OBJECTIVE : To examine the classification accuracy of measures of overall psychopathology recommended for pediatric primary care screening. METHOD : A systematic review identified relevant instruments described in the literature. Subsequent systematic reviews identified studies of sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) of each measure for various cutoffs and different criteria for disorder (e.g., caseness determined by structured interview, exceeding a cutoff score, referral for psychiatric evaluation). RESULTS : Measures include the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC), Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), Brief Infant-Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), and the Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional scale (ASQ:SE). For three measures (CBCL, PSC, and SDQ) studied extensively, achieving relatively high SE and SP values (≥ .70) simultaneously occurred in only 30-55% of the studies reviewed. There are relatively few studies of the ASQ:SE and BITSEA, or of relatively new measures. DISCUSSION : Documented utility of these measures as screening instruments is limited.
Keywords: pediatrics; psychometrics; screening; sensitivity; specificity.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.