Background: Biomarkers of neurodegeneration play a major role in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Information on both amyloid-β accumulation, e.g., from amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), and downstream neuronal injury, e.g., from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET, would ideally be obtained in a single procedure.
Objective: On the basis that the parallelism between brain perfusion and glucose metabolism is well documented, the objective of this work is to evaluate whether brain perfusion estimated in a dual-point protocol of 18F-florbetaben (FBB) PET can be a surrogate of FDG PET in appropriate use criteria (AUC) for amyloid PET.
Methods: This study included 47 patients fulfilling international AUC for amyloid PET. FDG PET, early FBB (pFBB) PET (0-10 min post injection), and standard FBB (sFBB) PET (90-110 min post injection) scans were acquired. Results of clinical subjective reports and of quantitative region of interest (ROI)-based analyses were compared between procedures using statistical techniques such as Pearson's correlation coefficients and t-tests.
Results: pFBB and FDG visual reports on the 47 patients showed good agreement (k > 0.74); ROI quantitative analysis indicated that both data modalities are highly correlated; and the t-test analysis does not reject the null hypothesis that data from pFBB and FDG examinations comes from independent random samples from normal distributions with equal means and variances.
Conclusions: A good agreement was found between pFBB and FDG data as obtained by subjective visual and quantitative analyses. Dual-point FBB PET scans could offer complementary information (similar to that from FDG PET and FBB PET) in a single procedure, considering pFBB as a surrogate of FDG.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; FDG PET; amyloid PET; appropriate use criteria; brain perfusion; brain rCBF; brain rCMRglc; florbetaben PET; mild cognitive impairment; quantitative analysis.