Different MAF translocations confer similar prognosis in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients

Leuk Lymphoma. 2020 Aug;61(8):1885-1893. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1749605. Epub 2020 Apr 19.

Abstract

The MAF translocations, t(14;16) and t(14;20), are considered as adverse prognostic factors based on few studies with small sample sizes. We report on their prognostic impact in a large group of 254 patients - 223 (87.8%) with t(14;16) and 31 (12.2%) with t(14;20). There were no intergroup differences in survival estimates. Median progression-free survival was 16.6 months for t(14;16) and 24.9 months for t(14;20) (p = 0.28). Median overall survival (OS) was 54.0 months and 49.0 months, respectively (p = 0.62). Median OS in patients who underwent double autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was 107.0 months versus 60.0 months in patients who received single ASCT (p < 0.001). ISS 3 was associated with shorter OS (HR = 1.89; 95% CI 1.24-3.19; p = 0.005) in Cox analysis. Our study suggests that t(14;20) should be considered as an adverse factor of equal prognostic implication to t(14;16).

Keywords: MAF; Translocation; myeloma; survival; t(14;16); t(14;20).

MeSH terms

  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation*
  • Humans
  • Multiple Myeloma* / diagnosis
  • Multiple Myeloma* / genetics
  • Multiple Myeloma* / therapy
  • Prognosis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Transplantation, Autologous
  • Treatment Outcome