Formative evaluation of practice changes for managing depression within a Shared Care model in primary care

Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Jan;18(1):50-63. doi: 10.1017/S1463423616000323. Epub 2016 Sep 9.

Abstract

Aim To investigate the implementation and initial impact of the Physician Integrated Network (PIN) mental health indicators, which are specific to screening and managing follow-up for depression, in three primary care practices with Shared Mental Health Care in Manitoba.

Background: Manitoba Health undertook a primary care renewal initiative in 2006 called the PIN, which included the development of mental health indicators specific to screening and managing follow-up for depression. These indicators were implemented in three PIN group practice sites in Manitoba, which are also part of Shared Mental Health Care.

Methods: The design was a non-experimental longitudinal design. A formative evaluation investigated the implementation and initial impact of the mental health indicators using mixed methods (document review, survey, and interview). Quantitative data was explored using descriptive and comparative statistics and a content and theme analysis of the qualitative interviews was conducted. Survey responses were received from 32 out of 36 physicians from the three sites. Interviews were conducted with 15 providers. Findings This evaluation illustrated providers' perceived attitudes, knowledge, skills, and behaviours related to recognizing and treating depression and expanded our understanding of primary care processes related to managing depression related to the implementation of a new initiative. Depression is viewed as an important problem in primary care practice that is time consuming to diagnose, manage and treat and requires further investigation. Implementation of the PIN mental health indicators was variable across sites and providers. There was an increase in use of the indicators across time and a general sentiment that benefits of screening outweigh the costs; however, the benefit of screening for depression remains unclear. Consistent with current guidelines, a question the findings of this evaluation suggests is whether there are more effective ways of having an impact on depression within primary care than screening.

Keywords: collaborative care; depression screening; primary care reform.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Analysis of Variance
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Delivery of Health Care, Integrated / methods*
  • Delivery of Health Care, Integrated / organization & administration
  • Delivery of Health Care, Integrated / trends
  • Depressive Disorder / diagnosis*
  • Depressive Disorder / therapy*
  • Disease Management
  • Health Status Indicators*
  • Humans
  • Interprofessional Relations
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Manitoba
  • Mass Screening / methods
  • Mass Screening / standards
  • Primary Health Care / methods*
  • Primary Health Care / organization & administration
  • Primary Health Care / trends
  • Program Evaluation