uncompensated care levels respond positively to Medicaid payment generosity, although the magnitude of the effect is small. Not-for-profit hospitals respond negatively to Medicaid HMO penetration. Public and for-profit hospitals respond negatively to increases in Medicaid eligibility. Results suggest that public insurance payment generosity is an effective but inefficient policy instrument for influencing uncompensated care among not-for-profit hospitals. Further, in localities with high HMO penetration or high penetration of for-profit hospitals, it may be necessary to establish explicit payments for care of the uninsured.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • American Hospital Association
  • Efficiency, Organizational
  • Eligibility Determination / organization & administration
  • Health Policy*
  • Health Services Research
  • Hospitals, Proprietary / economics*
  • Hospitals, Public / economics*
  • Hospitals, Teaching / economics
  • Hospitals, Voluntary / economics*
  • Humans
  • Managed Care Programs / organization & administration*
  • Marketing of Health Services
  • Medicaid / organization & administration*
  • Medically Uninsured
  • Models, Econometric
  • Organizational Innovation
  • Ownership
  • State Health Plans / organization & administration*
  • Uncompensated Care / economics
  • Uncompensated Care / statistics & numerical data*
  • United States