Revisiting robotic approaches to endocrine neoplasia: do the data support their continued use?

Curr Opin Oncol. 2016 Jan;28(1):26-36. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000245.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Although the advent of the robot has revolutionized the modern treatment of endocrine neoplasia, substantial controversies exist on its applicability, safety and benefits over the conventional laparoscopic operations. The present review aims to review the recent literature on various robotic approaches in treating thyroid, parathyroid, adrenal and pancreatic endocrine neoplasia and see whether its continued use should be supported.

Recent findings: In summary, the role of robotic thyroidectomy has been clearly established and should be continued by experienced surgeons on selected patients. Because of the limited availability of evidence, the feasibility of robotic parathyroidectomy has yet to be elucidated. With proven favorable perioperative outcomes, robotic adrenalectomy and pancreatectomy should be continued as potential alternatives to conventional surgery.

Summary: Robotic endocrine procedures still play a pivotal role in minimally invasive endocrine surgery with demonstrable safety and effectiveness. Future research should embark on prospective randomized-controlled trials on robotic endocrine procedures to collect higher level of evidence and long-term survival data.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adrenalectomy / methods
  • Endocrine Gland Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy / methods
  • Pancreatectomy / methods
  • Parathyroidectomy / methods
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Thyroidectomy / methods
  • Treatment Outcome