Comparison of two rapid whole-blood tests for Helicobacter pylori infection in Chinese patients

J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Nov;36(11):3441-2. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.11.3441-3442.1998.

Abstract

Consecutive Chinese patients undergoing endoscopy for dyspepsia were tested for Helicobacter pylori infection by two rapid whole-blood tests: FlexPack HP (Abbott Laboratories) and Helisal One-Step (Cortecs Diagnostics). Biopsy-based tests (rapid urease test and histology) and the [13C]urea breath test were used as the "gold standard." One hundred sixty-one consecutive patients were studied, and 88 (54.7%) were confirmed to have H. pylori infection. The sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values were 81.8%, 83.6% (P = 0.008), 85.7% (P = 0.04), and 79.2% for FlexPack HP and 84.1%, 63.0% (P = 0.008), 73.3% (P = 0.047), and 76.7% for Helisal One-Step, respectively.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Bacteremia / diagnosis*
  • Bacteremia / metabolism
  • Bacteremia / microbiology
  • Bacteriological Techniques* / statistics & numerical data
  • China
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Female
  • Helicobacter Infections / diagnosis*
  • Helicobacter Infections / metabolism
  • Helicobacter Infections / microbiology
  • Helicobacter pylori / isolation & purification*
  • Helicobacter pylori / metabolism
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Urea / metabolism
  • Urease / metabolism

Substances

  • Urea
  • Urease