Knowledge and practice of home blood pressure monitoring 6 months after the risk and assessment management programme: does health literacy matter?

Sau Nga Fu; Man Chi Dao; Carlos K H Wong; Bernard M Y Cheung

doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-139329

Knowledge and practice of home blood pressure monitoring 6 months after the risk and assessment management programme: does health literacy matter?

Postgrad Med J. 2022 Aug;98(1162):610-616. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-139329. Epub 2021 May 26.

Authors

Sau Nga Fu¹, Man Chi Dao², Carlos K H Wong^{3

4}, Bernard M Y Cheung⁵

Affiliations

¹ Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Hospital Authority Kowloon West Cluster, New Territories, Hong Kong fsn299@ha.org.hk.
² Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Hospital Authority Kowloon West Cluster, New Territories, Hong Kong.
³ Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
⁴ Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
⁵ Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Abstract

Background: Little is known whether patients with lower health literacy could retain the practice and knowledge of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) after an educational programme.

Methods: A cluster randomised controlled trial in five primary care clinics recruited participants with uncontrolled hypertension. Clinics were randomised either to a HBPM group education (Risk Assessment and Management Programme (RAMP-group), or individual counselling of self-management (RAMP-individual). Health literacy was assessed by the Chinese Health Literacy Scale for Chronic Care. Practice and knowledge of HBPM were surveyed by a 10-item HBPM knowledge checklist and patient record review 6 months after interventions. Predictors for regular HBPM and good HBPM knowledge were assessed by multivariate logistic regression models.

Results: 287 participants (RAMP-group: 151; RAMP-individual: 136) were follow-up for 6 months. 272 participants completed the knowledge questionnaires (response rate 94.8%). 67.8% of the participants performed HBPM regularly, and there was no statistical difference between both interventions. Age more than 65 (adjusted odds ratios (aOR) 2.58, 95% CI 1.37 to 4.86, p=0.003), not working (aOR 2.34, 95% CI 1.10 to 4.97, p=0.027)and adequate health literacy (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.28 to 3.95, p=0.005) predicted regular HBPM. Participants in RAMP-group demonstrated a significant lower body weight than those in RAMP-individual (-0.3±2.0 kg vs +0.7 ±1.7 kg, p<0.001).The RAMP-group participants were eight times more likely to have full HBPM knowledge score than the RAMP-individual participants (aOR 8.46, 95% CI 4.68 to 15.28, p<0.001).

Conclusion: Patients could retain HBPM knowledge better after RAMP-group than RAMP-individual. Older, retired and patients with adequate health literacy were more likely to continue weekly HBPM 6 months after education.

Trial registration number: NCT02551393.

Keywords: hypertension; primary care.

Publication types

Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Literacy*
Humans
Hypertension* / diagnosis
Hypertension* / therapy
Odds Ratio
Primary Health Care
Surveys and Questionnaires

Associated data

ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT02551393